Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

High Throughput Plant Activation Domain Identification and Mapping

ABSTRACT: Arabidopsis gene expression is regulated by more than 1,900 transcription factors (TFs), which have been identified genome-wide by the presence of well-conserved DNA binding domains. Activator TFs contain activation domains (ADs) that recruit coactivator complexes; however, for most Arabidopsis TFs, we lack knowledge about the presence, location, and transcriptional strength of their ADs. To address this gap, we experimentally identified Arabidopsis ADs on a proteome-wide scale, finding that over half of Arabidopsis TFs carry an AD. We annotated 1,553 ADs, the vast majority of which were previously unknown. We used the dataset generated to develop a neural network to accurately predict ADs and to identify sequence features necessary to recruit coactivator complexes. We uncovered six distinct sequence feature combinations that resulted in activation activity, providing a framework to interrogate activation domain sub-functionalization. Furthermore, we identified activation domains within the ancient AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) family of transcription factors, finding conservation of AD positioning in distinct clades. Our findings provide a deep resource for understanding transcriptional activation, a framework for examination of function within intrinsically disordered regions, and a predictive model of activation domains.

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae

PROVIDER: GSE234215 | GEO | 2024/05/19

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Activation domains and Coactivator direct genomic localization of fused DNA binding domains, defining the subset of activated promoters [RNA-seq]

Project description:Activation domains (ADs) within transcription factors (TFs) induce gene expression by recruiting coactivators to specific regulatory regions. Within the prevailing model, TF-coactivator recruitment is independent of DNA binding, which is consistent with direct AD-coactivator interactions seen outside cells. However, this independence was not yet tested within the genomic context. Here, we targeted two Med15-interacting ADs to hundreds of budding yeast promoters through fusions with multiple DNA binding domains (DBDs), gradually controlling their abundances using libraries of synthetic promoters. Genomic profiling revealed that AD identity influences DNA binding locations and that transcription induction and Med15 recruitment are restricted to a subset of DBD-bound promoters displaying flexible expression, multiple-TFs binding, and fuzzy nucleosome architecture. Further, when fused to a DBD, Med15 redirected binding towards promoters of fuzzy nucleosomes, overcoming DBD-based preferences. Our results demonstrate that ADs and their recruited coactivators posses an inherent preference for genomic localization and, therefore, define the subset of induced promoters.

2023-12-19 | GSE234431 | GEO

Revisiting the model for coactivator recruitment: Med15 can select its target sites independent of promoter-bound transcription factors

2024-07-27 | GSE234432 | GEO

Transcription factors activate genes through the phase separation capacity of their activation domains [RNA-seq]

Project description:Gene expression is controlled by transcription factors (TFs) that consist of DNA-binding domains (DBDs) and activation domains (ADs). The DBDs have been well- characterized, but little is known about the mechanisms by which ADs effect gene activation. Here we report that diverse ADs form phase-separated condensates with the Mediator coactivator. For the OCT4 and GCN4 TFs, we show that the ability to form phase-separated droplets with Mediator in vitro and the ability to activate genes in vivo are dependent on the same amino acid residues. For the estrogen receptor (ER), a ligand-dependent activator, we show that estrogen enhances phase separation with Mediator, again linking phase separation with gene activation. These results suggest that diverse TFs can interact with Mediator through the phase-separating capacity of their ADs and that formation of condensates with Mediator is involved in gene activation.

2018-10-26 | GSE120474 | GEO

Transcription factors activate genes through the phase separation capacity of their activation domains [ChIP-seq]

2018-10-26 | GSE120459 | GEO

Mechanisms Governing Target Search and Binding Dynamics of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors [RNA-seq]

Project description:Transcription factors (TFs) are classically attributed a modular construction, containing well-structured sequence specific DNA-binding domains (DBDs) paired with disordered activation domains (ADs) responsible for protein-protein interactions targeting cofactors or the core transcription initiation machinery. However, this simple division of labor model struggles to explain why TFs with identical DNA binding sequence specificity determined in vitro exhibit distinct binding profiles in vivo. The family of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) offer a stark example: aberrantly expressed in several cancer types, HIF-1α and HIF-2α subunit isoforms recognize the same DNA motif in vitro – the hypoxia response element (HRE) – but only share a subset of their target genes in vivo, while eliciting contrasting effects on cancer development and progression under certain circumstances. To probe the mechanisms mediating isoform-specific gene regulation, we used live cell single particle tracking (SPT) to investigate HIF nuclear dynamics and how they change upon genetic perturbation or drug treatment. We found that HIF-α subunits and their dimerization partner HIF-1β exhibit distinct diffusion and binding characteristics that are exquisitely sensitive to concentration and subunit stoichiometry. Using domain-swap variants, mutations, and a HIF-2α specific inhibitor, we found that although the DBD and dimerization domains are important, a major determinant of chromatin binding and diffusion behavior is dictated by the AD-containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDR). Using orthogonal genomic approaches such as Cut-and-Run and RNA-seq, we also confirmed IDR-dependent binding and activation for a specific subset of HIF-target genes. These findings reveal a previously unappreciated role of IDRs in regulating the TF search process that may play a role in selective functional target site binding on chromatin.

2022-07-08 | GSE207574 | GEO

Mechanisms Governing Target Search and Binding Dynamics of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors [Cut&Run]

2022-07-08 | GSE207573 | GEO

Filamentation and Biofilm Formation are Regulated by the Phase-Separation Capacity of Network Transcription Factors in Candida albicans

Project description:The ability of the fungus Candida albicans to filament and form biofilms contributes to its burden as a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections. Biofilm development involves an interconnected transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) consisting of nine transcription factors (TFs) that bind both to their own regulatory regions and to those of the other network TFs. Here, we show that seven of the nine TFs in the C. albicans biofilm network contain prion-like domains (PrLDs) that have been linked to the ability to form phase-separated condensates. Construction of PrLD mutants in four biofilm TFs reveals that these domains are essential for filamentation and biofilm formation in C. albicans. Moreover, biofilm PrLDs promote the formation of phase-separated condensates in the nuclei of live cells, and PrLD mutations that abolish phase separation (such as the removal of aromatic residues) also prevent biofilm formation. Biofilm TF condensates can selectively recruit other TFs through PrLD-PrLD interactions and can co-recruit RNA polymerase II, implicating condensate formation in the assembly of active transcriptional complexes. Finally, we show that PrLD mutations that block the phase separation of biofilm TFs also prevent filamentation in an in vivo model of gastrointestinal colonization. Together, these studies associate transcriptional condensates with the regulation of filamentation and biofilm formation in C. albicans, and highlight how targeting of PrLD-PrLD interactions could prevent pathogenesis by this species.

2023-11-20 | GSE245897 | GEO

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [uPBM_Elk1Ets1Gabpa_MycMaxMad]

Project description:Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. Our finding was possible due to a unique combination of carefully designed high-throughput assays and rigorous computation modeling, integrated into a unified framework called iMADS. We used iMADS to quantity, model, and analyze specificity differences between 11 paralogous TFs from 4 distinct human TF families. Our finding of differential specificity between closely related TFs has important implications for the interpretation of the regulatory effects of non-coding genetic variants.

2018-04-03 | GSE102810 | GEO

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_E2F1-3-4_cust2_v1]

2018-04-03 | GSE97886 | GEO

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_MycMaxMad_v1]

2018-04-03 | GSE97885 | GEO