Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Comparison of seven single cell Whole Genome Amplification commercial kits using targeted sequencing

ABSTRACT: Comparison of seven single cell Whole Genome Amplification commercial kits using targeted sequencing

PROVIDER: PRJEB22132 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Comparison of seven single cell Whole Genome Amplification commercial kits using targeted sequencing

Project description:Advances in biochemical technologies have led to a boost in the field of single cell genomics. Observation of the genome at a single cell resolution is currently achieved by pre-amplification using whole genome amplification (WGA) techniques that differ by their biochemical aspects and as a result by biased amplification of the original molecule. Several comparisons between commercially available single cell dedicated WGA kits (scWGA) were performed, however, these comparisons are costly, were only performed on selected scWGA kit and more notably, are limited by the number of analyzed cells, making them limited for reproducibility analysis. We benchmarked an economical assay to compare all commercially available scWGA kits that is based on targeted sequencing of thousands of genomic regions, including highly mutable genomic regions (microsatellites), from a large cohort of human single cells (125 cells in total). Using this approach, we could analyze the genome coverage, the reproducibility of genome coverage and the error rate of each kit. Our experimental design provides an affordable and reliable comparative assay that simulates a real single cell experiment. Results demonstrate the need for a dedicated kit selection depending on the desired single cell assay.

2017-09-24 | E-MTAB-5968 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparison of seven single cell whole genome amplification commercial kits using targeted sequencing.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC8387353 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of seven commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7206434 | biostudies-literature

Systematic assessment of commercially available low-input miRNA library preparation kits

Project description:We compared the performance of six commercial kits (QIAseq, SMARTer, CATS, CleanTag, srLp, TailorMix) capable of handling <100ng total RNA input for miRNA detection sensitivity, reliability, titration response and ability to detect differentially expressed miRNAs at different amounts of synthetic miRNAs. We observed differences in detection sensitivity between the kits, but none were able to detect the full repertoire of expected miRNAs. The reliability within the replicates of all kits was good, while larger differences were observed between the kits, although none could accurately quantify the majority of miRNAs.

2019-09-27 | GSE133719 | GEO

An extension to: Systematic assessment of commercially available low-input miRNA library preparation kits

Project description:We compared the performance of two commercial kits (NEBNext and NEXTflex) for miRNA detection sensitivity, reliability, titration response and ability to detect differentially expressed miRNAs at different amounts of synthetic miRNAs. We observed differences in detection sensitivity between the kits, but none were able to detect the full repertoire of expected miRNAs. The reliability within the replicates of all kits was good, while larger differences were observed between the kits, although none could accurately quantify the majority of miRNAs. In a previous publication (https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2019.1667741; GEO accession number GSE133719) we accessed the performance of six additional miRNA library preparation kits.

2020-05-31 | GSE141658 | GEO

Cross-Site Comparison of Ribosomal Depletion Kits for Illumina RNAseq Library Construction

Project description:In a cross-site study we evaluated the performance of ribosomal RNA removal kits from Illumina, Takara/Clontech, Kapa Biosystems, Lexogen, New England Biolabs and Qiagen on intact and degraded RNA samples. We found that all of the kits were capable of performing significant ribosomal depletion, though there were differences in their ease of use. All kits were able to remove ribosomal RNA to below 20% with intact RNA and identify ~14,000 protein coding genes from the Universal Human Reference RNA sample at >1FPKM. Analysis of differentially detected genes among kits suggested that transcript length may be a key factor in library production efficiency. These results provide a roadmap for labs on the strengths of each of these methods and how best to utilize them.

2018-02-01 | GSE100127 | GEO

YDRseries4, Comparison commercial dry active yeast to BY4743

Project description:This series represents the analysis of a commercial dry active yeast (purchased locally). The genetics of this sample is unknown. Keywords = commercial Keywords = dry active yeast Keywords: other

2005-08-01 | GSE1314 | GEO

Evaluation of RNA amplification and RNA-Seq library preparation protocols for spermatozoa RNA profiling

Project description:RNA-Seq technique was applied to investigate the effects of four cDNA amplification kits and two RNA-Seq library preparation kits to the deep sequencing results at different perspectives.

2015-05-09 | GSE57503 | GEO

RNA-seq sample preparation kits strongly affect transcriptome profiles of a gas-fermenting bacterium

Project description:Transcriptome analysis via RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become a standard technique employed across a variety of biological fields of study. This rapid adoption of the RNA-seq approach has been mediated, in part, by the development of various commercial RNA-seq library preparation kits compatible with common next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms. Generally, the essential steps of library preparation such as rRNA depletion and first-strand cDNA synthesis are tailored to a certain group of organisms (e.g. eukaryotes versus prokaryotes) or genomic GC content. Therefore, selection of appropriate commercial products is of crucial importance to capture the transcriptome of interest as closely to the native state as possible without introduction of technical bias. However, researchers rarely have the resources and time to test various commercial RNA-seq kits for their samples. In this work, we report a side-by-side comparison of RNA-seq data from the same Clostridium autoethanogenum input samples obtained using three commercial rRNA removal and strand-specific library construction products by NuGEN Technologies, Qiagen, and Zymo Research, and compare their performance with published data. While all three vendors advertise their products as suitable for prokaryotes, we found significant differences in their performance in terms of rRNA removal, strand-specificity, and, most importantly, transcript abundance distribution profiles. Notably, RNA-seq data obtained with Qiagen products were most similar to published data and delivered the best results in terms of library strandedness and transcript abundance distribution range. Our results highlight the importance of finding appropriate organism-specific workflows and library preparation products for RNA-seq studies.

2022-07-20 | GSE200959 | GEO

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

| PRJEB10820 | ENA