Human gut metagenome
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA118215 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Recent advances in (meta)genomic methods have provided new opportunities to examine host-microbe-environment interactions in the human gut. While opportunities exist to extract DNA from freshly sourced colonic tissue there are potentially valuable sources of DNA from historical studies that might also be examined. We examined how four different tissue DNA extraction methods employed in past clinical trials might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from a colonic tissue sample as assessed using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for human gut bacteria and archaebacteria. While all methods of DNA extraction produced similar phylogenetic profiles some extraction specific biases were also observed. Real time PCR analysis targeting several bacterial groups substantiated this observation. These data suggest that while the efficacy of different DNA extraction methods differs somewhat all the methods tested produce an accurate representation of microbial diversity. This suggests that DNA samples archived in biobanks should be suitable for retrospective analyses.
2010-01-01 | GSE18420 | GEO
Project description:Recent advances in (meta)genomic methods have provided new opportunities to examine host-microbe-environment interactions in the human gut. While opportunities exist to extract DNA from freshly sourced colonic tissue there are potentially valuable sources of DNA from historical studies that might also be examined. We examined how four different tissue DNA extraction methods employed in past clinical trials might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from a colonic tissue sample as assessed using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for human gut bacteria and archaebacteria. While all methods of DNA extraction produced similar phylogenetic profiles some extraction specific biases were also observed. Real time PCR analysis targeting several bacterial groups substantiated this observation. These data suggest that while the efficacy of different DNA extraction methods differs somewhat all the methods tested produce an accurate representation of microbial diversity. This suggests that DNA samples archived in biobanks should be suitable for retrospective analyses. Three technical replicates per sample (extraction method) were analysed
2010-05-16 | E-GEOD-18420 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Comparative Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Feces of Multiple Host Species for Downstream Next-Generation Sequencing
| PRJNA286763 | ENA
Project description:Comparative Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Feces of Multiple Host Species for Downstream Next-Generation Sequencing
| PRJNA286762 | ENA
Project description:Comparison of microbial DNA extraction methods for clinical applications
| PRJDB7617 | ENA
Project description:An improved methodology to overcome key issues associated with the methods of human fecal metagenomic DNA extraction
| PRJNA294995 | ENA
Project description:An improved methodology to overcome key issues associated with the methods of human fecal metagenomic DNA extraction
| PRJNA295000 | ENA
Project description:Evaluation of filtration and DNA extraction methods for environmental DNA biodiversity assessments across multiple trophic levels.
| PRJNA358589 | ENA