Project description:N6-methylation of 2’-O-methyladenosine (Am) in RNA occurs in eukaryotic cells to generate N6,2’-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am). Identification of the methyltransferase responsible for m6Am catalysis has accelerated studies on the function of m6Am in RNA processing. While m6Am is generally found in the first transcribed nucleotide of mRNAs, the modification is also found internally within U2 snRNA. However, the writer required for catalyzing internal m6Am formation had remained elusive. By sequencing transcriptome-wide RNA methylation at single-base-resolution, we identified human METTL4 as the writer that directly methylates Am at U2 snRNA position 30 into m6Am. We found that METTL4 localizes to the nucleus and its conserved methyltransferase catalytic site is required for U2 snRNA methylation. By sequencing human cells with overexpressed Mettl4, we determined METTL4’s in vivo target RNA motif specificity. In the absence of Mettl4 in human cells, U2 snRNA lacks m6Am thereby affecting a subset of splicing events that exhibit specific features such as overall 3’ splice-site weakness with certain motif positions more affected than others. This study establishes that METTL4 methylation of U2 snRNA regulates splicing of specific pre-mRNA transcripts.
Project description:N 6-methylation of 2'-O-methyladenosine (Am) in RNA occurs in eukaryotic cells to generate N6,2'-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am). Identification of the methyltransferase responsible for m6Am catalysis has accelerated studies on the function of m6Am in RNA processing. While m6Am is generally found in the first transcribed nucleotide of mRNAs, the modification is also found internally within U2 snRNA. However, the writer required for catalyzing internal m6Am formation had remained elusive. By sequencing transcriptome-wide RNA methylation at single-base-resolution, we identified human METTL4 as the writer that directly methylates Am at U2 snRNA position 30 into m6Am. We found that METTL4 localizes to the nucleus and its conserved methyltransferase catalytic site is required for U2 snRNA methylation. By sequencing human cells with overexpressed Mettl4, we determined METTL4's in vivo target RNA motif specificity. In the absence of Mettl4 in human cells, U2 snRNA lacks m6Am thereby affecting a subset of splicing events that exhibit specific features such as 3' splice-site weakness and an increase in exon inclusion. These findings suggest that METTL4 methylation of U2 snRNA regulates splicing of specific pre-mRNA transcripts.
Project description:In order to identify factors involved in transcription of human snRNA genes and 3’ end processing of the transcripts, we have carried out CRISPR affinity purification in situ of regulatory elements (CAPTURE), which is deadCas9-mediated pull-down, of the tandemly-repeated U2 snRNA genes in human cells. Pull-down proteins were identified by mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis.
Project description:Spliceosomal snRNA are key components of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), the building blocks of the spliceosome. The biogenesis of snRNPs is a complex process involving multiple cellular and subcellular compartments, the details of which are yet to be described. In short, the snRNA is exported to the cytoplasm as 3‘-end extended precursor (pre-snRNA), where it acquires a heptameric Sm ring. The SMN complex which catalyses this step, recruits Sm proteins and assembles them around the pre-snRNA at the single stranded Sm site. After additional modification, the complex is re-imported into the nucleus where the final maturation step occurs. Our modeling suggests that during the cytoplasmic stage of maturation pre-snRNA assumes a compact secondary structure containing Near Sm site Stem (NSS) which is not compattible with the formation of the Sm ring. To validate our in silico predictions we employed selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension sequencing (SHAPE-Seq) on U2 snRNA in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro, and U4 pre-snRNA in vitro. For the in vivo experiment HeLa cells were incubated for 10 min at 37°C with NAI or DMSO to final concentration 200 mM. RNA was isolated using Trizol (Sigma) and 200 µl chloroform and precipitated with ethanol at -20°C overnight. For the ex vivo experiment, RNA was isolated from HeLa cells after Protease K treatment at room temperature for 45 min. After incubation, RNA was isolated using equilibrated phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol buffered by folding buffer (110 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 110 mM KCl, 11 mM MgCl2) and cleaned on a PD-10 column according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Isolated RNA was treated with 100mM NAI or DMSO for 10 min at 37°C. For the in vitro experiment, U2WT and U4 pre-snRNA were transcribed by T7 polymerase followed by DNase I (30 min at 37 °C) and Proteinase K (30 min at 37°C) treatments. U2 snRNA was purified on 30 kDa Amicon columns, folded for 30 min at 37°C in 57 mM MgCl2 and incubated with 100 mM NAI at 37°C for 10 min. DMSO was used as a negative control. U4 pre-snRNA was purified on Superdex 200 Increase 10/300GL, folded for 30 min at 37°C in 60 mM MgCl2 and incubated with 100 mM NAI at 37°C for 10 min. DMSO was used as a negative control. All prepared RNA samples (in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo) were used for reverse transcription with the gene-specific primer 5’-CGTTCCTGGAGGTACTGCAA for U2 snRNA and 5’- AAAAATTCAGTCTCCG for U4 pre-snRNA. We used SHAPE MaP buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 75 mM KCl, 10 mM DTT, 0.5 mM dNTP, 6 mM MnCl2) and SuperScript II (Invitrogen). Amplicons for snRNAs were generated using gene-specific forward and reverse primers. Importantly, the primers include Nextera adaptors required for downstream library construction. PCR reaction products were cleaned using Monarch PCR&DNA Clean-up Kits. Remaining Illumina adaptor sequences were added using the PCR MasterMix and index primers provided in the NexteraXT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Libraries were quantified using Qubit (Invitrogen) and BioAnalyzer (Agilent). Amplicons were sequenced on a NextSeq 500/550 platform using a 150 cycle mid-output kit. All sequencing data was analyzed using the ShapeMapper 2 analysis pipeline1. The ‘—amplicon’ and ‘—primers’ flags were used, along with sequences of gene-specific handles PCR primers, to ensure primer binding sites are excluded from reactivity calculations. Default read-depth thresholds of 5000x were used. Analysis of statistically significant reactivity differences between ex vivo and in vivo-determined SHAPE reactivities was performed using the DeltaSHAPE automated analysis tool and default settings2. 1. Busan, S. & Weeks, K.M. Accurate detection of chemical modifications in RNA by mutational profiling (MaP) with ShapeMapper 2. RNA 24, 143-148 (2018). 2. Smola, M.J., Rice, G.M., Busan, S., Siegfried, N.A. & Weeks, K.M. Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension and mutational profiling (SHAPE-MaP) for direct, versatile and accurate RNA structure analysis. Nat Protoc 10, 1643-69 (2015).
Project description:In order to identify factors involved in transcription of human snRNA genes and 3’ end processing of the transcripts, we have carried out CRISPR affinity purification in situ of regulatory elements (CAPTURE), which is deadCas9-mediated pull-down, of the tandemly-repeated U2 snRNA genes in human cells. CAPTURE enriched many factors expected to be associated with human snRNA genes including pol II, NELF, CDK9, SPT5 and several subunits of the Integrator Complex. SPT6, Mediator subunits 16, 20 and 23, TAF15, CDK7, CDK9, Cyclin K, and the SPT16 subunit of FACT were also enriched. Several polyadenylation factors, including CPSF1, CPSF6 and CstF1-3 were also enriched by U2 gene CAPTURE. These add to the polyadenylation factors CstF2, Pcf11 and Ssu72 which we previously showed are associated with the human U1 and U2 genes. Analysis of genome-wide studies and ChIP-qPCR confirms the association of SPT6 with the U2 genes. In addition, SPT6 knockdown causes loss of subunit 3 of the Integrator complex from the U2 genes and transcriptional readthrough, indicating a functional role in snRNA gene expression. CAPTURE has therefore expanded the repertoire of transcription and RNA processing factors associated with these genes.
Project description:BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key factor in the development of atherogenesis. Methyltransferase-like protein 4 (METTL4) mediates N6-deoxyadenosine (6mA) methylation of mammalian mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). However, the role of METTL4-mediated mitoepigenetic regulation in atherosclerosis is still unknown. This study aims to investigate the potential involvement of METTL4 in atherosclerosis, explore the underlying mechanism, and develop targeted strategies for treating atherosclerosis. METHODS: Expression levels of mtDNA 6mA and METTL4 were determined in atherosclerotic lesions. We explored the mechanism of METTL4 involvement in atherosclerosis using Mettl4Mac-KO-Apoe-/- and Mettl4MUT-Apoe-/- mice and cell models, as well as bone marrow transplantation. Natural compound libraries were screened to identify potent METTL4 antagonists. In addition, bioinspired proteolysis-targeting (PROTAC) technology targeting macrophages within plaques was used to increase the efficacy of the METTL4 antagonist. RESULTS: The expression levels of mtDNA 6mA and METTL4 were significantly increased in plaque macrophages. Mettl4Mac-KO-Apoe-/- mice displayed suppressed mtDNA 6mA levels and atherosclerotic progression, which were reversed by METTL4 restoration via bone marrow transplantation (n = 6). Mechanistically, elevated METTL4 expression reduces MT-ATP6 expression by suppressing its transcription, thereby impairing the activity of mitochondrial respiration chain complex V. This disruption leads to the accumulation of excess protons in the mitochondrial intermembrane space, causing mitochondrial dysfunction. Consequently, mtDNA is released into the cytoplasm, ultimately triggering inflammasome activation. All results were reversed by the mutation in the METTL4 methyltransferase active site. Mettl4MUT-Apoe-/- mice showed suppressed mtDNA 6mA levels and atherosclerotic progression, and repaired mitochondrial function of macrophage, which were reversed by METTL4 restoration via bone marrow transplantation (n = 6). Pemetrexed (PEM) was identified as the first METTL4 antagonist to effectively alleviate atherosclerotic progression. Furthermore, we generated a proteolysis-targeting chimera drug based on PEM (PROTAC-PEM) that specifically targeting METTL4 in macrophages within plaques, showing a promising therapeutic effect on atherosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a novel mechanism by which mtDNA 6mA orchestrated mitochondrial function-related gene expression in macrophages, thereby promoting atherosclerosis. Through various experimental techniques, such as gene manipulation, pharmacological inhibition and PROTAC, this study demonstrated that mtDNA 6mA and its specific enzyme METTL4 hold potential as therapeutic targets for atherosclerosis.