Pilot study to identify technical variation in microarray data of mouse lungs in the context of inter-animal variation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
PROVIDER: GSE42521 | GEO | 2013/07/03
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA182486
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Prior to generation of microarray data for a Top-down Systems analysis of influenza A infection, we evaluated the degree and origin of technical variation in gene expression microarray data from mouse lungs and compared this to inter-animal variation. Technical variation in these microarray data in the context of inter-animal variation supported a choice of biological rather than technical replicates. A) One mouse (260) was infected with 0.6LD50 of the mouse pathogenic H1N1 strain PR8. Lung tissues were collected at 72h post infection and processed to yield whole lung RNA that was used for microarray analysis. The RNA was extracted in 3 individual batches (I, II, III), each batch of RNA was amplified in 2 separate batches (1,2), and the individual batches of amplified product were again hybridized in 2 batches. This dataset contains 18 microarrays covering 1 experimental condition with 1 biological replicate and a matrix of technical replicates. B) 3 mice (245, 246, 247) were infected with 0.6LD50 of the mouse pathogenic H1N1 strain PR8. Lung tissues were collected at 72h post infection and processed to yield whole lung RNA that was used for microarray analysis. From each animal, RNA was extracted, the RNA was amplified in three separate batches (A, B, C), and the individual batches of amplified product were again hybridized in 2 batches. This dataset contains 24 microarrays covering 1 experimental condition with 3 biological replicates and a matrix of technical replicates. Datasets A) and B) are linked to two biological datasets - one comparing the transcriptomes of 5 different cell types isolated from individual lungs of influenza A-infected or control animals (contains 75 microarrays covering 25 experimental conditions) and one comprising whole lung microarrays from sham-infected or influenza H1N1-infected animals (contains 138 microarrays, 19 experimental conditions, 7 biological replicates).
2013-07-03 | E-GEOD-42521 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The aim of this study was to map inter-individual variation in the human milk peptidome and to investigate relationships between these data and possible explanations for observed variation.
2022-05-04 | PXD028294 | Pride
Project description:The aim of this study was to map inter-individual variation in the human milk proteome and to investigate relationships between these data and possible explanations for observed variation.
2022-05-04 | PXD028280 | Pride
Project description:Isogenic individuals growing in the same environment often show substantial phenotypic variation. The causes, consequences and molecular bases of inter-individual variation are usually poorly understood. To characterize molecular differences between isogenic individuals, we measured genome-wide expression profiles in synchronized single young adult C. elegans worms.
2017-12-05 | GSE98747 | GEO
Project description:In the teleost fish Fundulus heteroclitus there is extensive variation in gene expression among individuals within and between populations. Accurate measures of the variation in mRNA expression using microarrays can be confounded by technical variation, which includes variation in RNA isolation procedures, day of hybridization and methods used to amplify and dye label RNA for hybridization. In this manuscript we analyze the relationship between the amount of mRNA and the fluorescent signal from the microarray hybridizations demonstrating that for a wide-range of mRNA concentrations the fluorescent signal is a linear function of the amount of mRNA. Additionally, the separate isolation, labeling or hybridization of RNA does not add significant amounts of variation in microarray measures of gene expression. However, single or double rounds of amplification for labeling do have small but significant affects on 10% of genes, but this source of technical variation is easy to avoid. To examine both technical and stochastic biological variation, mRNA expression was measured from the same five individuals over a six-week time course. There were few, if any, meaningful differences in gene expression among time points. Thus, microarray measures using standard laboratory procedures can be precise and quantitative and are not subject to significant random biological noise.
2008-11-21 | GSE12858 | GEO
Project description:Pilot study to identify technical variation in microarray data of mouse lungs in the context of inter-animal variation
| PRJNA182486 | ENA
Project description:Changes in gene regulation level have long been thought to play an important role in evolution and speciation, especially in primates. Over the past decade, comparative genomic studies have revealed extensive inter-species differences in gene expression levels yet we know much less about the extent to which regulatory mechanisms differ between species. To begin addressing this gap, we performed a comparative epigenetic study in primate lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), to query the contribution of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and four histone modifications (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, and H3K27me3) to inter-species variation in gene expression levels. We found that inter-species differences in mark enrichment near transcription start sites are significantly more often associated with inter-species differences in the corresponding gene expression level than expected by chance alone. Interestingly, we also found that first-order interactions among the histone marks and Pol II do not markedly contribute to the degree of association between the marks and inter-species variation in gene expression levels, suggesting that the marginal effects of the five marks dominate this contribution.
2014-11-09 | GSE60269 | GEO
Project description:Background: RNA-seq is revolutionizing the way we study transcriptomes. mRNA can be surveyed without prior knowledge of gene transcripts. Alternative splicing of transcript isoforms and the identification of previously unknown exons are being reported. Initial reports of differences in exon usage, and splicing between samples as well as quantitative differences among samples are beginning to surface. Biological variation has been reported to be larger than technical variation. In addition, technical variation has been reported to be in line with expectations due to random sampling. However, strategies for dealing with technical variation will differ depending on the magnitude. The size of technical variance, and the role of sampling are examined in this manuscript. Results: Independent Solexa/Illumina experiments containing technical replicates are analyzed. When coverage is low, large disagreements between technical replicates are apparent. Exon detection between technical replicates is highly variable when the coverage is less than 5 reads per nucleotide and estimates of gene expression are more likely to disagree when coverage is low. Although large disagreements in the estimates of expression are observed at all levels of coverage. Conclusions: Technical variability is too high to ignore. Technical variability results in inconsistent detection of exons at low levels of coverage. Further, the estimate of the relative abundance of a transcript can substantially disagree, even when coverage levels are high. This may be due to the low sampling fraction and if so, it will persist as an issue needing to be addressed in experimental design even as the next wave of technology produces larger numbers of reads. We provide practical recommendations for dealing with the technical variability, without dramatic cost increases.
2014-01-15 | GSE54068 | GEO
Project description:Background: RNA-seq is revolutionizing the way we study transcriptomes. mRNA can be surveyed without prior knowledge of gene transcripts. Alternative splicing of transcript isoforms and the identification of previously unknown exons are being reported. Initial reports of differences in exon usage, and splicing between samples as well as quantitative differences among samples are beginning to surface. Biological variation has been reported to be larger than technical variation. In addition, technical variation has been reported to be in line with expectations due to random sampling. However, strategies for dealing with technical variation will differ depending on the magnitude. The size of technical variance, and the role of sampling are examined in this manuscript. Results: Independent Solexa/Illumina experiments containing technical replicates are analyzed. When coverage is low, large disagreements between technical replicates are apparent. Exon detection between technical replicates is highly variable when the coverage is less than 5 reads per nucleotide and estimates of gene expression are more likely to disagree when coverage is low. Although large disagreements in the estimates of expression are observed at all levels of coverage. Conclusions: Technical variability is too high to ignore. Technical variability results in inconsistent detection of exons at low levels of coverage. Further, the estimate of the relative abundance of a transcript can substantially disagree, even when coverage levels are high. This may be due to the low sampling fraction and if so, it will persist as an issue needing to be addressed in experimental design even as the next wave of technology produces larger numbers of reads. We provide practical recommendations for dealing with the technical variability, without dramatic cost increases.
2014-01-15 | GSE54067 | GEO
Project description:Analysis of the extent to which inter-individual variation in mRNA decay contributes to inter-individual variation in gene expression levels in humans. The study examines properties of genome-wide decay rates and the relationship between mRNA decay and gene expression across genes, across individuals, and finally across genotype classes.
2012-10-01 | GSE37451 | GEO