Dataset Information

Comparative analysis of chicken Intestinal Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) following Eimeria acervulina (EA), E. maxima (EM), or E. tenella (ET) infection

ABSTRACT: Relative expression levels of mRNAs in chicken IEL experimentally infected with EA, EM, or ET were measured at 1 to 6 days post-infection (dpi) following primary and secondary infections. One week-old chickens were uninfected (negative control) or were orally inoculated with sporulated oocysts of EA, EM, or ET. One week later, the infected chickens were challenged with an identical inoculum of the homologous parasite. Intestinal samples were collected daily from 5 birds in a treatment group at from 1 to 6 dpi following primary and secondary infections. Cecum, duodenum, and jejunum were collected from the birds challenged with E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. tenella, respectively. Uninfected control samples and one of the 3 infection group samples were labeled with different fluorescent dyes and hybridized simultaneously on the same slide using a reference design with a dye swap protocol.

ORGANISM(S): Gallus gallus

PROVIDER: GSE31213 | GEO | 2011/08/15

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA145967

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: This study is to more comprehensively understand the genome-wide host response to avian pathogen E. coli (APEC). Methods: Male broiler chicks were challenged with APEC (or mock-challenged as controls), and bone marrow was harvested at 1 and 5 days post-infection (dpi). Based upon necropsy-scored lesions on liver, pericardium, and air sacs, the challenged birds were assigned to mild or severe pathology categories, representing resistant and susceptible phenotypes, respectively. RNA sequence data were first analyzed using the R package EdgeR to identify differentially expressed genes.GO and pathway analysis using the R package GOseq identified many immune-related pathways. Results: RNA sequencing resulted in 11 to 40 million single-end raw reads of 100 bp per sample. After alignment, an average of 80 % of the reads, with 5 % representing multiple mapping, were mapped to the chicken reference transcriptome. Among these detected unique transcripts, there were 2,404 novel genes mainly distributed on chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 3, Z, 5 in decreasing number. Genes were detected as differentially expressed (DE) between treatments (susceptible, resistant, and mock-challenged) at a given time point, or DE between 1 and 5 dpi within the same treatment group. Compared to mock-challenged birds on 5 dpi, susceptible birds exhibited extensive enhancement of their T cell and B cell development, as well as innate and adaptive immune response. However, for the 1 dpi group, susceptible birds exhibited a decreased gene expression of T and B cell development. The differences between the two phenotypes, susceptible and resistant birds, at 5 dpi showed that susceptible birds had increased gene expression of B-cell development and adaptive immune response. Conclusions: This is the first report to our knowledge examining the role of bone marrow cells in responding to APEC infection in broilers. This transcriptome study provides insight and global overview into the response of genes involved in the earliest phases of the immune response to APEC infection. Our data indicate a dynamic interaction between the innate and adaptive immune responses to APEC infection in susceptible birds, providing flexibility and redundancy in the host’s induction of cytokines and chemokines. Additionally, B cell and T cell development are also extensively affected by APEC infection for susceptible birds, resulting in drastic host impairment in early response to infection. The findings of present study shed light on the underlying chicken immune modulation against APEC infection. Also, this study will build a solid foundation for identifying host genetic variation that may be manipulated to enhance resistance to infection and may be useful as colibacillosis control targets.

Dataset Information

Comparative analysis of chicken Intestinal Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) following Eimeria acervulina (EA), E. maxima (EM), or E. tenella (ET) infection

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets