CSF2 x gender interactions on the transcriptome of Day 15 bovine extra-embryonic membrane
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Bos taurus
PROVIDER: GSE55364 | GEO | 2014/10/01
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA239416
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:We aimed to study the effects of CSF2 treatment on the transcriptome of the Day 15 female and male embryo. Within the raw files, channel 1= Cy3 and channel 2= Cy5 Transcriptional profiling of bovine extra-embryonic membrane at Day 15 post-insemination produced by IVF. Oocytes were matured and fertilized in vitro using a single Holstein bull. After 5 days in vitro culture, the embryos were either treated with 10 ng/ml bovine recombinant CSF2 or the Control (DPBS/BSA) until Day 7. At Day 7, the embryos were transferred into recipients. At day 15 following insemination, embryos were flushed and collected for total RNA and gDNA extraction. The gender of the embryos were determined by PCR prior to microarray analysis. CSF2 males were compared to Control males while CSF2 females were compared to Control females. Control females were also compared to control males.
2014-10-01 | E-GEOD-55364 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We aimed to study the effects of CSF2 treatment on the methylome of the Day 15 female and male embryo. Methylomic profiling of bovine extra-embryonic membrane at Day 15 post-insemination produced by IVF. Oocytes were matured and fertilized in vitro using a single Holstein bull. After 5 days in vitro culture, the embryos were either treated with 10 ng/ml bovine recombinant CSF2 or the Control (DPBS/BSA) until Day 7. At Day 7, the embryos were transferred into recipients. At day 15 following insemination, embryos were flushed and collected for total RNA and gDNA extraction. The gender of the embryos were determined by PCR prior to microarray analysis. CSF2 males were compared to Control males while CSF2 females were compared to Control females
2014-10-01 | E-GEOD-55873 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We aimed to study the effects of CSF2 treatment on the methylome of the Day 15 female and male embryo.
2014-10-01 | GSE55873 | GEO
Project description:P. aeruginosa PAO wildtype Cy3 PA3898 mutant Cy5
| PRJNA491282 | ENA
Project description:Chicken CSF2 and IL-4-, and CSF2-Dependent Bone Marrow Cultures Represent Macrophages
| PRJEB56177 | ENA
Project description:Femur and tibia bones were harvested from 8-week-old wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice. Bone marrow was flushed out into cold PBS (Life Technologies) plus 2% heat-inactivated FBS, passed through a needle five times to dissociate the cells, and then passed through a 70-μm cell strainer (Becton Dickinson) to remove cell clumps, bone, hair, and other cells/tissues. After addition of three volumes of NH4Cl solution (0.8% NH4Cl solution; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China), the mixture was incubated on ice for 10 min to remove red blood cells; the cells were then spun down and resuspended in cold PBS with 2% FBS. The harvested cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and supplemented with 10 ng/ml recombinant mouse CSF1 (R&D Systems) or 10 ng/ml recombinant mouse CSF2 (R&D Systems) for 7 days to obtain CSF1- or CSF2-induced BMDMs: M(CSF1) or M(CSF2) cells, respectively. To test the difference genes expression of TAMs obtained from M(CSF1) and M(CSF2) cells in C57BL/6 mice. We used microarrays to detail the global programme of gene expression and identified M(CSF1) and M(CSF2) cells during this process.
2017-02-28 | GSE95404 | GEO
Project description:Sample groupings for this project are as follows: Cauline leaf vs Cultured Cell : - Cauline leaf, p1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cauline leaf, p3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cotyledon dark : - Cotyledon, CP1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Cotyledon, CP2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Cotyledon light vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon, cn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon, cn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Cotyledon dark vs Cultured cell : - Cotyledon dark, n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Cotyledon dark, n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Germinating seed vs Cultured cell : - Germinating seed, gn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Germinating seed, gn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl light vs Hypocotyl dark : - Hypocotyl, hldn1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Hypocotyl, hldn2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Hypocotyl light vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl light, hln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl light, hln2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Petal vs Cultured cell : - Petal, pn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Petal, pn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) 1DBP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DBP, pin1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DBP, pin3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Pistil 1DPP vs Cultured cell : - Pistil 1DPP, psn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Pistil 1DPP, psn4; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root dark vs Cultured cell : - Root dark, rdn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root dark, rdn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Root light vs Cultured cell : - Root light, rln1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Root light, rlp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Root light vs Root dark : - Root light vs dark, rldp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Root light vs dark, rldp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Rosette leaf vs Cultured cell : - Rosette leaf, rfp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Rosette leaf, rfp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Sepal vs Cultured cell : - Sepal, sn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Sepal, sn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 3DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 3DPP, s3n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 3DPP, s3n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Silique 8DPP vs Cultured cell : - Silique 8DPP, s8n1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Silique 8DPP, s8n3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stamen vs Cultured cell : - Stamen, smn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Stamen, smn3; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Hypocotyl dark vs Cultured cell : - Hypocotyl dark, hn1; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) - Hypocotyl dark, hn2; Exp:Green; Ref: Red (Cy3:Cy5) Stem vs Cultured cell : - Stem, stp1; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp2; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) - Stem, stp3; Exp:Red; Ref: Green (Cy5:Cy3) Keywords: other
2004-10-24 | GSE1599 | GEO
Project description:RNA from 11 individual mouse cell lines were reverse-transcribed to cDNA, labeled with Cy5 and cohybridized with Cy3-labeled UMRR onto 7,500-spot mouse oligo microarrays (UNC). The data was analyzed using GeneTraffic software. 300-1000 spots out of 8,000 were flagged on each microarray and excluded from further analysis. Spots with hybridization signals in Cy5 channel higher than 1000 and with Cy5/Cy3 ratio greater than 2 were collected and the number of spots with these characteristics on only one microarray was determined. A reference experiment design type is where all samples are compared to a common reference. Keywords: reference_design
2006-01-05 | GSE3974 | GEO
Project description:4 pan-Neisseria arrays examining the gonococcal response to iron availability. Dual channel (Cy3/Cy5) arrays, using random nonamers for cDNA generation. Arrays scanned with ScanArray ExpressHT microarray scanner. Data analyzed using ArrayVision 7.0 and compiled in GeneSpring. Keywords: other
2005-07-11 | GSE2147 | GEO
Project description:Total RNA isolated from 10 individual human cell lines were reverse-transcribed to cDNA, labeled with Cy5 and co-hybridized with Cy3-labeled UHRR onto 43,000-spot cDNA microarrays (Stanford University). The data was analyzed using GeneTraffic software. Approximately 6000-8000 spots out of 43,000 (14-18 %) were flagged on each microarray and excluded from further analysis. Spots with hybridization signals in Cy5 channel higher than 1000 and with Cy5/Cy3 ratio greater than 2 were collected and the number of spots with these characteristics in only one cell line was determined. A reference experiment design type is where all samples are compared to a common reference. Keywords: reference_design
2006-01-05 | GSE3972 | GEO