Expression data from mandibular arches in mouse embryos
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Fusion of branchial arch derivatives is an essential event in the development of craniofacial architecture. A unique feature of the mandibular arch development is medial/lateral compartmentalization for the molecular networks. Those networks give rise to multiple region-specific organs, namely teeth, a tongue, salivary glands, and the supporting matrices such as bones and cartilages. We aimed to investigate molecular networks that govern the fusion process during mouse mandibular development. To this end, cDNA microarray technology was employed for screening of spatio-temporal gene expression in developing mandibular arch from E9.7 through E14.5.
Project description:Fusion of branchial arch derivatives is an essential event in the development of craniofacial architecture. A unique feature of the mandibular arch development is medial/lateral compartmentalization for the molecular networks. Those networks give rise to multiple region-specific organs, namely teeth, a tongue, salivary glands, and the supporting matrices such as bones and cartilages. We aimed to investigate molecular networks that govern the fusion process during mouse mandibular development. To this end, cDNA microarray technology was employed for screening of spatio-temporal gene expression in developing mandibular arch from E9.7 through E11.5. We conducted to divide a mandibular arch medially and laterally to compare both gene expression. From an embryo at E10.5, a medial (M) sample of the mandibular arch was dissected out -at just the distal end of opposed lateral lingual swellings-, and the bulk of remnant lateral region was collected as (L) sample under a stereomicroscope. Forty embryos for each time-point were used to obtain a pool of total RNA.
Project description:The Dlx homeobox genes have central roles in controlling patterning and differentiation of the brain and craniofacial primordia. In the brain, loss of Dlx function results in defects in the production, migration and differentiation of GABAergic neurons, that can lead to epilepsy. In the branchial arches, loss of Dlx function leads to craniofacial malformations that include trigeminal axon pathfinding defects. To determine how these genes function, we wish to identify the transcriptional circuitry that lies downstream of these transcription factors by comparing gene expression in wild type with Dlx mutant CNS and craniofacial tissues. 1) Compare gene expression in the maxillay branch of the first branchial arch (BA) of E10.5 wild type and Dlx2 -/- mutants. 2) Compare gene expression in the maxillary branch of the first BA of E10.5 wild type and Dlx1/2 -/- mutants. 3) Compare gene expression in wild type maxillary and mandibular branchial arches. 4) Compare gene expressionin mandibular branch of Dlx5/6 -/- mutants with wild type mandibular branch. The Dlx transcription factors are essential for controlling patterning of the brain and craniofacial primordia. In the brain, they control differentiation of GABAergic neurons of the basal ganglia. In the branchial arches, they control regional patterning. I hypothesize that there will be some conserved and some divergent mechanisms that the Dlx genes use in controlling brain and craniofacial development. We have already performed array analyses on Dlx function in the developing basal ganglia (with TGEN) by comparing expressed genes in wild type and Dlx1/2 mutants. Here we will compare gene expression in the brachial arches of wild type and Dlx mutant mice. 1) Generate E10.5 mouse embryos that are either wild type, Dlx2-/-, Dlx1/2 -/- or Dlx5/6 -/-. 2) Determine genotype by PCR. 3) Dissect branchial arches from the different genotypes. 4) Separate maxillary and mandibular branch of each branchial arch. 5) Prepare total RNA from the specimens. Obtain sufficient tissue to obtain 10 ug of total RNA - based on previous experience we anticipate that this will require ~ 10 branchial arches. We will pool the tissue from different embryos of the same genotype. 6) Send total RNA to TGEN for probe preparation, hybridization and array result analysis.
Project description:Meis ChIP-seq on mouse second branchial arch (BA2) and posterior branchial arches connected to outflow tract of the heart (PBA/OFT) at embryonic day (E) 11.5.
Project description:Meis ChIP-seq on mouse first branchial arch (BA1) and posterior branchial arches connected to outflow tract of the heart (PBA/OFT) at embryonic day (E) 11.5.
Project description:The overall goal of this project is to investigate the role of TGF-beta signaling in tissue-tissue interactions between myogenic precursors of craniofacial muscles and cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs). Here, we conducted gene expression profiling of the mandibular arch from mice at embryonic day E11.5 with a CNCC-specific conditional inactivation of the TGF-beta receptor type 1 gene Alk5. These mice provide a model of microglossia as well as disrupted extraocular and masticatory muscle development, which are congenital birth defects commonly observed in several syndromic conditions. To investigate the adverse effects of dysfunctional TGF-beta signaling on tissue-tissue interactions between CNCCs and myogenic precursors of craniofacial muscles, we analyzed mandibular arch tissue of mice with a CNCC-specific conditional inactivation of Alk5 (Wnt1-Cre; Alk5 fl/fl). We performed microarray analyses of the mandibular arch of Alk5 fl/fl control mice and Wnt1-Cre; Alk5 fl/fl mutant mice, collected at embryonic day E11.5 (n=4 per group).
Project description:Gata6 ChIP-seq on mouse posterior branchial arches connected to outflow tract of the heart (PBA/OFT) at embryonic day (E) 11.5. H3K27Ac ChIP-seq on mouse second branchial arch (BA2) and posterior branchial arches connected to outflow tract of the heart (PBA/OFT) at embryonic day (E) 11.5.
Project description:The Dlx homeobox genes have central roles in controlling patterning and differentiation of the brain and craniofacial primordia. In the brain, loss of Dlx function results in defects in the production, migration and differentiation of GABAergic neurons, that can lead to epilepsy. In the branchial arches, loss of Dlx function leads to craniofacial malformations that include trigeminal axon pathfinding defects. To determine how these genes function, we wish to identify the transcriptional circuitry that lies downstream of these transcription factors by comparing gene expression in wild type with Dlx mutant CNS and craniofacial tissues. 1) Compare gene expression in the maxillay branch of the first branchial arch (BA) of E10.5 wild type and Dlx2 -/- mutants. 2) Compare gene expression in the maxillary branch of the first BA of E10.5 wild type and Dlx1/2 -/- mutants. 3) Compare gene expression in wild type maxillary and mandibular branchial arches. 4) Compare gene expressionin mandibular branch of Dlx5/6 -/- mutants with wild type mandibular branch. The Dlx transcription factors are essential for controlling patterning of the brain and craniofacial primordia. In the brain, they control differentiation of GABAergic neurons of the basal ganglia. In the branchial arches, they control regional patterning. I hypothesize that there will be some conserved and some divergent mechanisms that the Dlx genes use in controlling brain and craniofacial development. We have already performed array analyses on Dlx function in the developing basal ganglia (with TGEN) by comparing expressed genes in wild type and Dlx1/2 mutants. Here we will compare gene expression in the brachial arches of wild type and Dlx mutant mice. 1) Generate E10.5 mouse embryos that are either wild type, Dlx2-/-, Dlx1/2 -/- or Dlx5/6 -/-. 2) Determine genotype by PCR. 3) Dissect branchial arches from the different genotypes. 4) Separate maxillary and mandibular branch of each branchial arch. 5) Prepare total RNA from the specimens. Obtain sufficient tissue to obtain 10 ug of total RNA - based on previous experience we anticipate that this will require ~ 10 branchial arches. We will pool the tissue from different embryos of the same genotype. 6) Send total RNA to TGEN for probe preparation, hybridization and array result analysis. Keywords: other
Project description:PITX1 had a significantly higher expression in the lower teeth compared to the upper teeth and this difference in PITX1 level was more evident in the molars compared to premolars, consistent with data in mouse developing teeth. These show that the differential gene expression during odontogenesis can continue to exist in mature teeth. We suggest that an in vitro study of dental pulp cells should take the differential gene profiles between the mandibular and maxillary teeth into consideration. The knowledge about gene profiling and pathways in mature teeth paves a way to explore a more precise treatment approach in regenerative dentistry.