Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test)
Project description:To reveal the HNRNPAB-regulated lncRNAs, we performed microarray analyses to screen differential lncRNAs in HCC cells after stable overexpression or knockdown of HNRNPAB. MHCC97H and HCCLM3 (HCC cell lines with high-metastatic potentials), PLC/PRF/5 and HepG2 (HCC cell lines with low-metastatic potentials) were used in this study. HepG2-control, HepG2-hnRNPAB, PLC/PRF/5-control, PLC/PRF/5-hnRNPAB, MHCC97H-control, MHCC97H-sh-hnRNPAB, HCCLM3-control, HCCLM3-sh-hnRNPAB were perpared with hU6-MCS-CBh-gcGFP-IRES-puromycin-shRNA-HNRNPAB/mock lentiviral and Ubi-MCS-SV40-EGFP-IRES-puromycin-HNRNPAB/mock cDNA lentiviral,respectively, each performed in triplicate.
Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) A stimulus or stress experiment design type is where that tests response of an organism(s) to stress/stimulus. e.g. osmotic stress, behavioral treatment Computed
Project description:Gene expression profiling comparisons of HepG2.2.15 or PLC/PRF/5 cells either mock (M) transfected or transfected with 0.2 microM S2 RNA or Scrambled (SCR) siRNA were carried out in duplicate 48 hours after transfection. The experiments were carried out in duplicate (a and b). The following combinations of RNA were used on 2 slides each: 1. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 2. 2.2.15 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 3. 2.2.15 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 4. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) 5. PLC/PRF/5 cells: mock transfection (reference) versus Scr treatment (test) 6. PLC/PRF/5 cells: Scr treatment (reference) versus S2 treatment (test) A stimulus or stress experiment design type is where that tests response of an organism(s) to stress/stimulus. e.g. osmotic stress, behavioral treatment Keywords: stimulus_or_stress_design
Project description:To investigate functional transcripts in metastatic HCC, we performed high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of tumors from 3 metastatic HCC and 3 non-metastatic HCC. And we performed RIP-seq human PLC/PRF/5 cells to investigate the HNRNPD binding transcripts. To investigate function of circLARP1B on AMPK pathway, we performed high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of WT (DMSO or Compound C) and circLARP1B-Def (DMSO) PLC/PRF/5 cells.