Higher-order chromatin organization defines PR and PAX2 binding to regulate endometrial cancer cell gene expression (Hi-C)
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Estrogen (E2) and Progesterone (Pg) via their specific receptors, ER and PR respectively, are major determinants in the development and progression of endometrial malignancies. We have studied how E2 and the synthetic progestin R5020 affect genomic function in Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells. Using ChIPseq in cells exposed to the corresponding hormones, we identified cell specific binding sites for ER (ERbs) and PR (PRbs), mostly binding to independent sites and both adjacent to PAXbs. Long-range interactions (HiC) showed enrichment of PRbs and PAXbs, which we call progestin control regions (PgCRs) inside TADs with differentially progestin-regulated genes. Effects of hormone treatments on gene expression were detected by RNAseq. PgCRs correlate with open chromatin independently of hormonal stimuli. In summary, endometrial response to progestins in differentiated endometrial tumor cells results in part from binding of PR to compartmentalized PgCRs in hormone-independent open chromatin, which include binding of partner transcription factors, in particular PAX2.
Project description:Estrogen (E2) and Progesterone (Pg) via their specific receptors, ER and PR respectively, are major determinants in the development and progression of endometrial malignancies. We have studied how E2 and the synthetic progestin R5020 affect genomic function in Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells. Using ChIPseq in cells exposed to the corresponding hormones, we identified cell specific binding sites for ER (ERbs) and PR (PRbs), mostly binding to independent sites and both adjacent to PAXbs. Long-range interactions (HiC) showed enrichment of PRbs and PAXbs, which we call progestin control regions (PgCRs) inside TADs with differentially progestin-regulated genes. Effects of hormone treatments on gene expression were detected by RNAseq. PgCRs correlate with open chromatin independently of hormonal stimuli. In summary, endometrial response to progestins in differentiated endometrial tumor cells results in part from binding of PR to compartmentalized PgCRs in hormone-independent open chromatin, which include binding of partner transcription factors, in particular PAX2.
Project description:Estrogen (E2) and Progesterone (Pg) via their specific receptors, ER and PR respectively, are major determinants in the development and progression of endometrial malignancies. We have studied how E2 and the synthetic progestin R5020 affect genomic function in Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells. Using ChIPseq in cells exposed to the corresponding hormones, we identified cell specific binding sites for ER (ERbs) and PR (PRbs), mostly binding to independent sites and both adjacent to PAXbs. Long-range interactions (HiC) showed enrichment of PRbs and PAXbs, which we call progestin control regions (PgCRs) inside TADs with differentially progestin-regulated genes. Effects of hormone treatments on gene expression were detected by RNAseq. PgCRs correlate with open chromatin independently of hormonal stimuli. In summary, endometrial response to progestins in differentiated endometrial tumor cells results in part from binding of PR to compartmentalized PgCRs in hormone-independent open chromatin, which include binding of partner transcription factors, in particular PAX2.
Project description:Estrogen (E2) and Progesterone (Pg) via their specific receptors, ER and PR respectively, are major determinants in the development and progression of endometrial malignancies. We have studied how E2 and the synthetic progestin R5020 affect genomic function in Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells. Using ChIPseq in cells exposed to the corresponding hormones, we identified cell specific binding sites for ER (ERbs) and PR (PRbs), mostly binding to independent sites and both adjacent to PAXbs. Long-range interactions (HiC) showed enrichment of PRbs and PAXbs, which we call progestin control regions (PgCRs) inside TADs with differentially progestin-regulated genes. Effects of hormone treatments on gene expression were detected by RNAseq. PgCRs correlate with open chromatin independently of hormonal stimuli. In summary, endometrial response to progestins in differentiated endometrial tumor cells results in part from binding of PR to compartmentalized PgCRs in hormone-independent open chromatin, which include binding of partner transcription factors, in particular PAX2.
Project description:Estrogen (E2) and Progesterone (Pg) via their specific receptors, ER and PR respectively, are major determinants in the development and progression of endometrial malignancies. We have studied how E2 and the synthetic progestin R5020 affect genomic function in Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells. Using ChIPseq in cells exposed to the corresponding hormones, we identified cell specific binding sites for ER (ERbs) and PR (PRbs), mostly binding to independent sites and both adjacent to PAXbs. Long-range interactions (HiC) showed enrichment of PRbs and PAXbs, which we call progestin control regions (PgCRs) inside TADs with differentially progestin-regulated genes. Effects of hormone treatments on gene expression were detected by RNAseq. PgCRs correlate with open chromatin independently of hormonal stimuli. In summary, endometrial response to progestins in differentiated endometrial tumor cells results in part from binding of PR to compartmentalized PgCRs in hormone-independent open chromatin, which include binding of partner transcription factors, in particular PAX2.
Project description:Exploring effect of progesterone/progestin treatment on ER and PR binding. Two cell lines, three conditions (Full Media with E2, E2+ Progesterone, Full Media + R5020 Progestin), three factors (ER, PR, p300), all with three replicates, each with a matched Input control.
Project description:Exploring effect of estrogen and progesterone/progestin treatment on ER and PR binding. Two cell lines, four conditions (Vehicle, E2, Progesterone, E2+Progesterone), three factors (ER, PR, p300), all with three replicates.
Project description:Although non-genomic steroid receptor pathways have been studied over the past decade, little is known about the direct gene expression changes that take place as a consequence of their activation. Progesterone controls proliferation of rat endometrial stromal cells during the peri-implantation phase of pregnancy. We showed that picomolar concentration of progestin R5020 mimics this control in UIII endometrial stromal cells via ERK1-2 and AKT activation mediated by interaction of Progesterone Receptor (PR) with Estrogen Receptor beta (ERb) and without transcriptional activity of endogenous PR and ER. Here we identify early downstream targets of cytoplasmic PR signaling and their possible role in endometrial stromal cell proliferation. Microarray analysis of global gene expression changes in UIII cells treated for 45 min with progestin identified 97 up- and 341 down-regulated genes. The most over-represented molecular functions were transcription factors and regulatory factors associated with cell proliferation and cell cycle, a large fraction of which were repressors down-regulated by hormone. Further analysis verified that progestins regulate Ccnd1, JunD, Usf1, Gfi1, Cyr61, and Cdkn1b through PR-mediated activation of ligand-free ER, ERK1-2 or AKT, in the absence of genomic PR binding. ChIP experiments show that progestin promoted the interaction of USF1 with the proximal promoter of the Cdc2 gene, and Usf1 knockdown abrogated Cdc2 progestin-dependent transcriptional regulation providing a mechanism for direct regulation of its expression. Finally, Cdc2 knockdown blocked R5020 induced UIII cell proliferation. We conclude that progestin induced proliferation of endometrial stromal cells requires ERK1-2 and AKT mediated early regulation of USF1, that induces Cdc2. To our knowledge, this is the first description of early target genes of progestin-activated classical PR via crosstalk with protein kinases and independently of hormone receptor binding to the genomic targets.
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.