Dataset Information

Enhancer-driven cell type comparison reveals similarities between the mammalian and avian telencephalon

ABSTRACT: Combinations of transcription factors govern the identity of cell types, which is reflected by genomic enhancer codes. We utilized deep learning to characterize these enhancer codes and devised three novel metrics to compare cell types in the telencephalon between mammals and birds. To this end, we generated single-cell multiome and spatially-resolved transcriptomics data of the chicken telencephalon. Enhancer codes of orthologous non-neuronal and GABAergic cell types show a high degree of similarity across vertebrates, while excitatory neurons of the mammalian neocortex and avian pallium exhibit varying degrees of similarity. Enhancer codes of avian mesopallial neurons are most similar to those of mammalian deep layer neurons. With this study, we present generally applicable deep learning approaches to characterize and compare cell types solely based on genomic sequences.

ORGANISM(S): Gallus gallus

PROVIDER: GSE275097 | GEO | 2024/08/24

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:Transcriptional enhancers act as docking stations for combinations of transcription factors and thereby regulate spatiotemporal activation of their target genes. A single enhancer, of a few hundred base pairs in length, can autonomously and independently of its location and orientation drive cell-type specific expression of a gene or transgene. It has been a long-standing goal in the field to decode the regulatory logic of an enhancer and to understand the details of how spatiotemporal gene expression is encoded in an enhancer sequence. Recently, deep learning models have yielded unprecedented insight into the enhancer code, and well-trained models are reaching a level of understanding that may be close to complete. As a consequence, we hypothesized that deep learning models can be used to guide the directed design of synthetic, cell type specific enhancers, and that this process would allow for a detailed tracing of all enhancer features at nucleotide-level resolution. Here we implemented and compared three different design strategies, each built on a deep learning model: (1) directed sequence evolution; (2) directed iterative motif implanting; and (3) generative design. We evaluated the function of fully synthetic enhancers to specifically target Kenyon cells or glial cells in the fruit fly brain using transgenic animals. We then exploited this concept further by creating “dual-code” enhancers that target two cell types, and minimal enhancers smaller than 50 base pairs that are fully functional. By examining the trajectories followed during state space searches towards functional enhancers, we could accurately define the enhancer code as the optimal strength, combination, and relative distance of TF activator motifs, and the absence of TF repressor motifs. Finally, we applied the same three strategies to successfully design human enhancers, finding highly similar design principles as in Drosophila. In conclusion, enhancer design guided by deep learning leads to better understanding of how enhancers work and shows that their code can be exploited to manipulate cell states.

Dataset Information

Enhancer-driven cell type comparison reveals similarities between the mammalian and avian telencephalon

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets