Transcriptomic analysis of photoperiod regulated dormancy induction in grapevine.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Vitis
PROVIDER: GSE128966 | GEO | 2023/03/31
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:This study compares age matched V. riparia axillary buds at one time point during long photoperiod (paradormancy maintenance) and short photoperiod (endodormancy induced). Keywords: endodormancy, photoperiod, paradormancy, grape, axillary bud
2005-08-05 | GSE3052 | GEO
Project description:Bud endodormancy induction response of two genotypes (‘Seyval’ a hybrid white wine grape and V. riparia, PI588259 a native north american species) was compared under long (15h) and short (13h) photoperiod. Three separate replicates (5 plants/replicate) were treated to generate paradormant (LD) and same aged endodormancy-induced (SD) buds for transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analysis. Potted, spur-pruned two to six-year-old vines were removed from cold storage (Seyval 3-19-07; V. riparia 3/26/07) and grown under a LD (15 h) at 25/20 + 3C day/night temperatures (D/N). When vines reached 12-15 nodes (3-25-07) they were randomized into LD or SD treatments with 25/20 + 3C D/N in climate controlled greenhouses with automated photoperiod system (VRE Greenhouse Systems). Three replications (5 vines/replication) were harvested between 5/07-6/07 and then again in 5/08-6/08 for a total of six replications. All treatments are repeated at the same time every year and harvested at the same time of day each year to minimize biological noise. At 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 days of LD and SD treatment, buds were harvested from nodes 3 to 12 of each separate replicate, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and placed at -80C for future RNA, protein and metabolite extraction. These time points encompass early reversible phases as well as key time points during transition to irreversible endodormancy development. After photoperiod treatments and bud harvests, all pruned vines were returned to LD and monitored for bud endodormancy. The endodormant vines were identified after 28 days and moved to cold storage. The nondormant vines were allowed to grow again and induced into dormancy at a later date. Acknowledgement:This study was funded by NSF Grant DBI0604755 and funds from the South Dakota Agriculture Experiment Station. ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Anne Fennell. The equivalent experiment is VV10 at PLEXdb.] 84 Samples of two genotypes compared under long and short photoperiod, 3 replicates each. Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : LD, 15h : 1 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : LD, 15h : 3 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : LD, 15h : 7 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : LD, 15h : 14 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : LD, 15h : 21 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : LD, 15h : 28 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : LD, 15h : 42 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : SD, 13h : 1 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : SD, 13h : 3 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : SD, 13h : 7 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : SD, 13h : 14 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : SD, 13h : 21 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : SD, 13h : 28 days (3-replications) Seyval (SV, Seyve Villard 5-276) : SD, 13h : 42 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : LD, 15h : 1 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : LD, 15h : 3 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : LD, 15h : 7 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : LD, 15h : 14 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : LD, 15h : 21 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : LD, 15h : 28 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : LD, 15h : 42 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : SD, 13h : 1 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : SD, 13h : 3 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : SD, 13h : 7 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : SD, 13h : 14 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : SD, 13h : 21 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : SD, 13h : 28 days (3-replications) V. riparia (VR, PI588259) : SD, 13h : 42 days (3-replications)
2009-08-05 | E-GEOD-17502 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genotypes used are Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Col-0 wild-type, atg5.3 mutant (SALK_020601), sid2.2 (Dewdney et al., 2000) and the atg5.3/sid2.2 double mutant that has been previously characterized by Yoshimoto et al. Plant Cell (2009). Plants were cultivated under control conditions (ideal nutrition N+S+; 10mM NO3- and 0.266mM SO42-), low nitrate (N-; 2 mM NO3- and 0.266mM SO42-), or low sulfate (S-; 10mM NO3- and 0.016mM SO42-) conditions, under in short days (160 micromol.m-2.s-1; 8 h light, 16 h dark) in growth chamber as described by Havé et al. 2019 New Phytologist. Rosettes were harvested at vegetative stage 60 days after sowing, 2-3 hours after the beginning of the photoperiod. Two consecutive cultures (C1 and C2) were performed at several month interval. For each culture, three plant repeats (R1-R3) were collected, each repeat was a mix of >6 rosettes. Details can be found in Havé et al. (2019) New Phytologist (doi: 10.1111/nph.15913). Associated publications are Havé et al. (2018) JXB (doi:10.1093/jxb/erx482), Havé et al. (2019) New Phytologist (doi: 10.1111/nph.15913) and Luo et al 2020 JXB (doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa337)
2023-10-27 | PXD029638 | Pride
Project description:Winter season with reduced day length (photoperiod); led to the growth cessation, dormancy induction and cold acclimation in woody perennial plants. To develop an understanding of the photoperiod signal transduction in Vitis riparia; shoot tip transcriptome profiling was performed under differential photoperiod treatments (long (LD, 15h) and short day (SD, 13h)) for 7 or 21 days after shoots reached 10 nodes (LD7, SD7, LD21 or SD21).
2023-04-28 | GSE95707 | GEO
Project description:Gene expression differences between grapevines with a dwarf and normal phenotype of an F2 population of a cross between Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon x V. riparia cv Riparia Gloire de Montpellier called CSxRGM_F2. Gene expression profiling was done using the Nimblegen whole genome array with 5 biological replicates.
2020-01-29 | E-MTAB-2472 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The first 18 experiments are ordered according to the legend in Figure 3 of the published paper. Experiment 19 is the gene expression profile of the swi4 deletion strain compared to the wild-type strain. This study is described in more detail in Iyer VR, et al.(2001) Nature 409:533-38 Keywords: other
2002-02-12 | GSE19 | GEO
Project description:454 dataset for Hosia, et al. Torstensson et al. Dinasquet et al.
| PRJEB7907 | ENA
Project description:Bud endodormancy induction response of two genotypes (‘Seyval’ a hybrid white wine grape and V. riparia, PI588259 a native north american species) was compared under long and short photoperiod. Three separate replicates (5 plants/replicate) were treated in each of 2 separate years (2007 and 2008) to generate paradormant (LD) and same aged endodormancy-induced (SD) buds for transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analysis. Potted, spur-pruned two to six-year-old vines were removed from cold storage (Seyval 3-19-07, 3/18/08; V. riparia 3/26/07, 3/24/08) and grown under a LD (15 h) at 25/20 + 3C day/night temperatures (D/N). When vines reached 12-15 nodes they were randomized into groups for differential photoperiod treatments. On 4/30/07 and 4/28/08 LD and SD (13 h) treatments were imposed with automated photoperiod system (VRE Greenhouse Systems). Temperatures were maintained at 25/20 + 3C D/N. Three replications (5 vines/replication) were harvested between 5/07-6/07 and then again in 5/08-6/08. At 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 days of differential photoperiod treatment, buds were harvested from nodes 3 to 12 (from the base of the shoot) of each separate replicate, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and placed at -80C for future RNA, protein and metabolite extraction. These time points encompass early reversible phases as well as key time points during transition to irreversible endodormancy development. After photoperiod treatments and bud harvests, all pruned vines were returned to LD and monitored for bud endodormancy. The endodormant vines were identified after 28 days and moved to cold storage. The nondormant vines were allowed to grow again and induced into dormancy at a later date. Acknowledgement:This study was funded by NSF Grant DBI0604755 and funds from the South Dakota Agriculture Experiment Station. ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Anne Fennell. The equivalent experiment is VV18 at PLEXdb.]
2016-01-13 | GSE66913 | GEO