Integrated multi-omics analysis of RB-loss identifies widespread cellular programming and synthetic weaknesses
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Orbitrap Fusion
ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (ncbitaxon:9606)
SUBMITTER: 
Wayne Miles
PROVIDER: MSV000084736 | MassIVE | Thu Dec 26 08:55:00 GMT 2019
REPOSITORIES: MassIVE
Similar Datasets
Project description:We used mass spectrometry-based proteomics to perform a phosphoproteomics analysis of selinexor-treated ex vivo AML patient samples (n=20) and 4 AML cell lines (PL-21, NOMO-1, GDM-1 and MV4-11). For quantitative phosphoproteomics, we used a tandem mass tag (TMT)-based approach. Conditions for the TMT 11-plex (Ex vivo samples) and TMT 8-plex (AML cell lines) setups are specified below. Cells were treated with 1 M selinexor (also known as KPT-330) or 0.1% DMSO for 6 hours. The experimental treatment conditions and TMT11-plex (ex vivo samples) and TMT8-plex (cell lines) labeling schemes are specified below: TMT-11-plex TMT channel Patient no Treatment Set 1 126 Ex_24 DMSO Set 1 127N Ex_24 Selinexor Set 1 127C Ex_25 DMSO Set 1 128N Ex_25 Selinexor Set 1 128C Ex_34 DMSO Set 1 129N Ex_34 Selinexor Set 1 129C Ex_41 DMSO Set 1 130N Ex_41 Selinexor Set 1 130C Ex_44 DMSO Set 1 131N Ex_44 Selinexor Set 1 131C Mix pool Mix pool Set 2 126 Ex_9 DMSO Set 2 127N Ex_9 Selinexor Set 2 127C Ex_18 DMSO Set 2 128N Ex_18 Selinexor Set 2 128C Ex_27 DMSO Set 2 129N Ex_27 Selinexor Set 2 129C Ex_29 DMSO Set 2 130N Ex_29 Selinexor Set 2 130C Ex_36 DMSO Set 2 131N Ex_36 Selinexor Set 2 131C Mix pool Mix pool Set 3 126 Ex_8 DMSO Set 3 127N Ex_8 Selinexor Set 3 127C Ex_13 DMSO Set 3 128N Ex_13 Selinexor Set 3 128C Ex_14 DMSO Set 3 129N Ex_14 Selinexor Set 3 129C Ex_19 DMSO Set 3 130N Ex_19 Selinexor Set 3 130C Ex_40 DMSO Set 3 131N Ex_40 Selinexor Set 3 131C Mix pool Mix pool Set 4 126 Ex_6 DMSO Set 4 127N Ex_6 Selinexor Set 4 127C Ex_15 DMSO Set 4 128N Ex_15 Selinexor Set 4 128C Ex_28 DMSO Set 4 129N Ex_28 Selinexor Set 4 129C Ex_39 DMSO Set 4 130N Ex_39 Selinexor Set 4 130C Ex_42 DMSO Set 4 131N Ex_42 Selinexor Set 4 131C Mix pool Mix pool AML cell lines: TMT-8-plex TMT channel Treatment Replicate GDM-1 126 DMSO 1 GDM-1 127N DMSO 2 GDM-1 127C DMSO 3 GDM-1 128N DMSO 4 GDM-1 128C Selinexor 1 GDM-1 129N Selinexor 2 GDM-1 129C Selinexor 3 GDM-1 130N Selinexor 4 MV4-11 126 DMSO 1 MV4-11 127N DMSO 2 MV4-11 127C DMSO 3 MV4-11 128N DMSO 4 MV4-11 128C Selinexor 1 MV4-11 129N Selinexor 2 MV4-11 129C Selinexor 3 MV4-11 130N Selinexor 4 NOMO-1 126 DMSO 1 NOMO-1 127N DMSO 2 NOMO-1 127C DMSO 3 NOMO-1 128N DMSO 4 NOMO-1 128C Selinexor 1 NOMO-1 129N Selinexor 2 NOMO-1 129C Selinexor 3 NOMO-1 130N Selinexor 4 PL-21 126 DMSO 1 PL-21 127N DMSO 2 PL-21 127C DMSO 3 PL-21 128N DMSO 4 PL-21 128C Selinexor 1 PL-21 129N Selinexor 2 PL-21 129C Selinexor 3 PL-21 130N Selinexor 4
2022-08-07 | PXD017660 | Pride
Project description:The data were acquired by performing multiplexed proteomics with TMT10-plex reagents using both and Orbitrap Fusion and an Orbitrap Lumos mass spectrometer and applying an SPS-supported LC-MS2/MS3 method. Samples were anti-FLAG immunoprecipitates of RB phospho-isoforms from human RPE1 cells. Samples were labeled with the specific TMT reagents as follows:
Sample pool 1: 126, Bridge; 127n, RB wild-type (replicate 1); 127c, RB_DELTA_cdk (replicate 1); 128n, FLAG-RB wild-type (replicate 1); 128c, FLAG-RB_DELTA_cdk (replicate 1); 129n, FLAG-RB_DELTA_cdk + S230 (replicate 1); 129c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S249 (replicate 1); 130n, ,FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T252 (replicate 1); 131, Bridge.
Sample pool 2: 126, Bridge; 127n, RB wild-type (replicate 2); 127c, RB_delta_cdk (replicate 2); 128n, FLAG-RB wild-type (replicate 2); 128c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk (replicate 2); 129n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S230 (replicate 2); 129c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S249 (replicate 2), 130n, ,FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T252 (replicate 2), 131, Bridge.
Sample pool 3: 126, Bridge; 127n, RB wild-type (replicate 3); 127c, RB_delta_cdk (replicate 3); 128n, FLAG-RB wild-type (replicate 3); 128c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk (replicate 3); 129n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S230 (replicate 3); 129c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S249 (replicate 3); 130n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T252 (replicate 3); 131, Bridge.
Sample pool 4: 126, Bridge; 127n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T356 (replicate 1); 127c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T373 (replicate 1); 128n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S608 (replicate 1); 128c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S612 (replicate 1); 129n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S780 (replicate 1); 129c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S788 (replicate 1); 130n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S795 (replicate 1); 131, Bridge.
Sample pool 5: 126, Bridge; 127n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T356 (replicate 2); 127c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T373 (replicate 2); 128n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S608 (replicate 2); 128c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S612 (replicate 2); 129n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S780 (replicate 2); 129c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S788 (replicate 2); 130n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S795 (replicate 2); 131, Bridge.
Sample pool 6: 126, Bridge; 127n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T356 (replicate 3); 127c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T373 (replicate 3); 128n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S608 (replicate 3); 128c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S612 (replicate 3); 129n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S780 (replicate 3); 129c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S788 (replicate 3); 130n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S795 (replicate 3); 131, Bridge.
Sample pool 7: 126, Bridge; 127n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S807 (replicate 1); 127c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S811 (replicate 1); 128n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T821 (replicate 1); 128c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T826 (replicate 1); 131, Bridge.
Sample pool 8: 126, Bridge; 127n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S807 (replicate 2); 127c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S811 (replicate 2); 128n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T821 (replicate 2); 128c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T826 (replicate 2); 131, Bridge.
Sample pool 9: 126, Bridge; 127n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S807 (replicate 3); 127c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + S811 (replicate 3); 128n, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T821 (replicate 3); 128c, FLAG-RB_delta_cdk + T826 (replicate 3); 131, Bridge.
2018-07-01 | MSV000082562 | MassIVE
Project description:Proteome maps of biochemically enriched synaptic tissue from human Alzheimers Disease (AD) and control angular gyrus samples to highlight the synapse as a site of integration for pathophysiological processes active in AD. The samples were combined into eleven TMTpools (01 to 11). Samples pools were fractionated using basic pH reversed-phase chromatography (bRPLC) and at least 12 fractions were analyzed by LC-MS2/MS3 per pool.
The RAW files are:
Carlyle_TMTpool_01_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_01_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_02_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_02_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_03_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_03_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_04_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_04_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_05_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_05_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_06_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_06_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_07_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_07_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_08, Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_09A, Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_09B, Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_10 to Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_09_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_09_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_10_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_10_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_11_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_11_fraction_12
The labeling scheme is:
TMTpool_01: RUSH_0592 (126), RUSH_0034 (127n), RUSH_0755 (127c), RUSH_0143 (128n), RUSH_1442 (128c), RUSH_0570 (129n), Pooled_sample (129c), Pooled_sample (130n), RUSH_0992 (130c), RUSH_0857 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_02: RUSH_0974 (126), RUSH_1440 (127n), RUSH_0240 (127c), RUSH_0032 (128n), RUSH_0406 (128c), RUSH_0065 (129n), RUSH_1376 (129c), RUSH_0684 (130n), RUSH_0269 (130c), RUSH_1159 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_03: RUSH_0136 (126), Pooled_sample (127n), RUSH_0537 (127c), RUSH_1250 (128n), RUSH_0795 (128c), RUSH_0001 (129n), RUSH_0404 (129c), RUSH_0606 (130n), RUSH_0229 (130c), RUSH_0465 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_04: RUSH_0734 (126), RUSH_0873 (127n), RUSH_0743 (127c), Pooled_sample (128n), RUSH_0712 (128c), RUSH_0751 (129n), RUSH_0302 (129c), RUSH_0499 (130n), RUSH_1218 (130c), RUSH_1421 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_05: RUSH_1392 (126), RUSH_0890 (127n), RUSH_1006 (127c), RUSH_1063 (128n), RUSH_0128 (128c), RUSH_0590 (129n), RUSH_0674 (129c), RUSH_0572 (130n), RUSH_0413 (130c), RUSH_1288 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_06: RUSH_1487 (126), RUSH_1348 (127n), RUSH_0007 (127c), RUSH_1323 (128n), RUSH_1498 (128c), RUSH_0976 (129n), RUSH_0859 (129c), RUSH_0544 (130n), RUSH_0067 (130c), RUSH_1384 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_07: RUSH_0212 (126), RUSH_1474 (127n), Pooled_sample (127c), RUSH_0010 (128n), RUSH_0931 (128c), RUSH_1205 (129n), RUSH_1200 (129c), RUSH_0206 (130n), RUSH_0376 (130c), RUSH_0460 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_08: RUSH_0927 (126), RUSH_0963 (127n), RUSH_0055 (127c), RUSH_0085 (128n), RUSH_0780 (128c), RUSH_0327 (129n), RUSH_0354 (129c), RUSH_0123 (130n), RUSH_1358 (130c), RUSH_1424 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_09: RUSH_1334 (126), RUSH_0921 (127n), Pooled_sample (127c), RUSH_1093 (128n), RUSH_1499 (128c), RUSH_1419 (129n), Pooled_sample (129c), RUSH_0555 (130n), RUSH_0618 (130c), RUSH_0732 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_10: RUSH_1176 (126), Pooled_sample (127n), RUSH_0958 (127c), RUSH_0447 (128n), RUSH_1485 (128c), RUSH_0158 (129n), RUSH_0252 (129c), RUSH_0078 (130n), RUSH_0415 (130c), Pooled_sample (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_11: RUSH_1313 (126), RUSH_0989 (127n), RUSH_0295 (127c), RUSH_0177 (128n), RUSH_0064 (128c), RUSH_0919 (129n), RUSH_0847 (129c), RUSH_0266 (130n), RUSH_0933 (130c), Pooled_sample (131n), bridge (131c).
2020-02-17 | MSV000084959 | MassIVE
Project description:We aimed to identify the response mechanism to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition. A431 cells were transfected with mock siRNA or BCL6 siRNA. Cells were then treated with gefitinib. Harvesting was done at 0h, at 24h and at 48h. Two TMT10plex sets were organized as follows: TMT set1: mock 0h (3x, channels 126, 127N and 127C), mock 24h (3x, 128N, 128C and 129N), mock 48h (3x, 129C, 130N, 130C) and internal pooled standard (131) composed from equal aliquots of all samples (mock siRNA and BCL6 siRNA). TMT set2: siBCL6 0h (3x, channels 126, 127N and 127C), siBCL6 24h (3x, 128N, 128C and 129N), siBCL6 48h (3x, 129C, 130N, 130C) and the same internal pooled standard (131) as for set 1.
2020-12-09 | PXD016605 | Pride
Project description:Part I - SI-NET tumors High Resolution Isoelectric Focusing (HiRIEF) LC-MS and relative quantification by iTRAQ 8-plex was used to analyze 14 small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs). The data was obtained from two separate TMT10plex sets and linked by a single internal pooled standard. The internal pooled standard was made by combining equal aliquots of the tryptic peptide mixtures from each of the 14 tissue samples. iTRAQ set1 was composed of 7 SI-NET samples, all from different individuals, and internal pooled standard labelled as follows: Channel 113 (sample Screen-1 with liver metastasis), Channel 114 (sample Screen-8 with liver metastasis), Channel 115 (sample Screen-3 with liver metastasis), Channel 116 (sample Screen-2 with liver metastasis), Channel 117 (sample Screen-5 no liver metastasis), Channel 118 (sample Screen-4 no liver metastasis), Channel 119 (sample Screen-10 no liver metastasis), Channel 121 (internal pooled standard). iTRAQ set2 was composed of 7 SI-NET samples, all from different individuals, and internal pooled standard labelled as follows: Channel 113 (sample Screen-7 with liver metastasis), Channel 114 (sample Screen-11 with liver metastasis), Channel 115 (sample Screen-13 with liver metastasis), Channel 116 (sample Screen-6 no liver metastasis), Channel 117 (sample Screen-12 no liver metastasis), Channel 118 (sample Screen-9 no liver metastasis), Channel 119 (sample Screen-14 no liver metastasis), Channel 121 (internal pooled standard). Part II - time course profiling in cell lines High Resolution Isoelectric Focusing (HiRIEF) LC-MS and relative quantification by TMT 10-plex was used to analyze cellular response to the neddylation inhibitor pevonedistat (MLN4924) at different timepoints in two SI-NET (small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors) cell lines. The data was obtained from two separate TMT 10-plex experiments. TMT set1 includes a time course experiment upon pevonedistat treatment of CNDT2 cells with harvests at 2h, 6h, 12h and 24h after treatment as well as of untreated control cells. Isobaric tag labelling of peptide samples with TMT10plex was used as follows. Biological duplicate controls (TMT channels 126, 127N), duplicate 2h (127C, 128N), duplicate 6h (128C, 129N), duplicate 12h (129C, 130N) and duplicate 24h (130C, 131) samples were employed. TMT set2 includes a time course experiment upon pevonedistat treatment of HC45 cells with harvests at 2h, 6h, 12h and 24h after treatment as well as of untreated control cells. Isobaric tag labelling of peptide samples with TMT10plex was used as follows. Biological duplicate controls (TMT channels 126, 127N), duplicate 2h (127C, 128N), duplicate 6h (128C, 129N), duplicate 12h (129C, 130N) and duplicate 24h (130C, 131) samples were employed.
2020-12-09 | PXD009877 | Pride
Project description:The small molecule YC-1 was identified as identified as a selectively active agent against subsets of the two major live cancer subtypes, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Response to YC-1 is dependent on the expression of the sulfotransferase SULT1A1, which activates YC-1 through sulfonation. The contributions of mass spectrometry to the study were: (i) identifying SULT1A1 as the key player in YC-1 response through observing the protein in a cell line with acquired resistance to the small molecule treatment, (ii) corroborating the role of SULT1A1 in the YC-1 activity by correlating protein expression profiles and drug responses across 37 biliary cancer cell lines, (iii) showing that SULT1A1 expression was associated with IDH mutations, FGFR2 fusion, and BAP1 loss in vivo studying patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, and (iv) identifying protein targets in a protein enrichment experiment with an immobilized drug.
(iii) PDX samples were analyzed using TMT multiplexing on an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer using the SPS-MS3 method. Prior to analysis, samples were fractionated offline using high pH reversed chromatography (12 fractions per TMT set). Three TMT sets were analyzed (ShiBardeesy_PDX_TMT1, ShiBardeesy_PDX_TMT2, and ShiBardeesy_PDX_TMT3), and samples were labeled as follows with channel (bridge channel, 130c):
ShiBardeesy_PDX_TMT1: SS101 (126), MG12 (127c), SS106 (127n), MG62 (128c), MG26 (128n), LCCH13 (129c), LCCH3 (129n), Q12050 (130n).
ShiBardeesy_PDX_TMT2: SS102 (126), SS110 (127n), MG34 (128c), MG17 (128n), LCCH4 (129c), MG68 (129n), HBT110 (130n).
ShiBardeesy_PDX_TMT3: SS103 (126), MG10 (127n), MG59 (128c), MG25 (128n), LCCH10 (129c), MG73 (129n), HBT211 (130n).
(iv) Samples from experiments using immobilized small molecules to determine direct interactors of YC-1 were performed using TMT10-barcoding and the SPS-MS3 method on an Orbitrap Lumos mass spectrometer. No off-line fraction was performed. Samples were grouped into two TMT sets (ShiBardeesy_ImmobilizedDrug_TMT1 and ShiBardeesy_ImmobilizedDrug_TMT2). Channel 131N was used as the bridge channel. Samples were labeled as follows:
ShiBardeesy_ImmobilizedDrug_TMT1: immobilized_inactiveYC-1_rep_1 (126), immobilized_inactiveYC-1_rep_2 (128n), immobilized_inactiveYC-1_rep_3 (128c), immobilized_YC-1_rep_1 (129n), immobilized_YC-1_plus_soluble_YC-1_competitor_rep_1 (130c).
ShiBardeesy_ImmobilizedDrug_TMT2: immobilized_YC-1_rep_2 (127n), immobilized_YC-1_plus_soluble_YC-1_competitor_rep_2 (128n), immobilized_YC-1_plus_soluble_YC-1_competitor_rep_3 (129c), immobilized_YC-1_rep_3 (130c).
2022-11-29 | MSV000090808 | MassIVE
Project description:High Resolution Isoelectric Focusing (HiRIEF) LC-MS was used to analyze samples from the human A431 cell line and also samples of histologically normal tissues. The high analytical depth afforded by HiRIEF permitted proteogenomics on these two sample sets (A431 cells and normal tissues). The A431 data was obtained from a time course experiment upon Gefitinib treatment (EGFR inhibition) of A431 cells with harvests at 2h, 6h and 24h after treatment as well of untreated cells. Isobaric tag labelling of peptide samples with TMT10plex was used. Biological triplicate controls (TMT channels 126, 127N, 127C), duplicate 2h (128N, 128C), duplicate 6h (129N, 129C) and triplicate 24h (130N, 130C, 131) samples were employed. The normal tissues data was obtained from two separate TMT10plex sets. TMT set1 was composed of 9 samples, all from different individuals, including three placenta samples (126, 127N, 127C) two liver samples (128N, 128C), two kidney samples (129N, 129C), two tonsil samples (130N, 130C), plus an internal pooled standard (131). TMT set2 was composed of 8 samples, all from different individuals, including one tonsil sample (126), two liver samples (127C, 128N), two kidney samples (128C, 129N), three testis samples (129C, 130N, 130C), plus an internal pooled standard (131). The internal pooled standard was made by combining equal aliquots of the tryptic peptide mixtures from each of the 17 tissue samples.
2018-01-19 | PXD006291 | Pride
Project description:Associated to PXD009877 which contains Part I and Part II. Part III – Pevonedistat/MLN4924 and Bortezomib treatment of the SI-NET (small intestinal – neuroendocrine tumor) cell line CNDT2. High Resolution Isoelectric Focusing (HiRIEF) LC-MS and relative quantification by TMT 10-plex was used to analyze cellular response to the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib alone or in combination with the neddylation inhibitor pevonedistat (MLN4924) at 12h after treatment in the CNDT2 cell line. The data was obtained from one TMT 10-plex experiment which included 4 untreated controls (TMT channels 126, 127N, 127C and 128N), 3 samples treated with 500 nM Bortezomib for 12 hours (TMT channels 128C, 129N and 129C) as well as 3 samples treated with both Bortezomib and Pevonedistat at 500 nM respectively for 12 hours (TMT channels 130N, 130C and 131).
2021-06-10 | PXD013024 | Pride
Project description:The small molecule YC-1 was identified as identified as a selectively active agent against subsets of the two major live cancer subtypes, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Response to YC-1 is dependent on the expression of the sulfotransferase SULT1A1, which activates YC-1 through sulfonation. The contributions of mass spectrometry to the study were: (i) identifying SULT1A1 as the key player in YC-1 response through observing the protein in a cell line with acquired resistance to the small molecule treatment, (ii) corroborating the role of SULT1A1 in the YC-1 activity by correlating protein expression profiles and drug responses across 37 biliary cancer cell lines, (iii) showing that SULT1A1 expression was associated with IDH mutations, FGFR2 fusion, and BAP1 loss in vivo studying patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, and (iv) identifying protein targets in a protein enrichment experiment with an immobilized drug.
(i) and (ii): Cell line samples from datasets (i) and (ii) were analyzed together in a set of 12 TMT sets (ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT1 to TMT12) using TMT11-barcoding. The samples were analyzed on an Orbitrap Lumos mass spectrometer using the SPS-MS3 method. Prior to analysis, samples were fractionated offline using high pH reversed chromatography (12 fractions per TMT set). Across all TMT sets, channel 131c was used as the bridge channel (pooled digests of all samples). Samples were labeled as follows (rep = replicate:
(i) Cell lines samples with acquired resistance to YC-1 treatment:
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT1: RBE_rep_1 (126), RBE YC1 Resistant 6_rep_1 (129c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT2: RBE YC1 Resistant 3_rep_1 (129n), RBE YC1 Resistant 1_rep_1 (130n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT3: RBE YC1 Resistant 2_rep_1 (126), RBE YC1 Resistant 5_rep_1 (130c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT4: RBE YC1 Resistant 4_rep_1 (126).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT5: RBE YC1 Resistant 1_rep_2 (127n), RBE YC1 Resistant 4_rep_2 (128c), RBE YC1 Resistant 3_rep_2 (130c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT6: RBE YC1 Resistant 2_rep_2 (126), RBE YC1 Resistant 6_rep_2 (127c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT7: RBE_rep_2 (128n), RBE YC1 Resistant 5_rep_2 (130n).
(ii) Proteomes of untreated biliary cell lines (baseline):
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT1: RBE_rep_1 (126), GB2_rep_1 (127n), HuCCT1_rep_1 (127c), ECC3_rep_1 (128n), ICC10_rep_1 (128c), KMCH-1_rep_1 (129n), SNU-1196_rep_1 (130n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT2: ICC13-7_rep_1 (126), ICC8_rep_1 (127n), ICC9_rep_1 (127c), SNU-478_rep_1 (128n), CC-SW-1_rep_1 (128c), CC-LP-1_rep_1 (129c), SSP-25_rep_1 (130c), ICC10-8_rep_1 (131n)
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT3: SNU-1079_rep_1 (127n), ICC5_rep_1 (127c), ICC7_rep_1 (128c), COR-L105_rep_1 (129n), ICC17_rep_1 (129c), GBC1_rep_1 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT4: ICC3_rep_1 (127n), ICC2_rep_1 (127c), ICC106_rep_1 (128n), ICC11_rep_1 (128c), HKGZ-CC_rep_1 (129n), SNU-869_rep_1 (129c), HuH28_rep_1 (130n), ICC12_rep_1 (130c), SNU-308_rep_1 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT5: ICC2_rep_2 (126), ECC3_rep_2 (127c), GB2_rep_2 (128n), ICC11_rep_2 (129n), ICC7_rep_2 (129c), SNU-869_rep_2 (130n), SSP-25_rep_2 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT6: CC-LP-1_rep_2 (127n), COR-L105_rep_2 (128n), HuCCT1_rep_2 (129n), ICC12_rep_2 (129c), ICC3_rep_2 (131n), ICC5_rep_2 (130n), SNU-478_rep_2 (130c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT7: ICC10_rep_2 (126), ICC10-6_rep_2 (127n), ICC10-8_rep_2 (127c), RBE_rep_2 (128n), ICC9_rep_2 (128c), ICC17_rep_2 (129n), ICC8_rep_2 (129c), CC-SW-1_rep_2 (130c), GBC1_rep_2 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT8: ICC13-7_rep_2 (127c), HuH28_rep_2 (128n), HKGZ-CC_rep_2 (128c), SNU-1079_rep_2 (129n), KMCH-1_rep_2 (129c), SNU-1196_rep_2 (130n), SNU-308_rep_2 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT9: SG231_rep_1 (126), KKU-100_rep_1 (127n), YSCCC_rep_1 (127c), ICC4_rep_1 (128n), TKKK_rep_1 (128c), ECC2_rep_1 (129n), KKU-M213/M214 (129c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT10: YSCCC_rep_2 (126), KKU-M213/M214_rep_2 (127n), SG231_rep_2 (127c), TKKK_rep_2 (129n), ECC2_rep_2 (129c), ICC4_rep_2 (130n), KKU-100_rep_2 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT11: ICC13-7_rep_1 (129n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT12: ICC13-7_rep2 (131n)
2022-11-29 | MSV000090805 | MassIVE
Project description:The experiments were done using an Orbitrap Fusion or an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer. Multiplexing was achieved using either TMT10 or TMT11 reagents and the SPS-MS3 method. Basic pH reversed-phase chromatography (bRPLC) was used for off-line pre-fractionation; 12 fractions were analyzed for proteome mappings (PMID: 26700037) and 24 fractions plus a phosphotyrosine-enriched sample for phosphoproteome mappings (PMID: 31606085). Phosphoproteome mappings were done using both HCD fragmentation with Orbitrap fragment ion detection and CID fragmentation with ion trap fragment ion detection (PMID: 29487189, PMID: 31606085). If multiple TMT sets were required to analyze all samples from an experiment two bridge channels pooled from all samples was used to connect the data from the individual TMT sets (PMID: 28892078).
Five proteomics experiments are described in the paper:
(i) 1. Quantitative proteomics of fully polarized macrophages after 4 days of treatment with IL4 or IFNgamma/LPS to determine global proteome landscape of fully polarized THP-1-derived M1-type versus M2a-type macrophages:
Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (one TMT set)
RAW files: Marneros_4DayTreatment_proteome_fraction01 to ...fraction12
8 samples
Labeling: PMA.1 (126), PMA.2 (127n), IL4.1 (127c), IL4.2 (128n), ILJQ1.1 (128c), ILJQ1.2 (129n), IFNgamma.1 (129c), IFNgamma.2 (130n)
(ii) Time-course quantitative proteomics during the first 24 hours after induction of macrophage polarization in THP-1-derived macrophages to identify protein changes associated with M1-type (IFNgamma/LPS-induced) versus M2a-type (IL-4-induced) polarization:
Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (three TMT sets: set01, set02, set03)
RAW files:
Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset01_fraction01 to ...fraction12
Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset02_fraction01 to ...fraction12
Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset03_fraction01 to ...fraction12
22 samples
Labeling:
set01; bridge 1 (126), PMA 0min (127n), PMA 10min (127c), PMA 30min (128n), PMA 1h (128c), PMA 2h (129n), PMA 4h (129c), PMA 8h (130n), PMA 24h (130c), bridge 2 (131n)
set02; bridge 1 (126), IL4 10min (127n), IL4 30min (127c), IL4 1h (128n), IL4 2h (128c), IL4 4h (129n), IL4 8h (129c), IL4 24h (130n), IFN 10min (130c), bridge 2 (131n)
set03; bridge 1 (126), IFN 30min (127n), IFN 1h (127c), IFN 2h (128n), IFN 4h (128c), IFN 8h (129n), IFN 24h (129c), bridge 2 (131n)
(iii) Time-course quantitative phosphoproteomics during the first 24 hours after induction of macrophage polarization in THP-1-derived macrophages to identify phosphorylation events associated with M1-type (IFNgamma/LPS-induced) versus M2a-type (IL-4-induced) polarization (same time points as in group 2):
Phosphoproteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (three TMT sets: set01, set02, set03)
RAW files:
Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset01_fraction01 to ...fraction06, ...fraction08 to ...fraction24, ...pY
Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset02_fraction01 to ...fraction12, ...fraction16 to ...fraction24, ...pY
Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset03_fraction01 to ...fraction24, ...pY
The following RAW files gave no phosphopeptide quantifications (they are no included in the group of provided RAW files): set01_fraction07, set02_fraction13, set02_fraction14, set02_fraction15.
22 samples
Labeling: as in (ii)
(iv) Quantitative proteomics to assess the effects of the B-Raf inhibitor GDC-0879 or of the MEK inhibitor trametinib on IL-4-induced M2-type polarization and IFNgamma/LPS-induced M1-type polarization on THP-1-derived macrophages after 24 hours of treatment:
Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (one TMT set)
RAW files: Marneros_BRAF_inhibitor_proteine_fraction01 to ...fraction12
11 samples
Labeling: IL4 1 (131c), IL4 2 (127n), IL4+GDC 1 (131n), IL4+GDC 2 (128n), IL4+TRAM 1 (130c), IL4+TRAM 2 (129n), IFNgamma+LPS 1 (130n), IFNgamma+LPS 2 (127c), IFNgamma+LPS+TRAM 1 (126), IFNgamma+LPS+TRAM 2(129c), IFNgamma+LPS+GDC (128c)
(v) Quantitative phosphoproteomics to assess the effects of the B-Raf inhibitor GDC-0879 on IL-4-induced M2-type polarization and IFNgamma/LPS-induced M1-type polarization on THP-1-derived macrophages after 24 hours of treatment:
Phosphoproteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (one TMT set)
RAW files: Marneros_BRAF_inhibitor_phospho_fraction01 to ...fraction24, ...pY
7 samples
Labeling: IL4 1 (131c), IL4 2 (127n), IL4+GDC 1 (130n), IL4+GDC 2 (128n), IFNgamma+LPS 1 (128c), IFNgamma+LPS 2 (127c), IFNgamma+LPS+GDC (130c)
2019-12-10 | MSV000084672 | MassIVE