Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Diversity and temporal patterns of planktonic protist assemblages at Mediterranean Long Term Ecological Research site.

ABSTRACT: Temporal diversity and community structure of the planktonic protist assemblage at the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) station MareChiara in the Gulf of Naples(Mediterranean Sea) assessed using V4 Illumina sequencing.

PROVIDER: PRJEB24595 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

protist

Project description:protist Metagenome

| PRJNA747906 | ENA

The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research?

Project description:Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, but our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years. All major protistan lineages were involved in interactions as hosts, symbionts (mutualists and commensalists), parasites, predators, and/or prey. Predation was the most common interaction (39% of all records), followed by symbiosis (29%), parasitism (18%), and 'unresolved interactions' (14%, where it is uncertain whether the interaction is beneficial or antagonistic). Using bipartite networks, we found that protist predators seem to be 'multivorous' while parasite-host and symbiont-host interactions appear to have moderate degrees of specialization. The SAR supergroup (i.e., Stramenopiles, Alveolata, and Rhizaria) heavily dominated PIDA, and comparisons against a global-ocean molecular survey (TARA Oceans) indicated that several SAR lineages, which are abundant and diverse in the marine realm, were underrepresented among the recorded interactions. Despite historical biases, our work not only unveils large-scale eco-evolutionary trends in the protist interactome, but it also constitutes an expandable resource to investigate protist interactions and to test hypotheses deriving from omics tools.

| S-EPMC6976576 | biostudies-literature

uncultured protist

Project description:uncultured protist overview

| PRJNA343050 | ENA

soil protist

Project description:soil protist Metagenome

| PRJNA408063 | ENA

protist metagenome

Project description:protist metagenome Metagenome

| PRJNA748517 | ENA

Escherichia coli biofilms vs planktonic culture

2013-12-30 | GSE24914 | GEO

uncultured protist

Project description:DNA extraction impacts on soil protist

| PRJNA342616 | ENA

Salmonella Typhimurium: Immobilized growth vs. Planktonic growth

Project description:Transcriptional profiling of four growth phases S. Typhimurium comparing immobilised growth with planktonic growth. Each array used labelled cDNA against a common genomic DNA reference. Triplicate or quadruple arrays were carried out for each of the 8 conditions as well as the inoculum culture: inoculum, planktonic MEP, planktonic LEP, planktonic ESP, planktonic LSP, immobilised MEP, immobilised LEP, immobilised ESP and immobilised LSP

2011-11-01 | E-GEOD-32995 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Vibrio cholerae biofilm and planktonic growth RNAseq analysis

Project description:To determine transcriptome differences in Vibrio cholerae when grown as planktonic and biofilm cultures, whole-genome level transcriptional profiling was performed using RNAseq analysis. Transcriptomes of biofim and planktonic cultures were compared in this study.

2020-05-28 | GSE135887 | GEO

Escherichia coli biofilms vs planktonic culture

Project description:Transcription profile of Escherichia coli cells in biofilms under static batch culture was compared to that of E. coli cells in planktonic cultures. Both E. coli biofilm and planktonic cultures were cultivated for 18 h in 10% Luria-Bertani broth at room temperature (20 degree Celsius). Biofilms were grown in static batch culture in petri dishes. Both planktonic culture and biofilms were homogenized and run through a separated protocol. Two condition experiments: E. coli biofilm vs E. coli planktonic cultures. Two biological replicates with independently grown and harvested biofilms or planktonic cultures. Each biological replicate has two technical replicates of hybridization on microarray slides. Each slide has three built-in replicates for each probe.

2013-12-30 | E-GEOD-24914 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data