Comparing Reference-Based RNA-Seq Mapping Methods for Non-Human Primate Data
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Papio cynocephalus
PROVIDER: GSE57485 | GEO | 2014/07/10
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA246538
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:We present a comparison of four reference-based mapping methods for mapping non-human primate data to a human reference sequence. We utilize TopHat2 and GSNAP for mapping to the human genome, and Bowtie2 and Stampy for mapping to the human genome and transcriptome for a total of six mapping approaches Comparison of reference-based mapping methods for 12 yellow baboons
2014-07-10 | E-GEOD-57485 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Purpose: to identify genes aberrantly expressed upon myocardial ablation of Hif1a Methods: a floxed Hif1a allele was deleted in mouse embryonic hearts using a NXK2.5Cre line. Total RNA was extracted from E12.5 hearts (n=3 for controls and mutants) usinz Trizol and processed for RNA-seq. Reads were mapped to Mm10 reference genome using TopHat2 and Bowtie2. Transcript expression values were determined after transcript normalization with AltAnalyze Results: this analysis revealed a total of 1451 genes significantely (|Fold| > 20% and P<0.05) modulated in Hif1a cKO hearts 6 total RNAseq runs with 3 experimental samples and 3 controls samples
2015-04-29 | E-GEOD-61209 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Purpose: to identify genes aberrantly expressed upon myocardial ablation of Hif1a Methods: a floxed Hif1a allele was deleted in mouse embryonic hearts using a NXK2.5Cre line. Total RNA was extracted from E12.5 hearts (n=3 for controls and mutants) usinz Trizol and processed for RNA-seq. Reads were mapped to Mm10 reference genome using TopHat2 and Bowtie2. Transcript expression values were determined after transcript normalization with AltAnalyze Results: this analysis revealed a total of 1451 genes significantely (|Fold| > 20% and P<0.05) modulated in Hif1a cKO hearts
2015-04-29 | GSE61209 | GEO
Project description:Genome-wide DNA methylation mapping uncovers epigenetic changes associated with animal development, environmental adaptation, and species evolution. To address the lack of high-throughput methods for studying DNA methylation in non-model organisms, we developed an integrated approach for studying DNA methylation differences without a reference genome. Experimentally, our method relies on an optimized 96-well protocol for reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), which we have validated in nine species (human, mouse, rat, cow, dog, chicken, zebrafish, carp, and sea bass). Bioinformatically, we developed the RefFreeDMA software (http://RefFreeDMA.computational-epigenetics.org) to deduce ad hoc genomes directly from RRBS reads and to pinpoint differentially methylated regions. These regions are interpreted using motif enrichment analysis and/or cross-mapping to annotated genomes. We validated our method by reference-free analysis of cell type-specific DNA methylation in the blood of human, cow, and carp. In summary, we present a cost-effective method for epigenome analysis in ecology and evolution, which enables epigenome-wide association studies in natural populations and species without a reference genome.
2015-12-03 | GSE74026 | GEO
Project description:High throughput sequencing is a powerful tool to investigate complex cellular phenotypes in functional genomics studies. Sequencing of transcriptional molecules, RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared to traditional expression analysis based on microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in analysis of RNA-seq data and to cross-compare the results with those obtained through a microarray platform. We used the well-characterized Saccharomyces cervevisiae strain CEN.PK 113-7D grown under two different physiological conditions (batch and chemostat) as a case study. In our work, we addressed the influence of genetic variability on the estimation of gene expression level using three different aligners for read-mapping (Gsnap, Stampy and Tophat), the capabilities of five different statistical methods to detect differential gene expression (baySeq, Cuffdiff, DESeq, edgeR and noiSeq) and we explored the consistency between the two main approaches for RNA-seq: reference mapping and de novo assembly. High reproducibility in data generated through RNA-seq among different biological replicates (correlation M-bM-^IM-% 0.99) and high consistency with the results identified with RNA-seq and microarray data analysis (correlation M-bM-^IM-% 0.91) were observed. The results from differential gene expression identification as well as the results of integrated analysis based on the different methods are in good agreement. Overall, our study provides a useful and comprehensive comparison of the workflow for transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq technique. Microarray ananlysis were perfomed from the same RNA extraction then compare the result with RNA-seq analysis
2012-09-14 | E-GEOD-37599 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:High throughput sequencing is a powerful tool to investigate complex cellular phenotypes in functional genomics studies. Sequencing of transcriptional molecules, RNA-seq, has recently become an attractive method of choice in the studies of transcriptomes, promising several advantages compared to traditional expression analysis based on microarrays. In this study, we sought to assess the contribution of the different analytical steps involved in analysis of RNA-seq data and to cross-compare the results with those obtained through a microarray platform. We used the well-characterized Saccharomyces cervevisiae strain CEN.PK 113-7D grown under two different physiological conditions (batch and chemostat) as a case study. In our work, we addressed the influence of genetic variability on the estimation of gene expression level using three different aligners for read-mapping (Gsnap, Stampy and Tophat), the capabilities of five different statistical methods to detect differential gene expression (baySeq, Cuffdiff, DESeq, edgeR and noiSeq) and we explored the consistency between the two main approaches for RNA-seq: reference mapping and de novo assembly. High reproducibility in data generated through RNA-seq among different biological replicates (correlation ≥ 0.99) and high consistency with the results identified with RNA-seq and microarray data analysis (correlation ≥ 0.91) were observed. The results from differential gene expression identification as well as the results of integrated analysis based on the different methods are in good agreement. Overall, our study provides a useful and comprehensive comparison of the workflow for transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq technique.
2012-09-14 | GSE37599 | GEO
Project description:To assess the performance of read mapping software for RNA-seq, 26 spliced alignment protocols based on 11 programs and pipelines (BAGET, GEM, GSNAP, GSTRUCT, MapSplice, PALMapper, PASS, ReadsMap, SMALT, STAR and TopHat) were applied to four human and mouse transcriptome data sets.
2013-07-15 | E-MTAB-1728 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Many library preparation methods are available for gene expression quantification. Here, we sequenced and analysed Universal Human Reference RNA (UHRR) prepared using Smart-Seq2, TruSeq (public data) and a protocol using unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) that all include the ERCC spike-in mRNAs to investigate the effects of amplification bias on expression quantification.
2016-05-13 | GSE75823 | GEO
Project description:Placental biopsies (n = 64 female placentas, n = 67 male placentas) were selected from healthy pregnancies from the POPs cohort. A quality control process was also applied for the RNA-Seq datasets: reads were trimmed with Trim Galore!, which uses cutadapt internally and were mapped to the same version of human genome reference (hg19). TopHat2, a splice-aware mapper built on top of Bowtie2 short-read aligner, was used in the mapping process in which so-called two-pass (or two-scan) alignment protocol was applied to rescue unmapped reads from the initial mapping step. In the second mapping, previously unmapped reads were re-aligned to the exon-intron junctions detected in the first-mapping by TopHat2 and were combined across all 131 placenta samples. The initial and second mapped reads were merged by samtools
| EGAD00001003462 | EGA
Project description:The application of next-generation sequencing technology to gene expression quantification analysis, namely, RNA-Sequencing, has transformed the way in which gene expression studies are conducted and analyzed. These advances are of particular interest to researchers studying organisms with missing or incomplete genomes, as the need for knowledge of sequence information is overcome. De novo assembly methods have gained widespread acceptance in the RNA-Seq community for organisms with no true reference genome or transcriptome. While such methods have tremendous utility, computational cost is still a significant challenge for organisms with large and complex genomes.In this manuscript, we present a comparison of four reference-based mapping methods for non-human primate data. We utilize TopHat2 and GSNAP for mapping to the human genome, and Bowtie2 and Stampy for mapping to the human genome and transcriptome for a total of six mapping approaches. For each of these methods, we explore mapping rates and locations, number of detected genes, correlations between computed expression values, and the utility of the resulting data for differential expression analysis.We show that reference-based mapping methods indeed have utility in RNA-Seq analysis of mammalian data with no true reference, and the details of mapping methods should be carefully considered when doing so. Critical algorithm features include short seed sequences, the allowance of mismatches, and the allowance of gapped alignments in addition to splice junction gaps. Such features facilitate sensitive alignment of non-human primate RNA-Seq data to a human reference.
| S-EPMC4112205 | biostudies-literature