Transcriptome sequencing of RNA isolated from small volumes of blood stabilized in Tempus solution: a technical assessment of different extraction methods and DNase treatment
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE210812 | GEO | 2023/03/08
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:We generated single-cell transcriptomes from a large number of single cells using several commercially available platforms, in both microliter and nanoliter volumes, and compared performance between them. We benchmarked each method to conventional RNA-seq of the same sample using bulk total RNA, as well as to multiplexed qPCR, which is the current gold standard for quantitative single-cell gene expression analysis. In doing so, we were able to systematically evaluate the sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of various approaches to single-cell RNA-seq. Our results show that it is possible to use single-cell RNA-seq to perform quantitative transcriptome measurements of individual cells, that it is possible to obtain quantitative and accurate gene expression measurements with a relatively small number of sequencing reads, and that when such measurements are performed on large numbers of cells, one can recapitulate the bulk transcriptome complexity, and the distributions of gene expression levels found by single-cell qPCR.
2013-10-20 | GSE51254 | GEO
Project description:The advancement of Third-Generation Sequencing (TGS) techniques managed to increase the sequencing length to several kilobases, which leads to a bright future for completely reserving alternative splicing (AS) events and isoform expressions. In recent years, many computational methods for isoform detection from long-read sequencing data have been developed and published. However, there is no prior comparative study that systemically evaluates the performance of the software implemented with different algorithms. Here we benchmarked nine methods implemented in seven computational tools that can identify isoform structures from TGS RNA sequencing data and analyzed their performances from various aspects using both simulated datasets produced by an in-house simulator and previously published experimental data. Our results comprehensively demonstrate the relative effectiveness of the approaches and provide guidance as well as recommendations for future research on AS analysis and further improvement of the tools for isoform detection using TGS data.
2023-12-25 | GSE227911 | GEO
Project description:We generated single-cell transcriptomes from a large number of single cells using several commercially available platforms, in both microliter and nanoliter volumes, and compared performance between them. We benchmarked each method to conventional RNA-seq of the same sample using bulk total RNA, as well as to multiplexed qPCR, which is the current gold standard for quantitative single-cell gene expression analysis. In doing so, we were able to systematically evaluate the sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of various approaches to single-cell RNA-seq. Our results show that it is possible to use single-cell RNA-seq to perform quantitative transcriptome measurements of individual cells, that it is possible to obtain quantitative and accurate gene expression measurements with a relatively small number of sequencing reads, and that when such measurements are performed on large numbers of cells, one can recapitulate the bulk transcriptome complexity, and the distributions of gene expression levels found by single-cell qPCR. 109 single-cell human transcriptomes were analyzed in total; 96 using nanoliter volume sample processing on a microfluidic platform, Nextera library prep (biological replicates); 3 using the SMARTer cDNA synthesis kit, Nextera library prep (biological replicates); 3 using the Transplex cDNA synthesis kit, Nextera library prep (biological replicates); 7 using the Ovation Nugen cDNA synthesis kit (biological replicates) where 3 used Nextera library prep and 4 used NEBNext library prep. In addition, 4 bulk RNA samples were sequenced: bulk RNA generated using ~1 million pooled cells was used to make bulk libraries, 2 of which were made using SMARTer cDNA synthesis kit (technical replicates) and 2 made using Superscript RT kit with no amplification (technical replicates). All 4 bulk samples were made into libraries using Nextera.
2013-10-20 | E-GEOD-51254 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The impact of the DNA extraction methods on the gut bacterial and fungal microbiota community recovery
| PRJEB29363 | ENA
Project description:Microbial community profiling using high-throughput sequencing relies in part on the preservation of the DNA and the effectiveness of the DNA extraction method. This study aimed at understanding to what extent these parameters affect the profiling. We obtained samples treated with and without a preservation solution. Also, we compared DNA extraction kits from Qiagen and Zymo-Research. The types of samples were defined strains, both as single species and mixtures, as well as undefined indigenous microbial communities from soil. We show that the use of a preservation solution resulted in substantial changes in the 16S rRNA gene profiles either due to an overrepresentation of Gram-positive bacteria or to an underrepresentation of Gram-negative bacteria. In addition, 16S rRNA gene profiles were substantially different depending on the type of kit that was used for extraction. The kit from Zymo extracted DNA from different types of bacteria in roughly equal amounts. In contrast, the kit from Qiagen preferentially extracted DNA from Gram-negative bacteria while DNA from Gram-positive bacteria was extracted less effectively. These differences in kit performance strongly influenced the interpretation of our microbial ecology studies.
| S-EPMC8298342 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Effect of DNA extraction methods on the determination of the structure of microbial communities in the phosphogypsum waste heap soil
| PRJEB12454 | ENA
Project description:Assessment of technical error in a dual-channel, two timepoint experiment using White lab Drosophila melanogaster microarrays Keywords: repeat sample
2005-05-12 | GSE2641 | GEO
Project description:Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of the Starfix coronary sinus (CS) active-fixation lead may be challenging, due to undeployment of fixation lobes and venous occlusion. We report our experience in Starfix TLE, in comparison with previous data. A 78-year-old male, implanted in 2009 with Starfix lead, was referred to our institution for TLE, due to infective endocarditis with lead-associated vegetations. The tip of Starfix lead was located in distant, anterior position, in the great cardiac vein, close to patent left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending artery anastomosis, and first-choice surgical removal had a prohibitive operative risk. Conventional dilatation beyond CS ostium, as well as the use of a standard delivery catheter, was ineffective. An off-label modification of the delivery, by cutting the distal soft tip, was successful. However, the tip of the lead fragmented and was trapped in the innominate vein. Then a gooseneck snare grasped the fragment, allowing complete retrieval. TLE of Starfix leads may be particularly challenging, especially when its tip is located in a distant anterior location. In these cases, important help may be obtained by dilatation within the CS, by means of conventional or modified delivery catheters. Only experienced operators, sometimes with non-conventional techniques, should perform TLE of Starfix leads. <Learning objective: TLE of Starfix leads may be challenging, particularly when the tip is located in a distant anterior position. Dilatation with conventional tools may be precluded. In these cases modifications of the delivery catheters may be useful. Surgery should be avoided as first-choice procedure; only experienced operators, sometimes with non-conventional techniques, should perform TLE of Starfix leads.>.
| S-EPMC6281896 | biostudies-other
Project description:Serum miRNAs are considered useful as non-invasive biomarkers for various diseases, but the optimal method for extracting RNA from serum is currently unknown. In this study, several RNA extraction kits were used to determine which kit is the optimal method. RNA was extracted from the serum of 8-week-old C57BL/6NJcl male mice according to the protocol of each RNA extraction kit. The yield of extracted RNA samples was calculated and electrophoretic patterns were evaluated by Agilent bioanalyzer. Expression patterns of the extracted RNA samples were confirmed by Agilent mouse miRNA microarray. The results showed significant differences in RNA yields in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit, and mirVana™ PARIS™ RNA and Native Protein Purification Kit compared to almost all other samples. Furthermore, two peaks were identified in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit using small RNA kit of Agilent bioanalyzer, one at 20-40 nucleotides (nt) and the other around 40-100 nt whereas the other reagents had a single peak. In addition, a high correlation was observed between the two RNA extraction kits in microarray. These results suggest that the above two kits are suitable for miRNA extraction from mouse serum.
2024-01-01 | GSE246437 | GEO
Project description:Many applications utilizing artificial lipid bilayers require the ability to exchange the bilayer's solution environment. However, because of the instability of the bilayer, the rate of solution exchange is limited, which significantly hinders the measurement rate and throughput. We have developed an artificial bilayer system that can withstand high flow speeds, up to 2.1 m/s, by supporting the bilayer with a hydrogel. We demonstrated the ability to measure during flow by measuring the conductance of gramicidin-A channels while switching between solutions of two different compositions, recording a time to measure 90% change in current of approximately 2.7 seconds at a flow rate of 0.1 m/s. We also demonstrated a potential application of this system by measuring the conductance modulation of the rat TRPM8 ion channel by an agonist and antagonist at varying concentrations, obtaining 7-point IC50 and EC50 values in approximately 7 minutes and 4-point values within 4 minutes.
| S-EPMC3817439 | biostudies-literature