ChIP-Seq for cofactors in cancer
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE45984 | GEO | 2013/04/13
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA196924
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Critical drivers of cancer progression are likely controlled through the actions of transcription factors and cofactors that bind to the genome and form enhancers that stimulate gene expression. We present ChIP-seq analysis of key transcriptional regulators, cofactors and histone modifications that indicate transcriptional activity across a range of different cancer cells. ChIP-seq was performed against the cofactors Med1, Brd4 and CDK7 in MM1.S multiple myeloma cells; Brd4 in Sk-MEL-5 melanoma cells; and H3K9/K14 acetylation in MV4;11 leukemia cells,
2013-04-13 | E-GEOD-45984 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We use a mouse model of age-dependent p16 epimutation, in which the p16 gene activity is directly controlled by promoter DNA methylation. We show p16 epimutation is modulated by folate and cofactors in dietary supplementation, which leads to increased colon cancer risk. Importantly, our findings provide functional evidence concerning the safety of folate fortification in the general population.
2024-08-19 | GSE243762 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional cofactors display core promoter class-specificity
| PRJNA477764 | ENA
Project description:Transcriptional cofactors display core promoter class-specificity in human
| PRJNA521352 | ENA
Project description:Transcriptional cofactors communicate regulatory cues from enhancers to promoters and are central effectors of transcription activation and gene expression, which is a hallmark of all multicellular organisms. However, the extent to which different cofactors display intrinsic specificity for distinct promoters is unclear. Testing intrinsic COF – core promoter (CP) compatibilities requires the systematic assessment of transcriptional activation for many CPs in the presence or absence of a given COF in an otherwise constant standardized reporter system. We therefore combined a plasmid-based high-throughput reporter assay, Self-Transcribing Active Core Promoter-sequencing (STAP-seq), with the specific recruitment of individual COFs to create a high-throughput activator bypass-like assay. Using this assay, we tested whether 5 different individually tethered human COFs (MED15, BRD4, EP300, MLL3 and EMSY) activate transcription from a selection of 12,000 candidate sequences encompassing different types of gene core promoters, enhancers and control sequences. In addition, we used the strong transcriptional activator P65 as a positive control and GFP as a negative control. We found that different COFs preferentially activate different CPs. For instance, MED15 prefers TATA-box containing CPs, while MLL3 preferentially activates CpG island promoters. The observed compatibilities between cofactors and promoters can explain how different enhancers specifically activate distinct sets of genes or alternative promoters within the same gene, and may underlie distinct transcriptional programs in human cells.
2019-05-15 | GSE126221 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptional cofactors communicate regulatory cues from enhancers to promoters and are central effectors of transcription activation and gene expression, which is a hallmark of all multicellular organisms. However, the extent to which different cofactors display intrinsic specificity for distinct promoters is unclear. Testing intrinsic COF – CP preferences requires the systematic assessment of transcriptional activation for many CPs in the presence or absence of a given COF in an otherwise constant standardized reporter system. We therefore combined a plasmid-based high-throughput reporter assay, Self-Transcribing Active Core Promoter-sequencing (STAP-seq), with the specific recruitment of individual COFs to create a high-throughput activator bypass-like assay. Using this assay, we tested whether 23 different individually tethered Drosophila melanogaster COFs could activate transcription from any of 72,000 CP candidates in S2 cells. We selected COFs that represent different functional classes and enzymatic activities: histone-acetyl transferases (Nejire - the fly ortholog of CBP/P300, Mof, Gcn5 - ortholog of pCAF, Atac2, Tip60, Br140), three components of the COMPASS-like histone H3K4 methyltransferase complexes (Lpt, Trr and Trx), nucleosome remodeling ATP-ase (Brm), two Chromo or Chromo-shadow domain (Chro and Mof) and three Bromodomain (Brd8, Brd9 and fs(1)h - ortholog of Brd4) -containing COFs, three subunits of the Mediator Complex (MED15, MED24 and MED25), three subunits of the TFIID general transcription factor (Taf4, Tbp and Trf2) and three less well-characterized COFs (EMSY, Gfzf and Pzg). We used the strong transcriptional activator P65 as a positive and GFP as a negative control. In addition, we tested 6 COFs and the 2 controls in two other Drosophila cell lines: ovarian somatic cells (OSC) and Kc167 cells. We uncovered five classes of core promoters, distinguished by their differential response to specific cofactors and by the presence of known sequence elements, such as the TATA-box, Down-stream Promoter Element, or TCT motif. Moreover, the five promoter types show distinct chromatin properties at endogenous loci. The observed compatibilities between cofactors and promoters can explain how different enhancers specifically activate distinct sets of genes, alternative promoters within the same genes, or even distinct transcription starting sites within the same promoters. Thus, cofactor–promoter compatibilities may underlie distinct transcriptional programs.
2019-05-15 | GSE116197 | GEO
Project description:Regulation of specific target genes by transcription factors is central to gene network control in development. How target specificity is achieved in eukaryotic genomes is poorly understood, as exemplified by the Hox family, which show limited in vitro DNA-binding specificity but clear functional specificity in vivo. We generated genome-wide binding profiles for three Hox proteins, Ubx, Abd-A and Abd-B, in Drosophila Kc167 cells, revealing clear target specificity and a striking influence of chromatin accessibility. Ubx and Abd-A bind to similar target sites in accessible chromatin whereas Abd-B binds additional specific targets. Provision of the TALE class cofactors, Exd and Hth, alters the Ubx binding profile, enabling binding to additional targets in the genome. Both the Abd-B specific targets and the cofactor-dependent Ubx targets are in relatively DNase1 inaccessible chromatin, suggesting that competition with nucleosomes is a key factor determining Hox protein target specificity.
2015-12-07 | GSE69796 | GEO
Project description:We report the application of single-molecule-based sequencing technology for REST and its cofactors genome wide binding sites in E14 cells.We then combine these binding sirtes with REST regulating gene profiling, to understand REST binding and regulation in E14 cells. Examination of REST and 5 cofactors(RCOR1, RCOR2,RCOR3,SIN3A,SIN3B) in E14 cells, REST and SIN3A endogenous antibody were used for ChIP experiment. The stable E14 cells expressing low level exogenous RCOR1, RCOR2, RCOR3,and SIN3B with V5 tag were used for ChIP experiment with V5 antibody to obtain individual ChIP DNA.
2011-04-01 | E-GEOD-28233 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In eukaryotes, members of large transcription factor families often exhibit similar DNA binding properties in vitro, yet initiate paralog-specific gene regulatory networks in vivo. The serially homologous first (T1) and third (T3) thoracic legs of Drosophila, which result from alternative gene regulatory networks specified by the Hox proteins Scr and Ubx, respectively, offer a unique opportunity to address this paradox in vivo. Genome-wide analyses using epitope-tagged alleles of both Hox loci in the T1 and T3 leg imaginal discs, which are the precursors to the adult appendages and ventral body regions, show that ~8% of Hox binding is paralog-specific. Binding specificity is mediated by interactions with distinct cofactors in different domains: the known Hox cofactor Exd acts in the proximal domain and is necessary for Scr to bind ~70% of its paralog-specific targets, while in the distal leg domain, we identified the homeodomain protein Distal-less (Dll) as a novel Hox cofactor that enhances Scr binding to a different subset of genomic loci. Reporter genes confirm the in vivo roles of Scr+Dll and suggest that ~1/3 of paralog-specific Hox binding in enhancers is functional. Together, these findings provide a genome-wide view of how Hox paralogs, and perhaps paralogs of other transcription factor families, orchestrate alternative downstream gene networks and suggest the importance of multiple, context-specific cofactors.
2022-05-23 | GSE184454 | GEO
Project description:Objective Estrogen-related-receptor α (ERRα) plays a critical role in the transcriptional regulation of cellular bioenergetics and metabolism, and perturbations in its activity have been associated with metabolic diseases. While several coactivators and corepressors of ERRα have been identified to date, a knowledge gap remains in understanding the extent to which ERRα cooperates with coregulators in the control of gene expression. Herein, we mapped the primary chromatin-bound ERRα interactome in mouse liver. Methods RIME (Rapid Immuno-precipitation Mass spectrometry of Endogenous proteins) analysis using mouse liver samples from two circadian time points was used to catalog ERRα-interacting proteins on chromatin. The genomic crosstalk between ERRα and its identified cofactors in the transcriptional control of precise gene programs was explored through cross-examination of genome-wide binding profiles from chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) studies. The dynamic interplay between ERRα and its newly uncovered cofactor Host cell factor C1 (HCFC1) was further investigated by loss-of-function studies in hepatocytes. Results Characterization of the hepatic ERRα chromatin interactome led to the identification of 48 transcriptional interactors of which 42 were previously unknown including HCFC1. Interrogation of available ChIP-seq binding profiles highlighted oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) under the control of a complex regulatory network between ERRα and multiple cofactors. While ERRα and HCFC1 were found to bind to a large set of common genes, only a small fraction showed their co-localization, found predominately near the transcriptional start sites of genes particularly enriched for components of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Knockdown studies demonstrated inverse regulatory actions of ERRα and HCFC1 on OXPHOS gene expression ultimately dictating the impact of their loss-of-function on mitochondrial respiration. Conclusions Our work unveils a repertoire of previously unknown transcriptional partners of ERRα comprised of chromatin modifiers and transcription factors thus advancing our knowledge of how ERRα regulates metabolic transcriptional programs.
2024-06-22 | PXD047767 | Pride