Drosophila life cycle
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster
PROVIDER: GSE1761 | GEO | 2004/11/04
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA90519
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Rice is one of important crop and, the genome has been already completely sequenced. Moreover we collected more than 30K rice FL-cDNA clones as transcriptome resources. However, the cDNA collection did not reveal the transcription activity and specificity of expression. So, we designed 60-mer oligo array based on the array system of Agilent Technologies (GPL477) as custom array. For validation of the array, we tested the reproducibility of labeling and hybridization. After this validation, 22K rice oligo array was supplied from Agilent Technologies (GPL892). 1: reproducibility of labeling: mRNA of shoot sample was amplified and labeled more than 10 times with Cy3 and Cy5, and both Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cRNA was hybridized on a slide (self-hybridization), and validate the reproducibility of labeling. In addition, we also amplified and labeled mRNA of other samples with Cy3 and Cy5, and made a self-hybridization. The intensity data of these array was also indicated transcription activity of genes in these samples. Keywords: variety among tissues
2008-04-01 | GSE7530 | GEO
Project description:HEK293T cells were either mock or miR-124 transfected. Cells were lysed 12 hours after transfection with Trizol reagent. RNA was isolated, amplified, labeled (cy5), and comparatively hybridized with a universal reference (cy3) on HEEBO arrays in biological triplicate. In addition, each biological replicate was measured twice (#2's). Data from the technical replicates was averaged before analysis. SS=steady state Compound Based Treatment: miR-124
2009-11-10 | GSE18835 | GEO
Project description:The salamander microRNA expression between mid-bud limb regenerating blastemas (17 days post amputation) and non-regenerating stump tissues was compared by microarray analysis. LC Sciences arrays: Six paired samples were analyzed: three mid-bud 17dpa blastemas (bl), and three non-regenerating stumps (st). Three arrays were hybridized comparing two paired samples each time. Biological dye-swaps were made by labeling bl samples once with Cy3 and twice with Cy5; st samples were labeled accordingly twice with Cy5 and once with Cy3. Multiple arrays averaged into a single Sample record. Supplementary files: GSE29727_LC_MultiArray_SimpleNormalizedData.txt.gz GSE29727_LC_signal_ratio_mean_SD.txt.gz GSE29727_LC_t-Test_st-vs-bl.txt.gz Exiqon arrays: Six paired samples were analyzed: three mid-bud 17dpa blastemas (bl), and three non-regenerating stumps (st). Six arrays were hybridized comparing each sample labeled with Hy3 against a common reference sample made by pooling all the samples and labeling it with Hy5. Multiple arrays not averaged, represented as multiple Sample records. Supplementary file: GSE29727_Exiqon_matrix_complete.txt
2012-11-06 | E-GEOD-29727 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Expression of the sense-antisense transcripts (SATs). Methods: The sequences of 60mer DNA specific to the sense and antisense genes were chosen by K.K. DNAFORM (Japan), and Agilent Technologies manufactured custom oligo DNA microarray chips by using this information. RNA was labeled and hybridized using Fluorescent Direct Label Kits (oligo dT-primed labeling) (Agilent Technologies), according to the manufacturer's protocols. For labeling with random nanomers, we used the CyScribe First-Strand cDNA Labeling Kit (Amersham). The RNA samples used for microarray experiments were from mouse ES cells, SL10 cells (fibroblast cell line), brain, heart, and testis. The total RNA of brain, heart, and testis for array experiments was purchased from Ambion. The total RNA of ES and fibroblast cells was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). The same total RNA samples were reciprocally labeled with Cy3 or Cy5, hybridized to the oligo DNA on the chip, and dye-normalized, and processed signals were obtained using Feature Extraction software (Agilent Technologies). Keywords: parallel sample
2005-03-31 | GSE2185 | GEO
Project description:Biochemical purification: Five grams of adult flies or 2.5 g of embryos were used in each affinity purification. Flies or embryos were suspended in 15 ml of buffer B (buffer A plus 1.5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride [PMSF], 0.5 5g/ml leupeptin, 0.8 5g/ml pepstatin, 20 U/ml DNase I, 100 U/ml RNasin [Promega], and 0.2 mg/ml heparin) in a mortar filled with liquid nitrogen and ground with a pestle to a fine powder. The powder was transferred to a glass-dounce, thawed and dounced until the pestle reached the bottom. The suspension was centrifuged twice at 40C and 10,000 g for 10 min. The fat layer on top was aspirated off after each centrifugation. Cleared extract (12.5 ml) was incubated with 600 5l of a slurry (50% [v/v]) of IgG-agarose beads (Sigma) for 90 min at 4C. The beads were washed once with buffer B for 15 min at 4C, and three times for 15 min at 4C with buffer C (20 mM TrisHCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0], 10% glycerol, 0.01% NP-40, 1 mM DTT, 10 U/ml RNasin). PumHD was released from beads by incubation with 150 Units of AcTEV protease (Invitrogen) for 2 hr at room temperature (RT). RNA was isolated from extracts and from the TEV eluates with TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen) followed by RNeasy Mini-Kit (Qiagen) purification according to the manufacturer's instructions. Microarray analysis: A pool of four control cDNAs (2 ng of each flp, gal4, lacZ and -Gal) was added to each RNA sample prior to labeling as controls for the labeling procedure. Total RNA (12 5g) derived from the extract and 300 ng or 30% of the affinity-isolated RNA were labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescent dyes, respectively, following cDNA synthesis with amino-allyl dUTP in addition to the four natural dNTPs using a 1:1 mixture of oligo(dT) and random nonamer primers. The Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cDNA samples were mixed and hybridized to Drosophila DNA microarrays. An all pairs experiment design type is where all labeled extracts are compared to every other labeled extract. Keywords: RNA IP
2006-02-28 | GSE3582 | GEO
Project description:RNA from Harpegnathos embryos, instar 1 larvae, instar 4 larvae, early pupae, late pupae, adult workers, and males was sequenced to look for gene expression changes throughout development.
2018-05-24 | GSE102604 | GEO
Project description:We used antibodies coupled to magnetic beads (MACS) to purify cell types out of whole blood from healthy donors (CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B cells). We also profiled whole blood (collected in Pax tubes) and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear cells obtained by Ficoll-Paque based separation. RNA was extracted using Trizol, amplified linearly twice, labeled with Cy5 and co-hybridized with amplified Stratagene human reference (labeled with Cy3). A reference experiement design type is where all samples are compared to a common reference. Keywords: reference_design
2006-05-23 | GSE4889 | GEO
Project description:RNA from Camponotus embryos, instar 1 larvae, instar 4 larvae, early pupae, late pupae (minor and major), adult workers, and males was sequenced to look for gene expression changes throughout development.
2018-05-24 | GSE102603 | GEO
Project description:Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is the causative agent of porcine enzootic pneumonia and a major factor in the porcine respiratory disease complex. A clear understanding of the mechanisms of pathogenesis does not exist. The virulence factors of M. hyopneumoniae are largely unknown and are most probably complex in nature. The transcriptional profile of intergenic regions is investigated using microarray PCR and oligonucleotide probes. It is hypothesized that intergenic regions of the Mhyo genome are being transcribed along with the ORFs. To test for transcripts in IG regions, cDNA was generated from M. hyopneumoniae RNA using random hexamers (IDT; Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. Coralville, IA) and a set of 129 hexamer oligonucleotide primers designed for M. hyopneumoniae mRNA. A single total RNA sample was split into eight 5 μg samples, and cDNA synthesis was conducted on four of these samples using the random hexamers (IDT); for the other four samples, cDNA was generated using primers designed for M. hyopneumoniae as described by Madsen et al. 2006. In each set of four, two samples were fluorescently labeled with Cy3 and the other two were labeled with Cy5 using an indirect labeling protocol. After labeling and cleanup, all 8 samples were quantified on a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer. For each array on the slide, 1 μg of labeled cDNA from each type of primer generation (Cy3 or Cy5, random or specific primer set) was combined and hybridized to a PCR featured array and an oligonucleotide featured array. This resulted in 2 arrays of PCR probes hybridized with dye swaps and 2 arrays of oligonucleotide probes with dye swaps. A second RNA sample was split in four 5 μg samples of total RNA, and the hybridization process was repeated for the oligonucleotide probe array.
2010-06-30 | E-GEOD-17893 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Microarrays were hybridized with a mixture of solutions containing LL2 cDNA labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 (dye-swap) and LL14 cDNA labeled with Cy5 or Cy3 (dye-swap). Keywords: repeat sample
2004-12-29 | GSE2114 | GEO