Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Differential gene expression in high and low sulfide-producing yeast strains during wine fermentation

ABSTRACT: Comparison between two commercial wine yeast strains (UCD522 and P29) differing in their production of H2S during wine fermentation.

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae

PROVIDER: GSE16215 | GEO | 2009/12/03

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA117155

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Differential gene expression in high and low sulfide-producing yeast strains during wine fermentation

Project description:Comparison between two commercial wine yeast strains (UCD522 and P29) differing in their production of H2S during wine fermentation. Due to the characteristics of the strains (commercial, non-standard wine strains), the experiment was duplicated using two completely different platforms and techniques (cDNA-based and in situ synthesized oligonucleotide-based). UCD522 and P29 wine microfermentations were performed in parallel and yeast samples were taken at the stage of fastest fermentation rate. Two biological replicates per yeast strain.

2010-05-18 | E-GEOD-16215 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Transcriptomic profiling of wine yeast strains during colombar fermentation

2009-05-01 | GSE13695 | GEO

Wine yeast EC1118 and CSM comparative transcriptomics during synthetic grape juice fermentation MS300 at day 6

2011-10-26 | GSE33068 | GEO

Transcription profiling of wine yeast strains during colombar fermentation

Project description:Comparative gene expression analysis of two wine yeast strains at three time points (days 2, 5 and 14) during fermentation of colombar must. In our study we conducted parallel fermentations with the VIN13 and BM45 wine yeast strains in two different media, namely MS300 (syntheticmust) and Colombar must. The intersection of transcriptome datasets from both MS300 (simulated wine must;GSE11651) and Colombar fermentations should help to delineate relevant and ânoisyâ changes in gene expression in response to experimental factors such as fermentation stage and strain identity. Experiment Overall Design: Two industrial wine yeast strains (BM45 and VIN13) grown micro-aerobically in Colombar must. Microarray analysis was performed at three time points during fermentation (days 2, 5 and 14), representing the exponential, early and late stationary growth phases respectively.

2009-05-14 | E-GEOD-13695 | biostudies-arrayexpress

A combined genetic and genomic approach uncovers molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits

Project description:Industrial wine yeast strains possess specific abilities to ferment under stressing conditions and give a suitable aromatic outcome. Although the fermentations properties of Saccharomyces cervisiae wine yeasts are well documented little is known on the genetic basis underlying the fermentation traits. Besides, although strain differences in gene expression has been reported, their relationships with gene expression variations and fermentation phenotypic variations is unknown. To both identify the genetic basis of fermentation traits and get insight on their relationships with gene expression variations, we combined fermentation traits QTL mapping and expression profiling in a segregating population from a cross between a wine yeast derivative and a laboratory strain.

2011-01-19 | GSE26437 | GEO

Global phenotypic and genomic comparison of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains

Project description:The aim of this study is to phenotype a collection of 27 S. cerevisiae commercial wine strains growing within temperatures (4-45ºC) in both minimal media (SD) and synthetic must (SM) and, taking into account µmax value, to select two strains with divergent phenotype in their capacity to grow at low temperature. To confirm this differential phenotype, we design a competition between both strains during wine fermentations. As expected, at low temperature fermentation, the strain showing a good performance out-competes to the strain growing badly in cold. Finally we aimed to decipher the molecular basis underlying this divergent phenotype by analyzing the genomic, proteomic and transcriptomic differences between both strains at low temperature (15ºC) and optimum temperature (28ºC).

2015-03-31 | GSE60140 | GEO

Wine yeast EC1118 and CSM comparative transcriptomics during synthetic grape juice fermentation MS300 at day 6

Project description:CSM is a commercial wine yeast with a long chronological life span, while commercial strain EC1118 displays a short life span in laboratory synthetic complete medium SC. Our aim is compare their expression profile on a high sugar fermentation From a preculture of two days in YPD, MS300 was innoculated at 10exp6 cells/mL in filled-in 50 mL conical centrifuge tubes and they were cultivated at 24ºC with mild shaking for 6 days.

2011-10-25 | E-GEOD-33068 | biostudies-arrayexpress

eQTL linkages in wine yeasts to decipher regulatory networks in wine fermentation

Project description:We performed here the transcriptomic profile of 44 segregants from a cross between S288c and 59A (a spore of EC1118 strain). The analysis was performed in wine fermentation condition in stationary phase during nitrogen starvation and in alcoholic stress. These data, associated with an individual genotyping by Affymetrix array allow us to highlight genetic variations involved in perturbation of regulatory network and fermentative behavior.

2013-10-21 | GSE41025 | GEO

Transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans in mixed-culture wine fermentation

Project description:In wine fermentation, the blending of non-Saccharomyces yeast with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve the complexity of wine has become common practice, but data regarding the impact on yeast physiology and on genetic and metabolic regulation remain limited. Here we describe a transcriptomic analysis of single species and mixed species fermentations.

2019-02-01 | GSE112581 | GEO

The response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to stress throughout a 15-day wine fermentation

Project description:We used genome-wide expression analyses to study the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to stress throughout a 15-day wine fermentation. Forty percent of the yeast genome significantly changed expression levels to mediate long-term adaptation to an environment in which ethanol is both a stressor and a carbon source. Within this set, we identify a group of 223 genes, designated as the Fermentation Stress Response (FSR), that are dramatically and permanently induced; FSR genes exhibited changes ranging from four-to eighty-fold. The FSR is novel; 62% of the genes involved have not been implicated in global stress responses and 28% of the genes have no functional annotation. Genes involved in respiratory metabolism and gluconeogenesis were expressed during fermentation despite the presence of high concentrations of glucose. Ethanol, rather than nutrient depletion, was responsible for entry of yeast cells into stationary phase. Ethanol seems to regulate yeast metabolism through hitherto undiscovered regulatory networks during wine fermentation. Keywords: time course, stress response, fermentation

2008-04-17 | GSE8536 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data