Structural Organization of the Retriever-CCC endosomal recycling complex
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Orbitrap Eclipse
ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (ncbitaxon:9606)
SUBMITTER: 
Ezra Burstein
PROVIDER: MSV000092103 | MassIVE | Mon Jun 05 09:23:00 BST 2023
REPOSITORIES: MassIVE
Similar Datasets
Project description:The recycling of membrane proteins from endosomes to the cell surface is vital for cell signaling and survival. Retriever, a trimeric complex of vacuolar protein-sorting-associated protein (VPS)35L, VPS26C and VPS29, together with the CCC complex comprising coiled-coil domain-containing (CCDC)22, CCDC93 and copper metabolism domain-containing (COMMD) proteins, plays a crucial role in this process. The precise mechanisms underlying retriever assembly and its interaction with CCC have remained elusive. Here, we present a high-resolution structure of retriever in humans determined using cryogenic electron microscopy. The structure reveals a unique assembly mechanism, distinguishing it from its remotely related paralog retromer. By combining AlphaFold predictions and biochemical, cellular and proteomic analyses, we further elucidate the structural organization of the entire retriever-CCC complex across evolution and uncover how cancer-associated mutations in humans disrupt complex formation and impair membrane protein homeostasis. These findings provide a fundamental framework for understanding the biological and pathological implications associated with retriever-CCC-mediated endosomal recycling.
| S-EPMC11260360 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The recycling of membrane proteins from endosomes to the cell surface is vital for cell signaling and survival. Retriever, a trimeric complex of VPS35L, VPS26C and VPS29, together with the CCC complex comprising CCDC22, CCDC93, and COMMD proteins, plays a crucial role in this process. The precise mechanisms underlying Retriever assembly and its interaction with CCC have remained elusive. Here, we present the first high-resolution structure of Retriever determined using cryogenic electron microscopy. The structure reveals a unique assembly mechanism, distinguishing it from its remotely related paralog, Retromer. By combining AlphaFold predictions and biochemical, cellular, and proteomic analyses, we further elucidate the structural organization of the entire Retriever-CCC complex and uncover how cancer-associated mutations disrupt complex formation and impair membrane protein homeostasis. These findings provide a fundamental framework for understanding the biological and pathological implications associated with Retriever-CCC-mediated endosomal recycling.
| S-EPMC10274727 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Plasma membrane proteomics, with label-free quantitation comparing all mutant groups to WT.
LUM2_1073550: EV_rep1
LUM2_1073551: WT_rep1
LUM2_1073552: W6D_rep1
LUM2_1073553: S829E_rep1
LUM2_1073554: G902E_rep1
LUM2_1073555: G325E_rep1
LUM2_1076766: EV_rep2
LUM2_1076767: WT_rep2
LUM2_1076768: W6D_rep2
LUM2_1076769: S829E_rep2
LUM2_1076770: G902E_rep2
LUM2_1076771: G325E_rep2
LUM2_1077992: EV_rep3
LUM2_1077993: WT_rep3
LUM2_1077994: W6D_rep3
LUM2_1077995: S829E_rep3
LUM2_1077996: G902E_rep3
LUM2_1077997: G325E_rep3
2023-06-05 | MSV000092104 | MassIVE
Project description:We applied time-series SE50bp RNA-seq with 35M reads per sample in wild-type, MZsox19b, MZspg, and double MZspgsox19b mutants in zebrafish embryos to understand the role of Pou5f3 and Sox19b during zebrafish zygotic genome activation. In total we sequenced 4 biological replicates (rep1-4) for WT time curve and 2 biological replicates (rep1-2) for each mutant. WT rep5 are technical replicates for WT rep1, while MZsox19b rep3 and MZspg rep3 are techical replicates for MZsox19b rep1 and MZspg rep1, respectively.
2021-03-03 | GSE137424 | GEO
Project description:Protein-protein interaction analysis in Huh7 cells expressing specific VPS35L mutations.
LUM2_1066594: EV_rep1
LUM2_1066595: WT_rep1
LUM2_1066596: W6D_rep1
LUM2_1066597: S829E_rep1
LUM2_1066598: G902E_rep1
LUM2_1066599: G325E_rep1
LUM2_1068615: EV_rep2
LUM2_1068616: WT_rep2
LUM2_1068617: W6D_rep2
LUM2_1068618: S829E_rep2
LUM2_1068619: G902E_rep2
LUM2_1068620: G325E_rep2
LUM2_1070655: EV_rep3
LUM2_1070656: WT_rep3
LUM2_1070657: W6D_rep3
LUM2_1070658: S829E_rep3
LUM2_1070659: G902E_rep3
LUM2_1070660: G325E_rep3
2023-06-05 | MSV000092102 | MassIVE
Project description:Protein-protein interaction proteomics from blue native gels with iBAQ quantification. Samples were run on native gels and corresponding molecular weight ranges were cut out.
LUM2_1049862: HeLa, 720kDa
LUM2_1049863: HeLa, 480kDa
LUM2_1049864: HeLa, 240kDa
LUM2_1049865: Commd1 IP, 720kDa
LUM2_1049866: Commd1 IP, 480kDa
LUM2_1049867: Commd1 IP, 240kDa
LUM2_1049868: VPS26C, 720kDa
LUM2_1049869: VPS26C, 480kDa
LUM2_1049870: VPS26C, 240kDa
2023-06-05 | MSV000092100 | MassIVE
Project description:Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells were treated with three newly synthesized compounds and DMSO as vehicle. Total RNA was isolated 6 and 24h after treatment and gene expression analysis was performed. Three independent experiments were performed, corresponding to rep1, rep2 and rep3. Experiment 1 (rep1) contained all substances at both time points tested. Experiment 2 (rep2) contained two of the compounds and control DMSO at both time points. Experiment 3 (rep3) contained the third compound and control DMSO at both time points.
2016-06-30 | GSE75588 | GEO
Project description:Following endocytosis into the endosomal network, integral membrane proteins undergo sorting for lysosomal degradation or are retrieved and recycled back to the cell surface. Here we describe the discovery of an ancient and conserved multiprotein complex that orchestrates cargo retrieval and recycling and, importantly, is biochemically and functionally distinct from the established retromer pathway. We have called this complex 'retriever'; it is a heterotrimer composed of DSCR3, C16orf62 and VPS29, and bears striking similarity to retromer. We establish that retriever associates with the cargo adaptor sorting nexin 17 (SNX17) and couples to CCC (CCDC93, CCDC22, COMMD) and WASH complexes to prevent lysosomal degradation and promote cell surface recycling of ?5?1 integrin. Through quantitative proteomic analysis, we identify over 120 cell surface proteins, including numerous integrins, signalling receptors and solute transporters, that require SNX17-retriever to maintain their surface levels. Our identification of retriever establishes a major endosomal retrieval and recycling pathway.
| S-EPMC5790113 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infects a broad range of dicotyledonous plant species and is the causative agent of stem rot in Brassica napus. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the defense response, we studied the patterns of gene expression in a partially resistant variety of ZhongYou 821 (ZY821) and a susceptible line from Westar over five time points, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-inoculation (hpi) using a B. napus oligonucleotide microarray. Maximum differential gene expression was observed at 48 hpi in both genotypes with ZY821 responding more quickly than Westar. Specific sets of genes exhibited higher levels of expression at the earlier stages of the infection (6-12 hpi), including genes encoding defense-associated proteins such as chitinases, glucanases, osmotins and lectins and genes encoding transcription factors belonging to the zinc finger, WRKY, AP2, and MYB classes. Genes encoding enzymes involved in JA, ethylene, and auxin synthesis were induced in both genotypes, as were those for gibberellin degradation. Changes in metabolic pathways affecting carbohydrate and energy metabolism appeared to be directed toward shuttling carbon reserves to the TCA cycle. Genes involved in glucosinolate and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were highly up-regulated suggesting that secondary metabolites are also important components of the response to S. sclerotiorum in B. napus. Keywords: Time course, infected vs mock infected Time course experiment (6hr, 12 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hrs), sclerotinia infected vs mock-infected. Biological replicates: 3, independently harvested. Technical replicates: 2, dye swapped within each time for each biological replicate (total 6 slides per time point) time after innoculation: 6 hours: zy 6h inf vs control rep1, zy 6h control vs inf rep1, zy 6h inf vs control rep2, zy 6h control vs inf rep2, zy 6h inf vs control rep3, zy 6h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 12 hours: zy 12h inf vs control rep1, zy 12h control vs inf rep1, zy 12h inf vs control rep2, zy 12h control vs inf rep2, zy 12h inf vs control rep3, zy 12h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 24 hours: zy 24h inf vs control rep1, zy 24h control vs inf rep1, zy 24h inf vs control rep2, zy 24h control vs inf rep2, zy 24h inf vs control rep3, zy 24h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 48 hours: zy 48h inf vs control rep1, zy 48h control vs inf rep1, zy 48h inf vs control rep2, zy 48h control vs inf rep2, zy 48h inf vs control rep3, zy 48h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 72 hours: zy 72h inf vs control rep1, zy 72h control vs inf rep1, zy 72h inf vs control rep2, zy 72h control vs inf rep2, zy 72h inf vs control rep3, zy 72h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 6h inf vs control rep1, zy 6h inf vs control rep2, zy 6h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 6h control vs inf rep1, zy 6h control vs inf rep2, zy 6h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 6h inf vs control rep1, zy 6h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 6h inf vs control rep2, zy 6h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 6h inf vs control rep3, zy 6h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 12h inf vs control rep1, zy 12h inf vs control rep2, zy 12h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 12h control vs inf rep1, zy 12h control vs inf rep2, zy 12h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 12h inf vs control rep1, zy 12h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 12h inf vs control rep2, zy 12h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 12h inf vs control rep3, zy 12h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 24h inf vs control rep1, zy 24h inf vs control rep2, zy 24h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 24h control vs inf rep1, zy 24h control vs inf rep2, zy 24h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 24h inf vs control rep1, zy 24h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 24h inf vs control rep2, zy 24h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 24h inf vs control rep3, zy 24h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 48h inf vs control rep1, zy 48h inf vs control rep2, zy 48h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 48h control vs inf rep1, zy 48h control vs inf rep2, zy 48h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 48h inf vs control rep1, zy 48h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 48h inf vs control rep2, zy 48h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 48h inf vs control rep3, zy 48h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: zy 72h inf vs control rep1, zy 72h inf vs control rep2, zy 72h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: zy 72h control vs inf rep1, zy 72h control vs inf rep2, zy 72h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 72h inf vs control rep1, zy 72h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 72h inf vs control rep2, zy 72h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: zy 72h inf vs control rep3, zy 72h control vs inf rep3
2010-05-06 | E-GEOD-13256 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infects a broad range of dicotyledonous plant species and is the causative agent of stem rot in Brassica napus. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the defense response, we studied the patterns of gene expression in a partially resistant variety of ZhongYou 821 (ZY821) and a susceptible line from Westar over five time points, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-inoculation (hpi) using a B. napus oligonucleotide microarray. Maximum differential gene expression was observed at 48 hpi in both genotypes with ZY821 responding more quickly than Westar. Specific sets of genes exhibited higher levels of expression at the earlier stages of the infection (6-12 hpi), including genes encoding defense-associated proteins such as chitinases, glucanases, osmotins and lectins and genes encoding transcription factors belonging to the zinc finger, WRKY, AP2, and MYB classes. Genes encoding enzymes involved in JA, ethylene, and auxin synthesis were induced in both genotypes, as were those for gibberellin degradation. Changes in metabolic pathways affecting carbohydrate and energy metabolism appeared to be directed toward shuttling carbon reserves to the TCA cycle. Genes involved in glucosinolate and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were highly up-regulated suggesting that secondary metabolites are also important components of the response to S. sclerotiorum in B. napus. Keywords: Time course, and infected vs mock infected Time course experiment (6hr, 12 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hrs), sclerotinia infected vs mock-infected. Biological replicates: 3, independently harvested. Technical replicates: 2, dye swapped within each time for each biological replicate (total 6 slides per time point) time after innoculation: 6 hours: westar 6h inf vs control rep1, westar 6h control vs inf rep1, westar 6h inf vs control rep2, westar 6h control vs inf rep2, westar 6h inf vs control rep3, westar 6h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 12 hours: westar 12h inf vs control rep1, westar 12h control vs inf rep1, westar 12h inf vs control rep2, westar 12h control vs inf rep2, westar 12h inf vs control rep3, westar 12h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 24 hours: westar 24h inf vs control rep1, westar 24h control vs inf rep1, westar 24h inf vs control rep2, westar 24h control vs inf rep2, westar 24h inf vs control rep3, westar 24h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 48 hours: westar 48h inf vs control rep1, westar 48h control vs inf rep1, westar 48h inf vs control rep2, westar 48h control vs inf rep2, westar 48h inf vs control rep3, westar 48h control vs inf rep3 time after innoculation: 72 hours: westar 72h inf vs control rep1, westar 72h control vs inf rep1, westar 72h inf vs control rep2, westar 72h control vs inf rep2, westar 72h inf vs control rep3, westar 72h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 6h inf vs control rep1, westar 6h inf vs control rep2, westar 6h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 6h control vs inf rep1, westar 6h control vs inf rep2, westar 6h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 6h inf vs control rep1, westar 6h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 6h inf vs control rep2, westar 6h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 6h inf vs control rep3, westar 6h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 12h inf vs control rep1, westar 12h inf vs control rep2, westar 12h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 12h control vs inf rep1, westar 12h control vs inf rep2, westar 12h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 12h inf vs control rep1, westar 12h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 12h inf vs control rep2, westar 12h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 12h inf vs control rep3, westar 12h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 24h inf vs control rep1, westar 24h inf vs control rep2, westar 24h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 24h control vs inf rep1, westar 24h control vs inf rep2, westar 24h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 24h inf vs control rep1, westar 24h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 24h inf vs control rep2, westar 24h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 24h inf vs control rep3, westar 24h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 48h inf vs control rep1, westar 48h inf vs control rep2, westar 48h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 48h control vs inf rep1, westar 48h control vs inf rep2, westar 48h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 48h inf vs control rep1, westar 48h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 48h inf vs control rep2, westar 48h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 48h inf vs control rep3, westar 48h control vs inf rep3 biological replicate: westar 72h inf vs control rep1, westar 72h inf vs control rep2, westar 72h inf vs control rep3 biological replicate: westar 72h control vs inf rep1, westar 72h control vs inf rep2, westar 72h control vs inf rep3 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 72h inf vs control rep1, westar 72h control vs inf rep1 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 72h inf vs control rep2, westar 72h control vs inf rep2 technical replicate - labeled-extract: westar 72h inf vs control rep3, westar 72h control vs inf rep3
2009-01-31 | E-GEOD-13254 | biostudies-arrayexpress