Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods

ABSTRACT: Strand-specific massively-parallel cDNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful tool for novel transcript discovery, genome annotation, and expression profiling. Despite multiple published methods for strand-specific RNA-Seq, no consensus exists as to how to choose between them. Here, we developed a comprehensive computational pipeline for the comparison of library quality metrics from any RNA-Seq method. Using the well-annotated Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptome as a benchmark, we compared seven library construction protocols, including both published and our own novel methods. We found marked differences in complexity, strand-specificity, evenness and continuity of coverage, agreement with known annotations, and accuracy for expression profiling. Weighing each method’s performance and ease, we identify the dUTP second strand marking and the Illumina RNA ligation methods as the leading protocols, with the former benefitting from the availability of paired-end sequencing. Our analysis provides a comprehensive benchmark, and our computational pipeline is applicable for assessment of future protocols in any organism.

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae

PROVIDER: GSE21739 | GEO | 2010/08/15

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA127357

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods

Project description:Strand-specific massively-parallel cDNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful tool for novel transcript discovery, genome annotation, and expression profiling. Despite multiple published methods for strand-specific RNA-Seq, no consensus exists as to how to choose between them. Here, we developed a comprehensive computational pipeline for the comparison of library quality metrics from any RNA-Seq method. Using the well-annotated Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptome as a benchmark, we compared seven library construction protocols, including both published and our own novel methods. We found marked differences in complexity, strand-specificity, evenness and continuity of coverage, agreement with known annotations, and accuracy for expression profiling. Weighing each method’s performance and ease, we identify the dUTP second strand marking and the Illumina RNA ligation methods as the leading protocols, with the former benefitting from the availability of paired-end sequencing. Our analysis provides a comprehensive benchmark, and our computational pipeline is applicable for assessment of future protocols in any organism. Examination of 11 different strand-specific RNA-Seq libraries from 7 distinct methods; also 2 control non-strand-specific RNA-Seq libraries. To assess the performance of each strand-specific library in digital expression profiling, we compared them to reference expression measurements estimated from expression profiles using competitive hybridization of a mid-log RNA sample vs. genomic DNA using Agilent arrays.

2010-08-15 | E-GEOD-21739 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Systematic comparative analysis of single cell RNA-sequencing methods

Project description:A multitude of single-cell RNA sequencing methods have been developed in recent years, with dramatic advances in scale and power, and enabling major discoveries and large scale cell mapping efforts. However, these methods have not been systematically and comprehensively benchmarked. Here, we directly compare seven methods for single cell and/or single nucleus profiling from three types of samples – cell lines, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and brain tissue – generating 36 libraries in six separate experiments in a single center. To analyze these datasets, we developed and applied scumi, a flexible computational pipeline that can be used for any scRNA-seq method. We evaluated the methods for both basic performance and for their ability to recover known biological information in the samples. Our study will help guide experiments with the methods in this study as well as serve as a benchmark for future studies and for computational algorithm development.

2019-06-01 | GSE132044 | GEO

Project description:Comparison of RO-seq Isolation Protocols and Library Preparation Methods

| PRJNA722106 | ENA

Saccharomyces cerevisiae 3' poly(A) site mapping

Project description:The use of alternative polyadenylation sites is common and affects the post-transcriptional fate of mRNA, including its stability, localization, and translation. Here we present a method for genome-wide and strand-specific mapping of poly(A) sites and quantification of RNA levels at unprecedented efficiency by using an on-cluster dark T-fill procedure on the Illumina sequencing platform. Our method outperforms former protocols in quality and throughput, and reveals new insights into polyadenylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Experimental benchmark of five different protocols (3tfill, bpmI, internal, rnaseq and yoon) for genome-wide identification of polyadenylation sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and transcript quantification. RNA was extracted from WT cells grown in glucose (ypd) or galactose (ypgal) as carbon source. The same RNA was used for 3 independent library constructions (technical replicates, rep).

2013-01-10 | E-GEOD-40110 | biostudies-arrayexpress

EGAS00001000433-sc-20130703 - samples

Project description:The main objective of this benchmark is the comparison of the full sequencing pipeline of different ICGC partners, including procedures, methods and performance of library preparation and whole-genome deep-sequencing. A secondary objective will be a follow-up comparison of data analysis pipelines for identification of germline and somatic variants subsequent to the results of the ICGC Somatic Variant Calling Pipeline Benchmark.

| EGAD00001000625 | EGA

ICGC Benchmarking Exercise

| EGAS00001000433 | EGA

metaExpertPro: a computational workflow for metaproteomics spectral library construction and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry data analysis

Project description:Analysis of large-scale data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) metaproteomics data remains a computational challenge. Here, we present a computational pipeline called metaExpertPro for metaproteomics data analysis. This pipeline encompasses spectral library generation using data-dependent acquisition MS (DDA-MS), protein identification and quantification using DIA-MS, functional and taxonomic annotation, as well as quantitative matrix generation for both microbiota and hosts. By integrating FragPipe and DIA-NN, metaExpertPro offers compatibility with both Orbitrap and timsTOF MS instruments. To evaluate the depth and accuracy of identification and quantification, we conducted extensive assessments using human fecal samples and benchmark tests. Performance tests conducted on human fecal samples indicated that metaExpertPro quantified an average of 45,000 peptides in a 60-minute diaPASEF injection. Notably, metaExpertPro outperformed three existing software tools by characterizing a higher number of peptides and proteins. Importantly, metaExpertPro maintained a low factual false discovery rate (FDR) of approximately 5% for protein groups across four benchmark tests. Applying a filter of five peptides per genus, metaExpertPro achieved relatively high accuracy (F-score = 0.67–0.90) in genus diversity and showed a high correlation (rSpearman = 0.73–0.82) between the measured and true genus relative abundance in benchmark tests. Additionally, the quantitative results at the protein, taxonomy, and function levels exhibited high reproducibility and consistency across the commonly adopted public human gut microbial protein databases IGC and UHGP. In a metaproteomic analysis of dyslipidemia (DLP) patients, metaExpertPro revealed characteristic alterations in microbial functions and potential interactions between the microbiota and the host.

2024-09-28 | PXD051104 | Pride

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods

Project description:Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods

| PRJNA596465 | ENA

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods

Project description:Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods

| PRJNA486769 | ENA

Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods (Cel_Seq)

Project description:Designing a single cell RNA sequencing benchmark dataset to compare protocols and analysis methods (Cel_Seq)

| PRJNA486514 | ENA