Project description:Analysis of gene expression in the lungs of pigs from high and low litter birth weight groups (HBW and LBW) inoculated with swine influenza virus. The aim of the experiment is to determine whether litter birth weight has an effect on the innate immune response to infection in pigs, and whether differences in gene expression can be linked to epigenetic differences between the two birth weight groups.
Project description:Analysis of gene expression in the lungs of pigs from high and low litter birth weight groups (HBW and LBW) inoculated with swine influenza virus. The aim of the experiment is to determine whether litter birth weight has an effect on the innate immune response to infection in pigs, and whether differences in gene expression can be linked to epigenetic differences between the two birth weight groups. A two condition experiment: lung tissue RNA from HBW and LBW SIV-infected pigs. 16 biological replicates for each condition, each hybridized with a reference to separate arrays. 32 arrays in total.
Project description:This study used virological, histological, and global gene expression data to compare the virulence of two 2009 pH1N1 isolates from human (A/California/04/2009) and swine (A/swine/Alberta/25/2009) to that of a 1918-like classical swine influenza virus (A/swine/Iowa/1930) in a pig model of infection. The overall goal of this study was to characterize the clinical, histological, virological and global gene expression responses to three distinct influenza A isolates in an experimental pig model of influenza infection. We compared the pathogenesis of two pH1N1 viruses, one derived from a human patient (A/CA/04/09 [CA09]) and the other from swine (A/swine/Alberta/25/2009 [Alb09]), with that of the 1918-like classical swine influenza virus (A/swine/Iowa/1930 [IA30]) in the pig model. Both pH1N1 isolates induced clinical symptoms such as coughing, sneezing, decreased activity, fever, and labored breathing in challenged pigs, but IA30 virus did not cause any clinical symptoms except fever. Although both the pH1N1 viruses and the IA30 virus caused lung lesions, the pH1N1 viruses were shed from the nasal cavities of challenged pigs whereas the IA30 virus was not. Microarray was used to assess global gene expression in the lungs at 3 and 5 days post-infection.
Project description:Comparison of gene expression in the lungs of pigs classified as Resistant (RES) or Susceptible (SUS) to influenza pathology based on clinical lesion scores. The aim of the experiment is to identify genes whose expression is associated with resistance/susceptibility to influenza pathology. These are a subset of animals selected from a larger experiment that investigated the effect of low (LBW) or high (HBW) litter birth weight phenotype on influenza pathology.
Project description:African swine fever (ASF) is the most dangerous disease of pigs and causes enormous economic losses in the global pig industry. However, the mechanism of ASF virus (ASFV) infection is unclear. Hence, we wanted to understand the host response mechanism upon ASFV infection. We analyzed the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between ASFV-infected and un-infected serum samples using quantitative proteomics. Setting the p-value < 0.05 and |log2 (fold change)| > 1.5, we identified 173 DEPs, including 57 upregulated and 116 downregulated proteins, which belonged to various biological processes and pathways according to the Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses. The enriched pathways include the immune system, metabolism, and inflammation.
Project description:This study used virological, histological, and global gene expression data to compare the virulence of two 2009 pH1N1 isolates from human (A/California/04/2009) and swine (A/swine/Alberta/25/2009) to that of a 1918-like classical swine influenza virus (A/swine/Iowa/1930) in a pig model of infection. The overall goal of this study was to characterize the clinical, histological, virological and global gene expression responses to three distinct influenza A isolates in an experimental pig model of influenza infection. We compared the pathogenesis of two pH1N1 viruses, one derived from a human patient (A/CA/04/09 [CA09]) and the other from swine (A/swine/Alberta/25/2009 [Alb09]), with that of the 1918-like classical swine influenza virus (A/swine/Iowa/1930 [IA30]) in the pig model. Both pH1N1 isolates induced clinical symptoms such as coughing, sneezing, decreased activity, fever, and labored breathing in challenged pigs, but IA30 virus did not cause any clinical symptoms except fever. Although both the pH1N1 viruses and the IA30 virus caused lung lesions, the pH1N1 viruses were shed from the nasal cavities of challenged pigs whereas the IA30 virus was not. Microarray was used to assess global gene expression in the lungs at 3 and 5 days post-infection. Crossbred pigs fwere obtained from a healthy herd free of SIV and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. These studies included two experiments: the classical H1N1 SIV (IA30) study was completed at Kansas State University's biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) facility in compliance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Kansas State University, and the pH1N1 virus study was completed at the Central States Research Center (CSRC), Inc., BSL-3 facility (Oakland, NE), in compliance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at CSRC. In each experiment, 10 pigs were inoculated with noninfectious cell culture supernatant as controls. For the classical H1N1 SIV experiment, 10 4-week-old crossbred pigs were inoculated intratracheally with 10^6 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50)/pig of egg-derived IA30 virus. For the pH1N1 virus experiment, 10 4-week-old crossbred pigs were inoculated intratracheally with 10^6 TCID50/pig of either egg-derived CA/09 or Alb/09 virus. Five animals per group were euthanized at 3 and 5 days postinfection (dpi), respectively.