Protein Identification in Tetrahymena thermophila cilia IEX fractions used for XL-MS
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Orbitrap Fusion Lumos
ORGANISM(S): Tetrahymena Thermophila (ncbitaxon:5911)
SUBMITTER: 
Edward Marcotte
PROVIDER: MSV000091710 | MassIVE | Thu Apr 13 14:53:00 BST 2023
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PXD050674
REPOSITORIES: MassIVE
Similar Datasets
Project description:Glioblastoma stem cells (TS-543) were harvested and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 mins at room temperature. The cells were lysed using SDS Lysis buffer for ChIP (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8). The lysate was then sonicated for 25 cycles at 30% amplitude (15 s ON and 45 s OFF). The sonicated samples were then diluted in ChIP dilution buffer (0.01% SDS, 1% Triton-X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 167 mM NaCl) and used for the immunoprecipitation with H3K27ac (Abcam, Ab4729), H2AZ (Active motive, cat#39113) and H3K27ac (Abcam cat#ab8580). After an over-night incubation with antibody, the bound DNA was washed sequentially with low salt wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X 100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl), high salt wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 500 mM NaCl), LiCl wash buffer (0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP40, 1%deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8) and TE wash buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA) to remove non-specific sequences and eluted in the elution buffer (84 mg NaHCO3, 1 ml 10% SDS, 9 ml H2O). Then the samples were reverse cross-linked using NaCl at 65°C overnight. The eluted DNA was purified and used for library preparation. Library preparation was performed as previously described as described in Bowman et al. BMC Genomics 2013. Briefly, end repair with NEBNext End Repair enzyme (NEB, E6050) and clean-up with 2.4x volume AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, A63880). A-tailing with Klenow Fragment (NEB, M0212) and purified with 2.4x volume AMPure XP beads. Adapter ligation reactions contained annealed universal adapter and T4 rapid ligase (NEB, B0202) and clean-up with 1.8x volume AMPure XP beads. Chromatin was amplified using KAPA Real-time Library Amplification Kit (KAPABIOSYSTEMS, KK2701) with universal primer and barcoded primer. Amplified chromatin was purified with QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced paired-end with Illumina NextSeq 500.
2021-09-05 | GSE152862 | GEO
Project description:Sample preparation: P-AMPK+AMP, P-AMPK+ATPγS, and AMPK+ATPγS protein samples were crosslinked in HBST buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.5 at room temperature, 200 mM NaCL, and 1 mM TCEP). Non-crosslinked negative controls were generated using the same procedure without the addition of DSSO. Reactions were initiated by spiking 1 uL of 75 mM DSSO (Thermo-Fisher) in DMSO into a 50 uL solution containing 10 uM protein and mixing. The final molar ratio of crosslinker:protein was 150:1. The reactions were incubated at 25°C for 45 minutes prior to being quenched by the addition of Tris pH 8.0 to a final concentration of 50 mM. Each crosslink reaction was done in triplicate and the reaction replicates were pooled after quenching. 10 μL samples of the pooled samples were loaded for SDS-PAGE analysis with Coomassie staining to confirm the presence of crosslinked protein. The remaining 140 μL of crosslinked and non-crosslinked samples were then acetone precipitated at -20°C overnight and the protein was pelleted by centrifugation at 16,000 rcf for 5 minutes at 4°C. After decanting, the pellets were dried for 15 minutes at room temperature before being resuspended in 12.5 uL of resuspension buffer (50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, 8M urea, pH 8.0). ProteaseMAX (Promega) was added to 0.02% and the solutions were mixed on an orbital shaker operating at 400 RPM for 5 minutes. After resuspension, 87.5 uL of digestion buffer (50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0) was added. Cysteines in the protein samples were reduced and akylated as follows. DTT was added to 5 mM final concentration and the protein solutions were incubated at 56°C in an orbital shaker operating at 400 RPM and for 20 minutes. After reduction, 2.7 uL of 550 mM iodoacetamide was added and the solutions were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 minutes. Reduced and alkylated protein solutions were digested using trypsin at a ratio of 1:200 (w/w trypsin:protein) and incubating at 37°C. After overnight incubation at 37°C, the samples were acidified by the addition of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, Thermo-Fischer) to 1%. Samples were then frozen and stored at -20°C until analysis.
2021-07-08 | PXD019017 | Pride
Project description:We determined genome-wide nucleosome occupancy in mouse embryonic stem cells and their neural progenitor and embryonic fibroblast counterparts to assess features associated with nucleosome positioning during lineage commitment. Cell type and protein specific binding preferences of transcription factors to sites with either low (e.g. Myc, Klf4, Zfx) or high (e.g. Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2) nucleosome occupancy as well as complex patterns for CTCF were identified. Nucleosome depleted regions around transcription start and termination sites were broad and more pronounced for active genes, with distinct patterns for promoters classified according to their CpG-content or histone methylation marks. Throughout the genome nucleosome occupancy was dependent on the presence of certain histone methylation or acetylation modifications. In addition, the average nucleosome-repeat length increased during differentiation by 5-7 base pairs, with local variations for specific genomic regions. Our results reveal regulatory mechanisms of cell differentiation acting through nucleosome repositioning. For chromatin immunoprecipitation, for each sample, 1 x 106 cells were cross-linked with 1% PFA and cell nuclei were prepared using a swelling buffer (25 mM Hepes pH 7.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.1% NP-40, 1 mM DTT). Chromatin was sheared to mononucleosomal fragments. After IgG preclearance the sheared chromatin was incubated with 4 µg of either a H3K9ac (Abcam, ab4441), a H3K27ac (Abcam, ab4729), or a H3K9me3 (Abcam ab8898) antibody over night. After washes with sonication (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% N-lauroylsarcosine, 0.1% Na-deoxycholate), high-salt- (50 mM Hepes pH 7.9, 500 mM NaCl, 1mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS), lithium- (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1mM EDTA, 250 mM LiCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% Na-deoxycholate) and 10 mM Tris-HCl, chromatin was eluted from the protein G magnetic beads and the crosslink was reversed over night. After RNase A and proteinase K digestion, the DNA was purified and subsequently cloned into a multiplexed Illumina library according to standard protocols. Sequenced 50 bp reads were mapped with bowtie and subsequently clustered with MACS 55 implemented in the Genomatix software suite (Genomatix, Munich, Germany) using a p-value of 10-5.
2012-10-21 | E-GEOD-40951 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Liver samples were lysed (15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl and 15 mM MgCl2, plus inhibitors (1 mg/ml heparin 100 µg/ml cycloheximide and 80 U RNAsin)), added to a 10-50% sucrose gradient and ultracentrifuged at 182,000x g for 2 hours. The gradient was aliquotted into 16 1ml fractions and added to Tri reagent (Sigma). RNA was extracted as per the manufacturer's instructions and then sub-pooled into fractions corresponding to monosomes, light polysomes, medium polysomes and heavy polysomes, according to ribosomal density (more ribosomal occupancy = higher translational activity = heavier, and therefore, located in the more dense fractions). Microarray analysis was performed by hybridising control (vehicle treated) monosomes against test (high-dose treated) monosomes on one microarray, control light polysomes against test light polysomes on a second microarray, and so forth for each sub-pool of fractions. Following microarray analysis there were a maximum of four values for each mRNA, corresponding to the proportional representation of that mRNA within each sub-pool of fractions. By calculating the change in values, i.e. degree of slope, across the monosomal region, the light polysomal region, the medium polysomal region and the dense polysomal region it was possible to determine any translational change in activity. In addition, the overall transcriptional change could be analysed for each mRNA.
2012-06-21 | GSE38807 | GEO
Project description:Flag-YBX1 overexpressed T24 cells pellets were resuspended with 2 volume of lysis buffer (150 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 1:100 protease inhibitor cocktail, 400 U/ml RNase inhibitor), and incubated at 4 °C for 30 min with rotation. Then the lysate was centrifuged at 15 000 g for 20 min. Before incubating the lysate with Flag beads, 100ul were taken as input. The anti-Flag M2 magnetic beads (Sigma, 10 μl per mg lysate) were washed with NT2 buffer (200 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor) four times. Cell lysate was mixed with M2 beads and incubated at 4 °C for 4 h with rotation. The beads were washed two times with 1 ml ice-cold NT2 buffer. Then the beads were subject to Micrococal nuclease (NEB) digestion (1:1 000 000 dilution) for 8 min at 37 °C. The beads were cooled on ice immediately for 5 min and washed two times with 1 ml ice-cold 1× PNK+EGTA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 20 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor) and two times with 1 ml ice-cold 1× PK buffer (50 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor). Then the beads were digested with 200 μl pre-heated (20 min at 50 °C) Proteinase K and RNAs were extracted with an equal volume of Acid-Phenol: Chloroform, pH 4.5 (Ambion). The RNAs were subjected to rRNA removal and Bisseq. The libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X-Ten platform at Novogene (Tianjin, CA) with paired-end 150 bp read length.The m5C sites were called using meRanCall from meRanTK (FDR < 0.01).
2019-07-02 | GSE133625 | GEO
Project description:Procedure details are reported in McCafferty et al. eLife2022;11e81977. Briefly cilia extract from Tetrahymena thermophila SB715 was fractionated on a mixed bed IEX HPLC column and all resulting fractions were crosslinked by addition of DSSO to 0.5mM. Following reduction, alkylation, trypsin digestion, and desalting, mass spectra were collected on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos using a DDA MS2-MS3 method and spectra were processed in ProteomeDiscoverer 2.3 using the Xlinkx node to identify crosslinks. The look-up database for crosslink identification was generated from the same .RAW files using a standard Basic workflow to identify proteins present in the fractions.
2023-04-20 | MSV000091761 | MassIVE
Project description:Samples were purchased from Clontech as mRNA. Hybridization material was generated through a random-priming amplification procedure (RP-AMP) using primers with a random sequence at the 3' end and a fixed motif at the 5' end. shDNP256 (first strand synthesis): 5'- TAG ATG CTG TTG NNN NNN NNN -3' shT7N9 (second strand synthesis): 5'- ACT ATA GGG AGA NNN NNN NNN -3' 1.5 g of mRNA was reverse-transcribed with Superscript II and the DP256 random primer for 20 minutes at 42 C (10 mM DTT, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 5 U/ l Superscript II). The RNA was degraded with the addition of 20 l volume of 0.5N sodium hydroxide and 0.25 M EDTA for 20 minutes at 65 C. The single stranded cDNA was purified using a commercial kit (Qiagen Qiaquick). The resulting product of single stranded cDNA was placed in its entirety in a second strand reaction. Second strand synthesis reactions utilized shT7N9 random primer and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase utilizing standard reaction conditions (37 C for 60 minutes, 0.2 mM DTT, 2.1 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.9, 2.1 mM MgCl2, 10.7 mM NaCl, 1.07 mM dNTPs, 0.1U/ l Klenow), followed by another Qiaquick purification. Multiple polymerase chain reactions were run using 0.15 g of double stranded DNA and standard reaction conditions. Amplification was achieved using 10 cycles of PCR with the DP256 and T7 primers (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, 0.01 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01 U/ l Taq Polymerase) DP256: 5'- GTT CGA GAC CTC TAG ATG CTG TTG -3' T7: 5'- AA TTA ATA CGA CTC ACT ATA GGG AGA -3' followed by Qiaquick purification. Further amplification was achieved using in vitro transcription reactions with X0.5 g dsDNA and T7 RNA Polymerase (7.5 mM DTT, 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 14.25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 2 mM Spermidine, 125 U/ml RNAguard, 2.5 mM dNTPs, 15 U/ml IPPase, 25kU/ml T7 Polymerase) for 16 hours at 42 C. The cRNA was purified (RNeasy) and reverse transcribed using Superscript and random 9-mers and amino-allyl dUTP (42 C for 20 minutes, 10 mM DTT, 50mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 0.5 mM aa-dUTP, 5 U/ l Superscript II). The cDNA for each channel was covalently coupled separately with Cy5 and Cy3 monoreactive fluors, respectively, in 1M sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.0, followed by quenching with 4.0 M hydroxylamine. The Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit and the percentage dye incorporation and total cDNA yield was determined spectrophotometrically. Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were combined and added to 2 mls 30% formamide with Herring Sperm DNA for hybridization to the microarray. Further details can be found in Castle et al., Genome Biol 2003;4(10):R66, http://genomebiology.com/2003/4/10/R66 , Roberts CJ et al., Science 2000, 287:873-880, and Schadt, Edwards, et al., unpublished. Normalization of single channel data is described in Ying, et al., "Identification of Chromosomal Regions Containing Transcribed Sequences Using Microarrays and Computational Methods" , 2003 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Biopharmaceutical Section [CD-ROM], Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 2003. Briefly, an invariant set of probes was selected based on their intensity ranks. Then, a LOESS regression model was fit for Cy5 vs. Cy3 intensities for all probes in the invariant set. Finally, for all probes on the array the Cy5 intensities were normalized to the corresponding Cy3 intensities using prediction values from the regression model. Note that the normalized intensity values given here were used for all analyses reported in the accompanying paper. The ratio values reported here were not used for the analysis described in the manuscript and are not calculated from the normalized intensity values given below. Keywords: other
2004-03-04 | GSE1097 | GEO
Project description:J1 mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and NIH-3T3 fibroblasts were grown in standard media conditions. Hybridized cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde; permeabilized in 70% ethanol; incubated for 12 hours at 30C in an RNA preserving hybridization (RPH) buffer (300 mM Sodium chloride, 30mM Sodium citrate, 2.1M Ammonium sulfate, 25% formamide, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mg/ml E. Coli tRNA, 500 μg/ml BSA); and reverse cross-linked for 1 hour at 50C with Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Proteinase K (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, 500 μg/ml Proteinase K).
2014-03-20 | GSE55919 | GEO
Project description:The associated files are mass spec data from two HPLC fractionations (Size Exclusion (SEC) or a triple phase ion exchange combination (WaxWaxCat)) of a single native protein extract from Selaginella moellendorfii. The extract was made from frozen powdered green tissue in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, 1% NP40, phosphatase inhibitors and plant-specific protease inhibitors. 1 mg total protein was separated by SEC and 1.25 mg (diluted to 50 mM NaCl) by a concatenated series of three columns: PolyWaxLP, PolyWaxLP, and poly CAT A (PolyLC, Inc). The triple column series was eluted with a NaCl gradient. The ion exchange fractions # 55-60 were not processed for mass spectrometry becaue the A280 trace from the HPLC indicated insufficient protein present in those fractions.
2019-10-28 | PXD013093 | Pride
Project description:Open chromatin regions in the MYC super-enhancer region were investigated by ATAC-seq in t(3;8) AML. ATAC-seq was performed as described (Buenrostro et al, 2013) with a modification in the lysis buffer (0.30 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 60 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.1% NP40, 0.15 mM Spermine, 0.5 mM Spermidine, 2 mM 6AA) to reduce mitochondrial DNA contamination.
| EGAD00001007910 | EGA