Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Microarray Based Comparison of two Amplification Methods For Nanogram Amounts of Total RNA

ABSTRACT: Two T7 based methods One round of Amplification (Affymetrix) and Two round of Amplification were compared to two Ribo-SPIA based systems, RiboSPIA and pico Ribo SPIA systems. Data for One Round of amplification , Two round of amplification and RiboSPIA are listed here. All Hybridisation were performed using Affymetrix Mouse 430-2 gene chips. Data were all scaled to 500 and scaling factor average was 3.6 +/- 0.9, background intensities 46 +/- 5 , noise 2.9 +/- 0.6, rawQ 1.5 +/- 0.2 Keywords: other

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE1435 | GEO | 2004/05/28

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA89973

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Transcription profiling of mouse samples subject to two different amplification methods for nanogram amounts of total rna to compare amplification methods

Project description:Two T7 based methods One round of Amplification (Affymetrix) and Two round of Amplification were compared to two Ribo-SPIA based systems, RiboSPIA and pico Ribo SPIA systems. Data for One Round of amplification , Two round of amplification and RiboSPIA are listed here. All Hybridisation were performed using Affymetrix Mouse 430-2 gene chips. Data were all scaled to 500 and scaling factor average was 3.6 +/- 0.9, background intensities 46 +/- 5 , noise 2.9 +/- 0.6, rawQ 1.5 +/- 0.2

2008-06-11 | E-GEOD-1435 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Microarray Based Comparison of three Amplification Methods For Nanogram Amounts of Total RNA

Project description:Two T7 based methods One round of Amplification (Affymetrix) and Two round of Amplification were compared to two Ribo-SPIA based systems, RiboSPIA and pico Ribo SPIA systems. Data for Pico-RiboSPIA are listed here. All Hybridisation were performed using Affymetrix Mouse 430-2 gene chips. Data were all scaled to 500. For 12 chips performed with pico Ribo SPIA the scaling factor average was 2.0 +/- 0.3, background intensities 74.4 +/- 12.7 , noise 3.9 +/- 0.6, rawQ 2.5 +/- 0.3 Keywords: ordered

2004-12-21 | GSE2019 | GEO

Transcription profiling of mouse samples to compare three amplification methods for nanogram amounts of total RNA

Project description:Two T7 based methods One round of Amplification (Affymetrix) and Two round of Amplification were compared to two Ribo-SPIA based systems, RiboSPIA and pico Ribo SPIA systems. Data for Pico-RiboSPIA are listed here. All Hybridisation were performed using Affymetrix Mouse 430-2 gene chips. Data were all scaled to 500. For 12 chips performed with pico Ribo SPIA the scaling factor average was 2.0 +/- 0.3, background intensities 74.4 +/- 12.7 , noise 3.9 +/- 0.6, rawQ 2.5 +/- 0.3

2008-06-11 | E-GEOD-2019 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparative transcriptional profiling of tumor-associated and normal lymphatic endothelial cells

Project description:In the past decade, the relevance of tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis for the metastatic spread of tumor cells has been demonstrated, thus indicating the potential of targeting tumor lymphangiogenesis to treat cancer. Whereas numerous preclinical studies demonstrated that blocking angiogenesis or lymphangiogenesis could inhibit tumor metastasis, the scarcity of highly selective targeting candidates hampers their translation to the clinic. We employed a new approach consisting of immuno-laser capture microdissection (i-LCM) and transcriptional profiling by means of microarrays in order to identify novel tumor-specific endothelial markers. By using short immunostainings prior to microdissection, specific identification of lymphatic (LECs) and blood (BECs) endothelial cells was allowed. For the subsequent gene expression profiling, a single round of the Ribo-Spia amplification method in combination with the Affymterix microarray platform was used. Comparison of gene expression profiles of tumor-associated and normal LECs resulted in the identification of differentially expressed genes in tumor-associated lymphatic vasculature.

2010-04-12 | E-GEOD-15760 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Neurospheres of WT and BMI-1 KO

Project description:The cRNA derived from Brain and Gut neurospheres of wild type and BMI-1 knockout mice were hybridized to Affymetrix mouse ver 2 Chips A, B and C. In case of brain neurospheres, the cRNA were generated by one round RNA amplification (conventional method). In contrast, the cRNA of Gut neurospheres were generated by two round RNA amplifications. Keywords: parallel sample

2003-10-14 | GSE611 | GEO

Development and application of a new immunophenotypic algorithm for molecular subtype classification of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Report from an International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program Study

Project description:We studied 498 de-novo adult DLBCL cases, which had been diagnosed between January 2002 and October 2009, as part of the International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program Study We perform global gene expression profiling from formalin fixed paraffin embedded 498 DLBCL tissues RNA by SPIA mediated microarray detection and identified the distinct subgroups of the disease within DLBCL, known as germinal-center-B-cell-like (GCB), activated B-cell-like (ABC), and unclassified DLBCL (UC). RNA of 498 FFPET DLBCL patient samples were extracted, amplified using a novel RNA amplicfication method, Single Primer Isothermal Amplification (SPIA, NuGen Inc.), and hybridized to Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChips. This dataset is the collaboration between The University of Texas at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

2012-07-31 | E-GEOD-31312 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Small Sample Amplification Technologies

Project description:This sample is part of a study that compares small sample amplification technologies. The analysis looks at differential gene expression when compared to one round of T7 amplification. A tumor cell line was used in comparison to a human reference RNA in this study. Keywords = amplification Keywords = small sample Keywords = Affymetrix Keywords: other

2005-06-03 | GSE2723 | GEO

Comparison of RNA Amplification Techniques meeting the demands for the Expression Profiling of Clinical Cancer Samples

Project description:For microarray experiments starting with nanogram amounts of RNA it is essential to implement reproducible and powerful RNA amplification techniques. Available methods were mainly tested for reproducibility, only a few studies concentrated on potential amplification bias. We evaluated three amplification protocols, which are less time-consuming than the commonly used T7-RNA polymerase based in vitro transcription protocols and therefore may be more suitable for clinical use: Template Switching (TS)-PCR (SMART-PCR Kit, BD), Ribo-SPIA (single primer isothermal amplification, Oviation, Nugen) and a random primer-based PCR. Additionally a more sensitive labeling method, Dendrimer-labeling (Genisphere), was evaluated. All methods were compared to unamplified RNA labelled at reverse transcription. Hybridizations were carried out on a targeted two-colour oligonucleotide microarray. From our results we conclude that RNA amplification with TS-PCR is highly reproducible and results in a reliable representation of the starting RNA population. We then assessed whether RNA amplification of clinical breast and thyroid cancer samples with TS-PCR showed robust performance when altered cycle numbers or partially degraded RNA were used. According to our experiments TS-PCR proved to be a very reliable method for global RNA amplification, even when starting from partially degraded RNA down to a RNA Integrity Number (RIN) of 4.3. Keywords: microarray expression profiling, RNA amplification techniques, RNA integrity

2007-08-24 | GSE5588 | GEO

Spotted long oligonucleotide arrays

Project description:Both spotted long oligonucleotide arrays and Affymetrix GeneChips were used to measure differential gene expression in two RNA samples (K562 erythroleukemia RNA and the Stratagene Universal Human Reference RNA). For Affymetrix technology, the two RNAs were analyzed separately. There are two replicates for K562 RNA (GSM4843 and GSM4844) and three for the Stratagene Universal reference (GSM4845-GSM4847). Two types of spotted long oligonucleotide arrays were used. These arrays were used to do two-color hybridizations to directly compare K562 and Universal reference RNAs. One array (GPL273) was made with probes from the Operon Human Genome Oligo Set Version 1. These arrays were used with unamplified cDNA probes (6 replicates, GSM4848-GSM4853), with aRNA probes produced by one round of T7 RNA polymerase-based amplification (6 replicates, GSM4854-GSM4859), and with aRNA probes produced by two rounds of amplification (2 replicates, GSM4860-GSM4861). Keywords: parallel sample

2003-03-18 | GSE344 | GEO

Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling

Project description:For more than a decade, microarrays have been a powerful and widely used tool to explore the transcriptome of biological systems. However, the amount of biological material from cell sorting or laser capture microdissection is much too small to perform microarray studies. To address this issue, RNA amplification methods have been developed to generate sufficient targets from picogram amounts of total RNA to perform microarray hybridisation. In this study, four commercial protocols for amplification of picograms amounts of input RNA for microarray expression profiling were evaluated and compared. The quantitative and qualitative performances of the methods were assessed. Microarrays were hybridised with the amplified targets and the amplification protocols were compared with respect to the quality of expression profiles, reproducibility within a concentration range of input RNA, and sensitivity. Four commercial protocols for amplification of picograms amounts of input RNA for microarray expression profiling were evaluated and compared. For each protocol, one RNA amplification was performed from 250 pg, and one from 500 pg of human universal RNA by two operators in two independent laboratories and compared to the amplified aRNA obtained from 2 µg and 100 ng RNA inputs following the standard protocol proposed by Affymetrix. A negative control (amplification without total RNA) and a positive control (if available) were included in each experimental batch. Samples indicating 50, 100, and 1000 pg RNA inputs correspond to 3 additional quantities of total RNA used to synthesise the cDNA target using the nugen protocol for comparison (250, 500 pg + 50, 100, 1000 pg).

2009-06-02 | E-GEOD-15398 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data