LINE1 TGS mechanism mediated by SETDB1-AGO2 complex in human somatic cells [MBD-seq]
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: LINE1s are abundant retroelements comprising 17% of human genome. Naturally, genomic LINE1s are tightly repressed by epigenetic mechanism; however, if relieved, they can be detrimental to genome stability by their transposition capability. So, a supervising mechanism that quickly re-represses the leaky LINE1s is demanded. Here we show that de-repressed LINE1s generate small RNAs, L1-siRNAs, which SETDB1 and AGO2 recognize, then move into searching for a transcript with sequence complementarity, and ultimately re-install a repression mechanism at LINE1 5’-untranslated region (5’UTR) by depositing trimethyl-H3K9 (H3K9me3). Immunoprecipitation (IP) results showed that SETDB1, AGO2, and L1-siRNA bound to each other and Chromatin-IP-seq and small-RNA-seq results demonstrated that they sat at the same locus within the 5’UTR. SETDB1, AGO2, and L1-siRNA all were necessary for LINE1 repression, particularly the evolutionary young and transposition-competent families such as L1HS/L1PA1 and L1PA2. KAP1, which frequently partners with SETDB1 for silencing local chromatin, was dispensible for the repression of young L1PAs. Our findings indicate that, as a surveillance mechanism, the L1-siRNA-triggered, SETDB1-AGO2-effected repair of epigenetic errors at the 5’UTR establishes a homeostatic re-repression mechanism on inadvertently de-repressed LINE1 copies over the genome.
Project description:LINE1s are abundant retroelements comprising 17% of human genome. Naturally, genomic LINE1s are tightly repressed by epigenetic mechanism; however, if relieved, they can be detrimental to genome stability by their transposition capability. So, a supervising mechanism that quickly re-represses the leaky LINE1s is demanded. Here we show that de-repressed LINE1s generate small RNAs, L1-siRNAs, which SETDB1 and AGO2 recognize, then move into searching for a transcript with sequence complementarity, and ultimately re-install a repression mechanism at LINE1 5’-untranslated region (5’UTR) by depositing trimethyl-H3K9 (H3K9me3). Immunoprecipitation (IP) results showed that SETDB1, AGO2, and L1-siRNA bound to each other and Chromatin-IP-seq and small-RNA-seq results demonstrated that they sat at the same locus within the 5’UTR. SETDB1, AGO2, and L1-siRNA all were necessary for LINE1 repression, particularly the evolutionary young and transposition-competent families such as L1HS/L1PA1 and L1PA2. KAP1, which frequently partners with SETDB1 for silencing local chromatin, was dispensible for the repression of young L1PAs. Our findings indicate that, as a surveillance mechanism, the L1-siRNA-triggered, SETDB1-AGO2-effected repair of epigenetic errors at the 5’UTR establishes a homeostatic re-repression mechanism on inadvertently de-repressed LINE1 copies over the genome.
Project description:LINE1s are abundant retroelements comprising 17% of human genome. Naturally, genomic LINE1s are tightly repressed by epigenetic mechanism; however, if relieved, they can be detrimental to genome stability by their transposition capability. So, a supervising mechanism that quickly re-represses the leaky LINE1s is demanded. Here we show that de-repressed LINE1s generate small RNAs, L1-siRNAs, which SETDB1 and AGO2 recognize, then move into searching for a transcript with sequence complementarity, and ultimately re-install a repression mechanism at LINE1 5’-untranslated region (5’UTR) by depositing trimethyl-H3K9 (H3K9me3). Immunoprecipitation (IP) results showed that SETDB1, AGO2, and L1-siRNA bound to each other and Chromatin-IP-seq and small-RNA-seq results demonstrated that they sat at the same locus within the 5’UTR. SETDB1, AGO2, and L1-siRNA all were necessary for LINE1 repression, particularly the evolutionary young and transposition-competent families such as L1HS/L1PA1 and L1PA2. KAP1, which frequently partners with SETDB1 for silencing local chromatin, was dispensible for the repression of young L1PAs. Our findings indicate that, as a surveillance mechanism, the L1-siRNA-triggered, SETDB1-AGO2-effected repair of epigenetic errors at the 5’UTR establishes a homeostatic re-repression mechanism on inadvertently de-repressed LINE1 copies over the genome.
Project description:LINE1s are abundant retroelements comprising 17% of human genome. Naturally, genomic LINE1s are tightly repressed by epigenetic mechanism; however, if relieved, they can be detrimental to genome stability by their transposition capability. So, a supervising mechanism that quickly re-represses the leaky LINE1s is demanded. Here we show that de-repressed LINE1s generate small RNAs, L1-siRNAs, which SETDB1 and AGO2 recognize, then move into searching for a transcript with sequence complementarity, and ultimately re-install a repression mechanism at LINE1 5’-untranslated region (5’UTR) by depositing trimethyl-H3K9 (H3K9me3). Immunoprecipitation (IP) results showed that SETDB1, AGO2, and L1-siRNA bound to each other and Chromatin-IP-seq and small-RNA-seq results demonstrated that they sat at the same locus within the 5’UTR. SETDB1, AGO2, and L1-siRNA all were necessary for LINE1 repression, particularly the evolutionary young and transposition-competent families such as L1HS/L1PA1 and L1PA2. KAP1, which frequently partners with SETDB1 for silencing local chromatin, was dispensible for the repression of young L1PAs. Our findings indicate that, as a surveillance mechanism, the L1-siRNA-triggered, SETDB1-AGO2-effected repair of epigenetic errors at the 5’UTR establishes a homeostatic re-repression mechanism on inadvertently de-repressed LINE1 copies over the genome.
Project description:p53 is a potent tumor suppressor and commonly mutated in human cancers. Recently, we demonstrated that p53 genes act to restrict retrotransposons in germ line tissues of flies and fish but whether this activity is conserved in somatic human cells is not known. Here we show that p53 constitutively restrains human LINE1s by cooperatively engaging sites in the 5’UTR and stimulating local deposition of repressive histone marks at these transposons. Consistent with this, the elimination of p53 or the removal of corresponding binding sites in LINE1s, prompted these retroelements to become hyperactive. Concurrently, p53 loss instigated chromosomal rearrangements linked to LINE sequences and also provoked inflammatory programs that were dependent on reverse transcriptase produced from LINE1s. Taken together, our observations establish that p53 continuously operates at the LINE1 promoter to restrict autonomous copies of these mobile elements in human cells. Our results further suggest that constitutive restriction of these retroelements may help to explain tumor suppression encoded by p53, since erupting LINE1s produced acute oncogenic threats when p53 was absent.
Project description:Deciphering the mechanisms that control the pluripotent ground state is key for understanding embryonic development. Nonetheless, the epigenetic regulation of ground-state mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) is not fully understood. Here, we identify the epigenetic protein MPP8 as being essential for ground-state pluripotency. Its depletion leads to cell cycle arrest and spontaneous differentiation. MPP8 has been suggested to repress LINE1 elements by recruiting the human silencing hub (HUSH) complex to H3K9me3-rich regions. Unexpectedly, we find that LINE1 elements are efficiently repressed by MPP8 lacking the chromodomain, while the unannotated C-terminus is essential for its function. Moreover, we show that SETDB1 recruits MPP8 to its genomic target loci, whereas transcriptional repression of LINE1 elements is maintained without retaining H3K9me3 levels. Taken together our findings demonstrate that MPP8 protects the DNA-hypomethylated pluripotent ground state through its association with the HUSH core complex, however, independently of detectable chromatin binding and maintenance of H3K9me3.