Microarray analysis of committed cDC progenitors
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
PROVIDER: GSE66565 | GEO | 2015/06/08
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA277343
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Analysis of stage-specific gene expression in Zbtb46GFP/+ pre-CD8 DCs, pre-CD4 DCs, CD24 cDCs and CD172a cDCs Bone Marrow and Splenocytes were harvested from 8-10 littermate Zbtb46GFP/+ mice and sorted to >95% purity on the FACS AriaFusion.
2015-06-08 | E-GEOD-66565 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The goal of this study is to compare the gene profiling of human blood BDCA-1+ cDCs, blood BDCA-3+ cDCs, CB CD172a-pre-cDCs and CB CB172a+ pre-cDCs. RNA from sorted populations was extracted and column-purified using the Arcturus PicoPure RNA Isolation kit (Applied Biosystems). Genomic DNA was removed by on-column digest with DNAse I (Qiagen), according to the PicoPure RNA Isolation kit manual. RNA libraries were prepared using the SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA for Sequencing kit (Clontech Laboratories) followed with Nextera XT DNA Library Prep kit (Illumina). Libraries were sequenced by 75-bp single-end reading on a NextSeq 500 sequencer (Illumina). Our results show that CD172a+ and CD172a- pre-cDCs represent developmentally discrete populations that differentially express lineage-restricted transcription factors. Moreover CD172a- pre-cDCs cluster with BDCA-3hi cDCs and CD172a+ pre-cDCs with BDCA-1+ cDCs.
2016-11-15 | GSE88858 | GEO
Project description:Zbtb46 represses G-CSFR and LifR in cDCs Zbtb46 does not significantly affect gene expression in erythroid progenitors WT, Het, and KO cells were sorted from BM or spleen and analyzed. Pre MegE cells were sorted as CD117+ CD150+ CD105-CD41-CD16/32-. Pre CFU-E cells were sorted as CD117+ CD150+ CD105lo CD41- CD16/32-. CFU-E cells were sorted as CD117+ CD150- CD105+ Cd41- CD16/32-. Splenic CD4+ DCs were sorted as B220- CD11c+ MHCII+ CD8- CD172+ CD11b+ CD4+.
2012-05-20 | E-GEOD-37028 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Cross-presentation of cell-associated antigens is carried out by classical DCs (cDCs) and monocyte-derived DCs (Mo-DCs), but whether a similar or distinct program exists for this process is unknown. In examining this issue, we discovered that only Ly-6ChiTremL4– monocytes, but not Ly-6ChiTremL4+ monocytes, can differentiate into Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs in response to GM-CSF and IL-4. However, Ly-6ChiTremL4+ monocytes were committed to Nur77-dependent development of Ly-6CloTremL4+ monocytes. Further, differentiation of monocytes with GM-CSF required addition of IL-4 to generate Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs that cross-presented as efficiently as CD24+ cDCs, which was accompanied by increased Batf3 and Irf4 expression. Unlike cDCs, Mo-DCs required only IRF4, and not Batf3, for cross-presentation. Further, Irf4–/– monocytes failed to develop into Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs, and instead developed into macrophages. Thus, cDCs and Mo-DCs use distinct transcriptional programs for cross-presentation that may drive different antigen-processing pathways. These differences may influence development of therapeutic DC vaccines based on Mo-DCs.
2016-05-25 | GSE75013 | GEO
Project description:Cross-presentation of cell-associated antigens is carried out by classical DCs (cDCs) and monocyte-derived DCs (Mo-DCs), but whether a similar or distinct program exists for this process is unknown. In examining this issue, we discovered that only Ly-6ChiTremL4– monocytes, but not Ly-6ChiTremL4+ monocytes, can differentiate into Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs in response to GM-CSF and IL-4. However, Ly-6ChiTremL4+ monocytes were committed to Nur77-dependent development of Ly-6CloTremL4+ monocytes. Further, differentiation of monocytes with GM-CSF required addition of IL-4 to generate Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs that cross-presented as efficiently as CD24+ cDCs, which was accompanied by increased Batf3 and Irf4 expression. Unlike cDCs, Mo-DCs required only IRF4, and not Batf3, for cross-presentation. Further, Irf4–/– monocytes failed to develop into Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs, and instead developed into macrophages. Thus, cDCs and Mo-DCs use distinct transcriptional programs for cross-presentation that may drive different antigen-processing pathways. These differences may influence development of therapeutic DC vaccines based on Mo-DCs.
2016-05-25 | GSE75012 | GEO
Project description:Cross-presentation of cell-associated antigens is carried out by classical DCs (cDCs) and monocyte-derived DCs (Mo-DCs), but whether a similar or distinct program exists for this process is unknown. In examining this issue, we discovered that only Ly-6ChiTremL4– monocytes, but not Ly-6ChiTremL4+ monocytes, can differentiate into Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs in response to GM-CSF and IL-4. However, Ly-6ChiTremL4+ monocytes were committed to Nur77-dependent development of Ly-6CloTremL4+ monocytes. Further, differentiation of monocytes with GM-CSF required addition of IL-4 to generate Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs that cross-presented as efficiently as CD24+ cDCs, which was accompanied by increased Batf3 and Irf4 expression. Unlike cDCs, Mo-DCs required only IRF4, and not Batf3, for cross-presentation. Further, Irf4–/– monocytes failed to develop into Zbtb46+ Mo-DCs, and instead developed into macrophages. Thus, cDCs and Mo-DCs use distinct transcriptional programs for cross-presentation that may drive different antigen-processing pathways. These differences may influence development of therapeutic DC vaccines based on Mo-DCs.
2016-05-25 | GSE75014 | GEO
Project description:Defense against attaching and effacing (A/E) bacteria requires the sequential generation of IL-23 and IL-22 to induce protective mucosal responses. While the critical source of IL-22 has been identified as CD4+ and Nkp46+ innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), the precise source of IL-23 is unclear. Here, we use genetic techniques to deplete specific classical dendritic cell (cDC) subsets and analyze immunity to the A/E pathogen Citrobacter rodentium. We find that Zbtb46+ cDCs, and specifically Notch2-dependent intestinal CD11b+ cDCs, but not Batf3-dependent CD103+ cDCs, are required for IL-23 production and immunity against C. rodentium. Notch2 controls cDC differentiation at a terminal step mediated by lymphotoxin signaling. Importantly, these results provide the first demonstration of a non-redundant function of CD11b+ cDCs in vivo. Analysis of differentially expressed genes in ESAM+ and ESAM- CD11b+ and DEC205+ splenic classical DC subsets. Splenocytes were harvested from WT C57Bl/6 or WT Cx3cr1-gfp mice and cDC subsets sorted to >95% purity on the FACSAriaII.
2013-06-01 | E-GEOD-45679 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Defense against attaching and effacing (A/E) bacteria requires the sequential generation of IL-23 and IL-22 to induce protective mucosal responses. While the critical source of IL-22 has been identified as CD4+ and Nkp46+ innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), the precise source of IL-23 is unclear. Here, we use genetic techniques to deplete specific classical dendritic cell (cDC) subsets and analyze immunity to the A/E pathogen Citrobacter rodentium. We find that Zbtb46+ cDCs, and specifically Notch2-dependent intestinal CD11b+ cDCs, but not Batf3-dependent CD103+ cDCs, are required for IL-23 production and immunity against C. rodentium. Notch2 controls cDC differentiation at a terminal step mediated by lymphotoxin signaling. Importantly, these results provide the first demonstration of a non-redundant function of CD11b+ cDCs in vivo.
2013-06-01 | GSE45679 | GEO
Project description:2 types of dendritic cells (DCs) can be generated in vitro in the presence of Flt3-L: CD4+ equivalent CD24- DCs and CD8+ equivalent CD24+ DCs. miR-142-/- mice show a severe defect in the generation of CD4+ equivalent CD24- DCs. To understand the underlying mechanism, RNA expression was analyzed by Affymetrix microarray from the 2 in vitro subtypes of DCs derived from miR-142+/+ and miR-142-/- bone marrow cells. We used microarrays to detail the global programme of gene expression in the presence or absence of miR-142 in in vitro derived DCs.
2012-11-16 | GSE42325 | GEO
Project description:Conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) arise from committed precursor dendritic cells (pre DCs) in the bone marrow that continuously seed the periphery. Pre-DCs and other upstream progenitors proliferate and mature in response to Fms-related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3L), which is considered the most important cytokine for cDC development. However, other cytokines such as stem cell factor (SCF) and colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) were also shown to induce pre-DC maturation into DC-like cells. It is not completely understood which cells contribute to cDC development once pre-DCs arrive in peripheral tissues. Here, we analyzed the impact of lymph node (LN) fibroblastic stromal cells (FSCs) on the maturation of pre-DCs into cDCs. We could demonstrate that ex vivo isolated LN FSCs co-cultured with pre-DCs induce precursor maturation into DC-like cells, which were capable of efficiently promoting the proliferation of naïve CD4+ T cells. Interestingly, FSCs isolated from mesenteric lymph nodes (mLNs) or peripheral LNs (pLNs) induced DC-like cells with highly comparable transcriptomes, showing similarity to both ex vivo isolated DCs and macrophages based on characteristic signature genes. Finally, by performing supplementation and receptor blocking studies we could demonstrate that CSF1 is a driving factor for LN FSC-mediated pre-DC maturation into DC-like cells. In summary, we could identify CSF1 as a novel stromal cell-derived factor that supports the maturation of pre-DCs into cDCs within secondary lymphoid organs.
2024-09-01 | GSE184661 | GEO