Project description:A significant proportion of breast cancer patients develop multiple synchronous unilateral breast tumors, also referred to as multifocal tumors, which represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Multifocality has been associated with a possible adverse patient outcome, propensity for axillary nodal involvement, and increased risk of local recurrence following breast conserving surgery when compared to unifocal tumors. Previous studies indicate that most lesions from multifocal tumors are concordant with regard to the currently used pathological parameters (histological subtype and grade, hormonal receptors and HER2 status). However, to our knowledge, no study has yet provided a detailed molecular analysis of multifocal breast cancer. Here, we aimed to better define the incidence of multifocal breast cancer using a systematic analysis of pathology reports of primary breast cancers and to compare different foci from 5 multifocal breast cancers in a global analysis using genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic data. We demonstrate that multifocality is a frequent finding since it concerns 22% (945/4340) of breast cancer patients with primary ductal breast cancer. We find that different lesions from multifocal breast cancer can differ at the (epi)genomic and transcriptomic level even when the foci present similar histology, grading, hormonal and HER2 status despite having a common genetic background. Since the number of (epi)genetic alterations with potential clinical utility is rapidly growing due to increasing numbers of targeted therapies, these findings suggest that it might be necessary to interrogate the different lesions of multifocal breast cancers for adequate treatment management of these tumors. The biological characterization of multifocal breast cancer here is focused on 5 cancers for which the foci did not differ in terms of histological grade, hormonal receptors and HER2 status. The characterization of multifocal tumors involved the identification of somatic rearrangements in 2 foci from each patient via low-coverage whole genome sequencing. Putative rearrangements were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and capillary sequenced in tumor and matching blood-derived germline DNA to validate the somatic rearrangements. For all patients, the presence of a number of validated rearrangements was assessed in different paraffin blocks of tumor-adjacent histologically normal tissue by nested PCR. We also performed transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling in 4 and 5 patients respectively using the HG-U133 Plus 2.0 Chips and Infinium Methylation 450K arrays (RNA was not available for patient E).

Project description:Multifocality or multicentricity in breast cancer may be defined as the presence of two or more tumor foci within a single quadrant of the breast or within different quadrants of the same breast, respectively. This original classification of the breast cancer as multicentric or multifocal was based on the assumption that cancers arising in the same quadrant were more likely to arise from the same ductal structures than those occurring in separate areas of the breast. The problem with these definitions is that the “quadrants” of the breast are arbitrary external designations, as no internal boundaries do exist. This project will therefore focus both on synchronous multifocal and multicentric tumors. The incidence of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers was reported to be between 13 and 75% depending on the definition used, the extent of the pathologic sampling of the breast and whether in situ disease is considered evidence of multicentricity (1). Although this incidence is variable, those figures show that it is a frequent phenomenon. Multiple (multifocal/multicentric) breast carcinomas, especially when occurring in the same breast, represent a real challenge for both pathologists and clinicians in terms of identifying the cellular origin and the best therapeutic management of the cancer. Multifocality or multicentricity has been associated with a number of more aggressive features including an increased rate of regional lymph node metastases and adverse patient outcome when compared with unifocal tumors (2-3), and a possible increased risk of local recurrence following breast conserving surgery (4). For the moment, the literature is divided on whether there is a corresponding impact on survival outcomes. Today, the current convention to stage and to treat multifocal and multicentric tumors is the classical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging guidelines with which tumor size is assessed by the largest tumor focus without taking other foci of disease into consideration. If some papers, as the recent one from Lynch and colleagues, support the current staging convention (3), others, however, as Boyages et al. suggested that aggregate size and not the size of the largest lesion should be considered in order to refine the prognostic assessment of those tumors (5). On the top of that, the question whether multifocal/multicentric carcinomas are due to the spread of a single carcinoma throughout the breast or is due to multiple carcinomas arising simultaneously has been a matter of debate. Some studies suggested that multifocal breast cancer may result from either intramammary spread from a single primary tumor or multiple synchronous primary tumors; whereas others suggest that multiple breast carcinomas always arise from the same clone (6-8). Recently, Pietri and colleagues analyzed the biological characterization of a series of 113 multifocal/multicentric breast cancers (8) which were diagnosed over a 5-year period. The expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors, Ki-67 proliferative index, expression of HER2 and tumor grading were prospectively determined in each tumor focus, and mismatches among foci were recorded. Mismatches in ER status were present in 5 (4.4%) cases and PgR in 18 (15.9%) cases. Mismatches in tumor grading were present in 21 cases (18.6%), proliferative index (Ki-67) in 17 (15%) cases and HER2 status in 11 (9.7%) cases. Interestingly, this heterogeneity among foci has led to 14 (12.4%) patients receiving different adjuvant treatments compared with what would have been indicated if we had only taken into account the biologic status of the primary tumor. This study therefore showed that differences in biological characteristics of multifocal/multicentric lesions play a crucial role in the adjuvant treatment decision making process. In this study, we will concentrate on a larger series of patients with multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer lesions. We aim at: 1. Evaluating the incidence of multifocality according to the different breast cancer molecular subtypes (ER-/HER2-, HER2+, ER+/HER2-). 2. Evaluating the incidence of multifocality in patients with hereditary breast cancer disease (presence of germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations). Moreover, we would like to investigate if multifocal lesions with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations exhibit a characteristic combination of substitution mutation signatures and a distinctive profile of deletions as demonstrated recently by Nik-Zainal and colleagues (9). 3. Correlating multifocality with clinical information in order to define its influence on patients’ survival (DFS and OS). 4. Carrying high coverage targeted gene sequencing of driver cancer genes and genes whose mutation is of therapeutic importance in order to compare clinically-relevant genetic differences between several multifocal breast cancer lesions. 5. Evaluating the impact of the distance between the different lesions on the clinical outcome but also on the genetic differences. 6. Comparing gene expression patterns between several multifocal breast cancer lesions and correlate them with the results of the targeted genes screen. 7. Characterizing the genomic and transcriptomic status of cancer related genes in metastatic lesions (local recurrence, positive lymph node or distant metastatic sites) from the same multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer patients in order to evaluate the consequence of genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity of multifocal lesions on metastatic lesions. Multiple (multifocal/multicentric) breast carcinomas, especially when occurring in the same breast, represent a real challenge for both pathologists and clinicians in terms of identifying the cellular origin and the best therapeutic choice. This project has the potential to identify genetic/transcriptomic differences existing between several lesions constituting multifocal breast cancers, which in the routine clinical practice are usually considered to be homogeneous among them. We foresee validating significant results in a larger series of patients and this, in turn, could have a remarkable impact on the treatment and clinical management of multifocal breast cancers. Indeed, we hope to provide some evidence whether or not each focus matters in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer to define the adequate therapeutic approach, especially in the context of targeted therapies. The work to be done at Sanger will be target gene screen pooling of 1400 samples.

Dataset Information

Multifocal Breast Project

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets