IL-4 signals interfere with regulatory T cell polarization in vitro by controlling their genome-wide chromatin accessibility
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
PROVIDER: GSE152810 | GEO | 2021/05/12
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:IL-4 signals interfere with regulatory T cell polarization in vitro by controlling their genome-wide chromatin accessibility
| PRJNA640530 | ENA
Project description:The experiments were done using an Orbitrap Fusion or an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer. Multiplexing was achieved using either TMT10 or TMT11 reagents and the SPS-MS3 method. Basic pH reversed-phase chromatography (bRPLC) was used for off-line pre-fractionation; 12 fractions were analyzed for proteome mappings (PMID: 26700037) and 24 fractions plus a phosphotyrosine-enriched sample for phosphoproteome mappings (PMID: 31606085). Phosphoproteome mappings were done using both HCD fragmentation with Orbitrap fragment ion detection and CID fragmentation with ion trap fragment ion detection (PMID: 29487189, PMID: 31606085). If multiple TMT sets were required to analyze all samples from an experiment two bridge channels pooled from all samples was used to connect the data from the individual TMT sets (PMID: 28892078).
Five proteomics experiments are described in the paper:
(i) 1. Quantitative proteomics of fully polarized macrophages after 4 days of treatment with IL4 or IFNgamma/LPS to determine global proteome landscape of fully polarized THP-1-derived M1-type versus M2a-type macrophages:
Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (one TMT set)
RAW files: Marneros_4DayTreatment_proteome_fraction01 to ...fraction12
8 samples
Labeling: PMA.1 (126), PMA.2 (127n), IL4.1 (127c), IL4.2 (128n), ILJQ1.1 (128c), ILJQ1.2 (129n), IFNgamma.1 (129c), IFNgamma.2 (130n)
(ii) Time-course quantitative proteomics during the first 24 hours after induction of macrophage polarization in THP-1-derived macrophages to identify protein changes associated with M1-type (IFNgamma/LPS-induced) versus M2a-type (IL-4-induced) polarization:
Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (three TMT sets: set01, set02, set03)
RAW files:
Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset01_fraction01 to ...fraction12
Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset02_fraction01 to ...fraction12
Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset03_fraction01 to ...fraction12
22 samples
Labeling:
set01; bridge 1 (126), PMA 0min (127n), PMA 10min (127c), PMA 30min (128n), PMA 1h (128c), PMA 2h (129n), PMA 4h (129c), PMA 8h (130n), PMA 24h (130c), bridge 2 (131n)
set02; bridge 1 (126), IL4 10min (127n), IL4 30min (127c), IL4 1h (128n), IL4 2h (128c), IL4 4h (129n), IL4 8h (129c), IL4 24h (130n), IFN 10min (130c), bridge 2 (131n)
set03; bridge 1 (126), IFN 30min (127n), IFN 1h (127c), IFN 2h (128n), IFN 4h (128c), IFN 8h (129n), IFN 24h (129c), bridge 2 (131n)
(iii) Time-course quantitative phosphoproteomics during the first 24 hours after induction of macrophage polarization in THP-1-derived macrophages to identify phosphorylation events associated with M1-type (IFNgamma/LPS-induced) versus M2a-type (IL-4-induced) polarization (same time points as in group 2):
Phosphoproteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (three TMT sets: set01, set02, set03)
RAW files:
Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset01_fraction01 to ...fraction06, ...fraction08 to ...fraction24, ...pY
Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset02_fraction01 to ...fraction12, ...fraction16 to ...fraction24, ...pY
Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset03_fraction01 to ...fraction24, ...pY
The following RAW files gave no phosphopeptide quantifications (they are no included in the group of provided RAW files): set01_fraction07, set02_fraction13, set02_fraction14, set02_fraction15.
22 samples
Labeling: as in (ii)
(iv) Quantitative proteomics to assess the effects of the B-Raf inhibitor GDC-0879 or of the MEK inhibitor trametinib on IL-4-induced M2-type polarization and IFNgamma/LPS-induced M1-type polarization on THP-1-derived macrophages after 24 hours of treatment:
Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (one TMT set)
RAW files: Marneros_BRAF_inhibitor_proteine_fraction01 to ...fraction12
11 samples
Labeling: IL4 1 (131c), IL4 2 (127n), IL4+GDC 1 (131n), IL4+GDC 2 (128n), IL4+TRAM 1 (130c), IL4+TRAM 2 (129n), IFNgamma+LPS 1 (130n), IFNgamma+LPS 2 (127c), IFNgamma+LPS+TRAM 1 (126), IFNgamma+LPS+TRAM 2(129c), IFNgamma+LPS+GDC (128c)
(v) Quantitative phosphoproteomics to assess the effects of the B-Raf inhibitor GDC-0879 on IL-4-induced M2-type polarization and IFNgamma/LPS-induced M1-type polarization on THP-1-derived macrophages after 24 hours of treatment:
Phosphoproteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (one TMT set)
RAW files: Marneros_BRAF_inhibitor_phospho_fraction01 to ...fraction24, ...pY
7 samples
Labeling: IL4 1 (131c), IL4 2 (127n), IL4+GDC 1 (130n), IL4+GDC 2 (128n), IFNgamma+LPS 1 (128c), IFNgamma+LPS 2 (127c), IFNgamma+LPS+GDC (130c)
2019-12-10 | MSV000084672 | MassIVE
Project description:Macrophages polarize towards different subpopulations with distinct and partly antagonistic functions in various diseases. IFNγ/LPS-polarized M1-type macrophages can have antiangiogenic activity, whereas IL-4-induced M2-type macrophages can be proangiogenic and profibrotic. Therapeutic strategies to inhibit M2-type polarization while promoting M1-type polarization could serve to inhibit pathological angiogenesis and fibrosis. Here, by combining global quantitative time-course proteomics and phosphoproteomics with a small-molecule inhibitor screen we identify signaling events that promote specifically IL-4-induced and not IFNγ/LPS-induced macrophage polarization and found that the MEK inhibitor trametinib and the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat potently prevent M2-type macrophage polarization without inhibiting M1-type polarization. In contrast, selective B-Raf inhibition promotes M2-type polarization. Trametinib and panobinostat also blocked M2-type macrophage polarization and concomitantly angiogenesis and fibrosis in models of wound healing and neovascular age-related macular degeneration in vivo. Thus, these pharmacologic inhibitors could be utilized therapeutically to selectively block IL4-induced macrophage polarization and reduce pathologic angiogenesis and fibrosis.
2021-10-01 | GSE140235 | GEO
Project description:Macrophages polarize towards different subpopulations with distinct and partly antagonistic functions in various diseases. IFNγ/LPS-polarized M1-type macrophages can have antiangiogenic activity, whereas IL-4-induced M2-type macrophages can be proangiogenic and profibrotic. Therapeutic strategies to inhibit M2-type polarization while promoting M1-type polarization could serve to inhibit pathological angiogenesis and fibrosis. Here, by combining global quantitative time-course proteomics and phosphoproteomics with a small-molecule inhibitor screen we identify signaling events that promote specifically IL-4-induced and not IFNγ/LPS-induced macrophage polarization and found that the MEK inhibitor trametinib and the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat potently prevent M2-type macrophage polarization without inhibiting M1-type polarization. In contrast, selective B-Raf inhibition promotes M2-type polarization. Trametinib and panobinostat also blocked M2-type macrophage polarization and concomitantly angiogenesis and fibrosis in models of wound healing and neovascular age-related macular degeneration in vivo. Thus, these pharmacologic inhibitors could be utilized therapeutically to selectively block IL4-induced macrophage polarization and reduce pathologic angiogenesis and fibrosis.
2021-10-16 | GSE154345 | GEO
Project description:Macrophages polarize towards different subpopulations with distinct and partly antagonistic functions in various diseases. IFNγ/LPS-polarized M1-type macrophages can have antiangiogenic activity, whereas IL-4-induced M2-type macrophages can be proangiogenic and profibrotic. Therapeutic strategies to inhibit M2-type polarization while promoting M1-type polarization could serve to inhibit pathological angiogenesis and fibrosis. Here, by combining global quantitative time-course proteomics and phosphoproteomics with a small-molecule inhibitor screen we identify signaling events that promote specifically IL-4-induced and not IFNγ/LPS-induced macrophage polarization and found that the MEK inhibitor trametinib and the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat potently prevent M2-type macrophage polarization without inhibiting M1-type polarization. In contrast, selective B-Raf inhibition promotes M2-type polarization. Trametinib and panobinostat also blocked M2-type macrophage polarization and concomitantly angiogenesis and fibrosis in models of wound healing and neovascular age-related macular degeneration in vivo. Thus, these pharmacologic inhibitors could be utilized therapeutically to selectively block IL4-induced macrophage polarization and reduce pathologic angiogenesis and fibrosis.
2021-10-16 | GSE154342 | GEO
Project description:Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) localizes to focal adhesions and is overexpressed in many cancers. FAK can also translocate to the nucleus, where it binds to, and regulates, several transcription factors, including MBD2, p53 and IL-33, to control gene expression by unknown mechanisms. We have used ATAC-seq to reveal that FAK controls chromatin accessibility at a subset of regulated genes. Integration of ATAC-seq and RNA-seq data showed that FAK-dependent chromatin accessibility is linked to differential gene expression, including of the FAK-regulated cytokine and transcriptional regulator interleukin-33 (Il33), which controls anti-tumor immunity. Analysis of the accessibility peaks on the Il33 gene promoter/enhancer regions revealed sequences for several transcription factors, including ETS and AP-1 motifs, and we show that c-Jun, a component of AP-1, regulates Il33 gene expression by binding to its enhancer in a FAK kinase-dependent manner. This work provides the first demonstration that FAK controls transcription via chromatin accessibility, identifying a novel mechanism by which nuclear FAK regulates biologically important gene expression.
| S-EPMC7794255 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Macrophages polarize towards different subpopulations with distinct and partly antagonistic functions in various diseases. IFNγ/LPS-polarized M1-type macrophages can have antiangiogenic activity, whereas IL-4-induced M2-type macrophages can be proangiogenic and profibrotic. Therapeutic strategies to inhibit M2-type polarization while promoting M1-type polarization could serve to inhibit pathological angiogenesis and fibrosis. Here, by combining global quantitative time-course proteomics and phosphoproteomics with a small-molecule inhibitor screen we identify signaling events that promote specifically IL-4-induced and not IFNγ/LPS-induced macrophage polarization and found that the MEK inhibitor trametinib and the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat potently prevent M2-type macrophage polarization without inhibiting M1-type polarization. In contrast, selective B-Raf inhibition promotes M2-type polarization. Trametinib and panobinostat also blocked M2-type macrophage polarization and concomitantly angiogenesis and fibrosis in models of wound healing and neovascular age-related macular degeneration in vivo. Thus, these pharmacologic inhibitors could be utilized therapeutically to selectively block IL4-induced macrophage polarization and reduce pathologic angiogenesis and fibrosis.
2021-10-16 | GSE154346 | GEO
Project description:Macrophages polarize towards different subpopulations with distinct and partly antagonistic functions in various diseases. IFNγ/LPS-polarized M1-type macrophages can have antiangiogenic activity, whereas IL-4-induced M2-type macrophages can be proangiogenic and profibrotic. Therapeutic strategies to inhibit M2-type polarization while promoting M1-type polarization could serve to inhibit pathological angiogenesis and fibrosis. Here, by combining global quantitative time-course proteomics and phosphoproteomics with a small-molecule inhibitor screen we identify signaling events that promote specifically IL-4-induced and not IFNγ/LPS-induced macrophage polarization and found that the MEK inhibitor trametinib and the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat potently prevent M2-type macrophage polarization without inhibiting M1-type polarization. In contrast, selective B-Raf inhibition promotes M2-type polarization. Trametinib and panobinostat also blocked M2-type macrophage polarization and concomitantly angiogenesis and fibrosis in models of wound healing and neovascular age-related macular degeneration in vivo. Thus, these pharmacologic inhibitors could be utilized therapeutically to selectively block IL4-induced macrophage polarization and reduce pathologic angiogenesis and fibrosis.
2021-10-16 | GSE154343 | GEO
Project description:IL-10 production by Th17 cells is critical for limiting autoimmunity and inflammatory responses. Gene array analysis on Stat6 and T-bet double deficient Th17 cells identified the Th2 transcription factor c-Maf to be synergistically up-regulated by IL-6 plus TGFbeta, and associated with Th17 IL-10 production. Both c-Maf and IL-10 induction during Th17 polarization depended on Stat3, but not Stat6 or Stat1, and mechanistically differed from IL-10 regulation by Th2 or IL-27 signals. TGFbeta was also synergistic with IL-27 to induce c-Maf, and induced Stat1 independent IL-10 expression in contrast to IL-27 alone. Retroviral transduction of c-Maf was able to induce IL-10 expression in Stat6 deficient CD4 and CD8 T cells, and c-Maf directly transactivated IL-10 gene expression through binding to a MARE motif in the IL-10 promoter. Together, these data reveal a novel role for c-Maf in regulating T effector development, and suggest that TGFbeta may antagonize Th17 immunity by IL-10 production through c-Maf induction. Our recent studies showed that IL-6 combined with TGFbeta differed from IL-6 combined with IL-23 for IL-10 production and pathogenic activities in CD4 T cells deficient in Stat6 and T-bet, despite similar IL-17 production. We performed gene array analysis on Stat6 and T-bet double deficient cells. We rationalized that by comparing gene expression in cells treated with IL-6 plus TGFbeta versus TGFbeta alone, we would be able to identify genes specific for standard Th17 polarization, and responsible for both IL-17 and IL-10 expression. By next comparing gene expression in cells treated with IL-6 plus TGFbeta versus IL-6 plus IL-23, we could eliminate molecules involved solely in IL-17 regulation, and obtain genes specifically responsible for IL-10 regulation.
2009-03-03 | E-GEOD-15029 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In vitro polarization of primary human blood derived macrophages
| PRJNA660405 | ENA