Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: DNA isolation and sampling kits comparison

PROVIDER: PRJEB24411 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR2249120.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR2249130.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR2249140.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR2249150.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR2249160.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 96

Similar Datasets

Project description:Comparison of DNA library preparation kits

| PRJNA769842 | ENA

Homo sapiens isolate:Puregene DNA Isolation Kits

Project description:Homo sapiens isolate:Puregene DNA Isolation Kits Genome sequencing

| PRJNA591378 | ENA

Project description:DNA Isolation Kit Comparison

| PRJNA380255 | ENA

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction kits for MiSeq sequencing

| PRJEB10820 | ENA

Assessment of RNA Isolation Kit Biases Toward Preferential Detection of exRNA Cargo Types

Project description:An integrative analysis of human biofluid data in the exRNA Atlas revealed the existence of distinct extracellular RNA cargo types. To determine whether different RNA isolation kits biased detection of certain exRNA cargo types, an integrative analysis was performed using pooled plasma and serum samples, where 10 different RNA isolation kits were applied.

2018-12-15 | GSE123865 | GEO

Project description:Comparison of different microbiome kits

| PRJNA550477 | ENA

Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods in Yeast on RNA-Seq: Implications for Differential Expression and Meta-Analyses

Project description:Based on the different chemistries of phenol extraction of RNA versus commercial kits, we hypothesized that certain species of mRNA may be preferentially extracted depending upon method, which could masquerade as differential expression in downstream RNA-seq experiments. We tested this using Saccharomyces cerevisiae samples that only differ in the RNA isolation method: a "standard" hot phenol extraction, versus two different commercial RNA isolation kits. While the kits had comparable relative mRNA abundances, samples isolated with hot phenol had higher relative abundance of mRNAs encoding membrane proteins. We hypothesize that hot phenol better solubilizes mRNAs associated with cellular membranes. We then compared the effects of each RNA isolation method on the ability to identify differentially expressed transcripts, using the yeast heat shock response a test case. The method of RNA isolation had little effect on the ability to identify differentially expressed transcripts. Thus, experiments within a single lab are unlikely to be affected by the choice of RNA isolation method as long as the same method is used throughout an experiment. For meta-analyses however, researchers should be cautious if trying to compare experiments where the RNA isolation methods differ.

2019-08-07 | GSE135430 | GEO

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction kits in characterizing symbiotic microbial communities in ascidians

| PRJNA418575 | ENA

Swab sample

Project description:Metagenomics of throat swabs, anal swabs and swab sampling kits.

| PRJNA764017 | ENA