SKOV-3TR
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE2627 | GEO | 2007/10/31
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA92141
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Human paclitaxel-resistant (SKOV-3TR) ovarian cancer cell line and the parent SKOV-3 cell line were grown in RPMI medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. The experiment was done to compare the expression differences between the parent SKOV-3 cell line and the derived SKOV-3TR cell line. Cells were plated in T75 flasks. They were cultured until they were 80% confluent and harvested by trypsinization followed by pelleting of the cells. All RNA isolation was accomplished with the Tri-Reagent (SIgma) and purified using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit reagents. The RNA (50 ug) was annealed with a random hexamer primer, and reverse-transcribed into cDNA with Powerscript (Clontech) reverse transcriptase for 2h at 42 degrees in the presence of amino-allyl dUTP. The cDNA from SKOV-3 RNA and SKOV-3TR RNA was covalently coupled separately with Cy3 and Cy5 monoreactive fluors in 50 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.0. The Cy3 and Cy5 labelled cDNAs were combined and purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit and hybridized to the microarray using the Hybrite chamber (Vysis). Fluorescent array images were collected for both Cy3 and Cy5 with a ScanArray 4000 (Perkin Elmer) at a resolution of 10 um at maximum laser power and photo-multiplier tube voltage of 50 to 60%. Segmentation was performed using the histogram method of the QuantArray (Perkin Elmer) package. Data was transformed into log base 2 expression ratios and normalized using scaled loess normalization.
2010-05-25 | E-GEOD-2627 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:124 gastric biopsies comprising of Normals, Intestinal Metaplasia, Chronic Gastritis and Carcinomas are profiled. The ratio metric is given by (Biological sample / Universal Reference). The Biological Samples are labeled with Cy5 (Green) and the Pooled Normal Biopsies RNA is always labeled with Cy3 (Red). The arrays were scanned using a ScanArray 5000 scanner (Perkin-Elmer) and data extraction was done using Quantarray (GSI Lumonics). Subsequently, the data was imported into GeneSpring (Silicon Genetics) and intensity dependent LOWESS normalization was performed. The 7383 genes were filtered using an intensity in the reference channel (Cy3) of 300. This corresponded to 2 standard deviations above the mean for the background signal. Background singal was calculated using the empty wells/spots on the array and the average of 4 different positions on the slide were used. Keywords: other
2005-07-25 | GSE2669 | GEO
Project description:This series repressents the data set from the paper "Expression microarray analysis and oligo array CGH of aquired gemcitabine resistance in mouse colon reveals selection for chromosomal aberrations". Biological material: One solid mouse tumor "Colon 26A" was routinely maintained by successive transplantation. A subset of mice with this tumor was treated at the maximum tolerable dosage of Gemcitabine and successively transplanted 5 times and similarly treated. The last passage was completly resistant and designated, "Colon 26G". Expression array: Total RNA was isolated from frozen mouse tumors using Tryzol. Single stranded cDNA was synthetized from 30 mg of total RNA by reverse transcription using aminoallyl labeled dUTP (Ambion). Labelling was performed according to the aminoallyl labeling protocol. Briefly, cDNA was incubated at room temperature for 1 h with fluorolink monofunctional cy5 or cy3 (Amersham) followed by 15 min 4 M hydroxylamine treatment. Uncoupled dyes were removed using Qiaquick PCR purification columns (Qiagen) and mixed with 12 mg poly(dA) (Amersham), 60 mg yeast tRNA (Sigma) and 24 mg Cot-1 DNA (Invitroen). The probe was dissolved in 127 ml hybridization mixture containing 46% formamide, 9.5% dextran sulfate, 2x SSC and 0.2% SDS. The probe was heated to 70°C for 10 min and annealed at 37°C for 1 h. Slides were hybridized for 14 h at 37°C over-night (HyArray 12™, Perkin Elmer). After hybridization the slides were washed in the HybArray 12™ with 50% formamide, 2x SSC, pH 7 at 35°C for 15 min, followed b PI buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate, 0.1% Igepal Ca630, pH 8) at room temperature and 3 washes of 0.2x SSC, 0.1x SSC and 0.01x SSC at room temperature followed by centrifugation. Arrays were scanned using a laser scanner (ScanArray Express, Perkin Elmer) and analysed using ImaGene version 5.6. Cy5 cy3 ratios are calculating by taking the log2 of the signal mean of each spot minus the median background mean of all spots on the array. This is followed by a standard normalization for spot intensity and calculation of the ratios. Keywords: other
2005-12-21 | GSE2352 | GEO
Project description:We used oligonucleotide microarrays to find differentially expressed genes between control subjects and those affected by sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Experiment Overall Design: Complementary RNAs (cRNAs) labelled with Cy5-CTP (Perkin-Elmer) were synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA of each sample of human motor cortex using the Low RNA Input Fluorescent Linear Amplification Kit (Agilent Technologies) following the manufacturerâs protocol. A reference cRNA, labelled with Cy3-CTP (Perkin-Elmer), was synthesized from 1 µg of sample Diseased 2 RNA. Aliquots (750 ng) of Cy3 and Cy5 labelled cRNA targets were co-hybridized on Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarrays (Agilent Technologies). Microarray hybridization and washing were performed using reagents and instruments (hybridization chambers and rotating oven) as indicated by the manufacturer (Agilent Technologies). Microarrays were scanned at 10-μm resolution using a GenePix Personal 4100A microarray scanner and the GenePix Pro 6.0 acquisition and data-extraction software (Molecular Devices, Corp.).
2008-06-13 | E-GEOD-4595 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:P. aeruginosa PAO wildtype Cy3 PA3898 mutant Cy5
| PRJNA491282 | ENA
Project description:Examine the effect of stimulation stress produced by chemical burn to the mice cornea in the lacrimal gland over a time course (0.5 - 360 hours) in comparison with the non-stimulated control animals. Using silver nitrate applicator (silver nitrate 37.5 mg and potassium nitrate 12.5 mg, Graham-Field,Inc.,) do two burns per eye, each with a separate applicator. For animals observed for more than 24 hours, eyes were then treated with gentamicin ointment to minimize infection. Total RNA were extracted from both burn and control eyes and were covalently coupled separately with Cy5 and Cy3 monoreactive fluors. The Cy5 and Cy3 labelled RNA were hybridized to the microarray. Fluorescent array images were collected for both Cy3 and Cy5 with ScanArray 4000XL and image intensity data were extracted and analyzed with Imagene analysis software. Ref:Fang Y, Choi D, Searles RP, Mathers WD.A time course microarray study of gene expression in the mouse lacrimal gland after acute corneal trauma.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Feb;46(2):461-9. Keywords = Corneal injury Keywords = mouse Keywords = lacrimal gland Keywords = gene microarrays Keywords: time-course
2004-05-21 | GSE1393 | GEO
Project description:The microarrays were constructed using a set of more than 17,000 sequence-verified clones from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). Of the 17,761 features (spots) on the microarray, 186 are control nonexpressed or nonhuman sequences or housekeeping genes. UniGene cluster IDs could be assigned by GenBank to 16,592 of the features as of June 1, 2001 (UniGene Build 133), indicating that they are representatives of nonredundant unique genes. Many have been functionally characterized, and chromosomal location and tissue expression patterns are known for others. Total RNA was isolated from semiconfluent cultures and reverse-transcribed into cDNA in a nucleotide mix containing amino-allyl deoxyuracil triphosphate (dUTP). The cDNA from stromal cells and Universal RNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was covalently coupled separately with Cy5 and Cy3 monoreactive fluors, respectively. The Universal RNA consists of a mixture of RNA from 10 different human cell lines with a broad expression coverage of over 80% of the sequences on the array, allowing comparison of expression patterns of multiple different samples of different origin. The Cy5- and Cy3-labeled cDNAs were combined for hybridization to the microarray. Fluorescent array images were collected for both Cy3 and Cy5, and image-intensity data were extracted and analyzed to obtain expression ratios to Universal RNA for each stromal cell line. From these the expression in the 2 lines could be compared. Keywords: other
2003-07-16 | GSE463 | GEO
Project description:Sample groupings for this project are as follows: Cauline leaf vs Cultured Cell : - Cauline leaf, p1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cotyledon dark : - Cotyledon, CP1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cotyledon, CP2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon, cn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon, cn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Cotyledon dark vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon dark, n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Germinating seed vs Cultured cell : - Germinating seed, gn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl light vs Hypocotyl dark : - Hypocotyl, hldn1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Hypocotyl, hldn2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Hypocotyl light vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl light, hln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl light, hln2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Petal vs Cultured cell : - Petal, pn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) 1DBP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DBP, pin1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Pistil 1DPP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DPP, psn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn4; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root dark vs Cultured cell : - Root dark, rdn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root dark, rdn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root light vs Cultured cell : - Root light, rln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root light, rlp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Root light vs Root dark : - Root light vs dark, rldp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Root light vs dark, rldp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Rosette leaf vs Cultured cell : - Rosette leaf, rfp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Sepal vs Cultured cell : - Sepal, sn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Sepal, sn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 3DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 3DPP, s3n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 8DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 8DPP, s8n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stamen vs Cultured cell : - Stamen, smn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl dark vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl dark, hn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl dark, hn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stem vs Cultured cell : - Stem, stp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Keywords: other
2004-10-24 | GSE1599 | GEO
Project description:Gene expression profile comparing 17-month old wild-type with psen1hu2547 zebrafish. Total RNA from 3-4 brains of 17-month old adult psen1hu2547 or WT fish was extracted using RNeasy mini columns (Qiagen) and quality-checked using NanoDrop 1000 (Thermo Scientific) and formaldehyde gel electrophoresis. cDNA was generated and labeled with Cy3 or Cy5-CTP using the low RNA input linear amplification kit (Perkin-Elmer). Upon purification and fragmentation, labeled cRNA was hybridized to the zebrafish 22K 60-mer oligonucleotide microarray (G2518A-001, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 65ºC for 17 hours. Three independent biological repeats were performed.
2014-10-06 | E-GEOD-62083 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This series repressents the data set from the paper "Expression microarray analysis and oligo array CGH of aquired gemcitabine resistance in mouse colon reveals selection for chromosomal aberrations". Biological material: One solid mouse tumor "Colon 26A" was routinely maintained by successive transplantation. A subset of mice with this tumor was treated at the maximum tolerable dosage of Gemcitabine and successively transplanted 5 times and similarly treated. The last passage was completly resistant and designated, "Colon 26G". Expression array: Total RNA was isolated from frozen mouse tumors using Tryzol. Single stranded cDNA was synthetized from 30 mg of total RNA by reverse transcription using aminoallyl labeled dUTP (Ambion). Labelling was performed according to the aminoallyl labeling protocol. Briefly, cDNA was incubated at room temperature for 1 h with fluorolink monofunctional cy5 or cy3 (Amersham) followed by 15 min 4 M hydroxylamine treatment. Uncoupled dyes were removed using Qiaquick PCR purification columns (Qiagen) and mixed with 12 mg poly(dA) (Amersham), 60 mg yeast tRNA (Sigma) and 24 mg Cot-1 DNA (Invitroen). The probe was dissolved in 127 ml hybridization mixture containing 46% formamide, 9.5% dextran sulfate, 2x SSC and 0.2% SDS. The probe was heated to 70°C for 10 min and annealed at 37°C for 1 h. Slides were hybridized for 14 h at 37°C over-night (HyArray 12â¢, Perkin Elmer). After hybridization the slides were washed in the HybArray 12⢠with 50% formamide, 2x SSC, pH 7 at 35°C for 15 min, followed b PI buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate, 0.1% Igepal Ca630, pH 8) at room temperature and 3 washes of 0.2x SSC, 0.1x SSC and 0.01x SSC at room temperature followed by centrifugation. Arrays were scanned using a laser scanner (ScanArray Express, Perkin Elmer) and analysed using ImaGene version 5.6. Cy5 cy3 ratios are calculating by taking the log2 of the signal mean of each spot minus the median background mean of all spots on the array. This is followed by a standard normalization for spot intensity and calculation of the ratios.
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-2352 | biostudies-arrayexpress