Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Opposing macrophage-polarization programs show extensive epigenomic and transcriptional cross-talk [ChIP_narrow]

ABSTRACT: The M1 and the M2 macrophage polarization programs (activated by IFNγ and IL-4, respectively) lie at the opposite edges of a continuum of activation states but are frequently co-activated during co-infections and in cancer despite controlling divergent functional responses. Whether these two programs are mutually exclusive, how they influence each other, and whether one represents the prevailing response, are all open questions. Co-administration of IFNγ and IL-4 exerted complex inhibitory effects over the M1 and M2 programs at the level of both epigenomic and transcriptional changes. Computational data mining and validation analyses revealed the molecular basis of the differential sensitivity of genes and cis-regulatory elements to the antagonistic effects of the opposite stimulus. For instance, while STAT1 and IRF motifs were associated with robust and IL-4-resistant responses to IFNγ, their coexistence with binding sites for some auxiliary transcription factors such as AP-1, generated vulnerability to IL-4-mediated inhibition. These data provide a core mechanistic framework for the integration of signals that control macrophage activation and the starting point for understanding macrophage responses in complex environmental conditions

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE84518 | GEO | 2017/03/02

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA329536

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Opposing macrophage-polarization programs show extensive epigenomic and transcriptional cross-talk [ChIP_broadly]

Project description:The M1 and the M2 macrophage polarization programs (activated by IFNγ and IL-4, respectively) lie at the opposite edges of a continuum of activation states but are frequently co-activated during co-infections and in cancer despite controlling divergent functional responses. Whether these two programs are mutually exclusive, how they influence each other, and whether one represents the prevailing response, are all open questions. Co-administration of IFNγ and IL-4 exerted complex inhibitory effects over the M1 and M2 programs at the level of both epigenomic and transcriptional changes. Computational data mining and validation analyses revealed the molecular basis of the differential sensitivity of genes and cis-regulatory elements to the antagonistic effects of the opposite stimulus. For instance, while STAT1 and IRF motifs were associated with robust and IL-4-resistant responses to IFNγ, their coexistence with binding sites for some auxiliary transcription factors such as AP-1, generated vulnerability to IL-4-mediated inhibition. These data provide a core mechanistic framework for the integration of signals that control macrophage activation and the starting point for understanding macrophage responses in complex environmental conditions

2017-03-02 | GSE84519 | GEO

Opposing macrophage-polarization programs show extensive epigenomic and transcriptional cross-talk [RNA-Seq]

2017-03-02 | GSE84517 | GEO

Novel transcriptome signatures and markers defining murine macrophages at the extremes of the canonical M1 and M2 polarization spectrum

Project description:Classically (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages play distinct roles in various physiological and disease processes. Understanding the gene transcription programs that contribute to macrophage polarization along the M1/M2 spectrum may lead to new tools to detect and therapeutically manipulate macrophage phenotype. Here, we define the M1 and M2 macrophage signature through mRNA microarray. The M1 macrophage signature was defined by 629 up-regulated and 732 down-regulated genes while the M2 macrophage signature was formed by 388 up-regulated and 425 down-regulated genes. While a subset of probes was common to both M1 and M2 cells, others were exclusive to each macrophage subset. The common M1/M2 pathways were characterized by changes in various transcriptional regulators and signaling partners, including increases in Kruppel-like Factor (Klf) 4, but decreases in Klf2. To identify M1 and M2 biomarkers that help discriminate these populations, we selected genes that were increased during M1 or M2 differentiation but decreased in the opposite population. Among top novel M1-distinct genes, we identified CD38, G-protein coupled receptor 18 (Gpr18) and Formyl peptide receptor 2 (Fpr2). Among top M2 genes, we found early growth response protein 2 (Egr2) and Myc. We validated these genes by Real-Time PCR and developed a CD38/Egr2-based flow cytometry assay that discriminates between M1 and M2 macrophages. Overall, this work defines the M1 and M2 signature and identifies several novel M1 and M2 genes that may be used to distinguish and manipulate M1 and M2 macrophages. Total RNA was prepared from bone marrow-derived macrophages of wild-type mice (n=2-3 independent mice) treated in M0, M1 or M2 conditions (n=2-3 replicates per condition originating from different mice)

2015-12-08 | E-GEOD-69607 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Identification of pharmacologic inhibitors and activators of IL-4-induced macrophage polarization [THP-1 RNA-seq]

Project description:Macrophages polarize towards different subpopulations with distinct and partly antagonistic functions in various diseases. IFNγ/LPS-polarized M1-type macrophages can have antiangiogenic activity, whereas IL-4-induced M2-type macrophages can be proangiogenic and profibrotic. Therapeutic strategies to inhibit M2-type polarization while promoting M1-type polarization could serve to inhibit pathological angiogenesis and fibrosis. Here, by combining global quantitative time-course proteomics and phosphoproteomics with a small-molecule inhibitor screen we identify signaling events that promote specifically IL-4-induced and not IFNγ/LPS-induced macrophage polarization and found that the MEK inhibitor trametinib and the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat potently prevent M2-type macrophage polarization without inhibiting M1-type polarization. In contrast, selective B-Raf inhibition promotes M2-type polarization. Trametinib and panobinostat also blocked M2-type macrophage polarization and concomitantly angiogenesis and fibrosis in models of wound healing and neovascular age-related macular degeneration in vivo. Thus, these pharmacologic inhibitors could be utilized therapeutically to selectively block IL4-induced macrophage polarization and reduce pathologic angiogenesis and fibrosis.

2021-10-16 | GSE154346 | GEO

Identification of pharmacologic inhibitors and activators of IL-4-induced macrophage polarization [PBMC RNA-seq]

2021-10-16 | GSE154345 | GEO

Identification of pharmacologic inhibitors and activators of IL-4-induced macrophage polarization [THP-1 ChIP-seq]

2021-10-16 | GSE154343 | GEO

Identification of pharmacologic inhibitors and activators of IL-4-induced macrophage polarization

2021-10-01 | GSE140235 | GEO

Identification of pharmacologic inhibitors and activators of IL-4-induced macrophage polarization [PBMC ChIP-seq]

2021-10-16 | GSE154342 | GEO

The Paradigm of Macrophage Polarization is not Applicable per seto Human Circulating Monocytes

Project description:Macrophage activation is required for the control of innate and adaptive immune responses. The classification in M1 and M2 macrophages based on a combination of small numbers of membrane and soluble markers is operational in murine and human macrophages. If this classification may be extended to circulating monocytes is not elucidated. To answer such question, human monocytes were stimulated for 6 and 18 hours with IFN-gamma and IL-4, two canonical agonists of M1/M2 polarization in macrophages, and gene expression programs were investigated with whole genome microarrays. The temporal analysis of these programs showed marked differences to both IFN-gamma and IL-4. In 6-h stimulated monocytes, gene categories related to inflammatory and immune responses were enriched, and these monocytes exhibited a M1 and M2 polarization in response to IFN-gamma and IL-4, respectively, as found in macrophages. In 18-h stimulated monocytes, the categories related to innate immunity and metabolic pathways were enriched in response to IFN-gamma and IL-4, whereas PPAR signaling pathway was specifically enriched in response to IL-4. In addition, the M1 and M2 polarization induced by IFN-gamma and IL-4, respectively, was replaced by an original transcriptional program that did not depend on IFN-gamma and IL-4. This program appeared as networks around chemokines, NF-kappaB/MAP kinase pathways and MHC class II molecules. These results clearly demonstrated that monocyte activation consisted of an early polarized stage likely involved in effector responses and a delayed stage that may regulate host responses. The establishment of databases on human circulating monocytes using high throughput methods may be critical for pathophysiological and clinical non-invasive studies. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from leukopacks from normal blood donor buffy coats (Etablissement FranÃ§ais du Sang, Marseille, France) by Ficoll density gradient

2012-12-07 | E-GEOD-27658 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Novel transcriptome signatures and markers defining murine macrophages at the extremes of the canonical M1 and M2 polarization spectrum

2015-12-08 | GSE69607 | GEO