Comparison of gene expression profiling among shRNAs-mediated RUNX1 knockdown in MV4-11 cells with various knockdown efficacies
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE98748 | GEO | 2017/10/01
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA386106
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Bromodomain extraterminal protein (BETP) inhibitors transcriptionally repress oncoproteins which undermines the growth and survival of AML cells. However, BETi treatment causes accumulation of BETPs, associated with reversible binding and incomplete inhibition of BRD4, which potentially compromises the activity of BETi in AML cells. Unlike BETi, BET-PROTAC (proteolysis-targeting chimera) ARV-825 recruits and utilize an E3-ubiquitin ligase to effectively degrade BETPs in AML cells. BET-PROTACs induce more apoptosis than BETi of mtRUNX1 AML cells. BET-PROTAC treatment induced more perturbations in the mRNA and protein expressions than BETi. It was noted that treatment with BETi or BET-PROTAC caused significant and sustained depletion of RUNX1 in AML cells. We also determined the effects of global depletion of RUNX1 in mtRUNX1 expressing AML OCI-AML5 cells. We observed an overlap in the signature of RUNX1 knockdown by shRNA with that of OTX015 and ARV-825 in OCI-AML5 cells.
2020-08-11 | GSE119261 | GEO
Project description:RUNX1 transcription factor (TF) is a key regulator of megakaryocytic development and when mutated is associated with familial platelet disorder and predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (FPD-AML). We used mice lacking Runx1 specifically in megakaryocytes (MKs) to characterize the Runx1-mediated transcriptional program during advanced stages of MK differentiation. Gene expression and chromatin-immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) of Runx1 and p300 identified functional Runx1-bound MK enhancers. Runx1/p300 co-bound regions showed significant enrichment in genes important for MK and platelet homeostasis. Runx1-bound regions were highly enriched in RUNX and ETS motifs and to a lesser extent in GATA motif. The data provides the first example of genome-wide Runx1/p300 occupancy in maturating FL-MK, unravels the Runx1-regulated program controlling MK maturation in vivo and identifies its bona fide regulated genes. It advances our understanding of the molecular events that upon mutations in RUNX1 lead to the predisposition to familial platelet disorders and FPD-AML. Examination of RUNX1 and P300 binding in WT mouse megakaryoctye cells using ChIP-Seq. The supplementary 'GSE45372_PeakList.txt' file includes a list of regions identified as binding for P300 or RUNX1 or both.
2013-03-22 | E-GEOD-45372 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:RUNX1 transcription factor (TF) is a key regulator of megakaryocytic development and when mutated is associated with familial platelet disorder and predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (FPD-AML). We used mice lacking Runx1 specifically in megakaryocytes (MKs) to characterize the Runx1-mediated transcriptional program during advanced stages of MK differentiation. Gene expression and chromatin-immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) of Runx1 and p300 identified functional Runx1-bound MK enhancers. Runx1/p300 co-bound regions showed significant enrichment in genes important for MK and platelet homeostasis. Runx1-bound regions were highly enriched in RUNX and ETS motifs and to a lesser extent in GATA motif. The data provides the first example of genome-wide Runx1/p300 occupancy in maturating FL-MK, unravels the Runx1-regulated program controlling MK maturation in vivo and identifies its bona fide regulated genes. It advances our understanding of the molecular events that upon mutations in RUNX1 lead to the predisposition to familial platelet disorders and FPD-AML. Gene expression profiles of mature megakaryocytes taken from fetal livers of megakaryocyte-specific Runx1 knockout mice, using Runx1F/F/Pf4-Cre mice versus control (WT) mice.
2013-03-22 | E-GEOD-45373 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Runx1 and Runx3 function redundantly in early T-development, and together drive T-lineage developmental progression by regulating distinct sets of genes in different stages. Context-specific Runx target genes are particularly enriched near Runx binding sites that dynamically shift from pre-T-commitment stages (Phase 1) to post-T-commitment stages (Phase 2). As total Runx activities (Runx1+Runx3) are maintained stably throughout early T-development stages, yet Runx factors physically interact with multiple collaborators, we hypothesized that different Runx-collaborating transcription factors compete to recruit a limited pool of Runx transcription factors. To test whether increasing Runx availability can alter Runx DNA-binding site choices, Runx1 overexpression vectors were introduced to two different systems. First, we increased Runx1 expression in a DN3-like cell line (representing a post-commitment, Phase 2 stage) in the presence or absence of exogenous Phase 1 co-factor, PU.1. Second, we increased Runx1 expression in Phase 1 primary cells which naturally express PU.1 and other Phase 1 collaborators. Then, Runx1 binding behaviors were measured using ChIP-seq or CUT&RUN (C&R). A modest increase of Runx1 levels (about 2-3 fold increase) substantially increased the number of Runx binding sites seen and the intensity of occupancy in both systems. When Runx expression was at physiological levels, PU.1 dominated Runx1 site choice before T commitment by recruiting Runx1 to PU.1 sites. The Phase 2 cell line system showed that it did this while depleting Runx1 from alternative high quality Runx motif sites. However, when Runx1 was overexpressed, Runx1 was still recruited to PU.1 sites, but this recruitment did not evacuate Runx1 occupancy from default preferred sites. Notably, Runx1 overexpression in primary Phase 1 cells caused precocious occupancy of post-commitment, Phase 2-specific sites. We found that these are often co-occupied with TCF1, E2A, and HEB, but have minimal co-binding with PU.1. In addition, Runx1 overexpression resulted in new binding sites that were not normally observed in pro-T cells, which are mostly sequestered by closed chromatin normally although they harbor more numerous Runx motifs. Thus, these data suggest that Runx DNA binding site choices are sensitive to Runx concentration and co-factors during early T-development.
2023-07-09 | GSE218147 | GEO
Project description:Although Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) has been generally considered to be a tumor suppressor, a growing body of evidence strongly suggests its pro-oncogenic property in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Here we demonstrate that anti-leukemic effect mediated by RUNX1 depletion is highly dependent on a functional p53-mediated cell death pathway. Based on our present findings, anti-tumor effect elicited by RUNX1 silencing was compensated by the other RUNX family members such as RUNX2 and RUNX3, and a simultaneous attenuation of whole RUNX family members as a cluster displayed a much stronger anti-tumor effect relative to their individual suppression. Notably, switching off RUNX cluster utilizing the novel alkylating agent-conjugated pyrrole-imidazole (PI) polyamides, which specifically bound to the consensus RUNX-binding sequences, was highly effective against leukemia as well as dismal-prognostic solid tumors arising from diverse origins in vivo without any significant adverse events. Together, this work identifies the crucial role of RUNX cluster in the maintenance and the progression of cancer cells, and the indicated gene switch technology-dependent its modulation would be a novel strategy to control malignancies.
2017-03-26 | GSE94835 | GEO
Project description:RUNX1 transcription factor (TF) is a key regulator of megakaryocytic development and when mutated is associated with familial platelet disorder and predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (FPD-AML). We used mice lacking Runx1 specifically in megakaryocytes (MKs) to characterize the Runx1-mediated transcriptional program during advanced stages of MK differentiation. Gene expression and chromatin-immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) of Runx1 and p300 identified functional Runx1-bound MK enhancers. Runx1/p300 co-bound regions showed significant enrichment in genes important for MK and platelet homeostasis. Runx1-bound regions were highly enriched in RUNX and ETS motifs and to a lesser extent in GATA motif. The data provides the first example of genome-wide Runx1/p300 occupancy in maturating FL-MK, unravels the Runx1-regulated program controlling MK maturation in vivo and identifies its bona fide regulated genes. It advances our understanding of the molecular events that upon mutations in RUNX1 lead to the predisposition to familial platelet disorders and FPD-AML.
2013-03-22 | GSE45372 | GEO
Project description:RUNX1 transcription factor (TF) is a key regulator of megakaryocytic development and when mutated is associated with familial platelet disorder and predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (FPD-AML). We used mice lacking Runx1 specifically in megakaryocytes (MKs) to characterize the Runx1-mediated transcriptional program during advanced stages of MK differentiation. Gene expression and chromatin-immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) of Runx1 and p300 identified functional Runx1-bound MK enhancers. Runx1/p300 co-bound regions showed significant enrichment in genes important for MK and platelet homeostasis. Runx1-bound regions were highly enriched in RUNX and ETS motifs and to a lesser extent in GATA motif. The data provides the first example of genome-wide Runx1/p300 occupancy in maturating FL-MK, unravels the Runx1-regulated program controlling MK maturation in vivo and identifies its bona fide regulated genes. It advances our understanding of the molecular events that upon mutations in RUNX1 lead to the predisposition to familial platelet disorders and FPD-AML.
2013-03-22 | GSE45373 | GEO
Project description:Ficolled AML-M0 sample gene expression profiles on Affymetrix HGU133Plus2.0 GeneChips. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) classified as FAB-M0 is defined as a subtype with minimally differentiated morphology. Here we investigated by gene expression (GEP) profiling whether AML-M0 cases should be considered as one or more unique molecular subgroups that discriminates them from other AML patients. By applying GEP and subsequent unsupervised analysis of 35 AML-M0 samples and 253 previously reported AML cases, we demonstrate that AML-M0 cases express a unique signature. Hematological transcription regulators such as CEBPA, CEBPD, PU.1 and ETV6 and the differentiation associated gene MPO appeared strongly down-regulated, in line with the very primitive state of this type of leukemia. Moreover, AML M0 cases appeared to have a strong positive correlation with a previously defined immature AML subgroup with adverse prognosis. AML-M0 leukemias frequently carry loss-of-function RUNX-1 mutation and unsupervised analyses revealed a striking distinction between cases with and without mutations. RUNX1 mutant AML-M0 samples showed a distinct up-regulation of B-cell-related genes, e.g. members of the B-cell receptor complex, transcriptions regulators RUNX3, ETS2, IRF8 or PRDM1 and major histocompatibility complex class II genes. Importantly, expression of one single gene, i.e. BLNK, enabled prediction of RUNX1 mutations in AML-M0 with high accuracy. We propose that RUNX1 mutations in this subgroup of AML cause lineage infidelity, leading to aberrant co-expression of myeloid and B-lymphoid genes in the same cells. Experiment Overall Design: 35 samples
2009-07-18 | E-GEOD-17061 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Runx transcription factors are essential for generating functional T cells starting from the earliest stages in thymic T-development. To evaluate how Runx factors instruct T cell development, we perturbed Runx activities using 1) CRISPR-Cas9, simultaneously deleting two predominant, redundant Runx factors, Runx1 and Runx3, and 2) Runx1-overepxression at a stage before pro-T cells commit to a T cell fate. Then single-cell transcriptome analysis was performed. Runx1/Runx3 knockout (KO) vs. Runx1 overexpression (OE) resulted in contrasting deviations from the normal developmental trajectory. The separation of both perturbation conditions from the controls implied that Runx factors regulate gene networks in individual cells to control separate pathways instead of changing distributions of cells among different stages along the control pathway. Notably, a common core set of genes responded to both KO and OE, in opposite directions. Runx activation target genes were selectively enriched for T-identity program and innate lymphoid cell program genes, whereas inhibition targets were significantly associated with stem/progenitor program and myeloid lineage pathways. Pseudotime inference analysis suggested that Runx perturbations also substantially regulate developmental speed, as Runx KO significantly slowed down developmental progression, whereas Runx1 OE resulted in pronounced acceleration. This interpretation was largely supported by Runx activities regulating key transcription factors involved in establishing distinct gene network modules during T cell development. Indeed, further analysis showed that Runx target genes get combinatorial inputs from these Runx-regulated transcription factors as well as from Runx factors themselves. Together, our data suggest that Runx transcription factors drive early T developmental progression by launching gene expression modules associated with T-identity and innate lymphoid cells through mediating other transcription factor cooperativities.
2023-07-09 | GSE218149 | GEO
Project description:Runx transcription factors play pivotal roles in the development of hematopoietic cells, including T cells. However, the Runx-target genes in early stages of thymic T cell development have been only partially elucidated. Moreover, the relationships of different Runx paralogs, whether they compete or collaborate with each other, are unknown. We have performed CRISPR-Cas9 mediated acute deletion of Runx1 and Runx3, alone and in combination, to define the functions of Runx factors and their target genes. We focused on two distinct stages of early T cell development; before lineage commitment (Phase1) and after commitment (Phase2). Our data suggest that Runx1 and Runx3 are functionally redundant in Phase1, hence the absence of one factor was compensated by the other factor. In Phase2, Runx1 becomes a major contributor, while low levels of Runx3 still strengthened the Runx1-mediated target gene regulation and showed an additive effect. Of importance, we found that Runx1 and Runx3 upregulate T cell programs and inhibit alternative lineage genes. In order to capture the developmental status of Runx-perturbed cells, we performed supervised principal component analysis (PCA) using a fixed frame of PC loadings from single cell RNA-seq analysis of normal in vivo-derived thymocytes. Unlike the reference in vitro and in vivo pro-T cell population or sgControl introduced cells, Runx knockout cells either failed to progress fully (Phase1) or deflected from the normal developmental trajectory (Phase2), suggesting essential roles of Runx factors in early stages of T development. In addition, we analyzed the correlation between stage-specific genomic occupancy of Runx1 and Runx3 (using previously published data for Runx1, GSE103953) and Runx-mediated gene regulation responses at each stage. Interestingly, genes with dynamic, stage-sensitive expression showed a very significant association with phase-specific genomic interactions of Runx factors, and an especially strong correlation with Runx activated target genes. In summary, our data suggest a pivotal role for Runx transcription factors in thymic T cell development by imposing T lineage specification in Phase1 and instructing the lineage-committed progenitor cells to progress through a normal T developmental trajectory.
2020-07-14 | GSE154304 | GEO