Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

DNA-binding of IRF3, IRF5 and IRF7 transcription factors

ABSTRACT: The Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs) are essential regulators of the innate immune response to viruses. IRFs 3, 5, and 7 drive type-1-interferon and cytokine production in a cell-type and stimulus-specific manner, suggesting regulatory complexity. IRFs 3, 5 and 7 bind DNA as phosphorylation-activated dimers and are classically described as binding a doublet of the canonical IRF binding site: 5'-AANNGAAA-3’. IRF3/5/7 have both common and distinct gene targets and the simple canonical motif does not capture the regulatory complexity of IRF-dependent gene expression. Previous studies, both low and high throughput, have refined our understanding of IRF regulation, yet a systematic comparison of DNA binding preferences for active, dimeric IRF complexes has not been performed. To address this, we designed an IRF-specific, custom protein-binding microarray (PBM) that includes synthetic IRF binding sites as well as type-1-interferon and cytokine promoters. Using constitutively active, phosphomimetic IRF3, 5 and 7 dimers, we find key DNA binding differences for these factors with implications for IRF-dependent gene regulation.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE109117 | GEO | 2018/01/12

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA429664

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

A new type of pathogenic transcription factor mutation targeting interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) in human lymphoma

Project description:We report the characterization of a recurrent somatic mutation c.295T>C (p.C99R) in the Interferon Regulatory Factor 4 (IRF4) gene in human lymphoma in the α3-recognition helix of the IRF4 DNA-binding domain. IRF4-C99R fundamentally alters IRF4 DNA-binding, combining loss-of-binding at canonical IRF motifs and neomorph gain-of-binding at canonical and non-canonical IRF composite elements (CEs). IRF4-C99R thoroughly modifies IRF4 function, blocking IRF4-dependent plasma cell induction, and specifically up-regulating lymphoma-specific genes in a degenerate Activator Protein-1 (AP-1)-IRF-CE (AICE)-dependent manner.

2023-07-21 | E-MTAB-12522 | biostudies-arrayexpress

STAT1 and IRF8 orchestrate IFNγ and LPS-mediated signal integration in the vasculature that leads to amplified pro-atherogenic responses

Project description:The transcription factor Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) 1 is activated by Interferon gamma (IFNγ) but also Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the trigger of inflammation. STAT1 together with downstream activated Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRF) create a platform for signal integration between IFNγ and the Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) 4 ligand in immune cells. Little is known about the role of STAT1 and IRFs on potential synergism between LPS- and INFγ-signaling in cells from the vasculature. We investigated whether vascular cells can promote inflammatory signaling by the STAT1-IRFs pathway.

2014-11-04 | GSE49519 | GEO

IRF-5 and IRF-8 govern the response of Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells following TLR9 ligation

2016-06-01 | GSE70429 | GEO

IRF-5 and IRF-8 govern the response of Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells following TLR9 ligation

Project description:Synthetic oligonucleotides (ODNs) containing CpG motifs stimulate human plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) to produce type-1 interferons (IFN) and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Previous studies demonstrated that interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) played a central role in mediating CpG-induced pDC activation. This work explores the inverse effects of IRF-5 and IRF-8 on CpG dependent gene expression. Results from RNA interference and microarray studies indicate that IRF-5 up-regulates TLR9-driven gene expression whereas IRF-8 down-regulates the same genes. Several findings support the conclusion that IRF-8 inhibits TLR9 dependent gene expression by directly blocking the activity of IRF-5. First, the inhibitory activity of IRF-8 is only observed when IRF-5 is present. Second, proximity ligation analysis shows that IRF-8 and IRF-5 co-localize within the cytoplasm of resting human pDC and co-translocate to the nucleus after CpG stimulation. Taken together, these findings suggest that two transcription factors with opposing functions control TLR9 signaling in human pDCs. CAL-1 cells were transfected with siRNA targeting IRF-5 (IRF-5si) and left unstimulated (n=4, technical repeats) or stimulated with K-type CpG ODN (n=4, technical repeats). CAL-1 cells were transfected with siRNA targeting IRF-8 (IRF-8si) and left unstimulated (n=4, technical repeats) or stimulated with K-type CpG ODN (n=4, technical repeats). CAL-1 cells were transfected with control siRNA (Contsi) and left unstimulated (n=4, technical repeats) or stimulated with K-type CpG ODN (n=4, technical repeats).

2016-06-01 | E-GEOD-70429 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Spring Varaemia of Carp Virus (SVCV) infection of adult zebrafish

Project description:During viral infection, a large number of immune response signaling molecules including the interferon regulatory (IRF) family and type I interferon (IFN) transcribe. The exact identity and expression levels of fish IRFs and type-I IFNs during viral infection remains largely unknown. Here, we utilized Illumina sequencing technology to determine differential expression patterns for both zebrafish IRFs and type-I IFNs during two stages of SVCV infection, i.e. 6h and 24h post-infection. For 12 zebrafish IRFs, we identified DrIRF1 mRNA as one of the most abundant in normal tissues and also in SVCV-infected tissues, but DrIRF11 had a very weak basal expression and was almost not induced by SVCV infection. We also identified the highly basal expression of DrIRF7, which together with DrIRF3, was highly induced by SVCV infection. For type-I IFNs, zebrafish has four IFN genes, three of which, IFN1/2/3, particularly IFN 1 and IFN 3, were significantly transcribed under the same conditions.

2014-11-11 | GSE63133 | GEO

Lethenteron camtschaticum

Project description:Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) in Lampetra japonica transcriptome

| PRJNA312436 | ENA

Genome-wide RNA-seq transcriptional analysis of splenocyte responses to Dengue virus infection in WT, Irf3(-/-)×Irf7(-/-) (DKO), Irf3-/-xIrf5-/-xIrf7-/- (TKO), and Ifnar1-/- (AB6) mice.

Project description:Interferon-regulatory factors (IRFs) are a family of transcription factors (TFs) that play critical roles in translating viral recognition into antiviral responses, including type I IFN production. Dengue virus (DENV) and other clinically important flaviviruses are controlled by functional type I interferon (IFN) responses. Using an experimental model of DENV infection that recapitulates key aspects of the human disease in mice, we demonstrate that while mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (Ifnar1-/-) succumb to DENV infection, mice that are deficient in IRF-3, IRF-5, and IRF-7 – the three transcription factors thought to regulate type I IFN production – survive DENV challenge. Genome-wide RNA-seq analysis of WT, Irf3(-/-)×Irf7(-/-) (DKO), Irf3-/-xIrf5-/-xIrf7-/- (TKO), and Ifnar1-/- (AB6) splenocytes identified minimal type I IFN production but a robust type II IFN (IFN-γ) response in DKO and TKO mice later shown to be dependent on IRF-1. These results reveal a key role for IRF-1 in antiviral defense by activating both type I and II IFN responses during DENV infection.

2017-11-07 | GSE104189 | GEO

Specificity of enhancer selection by IRF3, IRF5 and IRF9 in dendritic cells

Project description:To discover the key determinants of IRF-specific enhancer selection, we identified and characterized IRF binding regions. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with deep sequencing (ChIP-seq), we mapped the binding regions of IRF3, IRF5, and IRF9 in murine dendritic cells (DCs) stimulated with TLR3 and TLR9 agonists, as well as IFNβ, respectively. We comprehensively analysed the IRF cistromes to identify characteristic features, including DNA motifs for IRFs and other transcription factors, and chromatin status.

2019-07-31 | GSE125340 | GEO

Interferon Regulatory Factors: IRF1 and IRF7 directly regulate gene expression in bats in response to viral infection.

Project description:Bat cells and tissue have elevated basal expression levels of antiviral genes commonly associated with IFNα signalling. Here we show IRF1,3 and 7 levels are elevated in most bat tissues and that basally, IRFs contribute to the expression of type I IFN ligands and high expression of Interferon Regulated Genes (IRGs). CRISPR KO of IRF 1/3/7 in cells reveal distinct subsets of genes affected by each IRF in an IFN-ligand signalling dependent and largely independent manner. As the master regulators of innate immunity, the IRFs, control the kinetics and maintenance of the IRG response and play essential roles in response to IAV, HSV1, PRV3M and MERS-CoV infection. With its differential expression compared to human, this highlights a critical role for basal IRF expression in viral responses and potentially immune cell development in bats with relevance for IRF function in human biology.

2020-10-23 | PXD021982 | JPOST Repository

The specifcity of innate immune response is enforced by repression of interferon-response elements by NFkB p50

Project description:The specific binding of transcription factors to cognate sequence elements is thought to be critical for the generation of specific gene expression programs. The transcription factors nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) and the interferon (IFN) regulatory factors (IRFs) bind to the kB site and the interferon response element (IRE), respectively, of target genes, and they are activated in macrophages after exposure to pathogens. However, how these factors produce pathogen-specific inflammatory and immune responses remains poorly understood. Combining top-down and bottom-up systems biology approaches, we have identified the NF-kB p50 homodimer (p50:p50) as a regulator of IRF responses. First, unbiased genome-wide expression analysis revealed that p50 repressed a subset of IFN-inducible genes through a previously uncharacterized subclass of guanine-rich IRE (G-IRE) sequences, which was substantiated by biochemical and structural analyses. Second, mathematical modeling predicted that p50:p50 might enforce the stimulus-specificity of composite promoters. Indeed, the production of the antiviral regulator IFN-b was rendered stimulus-specific by the binding of p50:p50 to the G-IRE–containing IFNb enhancer to suppress cytotoxic IFN signaling. Specifically, a deficiency in p50 resulted in the inappropriate production of IFN-b in response to bacterial DNA sensed by Toll-like receptor 9. This role for NF-kB p50 in enforcing the specificity of the cellular response to pathogens by binding to a previously uncharacterized subset of IRE sequences alters our understanding of how the NF-kB and IRF signaling systems cooperate to regulate antimicrobial immunity. [BMDM]: Total RNA extracted from wt, p50-/- or ifnar-/- bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) were subjected to stimulation with LPS, CpG or IFNb [MEF]: Total RNA extracted from wt or p50KO primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts were subjected to stimulation with LPS or IFNb

2011-03-01 | E-GEOD-27112 | biostudies-arrayexpress