Dataset Information

FGFR inhibition blocks NF-kappaB-dependent glucose metabolism and confers metabolic vulnerabilities in cholangiocarcinoma

ABSTRACT: This study explored the response to FGFR inhibition in FGFR2-fusion+ intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. We conducted phosphoproteomics experiments in a patient-derived FGFR2-driven ICC cell line model upon FGFR inhibition. Samples were treated with the FGFR inhibitor, Futibatinib/TAS120 (75 nM) for 4 or 24 hours or with DMSO vehicle. The experiments were done using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer. Multiplexing was achieved using either TMT10/11 reagents and the SPS-MS3 method. Basic pH reversed-phase chromatography (bRPLC) was used for off-line pre-fractionation; 12 fractions were analyzed for proteome mappings (PMID: 26700037) and 24 fractions plus a phosphotyrosine-enriched sample for phosphoproteome mappings (PMID: 31606085). Phosphoproteome mappings were done using both HCD fragmentation with Orbitrap fragment ion detection and CID fragmentation with ion trap fragment ion detection (PMID: 29487189, PMID: 31606085). Labeling scheme: 126: DMSO-1, ICC13-7 cells were treated with DMSO, replicate 1 127n: Futibatinib(TAS120)-4h-1, ICC13-7 cells were treated with Futibatinib (TAS120) for 4h, replicate 1 127c: Futibatinib(TAS120)-24h-1, ICC13-7 cells were treated with Futibatinib (TAS120) for 24h, replicate 1 128n: DMSO-2, ICC13-7 cells were treated with DMSO, replicate 2 128c: Futibatinib(TAS120)-4h-2, ICC13-7 cells were treated with Futibatinib (TAS120) for 4h, replicate 2 129n: Futibatinib(TAS120)-24h-2, ICC13-7 cells were treated with Futibatinib (TAS120) for 24h, replicate 2

INSTRUMENT(S): Orbitrap Fusion Lumos

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (ncbitaxon:9606)

SUBMITTER: Wilhelm Haas Nabeel Bardeesy

PROVIDER: MSV000093916 | MassIVE | Wed Jan 24 14:23:00 GMT 2024

REPOSITORIES: MassIVE

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:Mass spectrometry-based proteomics was applied to unravel Erk signaling in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). A previously described engineered ESCs system for Erk induction via a drug-inducible cRAF-ErT2 fusion (Hamilton, W. B. & Brickman, J. M., Cell Rep 2014) was used in two different setups measuring the phosphoproteome in an 11-plex tandem mass tag (TMT)-based approach as described below. Fgf4 stimulation and MEK inhibition: ESCs were stimulated with Fgf4 (40 nM, recombinant, mouse, 5 minutes) following pretreatment (30 minutes) with either DMSO (1:10000) or MEK inhibition (MEKi: 1 microM PD0325901): The experimental treatment conditions and TMT11-plex labeling are specified below: 126: DMSO, unstimulated control replicate 1 127N: DMSO, unstimulated control replicate 2 127C: DMSO, unstimulated control replicate 3 128N: DMSO + Fgf4 replicate 1 128C: DMSO + Fgf4 replicate 2 129N: DMSO + Fgf4 replicate 3 129C: MEKi + Fgf4 replicate 1 130N: MEKi + Fgf4 replicate 2 130C: MEKi + Fgf4 replicate 3 131N: MEKi replicate 1 131C: MEKi replicate 2 Analog sensitive Erk2 setup: In the ESC system the ERK2-/- ESCs (Hamilton et al., PloS ONE, 2013) were engineered to stably express an inducible cRAF-ErT2 fusion protein expressed from the same transgene as a FLAG-tagged analogue sensitive Erk2Q103A. Erk1 was subsequently removed by CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis using sgRNAs flanking exon 2. Cells were pre-treated for 30 minutes with either the ATP-mimetic compound 1-NM-PP1 (2 microM) (Endo et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006), the Mek1 inhibitor PD0325901 (1 microM), or DMSO (0.01%), followed by induction or not of the cRAF-ErT2 fusion by (Z)-4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT) (250 nM) for 2 hours as indicated. The experimental treatment conditions and TMT11-plex labeling are specified below: 126: DMSO pretreatment, non-induced control, replicate 1 127N: DMSO pretreatment, non-induced control, replicate 2 127C: DMSO pretreatment, non-induced control, replicate 3 128N: DMSO pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 1 128C: DMSO pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 2 129N: DMSO pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 3 129C: PP1 pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 1 130N: PP1 pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 2 130C: PP1 pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 3 131N: MEKi pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 1 131C: MEKi pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 2

Project description:The experiments were done using an Orbitrap Fusion or an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer. Multiplexing was achieved using either TMT10 or TMT11 reagents and the SPS-MS3 method. Basic pH reversed-phase chromatography (bRPLC) was used for off-line pre-fractionation; 12 fractions were analyzed for proteome mappings (PMID: 26700037) and 24 fractions plus a phosphotyrosine-enriched sample for phosphoproteome mappings (PMID: 31606085). Phosphoproteome mappings were done using both HCD fragmentation with Orbitrap fragment ion detection and CID fragmentation with ion trap fragment ion detection (PMID: 29487189, PMID: 31606085). If multiple TMT sets were required to analyze all samples from an experiment two bridge channels pooled from all samples was used to connect the data from the individual TMT sets (PMID: 28892078). Five proteomics experiments are described in the paper: (i) 1. Quantitative proteomics of fully polarized macrophages after 4 days of treatment with IL4 or IFNgamma/LPS to determine global proteome landscape of fully polarized THP-1-derived M1-type versus M2a-type macrophages: Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (one TMT set) RAW files: Marneros_4DayTreatment_proteome_fraction01 to ...fraction12 8 samples Labeling: PMA.1 (126), PMA.2 (127n), IL4.1 (127c), IL4.2 (128n), ILJQ1.1 (128c), ILJQ1.2 (129n), IFNgamma.1 (129c), IFNgamma.2 (130n) (ii) Time-course quantitative proteomics during the first 24 hours after induction of macrophage polarization in THP-1-derived macrophages to identify protein changes associated with M1-type (IFNgamma/LPS-induced) versus M2a-type (IL-4-induced) polarization: Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (three TMT sets: set01, set02, set03) RAW files: Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset01_fraction01 to ...fraction12 Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset02_fraction01 to ...fraction12 Marneros_timecourse_proteome_TMTset03_fraction01 to ...fraction12 22 samples Labeling: set01; bridge 1 (126), PMA 0min (127n), PMA 10min (127c), PMA 30min (128n), PMA 1h (128c), PMA 2h (129n), PMA 4h (129c), PMA 8h (130n), PMA 24h (130c), bridge 2 (131n) set02; bridge 1 (126), IL4 10min (127n), IL4 30min (127c), IL4 1h (128n), IL4 2h (128c), IL4 4h (129n), IL4 8h (129c), IL4 24h (130n), IFN 10min (130c), bridge 2 (131n) set03; bridge 1 (126), IFN 30min (127n), IFN 1h (127c), IFN 2h (128n), IFN 4h (128c), IFN 8h (129n), IFN 24h (129c), bridge 2 (131n) (iii) Time-course quantitative phosphoproteomics during the first 24 hours after induction of macrophage polarization in THP-1-derived macrophages to identify phosphorylation events associated with M1-type (IFNgamma/LPS-induced) versus M2a-type (IL-4-induced) polarization (same time points as in group 2): Phosphoproteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (three TMT sets: set01, set02, set03) RAW files: Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset01_fraction01 to ...fraction06, ...fraction08 to ...fraction24, ...pY Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset02_fraction01 to ...fraction12, ...fraction16 to ...fraction24, ...pY Marneros_timecourse_phospho_TMTset03_fraction01 to ...fraction24, ...pY The following RAW files gave no phosphopeptide quantifications (they are no included in the group of provided RAW files): set01_fraction07, set02_fraction13, set02_fraction14, set02_fraction15. 22 samples Labeling: as in (ii) (iv) Quantitative proteomics to assess the effects of the B-Raf inhibitor GDC-0879 or of the MEK inhibitor trametinib on IL-4-induced M2-type polarization and IFNgamma/LPS-induced M1-type polarization on THP-1-derived macrophages after 24 hours of treatment: Proteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion (one TMT set) RAW files: Marneros_BRAF_inhibitor_proteine_fraction01 to ...fraction12 11 samples Labeling: IL4 1 (131c), IL4 2 (127n), IL4+GDC 1 (131n), IL4+GDC 2 (128n), IL4+TRAM 1 (130c), IL4+TRAM 2 (129n), IFNgamma+LPS 1 (130n), IFNgamma+LPS 2 (127c), IFNgamma+LPS+TRAM 1 (126), IFNgamma+LPS+TRAM 2(129c), IFNgamma+LPS+GDC (128c) (v) Quantitative phosphoproteomics to assess the effects of the B-Raf inhibitor GDC-0879 on IL-4-induced M2-type polarization and IFNgamma/LPS-induced M1-type polarization on THP-1-derived macrophages after 24 hours of treatment: Phosphoproteome mapping on Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (one TMT set) RAW files: Marneros_BRAF_inhibitor_phospho_fraction01 to ...fraction24, ...pY 7 samples Labeling: IL4 1 (131c), IL4 2 (127n), IL4+GDC 1 (130n), IL4+GDC 2 (128n), IFNgamma+LPS 1 (128c), IFNgamma+LPS 2 (127c), IFNgamma+LPS+GDC (130c)

Project description:We used mass spectrometry-based proteomics to unravel anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) signaling in the ALK and MYCN amplified neuroblastoma cell line, NB1. We specifically measured the ALK interactome, phosphoproteome, phosphotyrosine interactome and proteome as outlined below. ALK Interactome and phosphoproteome: For each experiment, three SILAC conditions (‘Light’: Lys0,Arg0, ‘Medium’: Lys4,Arg6, ‘Heavy’: Lys8,Arg10) of NB1 cells were treated for 30 minutes with each of the following ALK-targeting small-molecule inhibitors: TAE684 (100 nM), crizotinib (500 nM), and LDK378 (250 nM). The experiments were performed as specified below: Experiment 1: Light: 500 nM crizotinib, Medium: 100 nM TAE684, Heavy: 0.1% DMSO Experiment 2: Light: 100 nM TAE684, Medium: 250 nM LDK378, Heavy: 0.1% DMSO Experiment 3: Light: 250 nM LDK378, Medium: 500 nM crizotinib, Heavy: 0.1% DMSO These three triple-SILAC experiments allowed the effect of each inhibitor to be measured in duplicates. ALK phosphotyrosine interactome: To identify phosphotyrosine-specific interaction partners of ALK we used a label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approach. Interacting proteins to the peptide sequences (phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptide) indicated in the table below were identified by a peptide pull-down assay and mass spectrometry. Peptide pull-downs were performed on NB1 cell lysate prepared from cells treated for 30 minutes with LDK378 (250 nM) or DMSO. Each peptide pull-down was performed on lysates from two biological replicates. Sample name (raw file) Gene Uniprot Site Peptide sequence A1 ALK Q9UM73 pY1078 ELQSPEpYKLSKLR A2 ALK Q9UM73 pY1092 RTIMTDpYNPNYSF A3 ALK Q9UM73 pY1096 TDYNPNpYSFAGKT A4 ALK Q9UM73 pY1131 GAFGEVpYEGQVSG A5 ALK Q9UM73 pY1278 GMARDIpYRASYYR A6 ALK Q9UM73 pY1282 DIYRASpYYRKGGS A7 ALK Q9UM73 pY1283 IYRASYpYRKGGSA A8 ALK Q9UM73 pY1359 RSPGPVpYRIMTQS A9 ALK Q9UM73 pY1507 RLWNPTpYGSWFTE A10 ALK Q9UM73 pY1584 RSGNVNpYGYQQQG A11 ALK Q9UM73 pY1604 APGAGHpYEDTILK A12 ALK Q9UM73 Y1078 ELQSPEYKLSKLR B1 ALK Q9UM73 Y1092 RTIMTDYNPNYSF B2 ALK Q9UM73 Y1096 TDYNPNYSFAGKT B3 ALK Q9UM73 Y1131 GAFGEVYEGQVSG B4 ALK Q9UM73 Y1278 GMARDIYRASYYR B5 ALK Q9UM73 Y1282 DIYRASYYRKGGS B6 ALK Q9UM73 Y1283 IYRASYYRKGGSA B7 ALK Q9UM73 Y1359 RSPGPVYRIMTQS B8 ALK Q9UM73 Y1507 RLWNPTYGSWFTE B9 ALK Q9UM73 Y1584 RSGNVNYGYQQQG B10 ALK Q9UM73 Y1604 APGAGHYEDTILK C3 IRS2 Q9Y4H2 pY675 SSRSDDpYMPMSPA C4 IRS2 Q9Y4H2 pY742 SPEDSGpYMRMWSG C5 IRS2 Q9Y4H2 pY978 RSPLSDpYMNLDFS C6 IRS2 Q9Y4H2 Y675 SSRSDDYMPMSPA C7 IRS2 Q9Y4H2 Y742 SPEDSGYMRMWSG C8 IRS2 Q9Y4H2 Y978 RSPLSDYMNLDFS Additional explanations to MS raw files: -1 extension indicates Control (DMSO lysate) replicate 1. -2 extension indicates LDK378 (treated lysate) replicate 1. -3 extension indicates Control (DMSO lysate) replicate 2. -4 extension indicates LDK378 (treated lysate) replicate 2. Proteome: The NB1 cell line proteome was measured by a label-free mass spectrometry-based approach. The analysis was performed in two biological replicates.

Dataset Information

FGFR inhibition blocks NF-kappaB-dependent glucose metabolism and confers metabolic vulnerabilities in cholangiocarcinoma

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets