Panthera leo persica
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA243124 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR1217827.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1290853.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1290854.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1290855.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1290856.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 8 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Asiatic Lion Mitochondrial Genome Sequencing, Project-151, Gujarat Genomics Initiative, GSBTM, DST, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| PRJNA156677 | ENA
Project description:Asiatic Lion Mitochondrial Genome Sequencing [BIOWLT22E3], Project-151, Gujarat Genomics Initiative, GSBTM, DST, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| PRJNA193381 | ENA
Project description:Pontibacter gsbtmsis Genome Sequencing, Project-151, Gujarat Genomics Initiative, GSBTM, DST, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| PRJNA81593 | ENA
Project description:Arthrobacter crystallopoietes BAB32 Genome Sequencing, Project-151, Gujarat Genomics Initiative, GSBTM, DST, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| PRJNA178057 | ENA
Project description:Brevibacillus agri BAB2500 Genome Sequencing, Project-151, Gujarat Genomics Initiative, GSBTM, DST, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| PRJNA178058 | ENA
Project description:Halobacillus sp. BAB2008 Genome Sequencing, Project-151, Gujarat Genomics Initiative, GSBTM, DST, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| PRJNA178059 | ENA
Project description:Metagenomes of Saline Desert,Kutch,Gujarat, India, Project-151, Gujarat Genomics Initiative, GSBTM, DST, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India
| PRJNA244615 | ENA
Project description:The complete mitochondrial genome sequence 17,059?bp of Asiatic lion (Panthera leo persica) has been sequenced with the use of next generation sequencing technology using Ion Torrent PGM platform. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Asiatic lion consists of 13 protein-coding, 22 tRNA, and two rRNA genes, and 1 control region (CR). The mitochondrial genome is relatively similar to other felid mitochondrial genomes with respect to gene arrangement, composition, tRNA structures and skews of AT/GC bases to be typical of those reported for other mammals. The nucleotide composition of Asiatic lion mitogenome shows that there is more A-T% than G-C% on the positive strand as revealed by positive AT and CG skews. The overall base composition is 31.9% of A, 27.2% of C, 14.5% of G, and 26.2% of T. Most of the genes have ATA start codons, except ND1, COX2, ATP8, ATP6, ND4, and ND5 have ATG start codons.
| S-EPMC7800587 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:The long-term success of ex-situ conservation programmes depends on species-appropriate husbandry and enrichment practices complemented by an accurate welfare assessment protocol. Zoos and conservation breeding programmes should employ a bottom-up approach to account for intraspecific variations in measures of animal welfare. We studied 35 (14:21) captive Asiatic lions in Sakkarbaug Zoological Garden, Junagadh, India to understand the implications of individual variations on welfare measures. We categorized the subjects based on personality traits (bold or shy), rearing history (wild-rescued or captive-raised), sex, and social-grouping. We explored the association of these categorical variables on welfare indices such as behavioural diversity, latency to approach novel objects, enclosure usage and aberrant repetitive behaviours. Further, we assessed the inter-relationships between different behavioural measures of welfare. Results:Our results show that intraspecific variations based on rearing-history and personality traits are significantly associated with the welfare states of captive Asiatic lions. Asiatic lions with bold personality traits (M = 0.50, SD = 0.12, N = 21) and those raised in captivity (M = 0.47, SD = 0.12, N = 16) used enclosure space more homogenously compared to shy (M = 0.71, SD = 0.15, N = 14) and wild-rescued (M = 0.67, SD = 0.15, N = 19) animals. Behaviour diversity was significantly higher in captive-raised (M = 1.26, SD = 0.3, N = 16) and bold (M = 1.23, SD = 0.26, N = 21) subjects compared to wild-rescued (M = 0.83, SD = 0.35, N = 19) and shy (M = 0.73, SD = 0.34, N = 14) individuals. Aberrant repetitive behaviours (stereotypy) were significantly lower in bold (M = 7.01, SD = 4, N = 21) and captive-raised (M = 7.74, SD = 5.3) individuals compared to wild-rescued (M = 13.12, SD = 6.25, N = 19) and shy (M = 16.13, SD = 5.4, N = 16) lions. Sex and social-grouping of subjects did not show significant associations with behavioural welfare indices. Interestingly, behaviour diversity was reliably predicted by the enclosure usage patterns and aberrant repetitive behaviours displayed by subjects. Discussion:Our findings underline the importance of individual-centric, behaviour-based, and multi-dimensional welfare assessment approaches in ex-situ conservation programmes. The results suggest that behavioural welfare indices complemented with individual variations can explain inter-individual differences in behavioural welfare measure outcomes of Asiatic lions. These findings also provide zoo managers with a non-invasive tool to reliably assess and improve husbandry practices for Asiatic lions. Understanding the unique welfare requirement of individuals in captivity will be crucial for the survival of the species.
| S-EPMC7007979 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Time and space are essential niche dimensions along which species tend to coexist. We assessed spatiotemporal resource partitioning between leopards and lions and hypothesized the differential use of spatiotemporal resources by leopards with respect to lions. We used a systematic camera trap survey to collect the data at 50 sites. The data were analyzed using overlap indices, and non-parametric test statistics to assess the spatiotemporal associations. Leopard and lion were crepuscular and nocturnal in their activity pattern. They did not segregate temporally and showed substantially high overlap and strong temporal association. Leopard segregates with lion spatially by overlapping less and showing no association in space use at specific camera trap sites. Leopards showed preference for dense habitats, while the lion preferred both dense and open habitats. Leopard showed moderate-overlap and positive association with key prey species, i.e., chital and sambar. Lion, however showed low site-specific overlap and negative association with its crucial prey species, i.e., sambar and wild pig. We conclude that site-specific spatial partitioning along with differential affinities for habitat is helping leopards to partition their spatio-temporal resources with lions and hence facilitate coexistence of leopards with lions in Gir forest.
| S-EPMC7065753 | biostudies-literature