Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Neurogenesis by Pumilio Proteins [RNA-Seq]
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
PROVIDER: GSE95102 | GEO | 2017/08/15
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA376283
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:we employ crosslinking immunoprecipitation (iCLIP) to reveal Pum1 and Pum2 binding mRNAs
2017-08-15 | GSE95195 | GEO
Project description:We employ Mass spectrum to investigate proteome of Pum1-Knockout, Pum2-Knockout and WT conditions in human colorectal cancer cell line Hct116. Overall design: In order to investigate whether Pum1 and Pum2 regulate their targets at their protein levels, we used Pum1-Knockout, Pum2-Knockout and WT Hct116 cell line to extract total protein for Mass spectrum.
2021-07-23 | PXD027513 |
Project description:Pumilio proteins are RNA-binding proteins that control mRNA translation and stability by binding to the 3' UTR of target mRNAs. Mammals have two canonical Pumilio proteins, PUM1 and PUM2, which are known to act in many biological processes, including embryonic development, neurogenesis, cell cycle regulation and genomic stability. Here, we characterized a new role of both PUM1 and PUM2 in regulating cell morphology, migration, and adhesion in T-REx-293 cells, in addition to previously known defects in growth rate. Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in PUM double knockout (PDKO) cells for both cellular component and biological process showed enrichment in categories related to adhesion and migration. PDKO cells had a collective cell migration rate significantly lower than that of WT cells and displayed changes in actin morphology. In addition, during growth, PDKO cells aggregated into clusters (clumps) due to an inability to escape cell-cell contacts. Addition of extracellular matrix (Matrigel) alleviated the clumping phenotype. Collagen IV (ColIV), a major component of Matrigel, was shown to be the driving force in allowing PDKO cells to monolayer appropriately, however, ColIV protein levels remained unperturbed in PDKO cells. This study characterizes a novel cellular phenotype associated with cellular morphology, migration, and adhesion which can aid in developing better models for PUM function in both developmental processes and disease.
2023-01-01 | GSE207836 | GEO
Project description:Despite extensive studies on mammalian neurogenesis, its post-transcriptional regulation remains under-explored. Here we report that neural-specific inactivation of two murine post-transcriptional regulators, Pumilio 1 (Pum1) and Pum2, severely reduced the number of neural stem cells (NSCs) in the postnatal dentate gyrus (DG), drastically increased perinatal apoptosis, altered DG cell composition, and impaired learning and memory. Consistently, the mutant DG neurospheres generated fewer NSCs with defects in proliferation, survival, and differentiation, supporting a major role of Pum1 and Pum2 in hippocampal neurogenesis and function. Cross-linking immunoprecipitation revealed that Pum1 and Pum2 bind to thousands of mRNAs, with at least 694 common targets in multiple neurogenic pathways. Depleting Pum1 and/or Pum2 did not change the abundance of most target mRNAs but up-regulated their proteins, indicating that Pum1 and Pum2 regulate the translation of their target mRNAs. Moreover, Pum1 and Pum2 display RNA-dependent interaction with fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and bind to one another's mRNA. This indicates that Pum proteins might form collaborative networks with FMRP and possibly other post-transcriptional regulators to regulate neurogenesis.
| S-EPMC5580656 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pumilio paralogs, PUM1 and PUM2, are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins that are essential for vertebrate development and neurological functions. PUM1&2 function to negatively regulate gene expression by accelerating degradation of specific mRNAs. Here, we determined the repression mechanism and impact of human PUM1&2 on the transcriptome. We identified subunits of the CCR4-NOT (CNOT) deadenylase complex required for stable interaction with PUM1&2 and to elicit CNOT-dependent repression. Isoform-level RNA sequencing revealed broad co-regulation of target mRNAs through the PUM-CNOT repression mechanism. Functional dissection of the domains of PUM1&2 identified a conserved N-terminal region that confers the predominant repressive activity via direct interaction with CNOT. In addition, we show that the DCP2 mRNA decapping enzyme has an important role in repression by PUM1&2 N-terminal regions. Our results support a molecular model of repression by human PUM1&2 via direct recruitment of CNOT deadenylation machinery in a decapping-dependent pathway.
2021-09-09 | GSE159510 | GEO
Project description:The human members of the PUF family of proteins, PUM1 and PUM2, are RNA-binding proteins that post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression through binding to a PUM recognition element (PRE) in the 3′ UTR of target mRNAs, promoting RNA decay. Recent RNA-seq experiments in PUM1/2 knockdown conditions have identified hundreds of known and new human PUM targets through measurement of changes in steady state RNA levels. However, steady-state RNA levels do not allow for measurement of changes in RNA stability between conditions and do not allow for the differentiation between the contributions of changes in transcription rates and changes in RNA decay. Here, we identify hundreds of human PUM1/2 targets that have changes in RNA stability following PUM1/2 knockdown. We separate the contributions of changes in transcription rate and RNA stability and find that human PUM proteins almost exclusively modulate RNA abundance through changing RNA stability and not transcription. In addition, we find that the sequence preferences for all possible 8mers are largely similar between PUM1 and PUM2, suggesting that PUM1 and PUM2 recognize similar targets. We identify an ideal PRE “rulebook” by determining key contextual features around PREs, including local AU content, location of a PRE within a 3′ UTR, clustering of PREs, and number of miRNA sites near a PRE, that help differentiate functional PREs from non-functional ones as measured by our decay dataset. Consistent with previously identified functional roles of mammalian PUMs, we find that human PUM1 and PUM2 modulate the decay of genes related to signaling cascades and neuronal function. Finally, we train machine learning models to predict functional regulation of RNA targets by the human PUM proteins and find that contextual features around PREs contribute meaningful information to our models.
2020-08-05 | GSE145237 | GEO
Project description:We used RNA-seq to measure transcript levels in human cells with the PUM1 and PUM2 proteins knocked down; by analyzing the differences in transcript abundances between those conditions, we were able to identify 927 targets showing significant changes in the presence of the PUM knockdown.
2017-10-25 | GSE95412 | GEO
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2017-08-15 | GSE95197 | GEO
Project description:Approximately 1500 RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) profoundly impact mammalian cellular function by controlling distinct sets of transcripts, often using sequence-specific binding to 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) to regulate mRNA stability and translation. Aside from their individual effects, higher-order combinatorial interactions between RBPs on specific mRNAs have been proposed to underpin the regulatory network. To assess the extent of such co-regulatory control, we took a global experimental approach followed by targeted validation to examine interactions between two well-characterized and highly conserved RBPs, Argonaute2 (AGO2) and Pumilio (PUM1 and PUM2). Transcriptome-wide changes in AGO2-mRNA binding upon PUM knockdown were quantified by CLIP-seq, and the presence of PUM binding on the same 3′ UTR corresponded with cooperative and antagonistic effects on AGO2 occupancy. In addition, PUM binding sites that overlap with AGO2 showed differential, weakened binding profiles upon abrogation of AGO2 association, indicative of cooperative interactions. In luciferase reporter validation of candidate 3′ UTR sites where AGO2 and PUM colocalized, three sites were identified to host antagonistic interactions, where PUM counteracts miRNA-guided repression. Interestingly, the binding sites for the two proteins are too far for potential antagonism due to steric hindrance, suggesting an alternate mechanism. Our data experimentally confirms the combinatorial regulatory model and indicates that the mostly repressive PUM proteins can change their behavior in a context-dependent manner. Overall, the approach underscores the importance of further elucidation of complex interactions between RBPs and their transcriptome-wide extent.
2018-10-17 | GSE110519 | GEO
Project description:Approximately 1500 RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) profoundly impact mammalian cellular function by controlling distinct sets of transcripts, often using sequence-specific binding to 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) to regulate mRNA stability and translation. Aside from their individual effects, higher-order combinatorial interactions between RBPs on specific mRNAs have been proposed to underpin the regulatory network. To assess the extent of such co-regulatory control, we took a global experimental approach followed by targeted validation to examine interactions between two well-characterized and highly conserved RBPs, Argonaute2 (AGO2) and Pumilio (PUM1 and PUM2). Transcriptome-wide changes in AGO2-mRNA binding upon PUM knockdown were quantified by CLIP-seq, and the presence of PUM binding on the same 3′ UTR corresponded with cooperative and antagonistic effects on AGO2 occupancy. In addition, PUM binding sites that overlap with AGO2 showed differential, weakened binding profiles upon abrogation of AGO2 association, indicative of cooperative interactions. In luciferase reporter validation of candidate 3′ UTR sites where AGO2 and PUM colocalized, three sites were identified to host antagonistic interactions, where PUM counteracts miRNA-guided repression. Interestingly, the binding sites for the two proteins are too far for potential antagonism due to steric hindrance, suggesting an alternate mechanism. Our data experimentally confirms the combinatorial regulatory model and indicates that the mostly repressive PUM proteins can change their behavior in a context-dependent manner. Overall, the approach underscores the importance of further elucidation of complex interactions between RBPs and their transcriptome-wide extent.
2018-10-17 | GSE110518 | GEO