Genome-wide DNA methylation analyses by the HELP assay
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
PROVIDER: GSE51680 | GEO | 2015/09/10
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA224549
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:The HELP tagging assay was performed on purified genomic DNAs. The protocol was modified for NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina (NEB) from the original protocol4 (http://wasp.einstein.yu.edu/index.php/Protocol:HELP_tagging). Briefly, genomic DNA was digested by HpaII or MspI, the former only cutting at CCGG sequences where the central CG dinucleotide is unmethylated. AS and AE adapters were prepared by annealing two oligo DNAs separately. The first Illumina AE adapter was ligated to the compatible cohesive end created, juxtaposing an EcoP15I site beside the HpaII/MspI digestion site and allowing EcoP15I to digest within the flanking genomic DNA sequence. An A-overhang was created, allowing the ligation of the second Illumina AS adapter. This created both AE-insert-AS products and AS-insert-AS molecules. By performing a T7 polymerase-mediated in vitro transcription from a promoter sequence located on the AE adapter, we selectively enriched for the AE-insert-AS product. PCR amplification by NEBNext Multiplex Oligos was performed to generate a single-sized amplicons for Illumina sequencing. DNA methylation in Zscan4 positive and negative cells
2015-09-10 | E-GEOD-51680 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:CG Methylation of Col, Van and reciprocal hybrids using HpaII and MspI digestion followed by bioprime random labeling, and hybridization to AtTILE1 forward array. Study on constitutive and ploymorphic CG methylation between arabidopsis thaliana accessions Col-0 and Van-0. Study on the inheritance of CG methylation in reciprocal hybrids. Keywords: genomic hybridization
2008-04-11 | GSE8890 | GEO
Project description:Genome wide methylation profiling of gliomas is likely to provide important clues to improving treatment outcomes. Restriction enzyme based approaches have been widely utilized for methylation profiling of cancer genomes and will continue to have importance in combination with higher density microarrays. With the availability of the human genome sequence and microarray probe sequences, these approaches can be readily characterized and optimized via in silico modeling. We adapted the previously described HpaII/MspI based Methylation Sensitive Restriction Enzyme (MSRE) assay for use with two-color Agilent 244K CpG island microarrays. In this assay, fragmented genomic DNA is digested in separate reactions with isoschizomeric HpaII (methylation-sensitive) and MspI (methylation-insensitive) restriction enzymes. Using in silico hybridization, we found that genomic fragmentation with BfaI was superior to MseI, providing a maximum effective coverage of 22,362 CpG islands in the human genome. In addition, we confirmed the presence of an internal control group of fragments lacking HpaII/MspI sites which enable separation of methylated and unmethylated fragments. We used this method on genomic DNA isolated from normal brain, U87MG cells, and a glioblastoma patient tumor sample and confirmed selected differentially methylated CpG islands using bisulfite sequencing. Along with additional validation points, we performed a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal threshold (p ≤ 0.001). Based on this threshold, we identified ~2400 CpG islands common to all three samples and 145 CpG islands unique to glioblastoma. These data provide general guidance to individuals seeking to maximize effective coverage using restriction enzyme based methylation profiling approaches.
2009-12-08 | GSE19363 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: The study aimed to characterize the molecular phenotype of bone marrow macrophages in NHL with RNA sequencing analysis. Methods:RNA of sorted femur macrophages (CD11b+F4/80+) were extracted with an RNA extraction kit (Qiagen). The samples were submitted to Novogene Inc. for library preparation and subsequent RNA sequencing. RNA was used for cDNA library construction using an NEBNext® Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England Biolabs) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting 250-350 bp insert libraries were quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and quantitative PCR. Size distribution was analyzed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Qualified libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 Platform (Illumina) using a paired-end 150 run (2×150 bases). Reads containing adapter or poly-N and those of low quality were trimmed, after which gene counts were obtained though mapping the clean reads to reference genome mm10 using STAR 2.5.3a.
2021-12-12 | GSE190598 | GEO
Project description:Background: 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) is a recently discovered epigenetic modification that is altered in cancers. Genome wide assays for 5-hmC determination are needed as many of the techniques commonly used to assay 5-methylcytosine (5-mC), including conventional methyl-sensitive restriction digest and bisulfite sequencing, are incapable of distinguishing between 5-mC and 5-hmC. Results: Glycosylation of 5-hmC residues by beta-Glucosyl Transferase (beta-GT) can make CCGG residues insensitive to digestion by MspI. We used this premise to modify the HELP-tagging assay to identify both 5-mC and 5-hmC loci in the genome. Comparison of sequencing libraries after HpaII, MspI and MspI+ beta-GT conversion resulted in locus specific 5-mC and 5-hmC determination. A custom bioinformatics pipeline was created to identify 5-hmC sites that were validated at global level by LS-MS and the locus specific level by qRT-PCR of 5-hmC pulldown DNA. Hydroxymethylation at both promoter and intragenic locations correlated positively with gene expression. Analysis of pancreatic cancer samples revealed striking redistribution of 5-hmC sites in cancer cells and demonstrated enrichment of this modification at many oncogenic promoters such as GATA6. Conclusions: The HELP-GT assay allows a high resolution, simultaneous determination of 5-hmC and 5-mC loci from small amounts of DNA with the utilisation of modest sequencing resources. Redistribution of 5-hmC seen in cancer highlights the importance of examining this modification in conjugation with conventional methylome analysis.
2013-07-30 | GSE42723 | GEO
Project description:5-methylcytosine (5-mC) can be oxidized to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC). Genome-wide profiling of 5-hmC thus far indicated 5-hmC may not only be an intermediate form of DNA demethylation but could also constitute an epigenetic mark per se. We describe a cost-effective and selective method to detect both the hydroxymethylation and methylation status of cytosines in more than 1.8 million MspI sites in the human genome. This method involves the selective glucosylation of 5-hmC residues, short-sequence tag generation and high-throughput sequencing. We tested this method by screening H9 human embryonic stem cells and their differentiated embroid body cells, and found that differential hydroxymethylation preferentially occur in bivalent genes during cellular differentiation. Especially, our results support hydroxymethylation can regulate key transcription regulators with bivalent marks through demethylation and affect cellular decision on choosing active or inactive state of these genes upon cellular differentiation. We developed a cost-effective and selective method to detect both the hydroxymethylation and methylation status of cytosines in more than 1.8 million MspI sites in the human genome. In this method, we took advantage of the differential enzymatic sensitivities of the isoschizomers MspI and HpaII. HpaII cleaves only a completely unmodified site, any modification at either cytosine blocks the cleavage, while MspI recognizes and cleaves both 5-mC and 5-hmC, but not the newly discovered 5-formylcytosine (5-fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5-caC). Furthermore, beta-glucosyltransferase (beta-GT) can transfer a glucose to the hydroxyl group of 5-hmC and generate beta-glucosyl-5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-ghmC) that blocks MspI digestion. Thus, either by combining beta-GT treatment with MspI digestion or simply applying MspI/HpaII digestion, short sequence tags generated can be used for inferring hydroxymethylation or methylation status in around 1.8 million cytosine sites in the human genome. We tested this method by screening H9 human embryonic stem cells and their differentiated embroid body cells.
2012-12-20 | E-GEOD-41069 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:CG Methylation of Col, Van and reciprocal hybrids using HpaII and MspI digestion
| PRJNA102273 | ENA
Project description:This data was generated by ENCODE. If you have questions about the data, contact the submitting laboratory directly (Florencia Pauli mailto:fpauli@hudsonalpha.org). If you have questions about the Genome Browser track associated with this data, contact ENCODE (mailto:genome@soe.ucsc.edu). This track shows average methylation status in CpG islands. In general, methylation of CpG sites within a promoter causes silencing of the gene associated with that promoter For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf CpG regions were assayed via Methyl-seq, a method developed in the Myers laboratory to measure the methylation status at CpGs throughout the genome. It combines DNA digestion by a methyl-sensitive enzyme HpaII and its methyl-insensitive isoschizomer MspI with the Illumina DNA sequencing platform. The method was first applied in a collaboration with the laboratory of Dr. Julie Baker at Stanford University to study methylation and gene expression changes that occur in human embryonic stem cells before and after differentiation to definitive endoderm. A paper describing the results as well as the method has been submitted for publication [1]. This study profiled genomic DNA and mRNA samples derived from two human embryonic stem cell lines: H9 and BG02. These cells were differentiated into definitive endoderm, embryoid bodies, embryoid body-derived cells, and AFP+ (alpha-fetoprotein positive) hepatocytes. These in vitro samples were profiled with Methyl-seq and compared them with normal tissue samples from 11-week and 24-week fetal liver and adult liver. Methyl-seq assays more than 250,000 methyl-sensitive restriction enzyme cleavage sites, representing more than 90,000 genomic regions. These regions include 35,528 annotated CpG islands, while the remaining 55,084 non-CpG island regions are distributed across the genome in promoters, genes, and intergenic regions. Sequence tags present in MspI libraries but not in HpaII libraries are derived from methylated regions. Conversely, sequence tags that occur in HpaII libraries come from at least partially unmethylated regions. In vitro differentiation: Definitive endoderm precursor cells were generated from H9 hES cells by treating them with activin A. Embryoid bodies (EBs) were generated by growing undifferentitated H9 and BG02 hESCs in suspension. EB-derived cells were obtained by plating clumps of the cells from the EBs. AFP+ fetal hepatocytes were derived from EBs by plating EB cells with FgF, followed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate cells expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene driven from the AFP promoter. Isolation of genomic DNA: Genomic DNA is isolated from biological replicates of each cell line by using the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. DNA concentrations and a level of quality of each preparation is determined by UV absorbance. HpaII and MspI digestions: Cleavage of DNA by restriction endonuclease HpaII is prevented by the presence of a 5-methyl group at the internal C residue of its recognition sequence CCGG. MspI, an isoschizomer of HpaII, cleaves DNA irrespective of the presence of a methyl group at this position. For the MspI library, 5 µg genomic DNA was digested in a 100 µl reaction with 1X NEB Buffer2 and 20 units MspI restriction enzyme and incubated for 18 hr at 37°C. For the HpaII library, 5 µg genomic DNA was digested in a 100 µl reaction with 1X NEB Buffer1 and 20 units HpaII restriction enzyme and incubated for 18 hr at 37°C. Note that in subsequent versions of the Methyl-seq protocol, which will be described later, much lower amounts of genomic DNA were used (1 µg and potentially lower). DNA library construction and sequencing: High-throughput sequencing libraries were generated from DNA fragments of the HpaII or MspI digested genomic DNA according to the protocol posted at the website: http://myers.hudsonalpha.org/content/protocols.html. This approach was recently modified by removing the first PCR amplification step, just prior to the gel electrophoresis size-selection step, which was found to reduce a fragment-size bias in the sequencing libraries. These libraries were sequenced with an Illumina Genome Analyzer (GA2) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Data analysis: For this analyis, reads that align to human genome sequence version hg19 and contain the 5'-CGG-3' HpaII-cut signature on their 5' end were used. These aligned sequence reads were mapped to CCGG sites predicted in silico on hg19. Sites with four or more Msp1 tags occurring in either the forward or reverse direction were retained for analysis. These "assayable" sites were then grouped with neighboring sites that are within 35-75 bp of each other. Thus, a "region" can be comprised of between 2 and 18 digestion sites that are each within 35-75 bp of another site. Methylated and non-methylated calls were made by using HpaII tag data from all assayable cut sites. For each site across each region, the larger of either the forward read count or reverse read count was used. Regions that have an average of 0 or 1 read per cut site are called methylated, and regions with more than one sequence read per site are called unmethylated.
2012-10-03 | E-GEOD-41304 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:CEH-60 binding profile by comparison of DNA methylation of a C. elegans strain expression ceh-60::dam to a control strain expressing gfp::dam. Sequencing libraries prepared using NEBNext Singleplex oligos for Illumina®. Data analysis performed with GeneDamIDseq (Sharma, Ritler, and Meister 2016).
2020-11-16 | E-MTAB-9539 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC), a derivative of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC), is abundant in the brain for unknown reasons. We mapped the genomic distribution of 5-hmC and 5-mC in human and mouse tissues using glucosylation of 5-hmC coupled with restriction enzyme digestion, and interrogation on microarrays. We detected 5-hmC enrichment in genes with synapse-related functions in the brain. We also identified significant, tissue-specific differential distributions of these DNA modifications at the exon-intron boundary, in both human and mouse. This boundary change was mainly due to 5-hmC in the brain, but due to 5-mC in non-neural contexts. This pattern was replicated in multiple independent datasets, and the brain-specific change in 5-hmC was validated using single-molecule sequencing. Moreover, in the brain, constitutive exons contained higher levels of 5-hmC, relative to alternatively-spliced exons. Our study suggests a novel role for 5-hmC in RNA splicing and synaptic function in the brain The M-NM-2-glucosyltransferase (BGT) enzyme transfers a glucose molecule specifically to the hydroxymethyl group of 5-hmC, thus rendering it resistant to digestion by the methylation insensitive MspI enzyme at the ChmCGG target site; 5-hmC is thus detected by differential resistance to MspI-digestion with and without glucosylation of genomic DNA (gDNA). HpaII (targets the same site, CCGG) cannot cut CmCGG or ChmCGG, and conceptually its difference with MspI digestion is a measure of both 5-mC and 5-hmC. Subtraction of 5-hmC from the HpaII-based estimate therefore measures 5-mC. These estimates were measured on respective Affymetrix whole-genome tiling arrays (2.0 R ) MspI - APRIL_fc1.ch02_coverage.bed Undigested DNA - APRIL_fc1.ch01_coverage.bed GluMspI - APRIL_fc1.ch04_coverage_NONTARGET.bed GluMspI - APRIL_fc1.ch04_coverage.bed MspI - APRIL_fc1.ch02_coverage_NONTARGET.bed Undigested DNA - APRIL_fc1.ch01_coverage_NONTARGET.bed MspI - MARCH_fc1.ch02_coverage_NONTARGET.bed Undigested DNA - MARCH_fc1.ch01_coverage_NONTARGET.bed GluMspI - MARCH_fc1.ch04_coverage_NONTARGET.bed GluMspI - MARCH_fc1.ch04_coverage.bed MspI - MARCH_fc1.ch02_coverage.bed Undigested DNA - MARCH_fc1.ch01_coverage.bed MspI - MAY_fc1.ch02_coverage.bed GluMspI - MAY_fc1.ch04_coverage_NONTARGET.bed GluMspI - MAY_fc1.ch04_coverage.bed Undigested DNA - MAY_fc1.ch01_coverage.bed MspI - MAY_fc1.ch02_coverage_NONTARGET.bed Undigested DNA - MAY_fc1.ch01_coverage_NONTARGET.bed
2012-08-24 | E-GEOD-40158 | biostudies-arrayexpress