Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Binding specificities of transcription factors of the oomycete Phytophthorainfestans reflect conserved and divergent evolutionary patterns and function

ABSTRACT: Identifying the DNA-binding specificities of transcription factors (TF) is central to understanding gene networks that regulate growth and development. Such knowledge is lacking in oomycetes, a group of microbes that includes many important plant and animal pathogens. Here we describe the use of protein-binding oligonucleotide microarrays (PBMs) to define the DNA-binding preferences of 14 families of TFs from the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, which causes late blight of potato and tomato. DNA motifs obtained from the PBMs for representatives of each major TF family were validated by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) or ChIP-seq. Consistent with the large evolutionary distance of oomycetes from traditional models, only some of the P. infestans DNA-binding preferences resembled those of TFs from human and plants. Some families from P. infestans included clusters with canonical targets and others with novel targets. Paralogs having similar binding preferences often displayed distinct patterns of expression, suggesting functional divergence. Many TFs were predicted to either drive stage-specific expression or serve as general activators based on the representation of their binding sites within developmentally-regulated promoters. One such prediction was confirmed using a reporter gene assay. Our data thus provide a basis for understanding transcriptional regulation in P. infestans by linking TFs with their targets on a genome-wide level.

ORGANISM(S): synthetic construct Phytophthora infestans

PROVIDER: GSE270411 | GEO | 2024/07/03

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Mapping and Analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans Transcription Factor Binding Specificities

Project description:The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a powerful model for studying gene regulation, as it has a compact genome and a wealth of genomic tools. However, identification of regulatory elements has been hampered by the fact that DNA binding motifs are known for only 71 (9%) of the estimated 763 high-confidence sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs). To address this problem, we performed protein binding microarray (PBM) experiments on representatives of canonical TF families in the C. elegans TF repertoire, obtaining motifs for 129 distinct TFs. Moreover, we can infer motifs for 97 additional TFs that have DNA binding domains that are very similar to those already characterized, resulting in a total coverage of binding specificities for almost 40% of the C. elegans TF repertoire. These data highlight the diversification of binding motifs for the nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) and C2H2 zinc finger families, and reveal unexpected diversity of motifs for others, including the T-box and DM families. Enrichment of motifs in the promoters of functionally related genes is consistent with known biology in many cases, and also identifies putative new regulatory roles for poorly characterized TFs. The motifs are available at http:// http://cisbp.ccbr.utoronto.ca. Protein binding microarray (PBM) experiments were performed for a set of 129 diverse C. elegans transcription factors. Briefly, the PBMs involved binding GST-tagged DNA-binding proteins to two double-stranded 44K Agilent microarrays, each containing a different DeBruijn sequence design, in order to determine their sequence preferences. Details of the PBM protocol are described in Berger et al., Nature Biotechnology 2006.

2015-04-23 | E-GEOD-65719 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Evaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity

Project description:Genomic analyses often involve scanning for potential transcription-factor (TF) binding sites using models of the sequence specificity of DNA binding proteins. Many approaches have been developed to model and learn a protein’s binding specificity by representing sequence motifs, including the gaps and dependencies between binding-site residues, but these methods have not been systematically compared. Here we applied 26 such approaches to in vitro protein binding microarray data for 66 mouse TFs belonging to various families. For 9 TFs, we also scored the resulting motif models on in vivo data, and found that the best in vitro–derived motifs performed similarly to motifs derived from in vivo data. Our results indicate that simple models based on mononucleotide position weight matrices learned by the best methods perform similarly to more complex models for most TFs examined, but fall short in specific cases. In addition, the best-performing motifs typically have relatively low information content, consistent with widespread degeneracy in eukaryotic TF sequence preferences. Protein binding microarray (PBM) experiments were performed for a set of 86 mouse transcription factors. Briefly, the PBMs involved binding GST-tagged DNA-binding proteins to two double-stranded 44K Agilent microarrays, each containing a different DeBruijn sequence design, in order to determine their sequence preferences. Details of the PBM protocol are described in Berger et al., Nature Biotechnology 2006.

2012-12-13 | E-GEOD-42864 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Determination and Inference of Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Sequence Specificity

Project description:The DNA sequence preferences of the vast majority of eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) are unknown. Using an approach designed to broadly sample both DNA-binding domain types and eukaryotic clades, we have determined DNA-binding motifs for 1,033 TFs from 131 diverse eukaryotes, encompassing 54 domain types. Closely related orthologs and paralogs typically have very similar sequence preferences; this property allows inference of motifs for roughly one third of the 166,851 known or predicted eukaryotic TFs. While the origins of most motifs can be dated to hundreds of millions of years ago, we also characterize more recent TF expansions. Sequences matching the motifs are enriched upstream of TSS in most eukaryotic lineages, and at informative eQTL SNPs in Arabidopsis promoters, demonstrating their utility in mapping transcriptional networks. The motifs are housed at http://cisbp.ccbr.utoronto.ca Protein binding microarray (PBM) experiments were performed for a set of 1048 diverse eukaryotic transcription factors. Briefly, the PBMs involved binding GST-tagged DNA-binding proteins to two double-stranded 44K Agilent microarrays, each containing a different DeBruijn sequence design, in order to determine their sequence preferences. Details of the PBM protocol are described in Berger et al., Nature Biotechnology 2006.

2014-08-01 | E-GEOD-53348 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Genomic regions flanking E-box sites influence DNA binding specificity of bHLH transcription factors through DNA shape (validation)

Project description:DNA sequence is a major determinant of the binding specificity of transcription factors (TFs) for their genomic targets. However, eukaryotic cells often express, at the same time, TFs with highly similar DNA binding motifs but distinct in vivo targets. Currently, it is not well understood how TFs with seemingly identical DNA motifs achieve unique specificities in vivo. Here, we used custom protein binding microarrays to analyze TF specificity for putative binding sites in their genomic sequence context. Using yeast TFs Cbf1 and Tye7 as our case study, we found that binding sites of these bHLH TFs (i.e., E-boxes) are bound differently in vitro and in vivo, depending on their genomic context. Computational analyses suggest that nucleotides outside E-box binding sites contribute to specificity by influencing the 3D structure of DNA binding sites. Thus, local shape of target sites might play a widespread role in achieving regulatory specificity within TF families. Two protein binding microarray (PBM) experiments of Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factors were performed. Briefly, the PBMs involved binding GST-tagged yeast transcription factors Cbf1 and Tye7 to double-stranded 44K Agilent microarrays in order to determine the accuracy of our regression models for TF-DNA binding specificity. Briefly, this array contains 30-bp genomic sequences from our initial custom array (Gordan et al 2013, submitted), with 0 through 4 mutations designed at various positions in the genomic sequences. Each sequence in represented in 6 replicate spots. We report the PBM signal intensity for each spot. The PBM protocol is described in Berger et al., Nature Biotechnology 2006 (PMID 16998473).

2013-03-29 | E-GEOD-44437 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [uPBM_Runx1Runx2]

Project description:Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. Our finding was possible due to a unique combination of carefully designed high-throughput assays and rigorous computation modeling, integrated into a unified framework called iMADS. We used iMADS to quantity, model, and analyze specificity differences between 11 paralogous TFs from 4 distinct human TF families. Our finding of differential specificity between closely related TFs has important implications for the interpretation of the regulatory effects of non-coding genetic variants.

2018-07-19 | GSE117350 | GEO

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [uPBM_Elk1Ets1Gabpa_MycMaxMad]

2018-04-03 | GSE102810 | GEO

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_E2F1-3-4_cust2_v1]

2018-04-03 | GSE97886 | GEO

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_MycMaxMad_v1]

2018-04-03 | GSE97885 | GEO

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_Elk1Ets1Gabpa_v1]

2018-04-03 | GSE97793 | GEO

Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding [RG_Runx1Runx2_v1]

2018-04-03 | GSE97691 | GEO