Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Cross-platform comparability of microarray data

ABSTRACT: To facilitate collaborative research efforts between multi-investigator teams using DNA microarrays, we identified sources of error and data variability between laboratories and across microarray platforms and methods to accommodate this variability. RNA expression data were generated in seven laboratories, comparing two standard RNA samples using twelve microarray platforms. At least two standard microarray types (one spotted, one commercial) were used by all laboratories. Reproducibility for most platforms within any laboratory was typically good, but reproducibility between platforms and across laboratories was generally poor. Reproducibility between laboratories dramatically increased when standardized protocols were implemented for RNA labeling, hybridization, microarray processing, data acquisition and data normalization. Nonetheless, concordance could be found across different laboratories and platforms when data were analyzed in terms of enriched Gene Ontology categories. These findings indicate that microarray results generated by multiple sites and platforms can be comparable, and that multi-investigator teams will maximize data comparability by adopting a common platform and a common set of procedures to generate compatible data. Keywords: other

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE2458 | GEO | 2005/04/21

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA92677

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Cross-platform comparability of microarray data

Project description:To facilitate collaborative research efforts between multi-investigator teams using DNA microarrays, we identified sources of error and data variability between laboratories and across microarray platforms and methods to accommodate this variability. RNA expression data were generated in seven laboratories, comparing two standard RNA samples using twelve microarray platforms. At least two standard microarray types (one spotted, one commercial) were used by all laboratories. Reproducibility for most platforms within any laboratory was typically good, but reproducibility between platforms and across laboratories was generally poor. Reproducibility between laboratories dramatically increased when standardized protocols were implemented for RNA labeling, hybridization, microarray processing, data acquisition and data normalization. Nonetheless, concordance could be found across different laboratories and platforms when data were analyzed in terms of enriched Gene Ontology categories. These findings indicate that microarray results generated by multiple sites and platforms can be comparable, and that multi-investigator teams will maximize data comparability by adopting a common platform and a common set of procedures to generate compatible data. Keywords: other

2010-06-10 | E-GEOD-2458 | biostudies-arrayexpress

MOE430 whole mouse - mouse colon dilution series - RMA preprocessed

2005-06-30 | GSE2850 | GEO

Transcription profiling of whole adult mouse and adult mouse colon in different dilutions analysed in multiple centers

Project description:This data is part of a large-scale platform comparison experiment. Whole mouse and adult mouse colon RNA was mixed at different concentrations (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100) and distributed across multiple centers for analysis. Eight microarray platforms and RT-PCR were tested for different labeling protocols, amplification protocols, and data preprocessing approaches in order to maximize data intercomparability. The role of universal reference RNA was also examined. Probes of different platforms were matched using gene symbols and/or RefSeq/GenBank accession numbers. Several different normalization procedures were applied. Evaluation criteria included linearity, sensitivity/specificity, and reproducibility within and between platforms, labeling methods, and laboratories. Experiment Overall Design: Whole mouse (sacrificed on day 1, strain: C57BL/6) and adult mouse (8 weeks, strain: C57BL/6 ) colon RNA from multiple animals was pooled respectively. RNA was purified following the manufacturerâs recommendations and integrity was analyzed using an Agilent BioAnalyzer 2100 according to manufacturer instructions. Five RNA samples were created by mixing the two original samples at different concentrations (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100). The five master mix samples were then divided into duplicate sets of the five sample RNAs, distributed to individual laboratories, and hybridized to eight different microarray platforms at several different genome centers. The five samples included here were prepared from 10ng of total RNA using a T7 double amplification protocol as described in Schwab et al., 2003 and hybridized to Affymetrix MOE430 arrays as recommended by the manufacturer using the standard protocol. No replicates were produced.

2008-06-12 | E-GEOD-2850 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Reproducibility of molecular phenotypes after long-term differentiation to Human iPSC-Derived Neurons: a multi-site omics study [single-cell]

Project description:Reproducibility in molecular and cellular studies is fundamental to scientific discovery. To establish the reproducibility of a well-defined long term neuronal differentiation protocol, we repeated the cellular and molecular comparison of the same two iPSC lines across five distinct laboratories. Despite uncovering acceptable variability within individual laboratories, we detect poor cross-site reproducibility of the differential gene expression signature between these two lines. Factor analysis identifies the laboratory as the largest source of variation along with several variation-inflating confounds such as passaging effects and progenitor storage. Single cell transcriptomics shows substantial cellular heterogeneity underlying inter-laboratory variability and being responsible for biases in differential gene expression inference. Factor analysis-based normalization of the combined dataset can remove the nuisance technical effects, enabling the execution of robust hypothesis generating studies. Our study shows that multi-center collaborations can expose systematic biases and identify critical factors to be standardized when publishing novel protocols, contributing to increased cross-site reproducibility.

2018-08-20 | GSE118734 | GEO

Reproducibility of molecular phenotypes after long-term differentiation to Human iPSC-Derived Neurons: a multi-site omics study [bulk]

2018-08-20 | GSE118733 | GEO

Protocol matters – reproducibility and rigor of DNA methylation data sets [RNA-seq]

Project description:While epigenetics continues to be a burgeoning research area in neuroscience, unaddressed issues related to data reproducibility across laboratories remain. Indeed, separating meaningful experimental changes from background variability is a challenge in epigenomic studies. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of hippocampal tissues from wild-type rats across three independent laboratories revealed that seemingly minor protocol differences resulted in significant epigenome profile changes, even in the absence of experimental intervention. Difficult-to-match factors such as animal vendors and a subset of husbandry and tissue extraction procedures produced quantifiable variations between wild-type animals across the three laboratories. To enhance scientific rigor, we conclude that strict adherence to protocols is necessary for the execution and interpretation of epigenetic studies and that protocol-sensitive epigenetic changes, amongst naive animals, may confound experimental results.

2022-01-12 | GSE164800 | GEO

Protocol matters – reproducibility and rigor of DNA methylation data sets [BiSulfite-seq]

2022-01-12 | GSE164831 | GEO

Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) long oligo experiments for cross-platform study

Project description:Gene expression microarrays have made a profound impact in biomedical research. The diversity of platforms and analytical methods has made comparison of data from multiple platforms very challenging. In this study, we describe a framework for comparisons across platforms and laboratories. We have attempted to include nearly all the available commercial and “in-house” platforms. Using probe sequences matched at the exon level improved consistency of measurements across the different microarray platforms compared to annotation-based matches. Generally, consistency was good for highly expressed genes, and variable for genes with lower expression values as confirmed by QRT-PCR. Concordance of measurements was higher between laboratories on the same platform than across platforms. We demonstrate that, after stringent pre-processing, commercial arrays were more consistent than “in-house” arrays, and by most measures, one-dye platforms were more consistent than two-dye platforms. Keywords: cross platform microarrays

2006-06-01 | GSE4833 | GEO

cDNA (Cepko BMAP) experiments for cross-platform study

2006-06-01 | GSE4832 | GEO

Cross-platform study

Project description:Gene expression microarrays have made a profound impact in biomedical research. The diversity of platforms and analytical methods has made comparison of data from multiple platforms very challenging. In this study, we describe a framework for comparisons across platforms and laboratories. We have attempted to include nearly all the available commercial and in house platforms. Using probe sequences matched at the exon level improved consistency of measurements across the different microarray platforms compared to annotation-based matches. Generally, consistency was good for highly expressed genes, and variable for genes with lower expression values as confirmed by QRT-PCR. Concordance of measurements was higher between laboratories on the same platform than across platforms. We demonstrate that, after stringent pre-processing, commercial arrays were more consistent than in-house arrays, and by most measures, one-dye platforms were more consistent than two-dye platforms. This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2006-06-01 | GSE4854 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data