Neoadjuvant CD40 agonism remodels the tumor immune microenvironment in locally advanced esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE244748 | GEO | 2023/12/10
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Sotigalimab is an agonistic anti-CD40 mAb that can modulate antitumor immune responses. In a phase II clinical trial of sotigalimab combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced esophageal/gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) cancer with the primary outcome of efficacy as measured by pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, the combination induced pCR in 38% of treated patients. We investigated the mechanism of action of sotigalimab in samples obtained from this clinical trial. Tumor biopsies and peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline, following an initial dose of sotigalimab, and at the time of surgery after CRT completion from six patients. High dimensional single-cell techniques were used, including combined single-cell RNA-sequencing and proteomics (CITEseq) and multiplexed ion beam imaging, to analyze immune responses. Sotigalimab dramatically remodeled the immune compartment in the periphery and within the tumor microenvironment (TME), increasing expression of molecules related to antigen processing and presentation and altering metabolic pathways in myeloid cells. Concomitant with these changes in myeloid cells, sotigalimab treatment primed new T cell clonotypes and increased the density and activation of T cells with enhanced cytotoxic function. Sotigalimab treatment also induced a decrease in the frequency of Tregs in the TME. These findings indicate that a single dose of sotigalimab leads to enhanced antigen presentation that can activate T cells and induce new T cell clones. This restructuring of the TME provides elements which are critical to the development of effective antitumor immune responses and improved clinical outcomes.
| S-EPMC10809910 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Sotigalimab (sotiga) is an agonistic anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody that can modulate anti-tumor immune responses. In a clinical trial of sotiga combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer, treatment induced pathologic complete responses in 38% of patients. Using high-dimensional single cell techniques, we found that sotiga dramatically re-modeled both peripheral immune responses and the tumor microenvironment (TME), increasing components of antigen processing and presentation and altering metabolic pathways in myeloid cells. Concomitant with myeloid cell alterations, sotiga primed new T cell clonotypes, increased T cells with enhanced cytotoxic activity, and decreased the frequency of Tregs in the TME. Clinical responses were associated with both baseline and treatment-induced T cell states. These findings indicate that sotiga induces antigen presentation leading to enhanced T cell activation and clinical response, and that the immune composition of the TME at baseline is important in conferring sensitivity to this treatment approach.
2023-12-11 | GSE244739 | GEO
Project description:Sotigalimab (sotiga) is an agonistic anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody that can modulate anti-tumor immune responses. In a clinical trial of sotiga combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer, treatment induced pathologic complete responses in 38% of patients. Using high-dimensional single cell techniques, we found that sotiga dramatically re-modeled both peripheral immune responses and the tumor microenvironment (TME), increasing components of antigen processing and presentation and altering metabolic pathways in myeloid cells. Concomitant with myeloid cell alterations, sotiga primed new T cell clonotypes, increased T cells with enhanced cytotoxic activity, and decreased the frequency of Tregs in the TME. Clinical responses were associated with both baseline and treatment-induced T cell states. These findings indicate that sotiga induces antigen presentation leading to enhanced T cell activation and clinical response, and that the immune composition of the TME at baseline is important in conferring sensitivity to this treatment approach.
2023-12-11 | GSE244746 | GEO
Project description:Over the last several decades, the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has been increasing in developed countries. Although complete surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment for resectable disease, long-term outcomes are poor and recurrence rates are high with surgery alone in patients presenting with locally advanced disease. Multimodal therapy has been shown to improve survival; however, the optimal therapeutic approach remains controversial, and practices vary across the world. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is generally used in the U.S., whereas perioperative chemotherapy without radiation is favored in most European countries. In this review, we discuss why the treatment of locally advanced GEJ tumors remains controversial, examine the evidence for various multimodal approaches, discuss their respective pros and cons, evaluate the role of radiation therapy, highlight some ongoing and planned clinical trials, and suggest areas that need further research.
| S-EPMC4319638 | biostudies-other
Project description:Esophageal carcinoma is one of the most aggressive malignant diseases. At present, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are regarded as the standard modalities for the treatments of locally advanced esophageal cancers based on several landmark trials. However, the optimal regimen, radiation dose, and surgical intervals are uncertain and the rate of recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy is high. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and reaching a pathological complete response have been reported to have a better survival benefit and a fewer recurrence risk than those non-pathological complete responses. Nevertheless, less than half of patients will reach a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy, and the methods to evaluate the efficacy after neoadjuvant therapy accurately are limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been recommended for the treatments of advanced esophageal cancers. Recently, research has been beginning to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy combined with neoadjuvant therapy. Here, we will review and discuss the development of the neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced esophageal cancers and unsolved clinical problems.
| S-EPMC9021527 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Most gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJ) patients are already in the advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Thus, the probability of radical gastrectomy is low, and surgical treatment alone has a poor prognosis due to the high recurrence rate. In order to reduce the recurrence and distant metastasis after surgery, there have been many attempts made to improve the perioperative treatment of advanced localized gastric cancer, but no uniform criteria exist. Over recent years, immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown excellent efficacy across various types of tumors, becoming a potential treatment after surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. However, the efficacy of single-agent ICIs for gastric cancer is still unsatisfactory. As comprehensive, chemotherapy-based treatment has become the standard care for locally advanced gastric cancer, exploring combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be valuable to improving survival outcomes. Here, we report a 66-year-old male with dysphagia diagnosed with GEJ and was defined as clinical stage (cT4N2M0) and Siewert type II, characterized as mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) negative; surprisingly, with anti-PD-1 antibody plus SOX (S-1: a combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil+ oxaliplatin) as perioperative therapy, the patient achieved pathological complete remission (pCR), which indicates that the addition of ICIs to chemotherapy as a perioperative comprehensive treatment might provide a promising strategy option for GEJ. In addition, we review the current status of perioperative comprehensive treatment, in hope that this may provide some reference value for clinical decision-making.
| S-EPMC8039689 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for resectable proximal gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and distal esophageal cancer have evolved over several decades. Treatment recommendations differ based on histologic type-squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) versus adenocarcinoma (AC)-as well as the exact location of the tumor. Recent and older clinical trials in this area were critically reviewed. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with concurrent taxane- or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has an established role for both AC and SCC of the distal esophagus and GEJ. The use of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric AC is based on the FLOT4 and MAGIC trials; however, the utility of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in this setting requires further evaluation. Additional clinical trials evaluating chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiation that are currently in process are highlighted, given the need for further disease control.
| S-EPMC8996907 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (LAGC) has been recommended in several guidelines. However, there is no global consensus about the optimum of NAC regimens. We aimed to determine the optimal NAC regimen for LAGC.MethodsA systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. The literature search was conducted from inception to June 2022. The odds ratio (OR) value and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for assessment of R0 resection rate and pathological complete response rate (pCR) as primary outcomes. The hazard ratio (HR) value and 95% CI were interpreted for the assessment of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as second outcomes. The risk ratio (RR) value and 95% CI were used for safety assessment.ResultsTwelve randomized controlled trials were identified with 3846 eligible participants. The network plots for R0 resectability, OS, and DFS constituted closed loops. The regimens of TPF (taxane and platinum plus fluoropyrimidine), ECF (epirubicin and cisplatin plus fluorouracil), and PF (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine) showed a meaningful improvement of R0 resectability, as well as OS and/or DFS, compared with surgery (including surgery-alone and surgery plus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy). Importantly, among these regimens, TPF regimen showed significant superiority in R0 resection rate (versus ECF regimen), OS (versus ECF regimen), DFS (versus PF and ECF regimens), and pCR (versus PF regimen).ConclusionsThe taxane-based triplet regimen of TPF is likely the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for LAGC patients.
| S-EPMC9648003 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Opinion statement: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is increasing in incidence in Western nations leading to increased interest in and opportunity to study optimal management. Randomized trials have now robustly demonstrated the preoperative therapy with chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone improves survival outcome for the bulk of curable patients, those with locally advanced T1N1M0 and T2-3 N0-1 M0 disease. Evidence suggests but does not confirm that radiation-containing regimens are more beneficial. Clinical staging is designed to exclude patients with T1N0M0 disease who may be treated with surgery alone and those with metastatic disease who may not benefit from intensive local therapy. The approach to clinical staging includes endoscopy with ultrasound and fine needle aspirate to assess local and regional disease, supplemented by CT and PET scanning primarily to exclude metastatic disease. Minimally invasive approaches to esophagectomy may be used with the goal of reducing complications, but there is no evidence that mortality or ultimate outcome is improved.
| S-EPMC4625398 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neoadjuvant therapies, primarily chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, are able to improve the overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer (EC) based on the results of several randomized clinical trials. The advantage of neoadjuvant therapy is chiefly attributed to the decreased risk of local-regional recurrence and distant metastasis. Thus, it has been recommended as standard treatment for patients with resectable EC. However, several fundamental problems remain. First, the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), and surgery for EC patients with different histological types remain controversial. Furthermore, to reduce the toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy and the risk of complications caused by preoperative radiation therapy, the treatment protocols of nCT and nCRT still need to be investigated and optimized by prospective trials. Moreover, for patients with complete clinical response following neoadjuvant therapy, it is worth ascertaining whether a "watch and wait" surveillance plus surgery-as-needed policy is more favorable, as well as, in addition to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, whether immunotherapy, especially when combined with the traditional neoadjuvant therapy regimens, brings new prospects for EC treatment. In this review, we summarize the recent insights into the research progress and existing problems of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced resectable EC.
| S-EPMC8533976 | biostudies-literature