Similar Datasets
Project description:There is a need to move from binary hazard assessment to more quantitative assessment of genotoxicity to better inform human health risk assessment and understand the relevance of positive in vitro genotoxicity findings. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including transcriptomic biomarkers combined with high-throughput technologies, enable the testing of a broad concentration range, which allows quantitative assessment of in vitro results. Initial work with the transcriptomic GENOMARK and TGx-DDI biomarkers demonstrate their potential use for hazard identification and chemical prioritization; however, no study has evaluated the concordance and complementarity of GENOMARK and TGx-DDI. The overall aim of this study is to examine if a combined approach of integrating both transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity in human relevant HepaRGTM cells increases the certainty in hazard calls and potency rankings of chemicals. A sub-aim is to investigate whether GENOMARK is applicable to the TempO-Seq® high-throughput sequencing technology, to collect concentration-response data to rapidly perform hazard classification and potency ranking. Therefore, HepaRGTM cells were exposed to 10 chemicals (i.e. eight known in vivo genotoxicants and two in vivo non-genotoxicants) in increasing concentrations over 72h. TempO-Seq® was used to obtain concentration-response data for both biomarkers. Benchmark concentration (BMC) modelling of chemicals that were classified positive was conducted to obtain BMCs and transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) for potency ranking. The results confirm that GENOMARK is applicable to TempO-Seq® since it achieved 100% predictive accuracy. In addition, a high concordance was observed in the hazard classifications and potency rankings between both biomarkers. Overall, our findings show that in vitro transcriptomic data can be used to rapidly and effectively identify genotoxic hazards while simultaneously providing additional insights on potency that is more informative in a modern hazard assessment paradigm. The results of this case study support the high value of integrating these NAMs in a weight of evidence evaluation of genotoxicity using the important human-liver cell line.
2024-03-27 | GSE241068 | GEO
Project description:There is a need to move from binary hazard assessment to more quantitative assessment of genotoxicity to better inform human health risk assessment and understand the relevance of positive in vitro genotoxicity findings. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including transcriptomic biomarkers combined with high-throughput technologies, enable the testing of a broad concentration range, which allows quantitative assessment of in vitro results. Initial work with the transcriptomic GENOMARK and TGx-DDI biomarkers demonstrate their potential use for hazard identification and chemical prioritization; however, no study has evaluated the concordance and complementarity of GENOMARK and TGx-DDI. The overall aim of this study is to examine if a combined approach of integrating both transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity in human relevant HepaRGTM cells increases the certainty in hazard calls and potency rankings of chemicals. A sub-aim is to investigate whether GENOMARK is applicable to the TempO-Seq® high-throughput sequencing technology, to collect concentration-response data to rapidly perform hazard classification and potency ranking. Therefore, HepaRGTM cells were exposed to 10 chemicals (i.e. eight known in vivo genotoxicants and two in vivo non-genotoxicants) in increasing concentrations over 72h. TempO-Seq® was used to obtain concentration-response data for both biomarkers. Benchmark concentration (BMC) modelling of chemicals that were classified positive was conducted to obtain BMCs and transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) for potency ranking. The results confirm that GENOMARK is applicable to TempO-Seq® since it achieved 100% predictive accuracy. In addition, a high concordance was observed in the hazard classifications and potency rankings between both biomarkers. Overall, our findings show that in vitro transcriptomic data can be used to rapidly and effectively identify genotoxic hazards while simultaneously providing additional insights on potency that is more informative in a modern hazard assessment paradigm. The results of this case study support the high value of integrating these NAMs in a weight of evidence evaluation of genotoxicity using the important human-liver cell line.
2024-03-27 | GSE241067 | GEO
Project description:To modernize genotoxicity assessment and reduce reliance on experimental animals, new approach methodologies (NAMs) that provide human-relevant dose-response data are needed. Two transcriptomic biomarkers, GENOMARK and TGx-DDI, have shown a high classification accuracy for genotoxicity. As these biomarkers were extracted from different training sets, we investigated whether combining the two biomarkers in a human-derived metabolically competent cell line (i.e., HepaRG) provides complementary information for the classification of genotoxic hazard identification and potency ranking. First, the applicability of GENOMARK to TempO-Seq, a high-throughput transcriptomic technology, was evaluated. HepaRG cells were exposed for 72 h to increasing concentrations of 10 chemicals (i.e., eight known in vivo genotoxicants and two in vivo nongenotoxicants). Gene expression data were generated using the TempO-Seq technology. We found a prediction performance of 100%, confirming the applicability of GENOMARK to TempO-Seq. Classification using TGx-DDI was then compared to GENOMARK. For the chemicals identified as genotoxic, benchmark concentration modeling was conducted to perform potency ranking. The high concordance observed for both hazard classification and potency ranking by GENOMARK and TGx-DDI highlights the value of integrating these NAMs in a weight of evidence evaluation of genotoxicity.
| S-EPMC10952014 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Unlocking the power of transcriptomic biomarkers in qualitative and quantitative genotoxicity assessment of chemicals
| PRJNA1006340 | ENA
Project description:Unlocking the power of transcriptomic biomarkers in qualitative and quantitative genotoxicity assessment of chemicals I
| PRJNA1006335 | ENA
Project description:Unlocking the power of transcriptomic biomarkers in qualitative and quantitative genotoxicity assessment of chemicals II
| PRJNA1006345 | ENA
Project description:We assessed the genotoxicity of 30 food-flavoring chemicals used in Japan that have not been investigated before. These 30 food-flavoring chemicals have representative chemical structures belonging to 18 chemical classes. The Ames and chromosomal aberration (CA) tests (in vitro tests) were first conducted in accordance with the "Food Additive Risk Assessment Guidelines" of the Japan Food Safety Commission. If the in vitro test yielded a positive result, an in vivo micronucleus test or a transgenic mouse gene mutation assay was performed to verify the in vitro test results. Of the 30 food-flavoring chemicals, 3 yielded a positive result in both Ames and CA tests. Another 11 chemicals yielded positive results in the CA test. However, none of the chemicals yielding positive in vitro test results yielded positive results in the in vivo tests. These findings indicate no genotoxicity concerns of the food-flavoring chemicals belonging to the abovementioned 18 chemical classes used in Japan unless there are other structural modifications.
| S-EPMC9742862 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In Argentina, there is vast experience in qualitative iFOBT population screening that is part of the CRC Prevention and Early Detection National Program. The screening’s cut-off point is at 50 ng/mL buffer. Its positivity rate for 2019 has been an average of 26.15%, over the double of the one reported in the international literature (7.5-11%) for this cut-off point (1). There are no studies that assess such technology and suggest an appropriate cut-off point for this population. The goal of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of the qualitative iFOBT used in the present and the quantitative iFOBT with various cut-off points for advanced neoplastic wound screening (colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma) in an Argentine patient cohort.
| 2373286 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below. Refer to individual Series
2015-04-29 | E-GEOD-68387 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This study reports a comparative and mechanistic genotoxicity assessment of four engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) across three species, including E. coli, yeast, and human cells, with the aim to reveal the distinct potential genotoxicity mechanisms among the different nanomaterials and their association with physiochemical features. Both the conventional phenotypic alkaline comet test and the newly developed quantitative toxicogenomics assay, that detects and quantifies molecular level changes in the regulation of six DNA damage repair pathways, were employed. The proposed molecular endpoints derived from the toxicogenomics assays, namely TELI (Transcriptional Effect Level Index) and PELI (Protein Effect Level Index), correlated well with the phenotypic DNA damage endpoints from comet tests, suggesting that the molecular genotoxicity assay is suitable for genotoxicity detection. Temporal altered gene or protein expression profiles revealed various potential DNA damage types and relevant genotoxic mechanisms induced by the tested ENMs. nTiO2_a induced a wide spectrum of DNA damage consistently across three species. Three carbon-based ENMs, namely carbon black, single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) and fullerene, exhibited distinct, species and ENM property-dependent DNA damage mechanisms. All carbon based ENMs induced relatively weak DNA damage repair response in E. coli, but more severe DNA double strand break in eukaryotes. The differences in cellular structure and defense systems among prokaryotic and eukaryotic species lead to distinct susceptibility and mechanisms for ENM uptake and, thus, varying DNA damages and repair responses. The observation suggested that eukaryotes, especially mammalian cells, are likely more susceptible to genotoxicity than prokaryotes in the ecosystem when exposed to these ENMs.
| S-EPMC4224493 | biostudies-literature