Regulation of cohesin-mediated chromosome structure by PDS5 in mammals [RNA-seq]
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Cohesin regulates sister chromatids cohesion but also contributes to chromosome folding by promoting the formation of chromatin loops, a process proposed to be mediated by loop extrusion. PDS5 plays a crucial role in regulating the cohesin dynamic on chromatin, mainly through WAPL-mediated release activity and the opponent ESCO1/2-sororin dependent pathway. However, the exact function of PDS5 on cohesin-mediated chromatin looping remains ambiguous. Two versions of PDS5 exist in vertebrates, PDS5A and PDS5B. Here, we construct cells for rapid PDS5A or PDS5B degradation in PLC/PRF/5 cell line with the FKBP12F36V-dTAG degron system to perform loss of function studies. Combining Hi-C, ChIP-seq for cohesin regulators, and RNA-seq data, we describe the redundant and discrete roles of PDS5A and PDS5B in three-dimensional genome organization and gene expression.
Project description:Cohesin regulates sister chromatids cohesion but also contributes to chromosome folding by promoting the formation of chromatin loops, a process proposed to be mediated by loop extrusion. PDS5 plays a crucial role in regulating the cohesin dynamic on chromatin, mainly through WAPL-mediated release activity and the opponent ESCO1/2-sororin dependent pathway. However, the exact function of PDS5 on cohesin-mediated chromatin looping remains ambiguous. Two versions of PDS5 exist in vertebrates, PDS5A and PDS5B. Here, we construct cells for rapid PDS5A or PDS5B degradation in PLC/PRF/5 cell line with the FKBP12F36V-dTAG degron system to perform loss of function studies. Combining Hi-C, ChIP-seq for cohesin regulators, and RNA-seq data, we describe the redundant and discrete roles of PDS5A and PDS5B in three-dimensional genome organization and gene expression.
Project description:Cohesin regulates sister chromatids cohesion but also contributes to chromosome folding by promoting the formation of chromatin loops, a process proposed to be mediated by loop extrusion. PDS5 plays a crucial role in regulating the cohesin dynamic on chromatin, mainly through WAPL-mediated release activity and the opponent ESCO1/2-sororin dependent pathway. However, the exact function of PDS5 on cohesin-mediated chromatin looping remains ambiguous. Two versions of PDS5 exist in vertebrates, PDS5A and PDS5B. Here, we construct cells for rapid PDS5A or PDS5B degradation in PLC/PRF/5 cell line with the FKBP12F36V-dTAG degron system to perform loss of function studies. Combining Hi-C, ChIP-seq for cohesin regulators, and RNA-seq data, we describe the redundant and discrete roles of PDS5A and PDS5B in three-dimensional genome organization and gene expression.
Project description:Purpose: Cohesin is an important structural regulator of the genome. Whether cohesin HEAT repeat accessory proteins PDS5A and PDS5B differentially contribute to cohesin function remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to interrogate how PDS5A and PDS5B affect cohesin localization and gene expression in mouse embronic stem cells (mESCs) Method: Genome wide binding patterns of PDS5A, PDS5B, and cohesin in wildtype cells as well as in PDS5 CRISPR/Cas9 genome edited knockout cells were assessed via chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq). The redundancy of the PDS5 subunits was addressed by using siRNA against PDS5B in a PDS5A-knockout background.
Project description:Purpose: Cohesin is an important structural regulator of the genome. Whether cohesin HEAT repeat accessory proteins PDS5A and PDS5B differentially contribute to cohesin function remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to interrogate how PDS5A and PDS5B affect cohesin localization and gene expression in mouse embronic stem cells (mESCs) Method: The role of PDS5A and PDS5B in gene regulation was assessed by performing RNA-seq in wildtype and CRISPR-Cas9 genome edited PDS5 knockout mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). The redundancy of the PDS5s was addressed by using siRNA against PDS5B in a PDS5A-knockout background. Whether PDS5 and STAG proteins have selective roles in gene expression was addressed by using siRNA against STAG1 and STAG2 in a PDS5A-KO background
Project description:Cohesin structures the genome through the formation of chromatin loops and by holding together the sister chromatids. The acetylation of cohesin’s SMC3 subunit is a dynamic process that involves the acetyltransferase ESCO1 and deacetylase HDAC8. Here we show that this cohesin acetylation cycle controls the 3D genome. ESCO1 restricts the length of chromatin loops and architectural stripes, while HDAC8 promotes the extension of such loops and stripes. This role in controlling loop length turns out to be distinct from the canonical role of cohesin acetylation that protects against WAPL-mediated DNA release. We reveal that acetylation rather controls cohesin’s interaction with PDS5A to restrict chromatin loop length. Our data supports a model in which this PDS5A-bound state acts as a brake that enables the pausing and restart of loop enlargement. The cohesin acetylation cycle hereby provides punctuation in the process of genome folding.
Project description:The cohesin complex organizes the genome forming dynamic chromatin loops that impact on all DNA-mediates processes. There are two different cohesin complexes in vertebrate somatic cells, carrying the STAG1 or STAG2 subunit, and two versions of the regulatory subunit PDS5, PDS5A and PDS5B. Mice deficient for any of the variant subunits are embryonic lethal, which indicates that they are not functionally redundant. However, their specific behavior at the molecular level is not fully understood. The genome-wide distribution of cohesin provides important information with functional consequences. Here, we have characterized the distribution of cohesin subunits and regulators in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) either wild type or deficient for cohesin subunits and regulators by chromatin immunoprecipitation and deep sequencing. We identify non-CTCF cohesin binding sites in addition to the commonly detected CTCF cohesin sites and show that cohesin-STAG2 is the preferred variant at these positions. Moreover, this complex has a more dynamic association with chromatin as judged by fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), associates preferentially with WAPL and is more easily extracted from chromatin with salt than cohesin-STAG1. We observe that both PDS5A and PDS5B are exclusively located at cohesin-CTCF positions, that ablation of a single paralog has no noticeable consequences for cohesin distribution, while double knocked out cells show decreased accumulation of cohesin at all its binding sites. With the exception of a fraction of cohesin positions in which we find binding of all regulators-including CTCF and WAPL-, the presence of NIPBL and PDS5 is mutually exclusive, consistent with results of immunoprecipitation reactions in mammalian cells, as suggested previously from results in vitro. Our findings support the idea that non-CTCF cohesin binding sites represent sites of cohesin loading or pausing and are preferentially occupied by the more dynamic cohesin-STAG2. PDS5 proteins redundantly contribute to arrest cohesin at CTCF sites, possibly by preventing binding of NIPBL, but are not essential for this arrest. These results add important insights towards understanding how cohesin regulates genome folding and the specific contributions of the different variants that coexist in the cell.
Project description:The cohesin complex organizes the genome forming dynamic chromatin loops that impact on all DNA-mediates processes. There are two different cohesin complexes in vertebrate somatic cells, carrying the STAG1 or STAG2 subunit, and two versions of the regulatory subunit PDS5, PDS5A and PDS5B. Mice deficient for any of the variant subunits are embryonic lethal, which indicates that they are not functionally redundant. However, their specific behavior at the molecular level is not fully understood. The genome-wide distribution of cohesin provides important information with functional consequences. Here, we have characterized the distribution of cohesin subunits and regulators in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) either wild type or deficient for cohesin subunits and regulators by chromatin immunoprecipitation and deep sequencing. We identify non-CTCF cohesin binding sites in addition to the commonly detected CTCF cohesin sites and show that cohesin-STAG2 is the preferred variant at these positions. Moreover, this complex has a more dynamic association with chromatin as judged by fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), associates preferentially with WAPL and is more easily extracted from chromatin with salt than cohesin-STAG1. We observe that both PDS5A and PDS5B are exclusively located at cohesin-CTCF positions, that ablation of a single paralog has no noticeable consequences for cohesin distribution, while double knocked out cells show decreased accumulation of cohesin at all its binding sites. With the exception of a fraction of cohesin positions in which we find binding of all regulators-including CTCF and WAPL-, the presence of NIPBL and PDS5 is mutually exclusive, consistent with results of immunoprecipitation reactions in mammalian cells, as suggested previously from results in vitro. Our findings support the idea that non-CTCF cohesin binding sites represent sites of cohesin loading or pausing and are preferentially occupied by the more dynamic cohesin-STAG2. PDS5 proteins redundantly contribute to arrest cohesin at CTCF sites, possibly by preventing binding of NIPBL, but are not essential for this arrest. These results add important insights towards understanding how cohesin regulates genome folding and the specific contributions of the different variants that coexist in the cell.
Project description:Cohesin structures the genome through the formation of chromatin loops and by holding together the sister chromatids from S-phase until mitosis. The acetylation of cohesin’s SMC3 subunit is a dynamic process that involves the acetyltransferase ESCO1 and deacetylase HDAC8. Here we show that this cohesin acetylation cycle controls the 3D genome. ESCO1 restricts the length of chromatin loops and architectural stripes, while HDAC8 rather promotes the extension of such loops and stripes. This role in controlling loop length turns out to be distinct from the canonical role of cohesin acetylation that protects against WAPL-mediated DNA release. We reveal that acetylation rather controls cohesin’s interaction with PDS5A to restrict chromatin loop length. Our data supports a model in which this PDS5A-bound state acts as a brake that enables the pausing and restart of loop enlargement. The cohesin acetylation cycle hereby provides punctuation in the process of genome folding.
Project description:Cohesin structures the genome through the formation of chromatin loops and by holding together the sister chromatids from S-phase until mitosis. The acetylation of cohesin’s SMC3 subunit is a dynamic process that involves the acetyltransferase ESCO1 and deacetylase HDAC8. Here we show that this cohesin acetylation cycle controls the 3D genome. ESCO1 restricts the length of chromatin loops and architectural stripes, while HDAC8 rather promotes the extension of such loops and stripes. This role in controlling loop length turns out to be distinct from the canonical role of cohesin acetylation that protects against WAPL-mediated DNA release. Using a genome-wide haploid genetic screen we reveal that acetylation rather controls cohesin’s interaction with PDS5A to restrict chromatin loop length. Our data supports a model in which this PDS5A-bound state acts as a brake that enables the pausing and restart of loop enlargement. The cohesin acetylation cycle hereby provides punctuation in the process of genome folding.
Project description:In addition to sharing with condensin an ability to organize DNA into chromatids, cohesin regulates enhancer-promoter interactions and confers sister chromatid cohesion. Association with chromosomes is regulated by hook-shaped HEAT repeat proteins that Associate With its Kleisin (Scc1) subunit (HAWKs), namely Scc3, Pds5, and Scc2. Unlike Pds5, Scc2 is not a stable cohesin constituent but, as shown here, transiently displaces Pds5 during loading. Scc1 mutations that compromise its interaction with Scc2 adversely affect cohesin’s ATPase activity, loading, and translocation while Scc2 mutations that alter how the ATPase responds to DNA abolish loading despite cohesin’s initial association with loading sites. Lastly, Scc2 mutations that permit loading in the absence of Scc4 increase Scc2’s association with chromosomal cohesin and reduce that of Pds5. We suggest that cohesin switches between two states, one with Pds5 bound to Scc1 that is not able to hydrolyse ATP efficiently but is capable of release from chromosomes and another in which Scc2, transiently replacing Pds5, stimulates the ATP hydrolysis necessary for loading and translocation away from loading sites.