ChIP-seq of ER, PR, p300 in two ER+ breast cancer cell lines treated with estrogen and with and without progestins
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE68355 | GEO | 2015/05/22
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA282508
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Exploring effect of progesterone/progestin treatment on ER and PR binding. Two cell lines, three conditions (Full Media with E2, E2+ Progesterone, Full Media + R5020 Progestin), three factors (ER, PR, p300), all with three replicates, each with a matched Input control.
2015-05-22 | E-GEOD-68355 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Exploring effect of estrogen and progesterone/progestin treatment on ER and PR binding. Two cell lines, four conditions (Vehicle, E2, Progesterone, E2+Progesterone), three factors (ER, PR, p300), all with three replicates.
2015-05-22 | E-GEOD-68356 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Exploring effect of estrogen and progesterone/progestin treatment on ER and PR binding.
2015-05-22 | GSE68356 | GEO
Project description:Exploring effect of progesterone/progestin treatment on gene expression Two cell lines, three conditions (Full Media with E2, E2+ Progesterone, Full Media + R5020 Progestin)
2015-05-22 | E-GEOD-68358 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Exploring effect of progesterone/progestin treatment on gene expression
2015-05-22 | GSE68358 | GEO
Project description:An incomplete understanding of dose-dependent progesterone receptor (PR) biology has led to the suboptimal exploitation of PR as a therapeutic target. While hormone replacement therapies (HRT) containing low-doses of synthetic progestogens (progestins) have been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, high-dose progestin therapies have beneficial therapeutic effects in some patients with breast cancer. Herein we report that PR subcellular localization, post-trans3lational modifications, stability, chromatin binding, responsive gene expression and downstream biology differ considerably as a function of progestin concentration. Dose-dependent transcriptional profiling revealed that different concentrations of progestin elicit classic sigmoidal and/or biphasic gene induction at distinct target gene sets. Notably, when compared to high doses of progestin, low-dose treatments lead to minimal nuclear translocation of PR while supporting robust induction of a subset of target genes, indicating that PR occupancy has a complex relationship to target gene induction. Interestingly, high but not low-dose progestin treatments lead to increased phosphorylation at Ser294 and is associated with higher receptor turnover. Furthermore, while low-dose treatments stimulate cell proliferation, high-dose treatments do not result in significant cell cycle progression to S phase. Similar biphasic and sigmoidal patterns of gene induction were observed in human breast tumor explants treated with various concentrations of progestin, underscoring the need to fine tune the dosage of PR-targeting therapies. Given the wide range of medical applications of PR target therapy, our discovery of distinct dose-dependent PR biology may have important clinical implications.
2020-06-13 | GSE99986 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers.
2016-06-01 | GSE80367 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers.
2016-06-01 | GSE80366 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers.
2016-06-01 | GSE80365 | GEO
Project description:Transcriptomic changes and estrogen and progesterone receptor binding in multiple ER+/PR+ models (eight ER+/PR+ patient tumors, various T47Ds, ZR75) and multiple ER+/PR-negative models (four ER+/PR- patient tuumors, PR-deficient T47D and MCF7 cells) treated with various hormone combinations. Results: In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. Importantly, when both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Conclusions: Genomic Agonism and Phenotypic Antagonism between Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Individual and concerted actions of ER and PR highlight the prognostic and therapeutic value of PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers. ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR-deficient model systems were deprived of steroids by culturing them in phenol red free RPMI 1640 media that is supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, these steroid-deprived models were treated with either vehicle, 10 nM estradiol, 10 nM progestin R5020 or 10 nM of both the hormones and genomics (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq) was performed. ChIP-seq was done after 45 minutes of hormone treatments. For cell models, RNA-seq was done after 12 hours of hormone treatments. Tumor explants were treated with either 24 or 48 hours.
2016-06-01 | E-GEOD-80367 | biostudies-arrayexpress