Dataset Information

Hepatic Gene Expression Changes Throughout the Day in the Fischer Rat

ABSTRACT: One µg of total RNA from either an individual rat or from a pooled sample was amplified and labeled with a fluorescent dye (either Cy3 or Cy5) using the Low RNA Input Linear Amplification Labeling kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The amount and quality of the resulting fluorescently labeled cRNA was assessed using a Nanodrop ND-100 spectrophometer and an Agilent Bioanalyzer. Equal amounts of Cy3- or Cy5-labeled cRNA were hybridized to the Agilent Rat Oligo Microarray (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) for 17 hrs, prior to washing and scanning. Data was extracted from the resulting images using Agilent’s Feature Extraction Software (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). For day/night comparisons, two types of complementing hybridizations were performed: hepatic RNA from individual day rats was hybridized against a pool made up of RNA from 12 hour offset night rats, and RNA from individual night rats was hybridized against a pool made up of RNA from 12-hour offset day rats. Specifically, hepatic RNA samples from three individual day rats collected ten hours after light on (CT10) were hybridized against a pooled RNA sample composed of equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six night rats collected ten hrs after lights off (CT22); and RNA samples from three individual night rats collected at CT22 were hybridized against a pooled RNA sample composed of equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six day rats collected at CT10. This was replicated in a second study for a total of 24 hybridizations of 12 hour offset samples. For time of day comparisons, equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six rats collected at each of four different times of the circadian day (CT4, CT10, C16 and CT22) were pooled. The two replicate studies thus resulted in 8 pools (two replicate pools/time point times four time points); each pool was hybridized against a Universal Rat Reference RNA Standard (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Keywords: time-course

ORGANISM(S): Rattus norvegicus

PROVIDER: GSE2441 | GEO | 2005/04/15

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA92645

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:One Âµg of total RNA from either an; individual rat or from a pooled sample was amplified and labeled with a; fluorescent dye (either Cy3 or Cy5) using the Low RNA Input Linear Amplification Labeling kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) following the manufacturerâ??s protocol. The amount and quality of the resulting fluorescently labeled cRNA was assessed using a Nanodrop ND-100 spectrophometer and an Agilent; Bioanalyzer. Equal amounts of Cy3- or Cy5-labeled cRNA were hybridized to the Agilent Rat Oligo Microarray (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) for 17 hrs, prior to washing and scanning. Data was extracted from the resulting; images using Agilentâ??s Feature Extraction Software (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA). For day/night comparisons, two types of complementing hybridizations were performed: hepatic RNA from individual day rats was hybridized against a pool made up of RNA from 12 hour offset night rats, and RNA from individual night rats was hybridized against a pool made up of RNA from 12-hour offset day rats. Specifically, hepatic RNA samples from three individual day rats collected ten hours after light on (CT10) were hybridized against a pooled RNA sample composed of equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six night rats collected ten hrs after lights off (CT22); and RNA samples from three individual night rats collected at CT22 were hybridized against a pooled RNA sample composed of equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six day rats collected at CT10. This was replicated in a second study for a total of 24 hybridizations of 12 hour offset samples. For time of day comparisons, equal aliquots of RNA from the livers of six; rats collected at each of four different times of the circadian day (CT4, CT10, C16 and CT22) were pooled. The two replicate studies thus resulted in 8 pools (two replicate pools/time point times four time points); each pool was hybridized against a Universal Rat Reference RNA Standard (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).

Project description:Microbiota from rats fed with wheat aleurone and plant omega fatty acids In this study we investigated how an AX-rich WA and ALA from linseed oil (LO) modulate the gut microbiota of rats. Wistar rats were fed a standard diet and received either an iso-energetic control oil (PO), control oil + aleurone (A+PO), linseed oil (LO) or linseed oil + aleurone (A+LO) during 12 weeks. Feacal samples were recovered after the 12 week treatments. DNA extractions were performed using using the Qiagen's DNA Stool Kit (Qiagen, West Sussex, UK). 10ng of DNA template were amplified by PCR (16S gene) and purified using Qiagen's Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, West Sussex, UK). 1ug of purified PCR product were labelled with either Cy3 or Cy5 using Genomic DNA ULS Labelling kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). 250ng of labelled DNA were hybridized on the microarray for 24h at 65M-BM-0C. Washings were performed as recommended by the manufacturer. Microarray scanning was performed on a Surescan Microarray scanner (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Data were extracted using the Feature extraction software (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The retained intensity value for each probe was the ratio between the spotM-bM-^@M-^Ys median intensity signals and the median of background signals. A 13 chip study was realized to analyze the feacal microbiota of rats treated with either an iso-energetic control oil (PO), control oil + aleurone (A+PO), linseed oil (LO) or linseed oil + aleurone (A+LO) during 12 weeks. Each microarray corresponding to hybridization with 250ng of labelled 16S rRNA gene amplicons from 2 rat DNA faecal samples. Microbiota structure and diversity were assessed using the HuGChip (Tottey et al., 2013). Each probe (4441) was synthetized in three replicates. On the same array, 2 different samples were hybridized. One labelled with the Cy3 dye and one with the Cy5 dye. The results were processed as single channel (13 raw data files available on Series records for 25 samples).

Project description:Surgically resected gastric adenocarcinoma samples and their paired disease-free (R0) marginal nonmalignant tissue were obtained from 14 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. RNA was isolated using the RNAeasy Kit (Qiagen Valencia, CA) from 15 mg of tissue. The quality of total RNA and its integrity was assessed using the Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA) and RIN value (RNA Integrity Number) was recorded for all the samples for intact 18S and 28S rRNA. Total RNA (800 ng) from each sample was reverse transcribed and linear amplified using the low RNA input linear amplification kit (Agilent Technologies). After synthesis of the first and second strand of cDNA, the product was used in an in vitro transcription reaction to generate cRNAs in the presence of cyanine 3-labeled UTP (Cy3) for normal and cyanine 5-labeled UTP (Cy5) for tumor. Fragmented Cy3-labeled cRNA of the control sample were mixed with equal amounts of Cy5-labeled cRNA from the gastric tumor sample, and the mixtures were hybridized onto 44K whole human genome DNA microarrays (Agilent Technologies) for 17 hrs at 65°C with constant rotation (10 rpm). Subsequently, the arrays were washed according to manufacturer’s instructions. The slides were scanned using an Agilent microarray scanner (G2565AA), and the images were processed using the Agilent feature extraction software AFE 9.5. GeneSpring GX v10.1 (Agilent Technologies) was used to analyze the expression profiles obtained after microarray hybridization. The feature extraction files from all the samples were uploaded to GeneSpring. Following intensity-dependent normalization (Lowess), the data was subjected to statistical analysis. A two tailed student’s t-test was used to determine significance of the differences observed between the normal and tumor samples. Benjamini Hochberg algorithm was used to compute false discovery rates. Genes were filtered based on P value threshold of 0.001 and false discovery rate of less than 1%.

Dataset Information

Hepatic Gene Expression Changes Throughout the Day in the Fischer Rat

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets