Project description:Alzheimer case-control samples originate from the EU funded AddNeuroMed Cohort, which is a large cross-European AD biomarker study relying on human blood as the source of RNA. The design is case-control. Cases are either Alzheimer's disease patients, subjects with mild cognitive impairment or age and gender matched controls.
Project description:Alzheimer case-control samples originate from the EU funded AddNeuroMed Cohort, which is a large cross-European AD biomarker study relying on human blood as the source of RNA.
Project description:BACKGROUND:The goal of the present study was to analyze the macular microvacular network in mild cognitive impirment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS:Twelve patients with AD and 19 patients with MCI were recruited together with 21 cognitively normal controls with a similar range of ages. Optical coherence tomography angiography was used to image the retinal microvascular network at the macular region, including retinal vascular network (RVN), superficial vascular plexus (SVP), and deep vascular plexus (DVP). Fractal analysis (box counting, Dbox) representing the microvascular density was performed in different annular zones and quadrantal sectors. The macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness was measured using Zeiss OCT. The relationship between the retinal microvasculature and clinical manifestations was analyzed. RESULTS:Patients with AD had lower densities of RVN, SVP, and DVP in the annulus, from 0.6 to 2.5 mm in diameter (P < 0.05) in comparison with controls. Patients with MCI had lower density of DVP in the superior nasal quadrant (P < 0.05) than that of the controls. There were no significant differences of GC-IPL thickness among groups (P > 0.05). There was a trend of vascular density loss from control to MCI then AD (P < 0.05). Retinal microvascular density of DVP was correlated with GC-IPL thickness (P < 0.05) in patients with AD, but not in patients with MCI and controls. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with AD had less density of retinal microvascular networks than controls. Our findings suggest the presence of retinal microvascular dysfunction in AD.
Project description:ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate early clinical differences between cerebral arteriolosclerosis (pARTE), Alzheimer disease (pAD), and AD with arteriolosclerosis (ADARTE).MethodsUsing National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center neuropathology diagnoses, we defined pARTE (n=21), pAD (n=203), and ADARTE (n=158) groups. We compared demographics, medical history, psychometrics, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) allele variants across neuropathology groups. Retrospective timepoints were first evaluation with Global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5 and 1.0, via the CDR Dementia Staging Instrument, corresponding to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia, respectively.ResultsIn MCI, clinical differences were minimal but pARTE subjects were older, had later onset cognitive decline, and progressed less severely than pAD. In mild dementia, pAD subjects were younger and had earlier onset of decline. Neuropsychiatric (depression) and psychometric (Logical Memory Delayed Recall, Trails B) differences also emerged between the groups. In MCI, APOE4 associated with worse Logical Memory Delayed Recall in pAD and ADARTE. In mild dementia, APOE4 associated with better animal fluency in pAD, but with better Trails A performance and more neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire) in ADARTE.ConclusionsDifferences between pARTE, pAD, and ADARTE emerge at mild dementia rather than MCI. APOE4 has varied cognitive and psychiatric impact dependent on neuropathology group and stage.
Project description:ObjectivesWhile plasma biomarkers have been proposed to aid in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD), few biomarkers have been validated in independent patient cohorts. Here we aim to determine plasma biomarkers associated with AD in 2 independent cohorts and validate the findings in the multicenter Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).MethodsUsing a targeted proteomic approach, we measured levels of 190 plasma proteins and peptides in 600 participants from 2 independent centers (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Washington University, St. Louis, MO), and identified 17 analytes associated with the diagnosis of very mild dementia/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD. Four analytes (apoE, B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, pancreatic polypeptide) were also found to be altered in clinical MCI/AD in the ADNI cohort (n = 566). Regression analysis showed CSF Aβ42 levels and t-tau/Aβ42 ratios to correlate with the number of APOE4 alleles and plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide and pancreatic polypeptide.ConclusionFour plasma analytes were consistently associated with the diagnosis of very mild dementia/MCI/AD in 3 independent clinical cohorts. These plasma biomarkers may predict underlying AD through their association with CSF AD biomarkers, and the association between plasma and CSF amyloid biomarkers needs to be confirmed in a prospective study.
Project description:IntroductionWe investigated whether cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) benefit cognitive outcomes in mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease (MCI-AD) and in mild AD dementia (ADdem).MethodsData from 2242 individuals, clinically diagnosed with MCI-AD [Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), 0 or 0.5] or with mild ADdem (CDR, 0.5 or 1), were available from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS). General linear mixed models were used to examine the annual change in the CDR Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) and in neuropsychological performance. We compared slopes before and after ChEI initiation among ChEI users, and also compared the change in scores of ChEI users versus nonusers.ResultsThirty-four percent of 944 MCI-AD and 72% of 1298 ADdem participants were ChEI users. Cognitive decline was greater after ChEI initiation in MCI-AD and ADdem groups (eg, MCI-AD, CDR-SB: 0.03 points/y before initiation; 0.61 points/y after initiation, P<0.0001). Both MCI-AD and ADdem groups had faster decline after ChEI initiation than nonusers (eg, MCI-AD, CDR-SB: 0.61 points/y, ChEI users; 0.24 points/y, nonusers, P<0.0001).DiscussionThis study suggests that ChEI use may not improve the cognitive course in MCI-AD and mild ADdem.