Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing) assess genome-wide chromatin accessibility of Runx2fl/fl Mouse Molar Transcriptomes

ABSTRACT: Purpose: To study the function of Runx2 on mouse tooth root development. The goals of this study are to assess genome-wide chromatin accessibility of Runx2fl/fl Mouse Molar Transcriptomes to identify the potential downstream target of Runx2. Methods: the apical halves of lower 1st molars of PN7.5 control mice were lysed to get a single cell suspension. 50000 cells 50,000 cells were lysed, and followed by transposition reaction and purification, and PCR amplification. The library construction and sequencing were performed by NextSeq 500 platform.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE151563 | GEO | 2020/08/31

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

IGF1 treatment of developing mouse molar

Project description:When evolution leads to differences in body size, organs generally scale along. A well-known example of the tight relationship between organ and body size is the scaling of mammalian molar teeth. To investigate how teeth scale during development and evolution, we compared mouse and rat molar development from initiation through final size. Whereas the linear dimensions of the rat first lower molar are twice that of the mouse molar, their shapes are largely the same. We found that scaling of the molars starts early, and that the rat molar is patterned equally as fast but in a larger size than the mouse molar. Using transcriptomics, we discovered that a known regulator of body size, insulin-like growth factor 1 (Igf1), is more highly expressed in the rat molars compared to the mouse molars. Ex vivo and in vivo mouse models demonstrated that modulation of the IGF pathway reproduces several aspects of the observed scaling process. Furthermore, analysis of IGF1-treated mouse molars and computational modeling indicate that IGF signalling scales teeth by simultaneously inhibiting the cusp patterning programme and by enhancing growth, thereby providing a relatively simple mechanism for scaling teeth during development and evolution. Finally, comparative data from shrews to elephants suggest that this scaling of patterning mechanism regulates the minimum tooth size possible, as well as the patterning potential of large teeth.

2022-11-19 | GSE218338 | GEO

Expression data from additional molar germs at stages of early development in miniature pigs

Project description:We identified the spatiotemporal pattern of cascade initiation of additional molars in miniature pig,where second molar (M2) initiated from the posterior-free end of the dental lamina over the first molar (M1) at E60 when M1 progressed to the late bell stage. Similarly, third molar (M3) budded off from the posterior-free end of the dental lamina over M2, which reached bell stage at PN20. However, the molecular mechanisms of the regulatory network during sequential formation of additional molars remain poorly characterized in diphyodont mammals. We performed microarrays on miniature pigs at three molar developmental stages to examine their differential gene expression profiles and potential regulatory networks during additional molar morphogenesis.

2017-01-24 | GSE77006 | GEO

RNA-Sequencing for Additional Molar Germs Transcriptomes at Stages of Early Development in Miniature Pigs

Project description:The molecular mechanisms of the regulatory network of mRNAs and long non-coding RNAs during sequential formation of additional molars remain poorly characterized in diphyodont mammals. The diphyodont miniature pig has proved to be a valuable model for studying human molar morphogenesis. Here, we performed RNA-seq on miniature pigs at three molar developmental stages to examine their differential gene expression profiles and potential regulatory networks during additional molar morphogenesis. Many new unannotated genes plus putative long non-coding RNAs were identified. Our data provide fundamental knowledge and a basis for understanding the molecular mechanisms governing cascade initiation of additional molars.

2017-01-24 | GSE79507 | GEO

Next Generation Sequencing Facilitates Quantitative Analysis of Runx2fl/fl and Gli1-CreERT2;Runx2fl/fl Mouse Molar Transcriptomes

Project description:Purpose: To study the function of Runx2 on mouse tooth root development. The goals of this study are to compare NGS-derived molar transcriptome profiling (RNA-seq) bwtween Runx2fl/fl and Gli1-CreERT2;Runx2fl/fl mice to identify the potential downstream target of Runx2. Methods: molar mRNA profiles from PN7.5 Runx2fl/fl and Gli1-CreERT2;Runx2fl/fl mice (induction at PN3.5) were generated by deep sequencing, using Novaseq. Results: Using an optimized data analysis workflow, we mapped about 68 million sequence reads per sample to the mouse genome ( mm10) and identified 80,214 transcripts with Partek E/M workflow. 427 differentially regulated genes were identified (＞1.8-fold, p＜0.05), of which 219 were upregulated and 208 were downregulated.

2020-08-31 | GSE151562 | GEO

Single cell transcriptional profiling of mouse molar and incisor tooth assembloids

Project description:Throughout the various stages of tooth development, reciprocal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are the driving force, for instance crucially involved in the differentiation of mature enamel-forming ameloblasts and dentin-producing odontoblasts. Here we established mouse tooth ‘assembloids’, comprised of tooth organoid-derived dental epithelial cells (from mouse molars and incisors) cultured together with molar dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), to mimic these developmental interactions. Assembloids from both tooth types were grown both in basal- and differentiation-inducing conditions. Single cell transcriptomics analysis was applied to in detail characterize and validate the newly developed mouse tooth assembloid model and evaluate the induced differentiation processes.

2023-04-19 | E-MTAB-12544 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Molar and incisor development

Project description:One of the key questions in developmental biology is how from universally shared molecular mechanisms and pathways, is it possible to generate organs displaying similar or complementary functions, with a wide range of different shapes or tissue organization? The dentition represents a valuable system to address the issues of differential molecular signatures generating specific tooth types. We performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis of developing murine lower incisors, mandibular molars and maxillary molars at the developmental cap stage (E14.5) prior to recognizable tooth shape and cusp pattern. We compared gene expression profiles in developing murine lower incisor and molars, as well as between the lower and upper (mandibular and maxillary) first molars

2013-03-31 | E-GEOD-43144 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Keystone genes for tooth development [Vole RNA-Seq]

Project description:The expression levels of developing vole molar and jaw transcriptome were measured. each of first molars at embryonic days 13-16 (E13, E14, E15, E16), second molars at E16, and jaw tissues at E14.

2024-11-07 | GSE250184 | GEO

ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing) assess genome-wide chromatin accessibility of Runx2fl/fl Mouse Molar Transcriptomes

Project description:ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing) assess genome-wide chromatin accessibility of Runx2fl/fl Mouse Molar Transcriptomes

| PRJNA636372 | ENA

Molar and incisor development

2013-03-31 | GSE43144 | GEO

Comparative study of gene expression in lower and upper first molar cap stage tooth germs of DUHi and FVB mice

Project description:The dataset aims at comparing gene expression in the developing lower and upper first molars of two mouse strains: DUHi and FVB. We studied molar tooth germ an early cap stage, looking for differences in activation-inhibition mechanisms that promote tooth formation. 19202 genes are in common between FVB and reference strain C57B6 and have a MGI annotation. Out of these genes, 2234 genes (11.6%) presented a significant difference of expression between the mapping on the reference strain C57B6 and the mapping on FVB strain (DESeq2, adjusted P value < 0.05, considering the mapping effect that is with 12 replicates). This is presumably a mapping artifact, due to the sequence divergence between mouse strains. These genes were removed, and the remaining 16,968 genes were retained for further analysis. 3619 genes were found to be differentially expressed between the two strains in the lower and upper molar (jaw+strain)

2020-03-27 | GSE135432 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data