Dataset Information

Apigenin as a Candidate Prenatal Treatment for Trisomy 21: Effects in Human Amniocytes and the Ts1Cje Mouse Model [Mouse]

ABSTRACT: Down syndrome (DS), a genetic condition leading to intellectual disability, is characterized by triplication of human chromosome 21. Neuropathological hallmarks of DS include abnormal central nervous system development that manifests during gestation and extends throughout life. As a result, newborns and adults with DS exhibit cognitive and motor deficits and fail to meet typical developmental and lack independent life skills. In the last two decades, a number of preclinical treatment studies showed beneficial effects in the Ts65Dn mouse model. As of summer 2020, 13 pharmacological interventions have been tested with little evidence of success in humans with DS. Potential reasons for this failure may be related to the fact that these therapeutic interventions were carried out too late, and not during the prenatal and early postnatal critical periods for brain development. To date, no prenatal treatment studies have been reported in pregnant women carrying fetuses with T21. A limited number of prenatal treatment studies using fluoxetine, maternal choline supplementation and the neuroprotective peptides NAP and SAL have been described using the Ts65Dn mouse model of DS. In our previous studies, we integrated gene expression data from nine different cellular and tissue sources in both humans with DS and mouse models to identify common dysregulated signaling pathways and cellular processes. We demonstrated that pathway abnormalities associated with DS were the result of gene-dosage specific effects and the consequence of a global stress response with activation of compensatory mechanisms. To counteract these genome-wide abnormalities, we used the Connectivity Map database (www.broadinstitute.org/CMap) to discover molecules that could be repurposed to rescue the transcriptome and promote more typical brain development in individuals with DS. One of the molecules that had the most consistent negative scores (hence, negating the dysregulated gene expression signatures in DS) across tissues and species was apigenin (4’, 5, 7-trihydroxyflavone). Here, we hypothesized that prenatal treatment with apigenin would partly rescue the global gene expression dysregulation to improve neurogenesis and postnatal cognitive outcomes in DS. In the current study, we used a human in vitro cell model (amniocytes derived from live fetuses with Trisomy 21 and euploid fetuses) and the Ts1Cje mouse model of DS to evaluate the effects of apigenin as a potential therpay for prenatal brain defects and postnatal cognitive outcome in DS. We demonstrated that apigenin is a safe treatment that can rescue oxidative stress and total antioxidant capacity imbalance in human amniocytes from fetuses with T21. It also improved several postnatal behavioral deficits in the Ts1Cje mouse model. We also showed that apigenin achieves its therapeutic action by triggering the expression of neurogenic genes, suppressing inflammation via inhibiting NFκB and by reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, while promoting the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, angiogenic and neurotrophic factors.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE158376 | GEO | 2020/09/23

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:Down syndrome (DS), a genetic condition leading to intellectual disability, is characterized by triplication of human chromosome 21. Neuropathological hallmarks of DS include abnormal central nervous system development that manifests during gestation and extends throughout life. As a result, newborns and adults with DS exhibit cognitive and motor deficits and fail to meet typical developmental and lack independent life skills. As of summer 2020, 13 pharmacological interventions have been tested with little evidence of success in improving cognition in humans with DS. Potential reasons for this failure may be related to the fact that these therapeutic interventions were carried out too late, and not during the prenatal and early postnatal critical periods for brain development. To date, no prenatal treatment studies have been reported in pregnant women carrying fetuses with T21. A limited number of prenatal treatment studies using fluoxetine, maternal choline supplementation and the neuroprotective peptides NAP and SAL have been described using the Ts65Dn mouse model of DS. In our previous studies, we integrated gene expression data from nine different cellular and tissue sources in both humans with DS and mouse models to identify common dysregulated signaling pathways and cellular processes. We demonstrated that pathway abnormalities associated with DS were the result of gene-dosage specific effects and the consequence of a global stress response with activation of compensatory mechanisms. To counteract these genome-wide abnormalities, we used the Connectivity Map database (www.broadinstitute.org/CMap) to discover molecules that could be repurposed to rescue the transcriptome and promote more typical brain development in individuals with DS. One of the molecules that had the most consistent negative scores (hence, negating the dysregulated gene expression signatures in DS) across tissues and species was apigenin (4’, 5, 7-trihydroxyflavone). Here, we hypothesized that prenatal treatment with apigenin would partly rescue the global gene expression dysregulation to improve neurogenesis and postnatal cognitive outcomes in DS. In the current study, we used a human in vitro cell model (amniocytes derived from live fetuses with Trisomy 21 and euploid fetuses) and the Ts1Cje mouse model of DS to evaluate the effects of apigenin as a potential therpay for prenatal brain defects and postnatal cognitive outcome in DS. We demonstrated that apigenin is a safe treatment that can rescue oxidative stress and total antioxidant capacity imbalance in human amniocytes from fetuses with T21. It also improved several postnatal behavioral deficits in the Ts1Cje mouse model. We also showed that apigenin achieves its therapeutic action by triggering the expression of neurogenic genes, suppressing inflammation via inhibiting NFκB and by reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, while promoting the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, angiogenic and neurotrophic factors.

Project description:Down syndrome (DS), a genetic condition leading to intellectual disability, is characterized by triplication of human chromosome 21. Neuropathological hallmarks of DS include abnormal central nervous system development that manifests during gestation and extends throughout life. As a result, newborns and adults with DS exhibit cognitive and motor deficits and fail to meet typical developmental and lack independent life skills. A critical outstanding question is how DS-specific prenatal and postnatal phenotypes are recapitulated in different mouse models. To begin answering this question, we developed a life span approach to directly compare differences in embryonic brain development, cellularity, gene expression, neonatal and adult behavior behavior in three cytogenetically distinct mouse models of DS—Ts1Cje, Ts65Dn and Dp16/1Yey (Dp16). In the last two decades multiple therapeutic trials have been attempted to improve cognition in humans with DS but the results of these interventions lacked efficacy despide their succes in the Ts65Dn mouse model of DS. To better understand how phenotypic changes in humans in DS are recapitulated in different mouse models, we copared embryonic brain development and gene expression, perinatal behavior and brain excitatoty/inhibitory cell distribution, and adult behavior and gene expression in the Dp16, Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje mouse models of DS. The objectives of this study were to determine the best model(s) for prenatal and postnatal therapeutic trials and to identify treatment endpoints that can be used to evaluate the fficacy of these therapies prior to human clinical trials. Our data showed that, at embryonic day 15.5, Ts65Dn mice are the most profoundly and consistently affected with respect to somatic growth, brain morphogenesis, and neurogenesis compared to Ts1Cje and Dp16 embryos. However, gene expression results show that both Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje embryonic forebrains have a relatively high number of differentially expressed genes compared to Dp16, with little overlap in gene identities and genomic distribution observed among these models. Additionally, postnatal histological analyses show varying degrees of cell population and brain histogenesis abnormalities among the three strains. Behavioral testing also highlights differences among the models in their ability to meet various developmental milestones. At adulthood, Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje showed hyperactive behavior in the open field test but not Dp16 mice. In the fear conditioning test, all three strains showed lower freezing versus eupploid mice; Dp16 were the most severely affected. In the Morris water maze, Ts65Dn showed significant delays in the hidden platform, probe and reversal trials. Dp16 mice showed milder deficits in the hidden platform trial but severe deficits in reversal. Ts1Cje mice had no spatial memory deficits. In the rotarod test, Dp16 performed poorly in fixed and accelerating speed trials, while Ts1Cje was only abnormal at high speeds. Ts65Dn rotarod performance was unaffected. Compared to euploid, Ts65Dn had a higher number of differentially expressed (DEX) genes in cortex and cerebellum, while Ts1Cje had more DEX genes in hippocampus and cerebellum. Dp16 had the lowest number of DEX genes in all regions analyzed. Pathway analyses highlighted commonly dysregulated pathways, including G-protein signaling, oxidative stress, interferon signaling, glycosylation and disulfide bonds.

Dataset Information

Apigenin as a Candidate Prenatal Treatment for Trisomy 21: Effects in Human Amniocytes and the Ts1Cje Mouse Model [Mouse]

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets