Gene expression outcome for gastric cancer patients
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE49051 | GEO | 2014/10/01
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA212779
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:The gene expression of the three cancer patients who had operation were compared with the genes of the three normal cases. Three gastric cancer patients were compared with the three normal persons.
2014-10-01 | E-GEOD-49051 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We performed RNA-Seq analysis of plasma and urinary EVs collected before and after radical prostatectomy, and matched tumor and normal prostate tissues of 10 patients with prostate cancer. To identify putative cancer-derived RNA biomarkers, we searched for RNAs that were overexpressed in tumor as compared to normal tissues, present in the pre-operation EVs and decreased in the post-operation EVs in each RNA biotype.
2022-11-16 | E-MTAB-11910 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Gene expression in histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients and cancer-free prophylactic mastectomy patients share a similar profile Introduction: We hypothesized that gene expression in histologically normal epithelium (NlEpi) would differ in breast cancer patients (HN) compared to usual-risk controls undergoing reduction mammoplasty (RM), and that gene expression in NlEpi from cancer-free prophylactic mastectomies from high-risk women (PM), would resemble HN gene expression. Methods: We analyzed gene expression in 73 NlEpi samples microdissected from frozen tissue. In 42 cases, we used Affymetrix HU133A microarrays to compare gene expression in 18 RM vs 18 age-matched HN (9 ER+, 9 ER-) and 6 PM. Data were validated with qPCR in 31 independent NlEpi samples (8 RM, 17 HN, 6 PM). Results: 98 probesets (86 genes) were differentially expressed between RM and HN samples. Perfoming supervised hierarchical analysis with these 98 probesets, PM and HN samples clustered together, away from RM samples. qPCR validation of independent samples was high (84%) and uniform in RM vs HN, and lower (58%), but more heterogeneous, in RM vs PM. The 86 genes were implicated in many processes including transcription and the MAPK pathway. Conclusion: Gene expression differs between NlEpi of cancer cases and controls. The cancer cases' profile can be discerned in high-risk NlEpi. This suggests that the profile is not an effect of the tumor, but may mark increased risk and reveal breast cancer's earliest genomic changes. We determined that 98 probesets significantly differed between reduction mammoplasty and histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients. We also found that the histologically normal epithelium from prophylactic mastectomy patients' gene expression was more similar to histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients' than to reduction mammoplasty patients' gene expression. These results demonstrate that gene expression differs between NlEpi of cancer cases and controls. The cancer cases’ profile can be discerned in high-risk NlEpi. This suggests that the profile is not an effect of the tumor, but may mark increased risk and reveal breast cancer's earliest genomic changes.
2010-06-01 | GSE20437 | GEO
Project description:Gene expression in histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients and cancer-free prophylactic mastectomy patients share a similar profile Introduction: We hypothesized that gene expression in histologically normal epithelium (NlEpi) would differ in breast cancer patients (HN) compared to usual-risk controls undergoing reduction mammoplasty (RM), and that gene expression in NlEpi from cancer-free prophylactic mastectomies from high-risk women (PM), would resemble HN gene expression. Methods: We analyzed gene expression in 73 NlEpi samples microdissected from frozen tissue. In 42 cases, we used Affymetrix HU133A microarrays to compare gene expression in 18 RM vs 18 age-matched HN (9 ER+, 9 ER-) and 6 PM. Data were validated with qPCR in 31 independent NlEpi samples (8 RM, 17 HN, 6 PM). Results: 98 probesets (86 genes) were differentially expressed between RM and HN samples. Perfoming supervised hierarchical analysis with these 98 probesets, PM and HN samples clustered together, away from RM samples. qPCR validation of independent samples was high (84%) and uniform in RM vs HN, and lower (58%), but more heterogeneous, in RM vs PM. The 86 genes were implicated in many processes including transcription and the MAPK pathway. Conclusion: Gene expression differs between NlEpi of cancer cases and controls. The cancer cases' profile can be discerned in high-risk NlEpi. This suggests that the profile is not an effect of the tumor, but may mark increased risk and reveal breast cancer's earliest genomic changes. We determined that 98 probesets significantly differed between reduction mammoplasty and histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients. We also found that the histologically normal epithelium from prophylactic mastectomy patients' gene expression was more similar to histologically normal epithelium from breast cancer patients' than to reduction mammoplasty patients' gene expression. These results demonstrate that gene expression differs between NlEpi of cancer cases and controls. The cancer casesâ?? profile can be discerned in high-risk NlEpi. This suggests that the profile is not an effect of the tumor, but may mark increased risk and reveal breast cancer's earliest genomic changes. 42 total laser capture microdissected histologically normal breast tissue samples were analyzed with Affymetrix HU133A microarrays. 36 samples were age-matched between reduction mammoplasty (n=18) and histologically normal epithelial samples from breast cancer patients (n=18; 9ER+, 9ER-). 6 histologically normal epithelial samples from prophylactic mastectomy patients were then compared to data generated from the original 36 sample comparison. Sample numbers correspond to individual patient samples.
2010-06-08 | E-GEOD-20437 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Proteomics is a powerful approach to study the molecular mechanisms of cancer. In this study, we aim to characterize the proteomic profile of gastric cancer (GC) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2. Forty GC tissue samples including 19 cases from diabetic patients and 21 cases from individuals without diabetes (control group) were selected for the proteomics analysis. Gastric tissues were processed following the single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation approach—SP3 and enzymatic digestion with trypsin. The resulting peptides were analyzed by LC-MS Liquid Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS). The comparison of protein expression levels between GC samples from diabetic and non-diabetic patients was performed by label-free quantification (LFQ). A total of 6599 protein groups were identified in the 40 samples. Thirty-seven proteins were differentially expressed among the two groups, with 16 upregulated and 21 downregulated in the diabetic cohort. Statistical overresentation tests were considered for different annotation sets including the Gene Ontology(GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Reactome, and Disease functional databases. Upregulated proteins in the GC samples from diabetic patients were particularly enriched in respiratory electron transport and alcohol metabolic biological processes, while downregulated proteins were associated with epithelial cancers, intestinal diseases, and cell–cell junction cellular components. Taken together, these results support the data already obtained by previous studies that associate diabetes with metabolic disorders and diabetes-associated diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, and also provide valuable insights into seven GC-associated protein targets, claudin-3, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor protein, cadherin-17, villin-1, transglutaminase-2, desmoglein-2, and mucin-13, which warrant further investigation.
2021-01-22 | PXD022915 | Pride
Project description:Purpose: Analysis of exosomal miRNA in plasma of patients with metastatic and non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. To identify exosomes cargo specific miRNAs promoting cancer metastasis. Methods: We divide the plasma samples into five groups according to whether they have metastasis and undergo surgery.The five groups are Health(20),Metastasis Pre-operation and Post-operation (14),Non-metastasis Pre-operation and Post-operation(9).Then we collected the exosomes by ultracentrifugation and extracted the small RNA in each sample.Then, we analyzed the expression changes of miRNA by small RNA sequencing. Result: Different groups have different expression of small RNA. Compared with the non-metastatic group, the expression of miR-92a-3p , miR-148-3p and miR-25-3p increased in the metastatic group. Conclusion:Exosomal miRNA in pancreatic cancer patient derived plasma were analyze using Hiseq2500 sequencing technique. We identified that miR-92a-3p, miR-148-3p and miR-25-3p enriched in metastatic pancreatic cancer patient plasma derived exosomes.
2022-01-01 | GSE166799 | GEO
Project description:Gastric cancer samples of Mexican patients
| PRJNA481039 | ENA
Project description:Early gastric cancers (EGC) precede advanced gastric cancers (AGC) with a favorable clinical outcome compared to advanced gastric cancers (AGC). To understand the progression mechanisms of EGC to AGC, it is required to disclose the EGC and AGC genomes in terms of the the mutational and evolutionary perspectives. In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing and copy number profiling of nine microsatellite (MS)-unstable (MSI-H) (5 EGC and 4 AGC) and eight MS-stable (MSS) gastric cancers (4 EGC and 4 AGC). Unexpectedly, we observed no substantial differences in the number, sequence composition and functional consequences (potential driver mutations and affected pathways) of the mutations and CNAs between EGC and AGC genomes in both MSI-H and MSS cases. Gastrectomy tissues from 17 GC patients were used for this study. The hospital pathology department confirmed pathologic features of the GC (e.g., EGC vs. AGC, differentiation, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage). All of the picked areas from tumor and normal areas were frozen, cut, and stained with hematoxylin & eosin (H&E). Two pathologists selected cases with rich tumor cell population (at least 60%), which were subsequently used in the study. Copy number profiling was performed using Agilent 180K platform according to the manufacturer's protocol.
2014-06-30 | E-GEOD-57176 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Cognitively affected DMD patients have unique methylation signatures compared to cognitively normal DMD patients
| PRJNA902482 | ENA
Project description:Cognitively affected DMD patients have unique methylation signatures compared to cognitively normal DMD patients
| PRJNA902483 | ENA