The identification and functional annotation of RNA structures conserved in vertebrates
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE87214 | GEO | 2017/04/26
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA343900
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:We assessed how the effects of transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) on the activity of a cis-regulatory sequence (CRS) depend on the local sequence context. We constructed a library of synthetic CRSs composed of TFBSs enriched in mouse photoreceptors and assayed them by massively parallel reporter assay in live mouse retina. We used the resulting data to train neural network-based models that predict CRS activity from sequence.
2023-03-05 | GSE225867 | GEO
Project description:We have developed an oligoGEArray with 434 genes from Ae. aegypti salivary gland. OligoGEArray was customized with the salivary gland genes chosen from the transcriptome source published by Ribeiro et al (2007). Oligonucleotides (60bp) were designed and array were manufactured by SABiosciences. Using this OligoGEArray, we analyzed the differential expression of salivary trancritptome upon blood feeding.
2009-12-31 | GSE16392 | GEO
Project description:Experiments conducted on this tiling array are used to (1) validate the frozen gene sets of the current genome annotation, (2) improve the predicted gene structures by empirically determining UTRs and intron-exon boundaries, identifying missing upstream, internal, and downstream exons and alternative transcripts, (3) propose gene structure models in transcribed regions containing no predicted genes and (4) delineate transcriptionally active regions of the genome from intergenic, intronic and genic regions. Signal to background ratios were determined by first calling probes that fluoresced at intensities greater than 99% of the random probes’ signal intensities; therefore only 1% of fluorescing experimental probes should be false positives.
2011-02-01 | GSE25856 | GEO
Project description:Experiments conducted on this tiling array are used to (1) validate the frozen gene sets of the current genome annotation, (2) improve the predicted gene structures by empirically determining UTRs and intron-exon boundaries, identifying missing upstream, internal, and downstream exons and alternative transcripts, (3) propose gene structure models in transcribed regions containing no predicted genes and (4) delineate transcriptionally active regions of the genome from intergenic, intronic and genic regions. Signal to background ratios were determined by first calling probes that fluoresced at intensities greater than 99% of the random probes’ signal intensities; therefore only 1% of fluorescing experimental probes should be false positives.
2011-02-01 | GSE25855 | GEO
Project description:Experiments conducted on this tiling array are used to (1) validate the frozen gene sets of the current genome annotation, (2) improve the predicted gene structures by empirically determining UTRs and intron-exon boundaries, identifying missing upstream, internal, and downstream exons and alternative transcripts, (3) propose gene structure models in transcribed regions containing no predicted genes and (4) delineate transcriptionally active regions of the genome from intergenic, intronic and genic regions. Signal to background ratios were determined by first calling probes that fluoresced at intensities greater than 99% of the random probes’ signal intensities; therefore, only 1% of fluorescing experimental probes should be false positives.
2011-02-01 | GSE25852 | GEO
Project description:We checked the effects of mutations on expression levels by using systematically mutated probes. We used Agilent custom microarray whose probe length is 60bp. To check artificial mutation effect, we designed 56 patterns of mutations, 24 patterns of insertions and deletions. On the microarray, we used 7,987 probes from Agilent human gene probes. In these experiments, we checked the difference of expression levels about at least 73 probes for each mutation type. We performed microarray experiments with an Agilent 4x44k custom microarray. We measured gene expressions using a qPCR Human reference total RNA sample provided by CloneTech. Gene expression profiles were normalized with quintile normalization according to the Agilent protocol except that only non-mutated 219 probes were used.
2011-11-01 | GSE30981 | GEO
Project description:We checked the effects of mutations on expression levels by using systematically mutated probes. We used Agilent custom microarray whose probe length is 60bp. To check artificial mutation effect, we designed 56 patterns of mutations, 24 patterns of insertions and deletions. On the microarray, we used 7,987 probes from Agilent human gene probes. In these experiments, we checked the difference of expression levels about at least 73 probes for each mutation type. We performed microarray experiments with an Agilent custom microarray. We measured gene expressions using a qPCR Human reference total RNA sample provided by CloneTech. Gene expression profiles were normalized with quintile normalization according to the Agilent protocol except that only non-mutated 219 probes were used.
2011-11-01 | GSE30978 | GEO
Project description:Experiments conducted on this tiling array are used to (1) validate the frozen gene sets of the current genome annotation, (2) improve the predicted gene structures by empirically determining UTRs and intron-exon boundaries, identifying missing upstream, internal, and downstream exons and alternative transcripts, (3) propose gene structure models in transcribed regions containing no predicted genes and (4) delineate transcriptionally active regions of the genome from intergenic, intronic and genic regions. Signal to background ratios were determined by first calling probes that fluoresced at intensities greater than 99% of the random probes’ signal intensities; therefore only 1% of fluorescing experimental probes should be false positives. We conducted two-color competitive hybridizations that measure differential expression from three replicates, each using RNA from independent biological extractions. Transcriptional active regions (TARs) were defined by stringing together overlapping probes showing fluorescence above a 1% false positive rate (FPR). Positive probes were joined into a TAR if they were adjacent (maxgap=0, no intermittent non-positive probe) and a TAR’s length had to be at least 45 bp (minrun=45, mid-point first positive probe to mid-point last positive probe, resulting in at least 3 adjacent positive probes for a TAR). Transcriptional active regions (TARs) were defined by stringing together overlapping probes showing fluorescence above a 1% false positive rate (FPR). The data analysis to measure differential expression of genes and of unannotated TARs was performed using the statistical software package R and Bioconductor with additions and modifications. The signal distributions across chips, samples and replicates were adjusted to be equal according to the mean fluorescence of the random probes on each array. All probes including random probes were quantile-normalized across replicates. Expression-level scores were assigned for each predicted gene based on the median log2 fluorescence over background intensity of probes falling within the exon boundaries.
2011-02-01 | E-GEOD-25856 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Experiments conducted on this tiling array are used to (1) validate the frozen gene sets of the current genome annotation, (2) improve the predicted gene structures by empirically determining UTRs and intron-exon boundaries, identifying missing upstream, internal, and downstream exons and alternative transcripts, (3) propose gene structure models in transcribed regions containing no predicted genes and (4) delineate transcriptionally active regions of the genome from intergenic, intronic and genic regions. Signal to background ratios were determined by first calling probes that fluoresced at intensities greater than 99% of the random probes’ signal intensities; therefore, only 1% of fluorescing experimental probes should be false positives. We conducted two-color competitive hybridizations that measure differential expression from three replicates, each using RNA from independent biological extractions. Transcriptional active regions (TARs) were defined by stringing together overlapping probes showing fluorescence above a 1% false positive rate (FPR). Positive probes were joined into a TAR if they were adjacent (maxgap=0, no intermittent non-positive probe) and a TAR’s length had to be at least 45 bp (minrun=45, mid-point first positive probe to mid-point last positive probe, resulting in at least 3 adjacent positive probes for a TAR). The data analysis to measure differential expression of genes and of unannotated TARs was performed using the statistical software package R and Bioconductor with additions and modifications. The signal distributions across chips, samples and replicates were adjusted to be equal according to the mean fluorescence of the random probes on each array. All probes including random probes were quantile-normalized across replicates. Expression-level scores were assigned for each predicted gene based on the median log2 fluorescence over background intensity of probes falling within the exon boundaries.
2011-02-01 | E-GEOD-25852 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Experiments conducted on this tiling array are used to (1) validate the frozen gene sets of the current genome annotation, (2) improve the predicted gene structures by empirically determining UTRs and intron-exon boundaries, identifying missing upstream, internal, and downstream exons and alternative transcripts, (3) propose gene structure models in transcribed regions containing no predicted genes and (4) delineate transcriptionally active regions of the genome from intergenic, intronic and genic regions. Signal to background ratios were determined by first calling probes that fluoresced at intensities greater than 99% of the random probes’ signal intensities; therefore only 1% of fluorescing experimental probes should be false positives. We conducted two-color competitive hybridizations that measure differential expression from three replicates, each using RNA from independent biological extractions. Transcriptional active regions (TARs) were defined by stringing together overlapping probes showing fluorescence above a 1% false positive rate (FPR). Positive probes were joined into a TAR if they were adjacent (maxgap=0, no intermittent non-positive probe) and a TAR’s length had to be at least 45 bp (minrun=45, mid-point first positive probe to mid-point last positive probe, resulting in at least 3 adjacent positive probes for a TAR).The data analysis to measure differential expression of genes and of unannotated TARs was performed using the statistical software package R and Bioconductor with additions and modifications. The signal distributions across chips, samples and replicates were adjusted to be equal according to the mean fluorescence of the random probes on each array. All probes including random probes were quantile-normalized across replicates. Expression-level scores were assigned for each predicted gene based on the median log2 fluorescence over background intensity of probes falling within the exon boundaries.
2011-02-01 | E-GEOD-25855 | biostudies-arrayexpress