Characterization of the transcriptional response to Orsay RNA1
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Caenorhabditis elegans
PROVIDER: GSE138268 | GEO | 2019/10/04
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Characterization of the transcriptional response to Orsay RNA1
| PRJNA575251 | ENA
Project description:Background information: According to our observations, cde-1 (tm1021) null C. elegans animals show increased susceptibility to the Orsay virus (which has a bipartite positive RNA genome), compared to WT (N2 strain). Viral infection seems limited to intestinal cells. CDE-1 is a terminal uridylyltransferase (TUT). TUTs have been shown to promote RNA decay by 3’ end uridylation in various contexts and organisms. We hypothesize that CDE-1 serves as an antiviral factor by uridylating the viral RNA genome. Aims: We question small RNA populations in cde-1 mutants versus WT after two days of infection by the Orsay virus. Methods: Approximately 200 C. elegans animals were infected for 48 hours from the L2 stage to the adult stage with 20 µl filtrate of the Orsay virus on 50mm plate seeded with HB101 bacteria, in biological duplicates, for the following genetic backgrounds: N2 (+), drh-1 (ok3495), rde-1 (ne219), cde-1 (mj414), cde-1 (tm1021), cde-1 (tm1021);drh-1 (ok3495), cde-1 (tm1021);rde-1 (ne219). Animals were then washed in M9 and resuspended in 1 ml TRIsure (Bioline). Samples were freeze-thaw three times using liquid nitrogen and RNA purification was performed according to Bioline’s guidelines. Purified RNA was either directly used for library preparation (5’ dependent libraries) or was first submitted to 5’ polyphosphatase treatment (5’ independent libraries) as in Ashe, et al. 2013. sRNA libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Small RNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina) according to manufacturer’s instructions (with size selection between 20 and 35 nt, adapters excluded) and deep sequencing was produced with an Illumina HiSeq machine (single read 36).
2019-04-12 | GSE80169 | GEO
Project description:The nematode C. elegans contains several types of endogenous small interfering RNAs (endo-siRNAs) produced by RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) complexes. Both “silencing” siRNAs bound by Worm-specific Argonautes (WAGO) and “activating” siRNAs bound by the CSR-1 Argonaute require the DRH-3 helicase, an RdRP component. Here we show that, in the drh-3(ne4253) mutant deficient in RdRP-produced secondary endo-siRNAs, the silencing histone mark H3K9me3 is largely depleted, whereas in the csr-1 partial loss-of-function mutant this mark is ectopically deposited on CSR-1 target genes. Moreover, we observe ectopic H3K9me3 at enhancer elements in both drh-3 and csr-1 partial loss-of-function mutants and describe small RNAs matching enhancers. Finally, we detect accumulation of H3K27me3 at highly expressed genes in the drh-3(ne4253) mutant, which correlates with their reduced transcription. Our study shows that when abundant RdRP-produced siRNAs are depleted, there is ectopic elevation of noncoding RNAs linked to increase in silencing chromatin marks. Moreover, our results suggest that enhancer small RNAs may guide local H3K9 methylation.
2019-04-04 | GSE115629 | GEO
Project description:Small RNA sequencing of Orsay virus infected animals and their progeny
2015-01-01 | GSE60020 | GEO
Project description:wastewater metagenomics Orsay site 01
| PRJEB18607 | ENA
Project description:Armillaria ostoyae RNA1 Transcriptome or Gene expression
| PRJNA192550 | ENA
Project description:Armillaria ostoyae RNA1 Transcriptome or Gene expression
| PRJNA179157 | ENA
Project description:This experiment investigates changes in gene expression upon Orsay virus infection and between males and hermaphrodites in the nematode Ceanorhabditis elegans. The laboratory reference strain N2 was used. For this strain, males are less susceptible to Orsay virus infection than hermaphrodites. The goal of the experiment was to identify genes that show different expression patterns for both sexes upon Orsay virus infection. We mock-treated or infected 48h-old C. elegans populations with Orsay virus and took samples 30-hours after infection. For each treatment-sex combination 8 samples were collected. Thereafter RNA was isolated, labelled, and hybridized on microarray. The gene-expression dynamics of previously identified genes (e.g. from literature and from a highly replicated N2 versus CB4856 experiment) were analyzed.
2020-09-13 | E-MTAB-9561 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Aim: We question relative mRNA levels in cde-1 mutants versus WT C. elegans (N2 strain) infected by the Orsay virus Methods: Approximately 200 cde-1 (tm1021) mutants or N2 animals were infected for 48 hours from the L2 stage to the adult stage with 20 µl filtrate of the Orsay virus on 50mm plate seeded with HB101 bacteria, in biological triplicates. Animals were then washed in M9 and resuspended in 1 ml TRIsure (Bioline). Samples were freeze-thaw three times using liquid nitrogen and RNA purification was performed according to Bioline’s guidelines. mRNA libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra directional RNA library kit (NEB) with poly(A) selection and deep sequencing was produced with an Illumina HiSeq machine (single read 50). For differential expression analysis, genes were only included in the analysis if they had at least 1 count per million in all of the control samples or all of the experiment samples. After applying this filter, differentially expressed genes were then called using EdgeR (Robinson, et al. 2010). For the correlation matrix, Pairwise Pearson correlation values were calculated between all samples.
2018-01-31 | GSE76901 | GEO
Project description:Aim: We question non-templated transcript 3ʹ tails in cde-1 mutants versus WT C. elegans (N2 strain) infected by the Orsay virus Methods: Approximately 200 cde-1 (tm1021) mutants or N2 animals were infected for 48 hours from the L2 stage to the adult stage with 20 µl filtrate of the Orsay virus on 50mm plate seeded with HB101 bacteria, in biological duplicates. Animals were then washed in M9 and resuspended in 1 ml TRIsure (Bioline). Samples were freeze-thaw three times using liquid nitrogen and RNA purification was performed according to Bioline’s guidelines. TAILseq preparation and sequencing was performed as described in Chang, et al. Moll. Cell 2014. Tail-seq libraries were processed using Tailseeker 2 (Chang et al. Moll. Cell 2014). The 5ʹ and 3ʹ libraries were subsequently adapter trimmed using cutadapt 1.10 (Martin. EMBnet.journal 2011) with Illumina small RNA-seq adapters and filtered to a minimum length of 5bp. Trimmed 5’ reads were mapped with STAR 2.5.2a (Dobin, et al. Bioinformatics 2013) against a combined meta-genome consisting of the C. elegans reference genome WBcel235 (Harris, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014) and the Orsay virus genome (Felix, et al. Plos Bio. 2011). Mapping was performed in end-to-end mode allowing no mismatches and a gap opening and extension penalty of 10000. Reads were assigned to genes with bedtools 2.26.0 (Quinlan and Hall. Bioinformatics 2010). Subsequently, 3ʹ reads without poly(A) tail or too many dark cycles were removed from the data. For the subsequent analysis, all C. elegans tags with poly(A) tail length equal to zero were discarded. Average poly(A) tail lengths and uridylation lengths for each sample were calculated as the arithmetic mean weighted by the support for each tag, reported by Tailseeker.
2019-08-19 | GSE85893 | GEO